Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Pregnancy, Birth, and Medicine" by Rebecca Kukla |
This is an automatically generated and experimental page
If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.
This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.
- Anstötz, C, 1993, “Should a brain-dead pregnant woman carry her child to full term? The case of the ‘Erlanger baby’”, Bioethics 7(4): 340–50. (Scholar)
- Armstrong, Elizabeth M, 2003, Conceiving Risk, Bearing Responsibility: Fetal Alcohol Syndrome and the Diagnosis of Moral Disorder, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. (Scholar)
- Asch, Adrienne, 2000, “Why I have not changed my mind about prenatal diagnosis: reflections and refinements”, in Parens and Asch (eds.), Prenatal Testing and Disability Rights, Washington: Georgetown University Press, 234-258. (Scholar)
- Beck U., 1992, Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, London: Sage. (Scholar)
- Benatar, David, 2006, Better Never to Have Been: The Harm of Coming into Existence, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Brock, Daniel, 1995, “The non-identity problem and genetic harms—the case of wrongful handicaps”, Bioethics 8: 269–275. (Scholar)
- Bergeron, Veronique, 2007, “The ethics of cesarean section on maternal request: a feminist critique of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' position on patient-choice surgery”, Bioethics 21(9): 478–87. (Scholar)
- Buchanan, Alan, et al, 2000, Chance to Choice: Genetics and Justice, New York: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Capron, Alex, 1998, “Punishing mothers”, Hastings Center Report 28(1): 31–33. (Scholar)
- Center for Reproductive Rights, 2000, Punishing women for their behavior during pregnancy: an approach that undermines women's health and children's interest, (Briefing Paper), New York: The Center for Reproductive Rights. [Available online] (Scholar)
- Chervenak, Frank A. and McCullough, Laurence B., 1991, “Justified limits on refusing intervention”, Hastings Center Report 21(2): 12–18. (Scholar)
- Chervenak, Frank A. and McCullough, Laurence B., 1996, “The fetus as patient: an essential ethical concept for maternal-fetal medicine”, Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine 5(3): 115–19. (Scholar)
- Chervenak, Frank A. and McCullough, Laurence B., 2006, “An ethical critique of boutique fetal imaging: a case for the medicalization of fetal imaging”, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 194(5): 1501. (Scholar)
- Coverdale, J. H., McCullough, L. B., and Chervenak, F. A., 2004, “Assisted and surrogate decision making for pregnant patients who have schizophrenia:” Schizophrenia Bulletin 30(3): 659–64. (Scholar)
- Crossley, Michele, 2007, “Childbirth, complications, and the illusion of ‘choice’: A case study”, Feminism and Psychology 17(4): 543–563. (Scholar)
- Davis, Dena, 2001, Genetic Dilemmas: Reproductive Technologies, Parental Choices, and Children's Futures, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Davis-Floyd, Robbie, 2004, Birth as an American Rite of Passage, 2nd edition, Berkeley: University of California Press. (Scholar)
- DeBruin, Debra, 1994, “Justice and the inclusion of women in clinical studies: an argument for further reform”, Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 4(2): 117–46. (Scholar)
- DeVille, K. A. and Kopelman, L. M., 1998, “Moral and social issues regarding pregnant women who use and abuse drugs”, Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America 25(1): 237–54. (Scholar)
- Diekema, Douglas S., 2003, “Involuntary sterilization of persons with mental retardation: an ethical analysis”, Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews 9(1): 21–6. (Scholar)
- Draper, Heather J., 1996, “Women, forced caesareans and antenatal responsibilities”, Journal of Medical Ethics 22(6): 327–33. (Scholar)
- Duden, Barbara, 1993, Disembodying Women: Perspectives on Pregnancy and the Unborn, Cambridge: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- Finn, Lisa, 1998, “It's for (y)our own good: an analysis of the discourses surrounding mandatory, unblinded HIV testing and newborns”, Journal of Medical Humanities 19(2–3): 133–62. (Scholar)
- Fost, Norman, 1994, “Case study: the baby in the body”, Hastings Center Report 24(1): 31–2. (Scholar)
- Giacomini, Mita, and Baylis, François, 2003, “Excluding women from research: reasons and rejoinders”, Clinical Researcher 3(10): 12–15. (Scholar)
- Gilmore, Ian, 2008, “Excessive drinking in young women: not just a lifestyle disease”, British Medical Journal 336: 952. (Scholar)
- Golden, Janet, 2006, Message in a Bottle: The Making of Fetal Alcohol Syndrome, Cambridge: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- Hans, S. L., 1999, “Demographic and psychosocial characteristics of substance-abusing pregnant women”, Clinics in Perinatology 26(1): 55–74. (Scholar)
- Harman, Elizabeth, 2004, “Can we harm and benefit in creating?”, Philosophical Perspectives 18: 89–113. (Scholar)
- Heyd, David, 2009, “The intractability of the nonidentity problem”, in Harming Future Persons: Ethics, Genetics, and the Nonidentity Problem, eds. M. Roberts and D. T. Wasserman, Dordrecht: Springer, 3–28. (Scholar)
- Holden, Constance, 2008, “Women abound in NIH trials”, Science 322: 219. (Scholar)
- Holtug, N., 2009, “Who cares about identity?”, in Harming Future Persons: Ethics, Genetics, and the Nonidentity Problem, eds. M. Roberts and D. T. Wasserman, Dordrecht: Springer, 71–92. (Scholar)
- Jarvis-Thomson, Judith, 1971, “A defense of abortion”, Philosophy and Public Affairs 1(1): 47–66.
- Katz-Rothman, Barbara, 1993, The Tentative Pregnancy: How Amniocentesis Changes the Experience of Motherhood, New York: Norton. (Scholar)
- Kuehn, Bridget, 2006, “CDC promotes care before conception”, JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association 295(22): 2591–2.
- Kukla, Rebecca, 2005, Mass Hysteria: Medicine, Culture, and Mothers' Bodies, Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield. (Scholar)
- Kukla, Rebecca, 2005a, “The limits of lines: negotiating hard medical choices”, APA Newsletter on Philosophy of Medicine 5(1), 13–19. (Scholar)
- Kukla, Rebecca, 2008, “Measuring Mothering”, International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 1(1): 67–90. (Scholar)
- Kukla, Rebecca, et al, 2009, “Finding autonomy in birth”, Bioethics 23(1): 1–8. (Scholar)
- Kumar, R., 2003, “Who can be wronged?”, Philosophy and Public Affairs 31(2): 99–112. (Scholar)
- Lawson, Karen, 2003, “Perceptions of deservedness of social aid as a function of prenatal diagnostic testing”, Journal of Applied Social Psychology 33(1): 76–90. (Scholar)
- Lee, Ellie J., 2009, “Advocating alcohol abstinence to pregnant women in Britain: some sociological observations”, presented at the Changing Parenting Culture seminar series, Aston University, Birmingham, U.K. (Scholar)
- Lippman, Abby, 1994, “The genetic construction of prenatal testing: choice, consent, or conformity for women?”, in Women and Prenatal Testing: Facing the Challenges of Genetic Technology, Karen H Rothenberg and Elizabeth J Thomson, eds., Columbus: Ohio State Press. (Scholar)
- Little, Margaret Olivia, 1996, “Why a feminist approach to bioethics?”, Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 6(1): 1–18. (Scholar)
- Little, Margaret Olivia, 1999, “Abortion, intimacy, and the duty to gestate”, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 2(3): 295–312. (Scholar)
- Lupton, Deborah, 1998, “Risk and the ontology of pregnant embodiment”, in Risk and Sociocultural Theory, D. Lupton, ed., New York: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Lyerly, Anne Drapkin, 2006, “Shame, gender, birth”, Hypatia 21(1): 101–118. (Scholar)
- Lyerly, Anne Drapkin, et al, 2007, “Risks, values, and decision making surrounding pregnancy”, Obstetrics and Gynecology 109(4): 979–84. (Scholar)
- Lyerly, Anne Drapkin, Little, Margaret Olivia, and Faden, Ruth R., 2008, “The second wave: toward responsible inclusion of pregnant women in research”, International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 1(2): 5–22. (Scholar)
- Lyerly, Anne Drapkin, Little, Margaret Olivia and Faden, Ruth R., 2008, “A critique of the ‘fetus as patient’”, American Journal of Bioethics 8(7): 42–44.
- Lyerly, Anne Drapkin, et al, 2009, “Risk and the pregnant body”, Hastings Center Report 39(6): 34–42. (Scholar)
- Lyerly, Anne Drapkin and Mahowald, Mary, “Maternal-fetal surgery: the fallacy of abstraction and the problem of equipoise”, Health Care Analysis 9(2): 151–65. (Scholar)
- Macklin, Ruth, 1977, “Moral issues in human genetics: counseling or control?”, Dialogue 16(3): 375–96. (Scholar)
- Mattingly, S. S., 1992, “The maternal-fetal dyad: exploring the two-patient obstetric model”, Hastings Center Report 22(1): 13–18. (Scholar)
- Minkoff, Howard, 2006, “The ethics of cesarean section by choice”, Seminars in Perinatology, 30(5): 309–312. (Scholar)
- Minkoff, Howard and Chervenak, Frank A., 2003, “Elective primary cesarean delivery”, New England Journal of Medicine 348: 946–50. (Scholar)
- Minkoff, Howard and Paltrow, Lynn, 2004, “Melissa Rowland and the rights of pregnant women”, Obstetrics and Gynecology 104(6): 1234–36. (Scholar)
- Mitchell, Lisa M., 2001, Baby's First Picture: Ultrasound and the Politics of Fetal Subjects, Toronto: University of Toronto Press. (Scholar)
- Morgan, Kathryn, 1998, “Contested bodies, contested knowledges”, in S. Sherwin (ed.), The Politics of Women's Health, Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 83-121. (Scholar)
- Mullin, Amy, 2005, Reconceiving Pregnancy and Childcare: Ethics, Experience, and Reproductive Labor, New York: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Murkoff, et al, 2003, What to Expect When You're Expecting, 3rd Edition, New York: Workman Publishing. (Scholar)
- Nelson, Hilde Lindemann, 1994, “The architect and the bee: some reflections on postmortem Pregnancy”, Bioethics 8(3): 247–267. (Scholar)
- Nelson, L. J. and Milliken, N., 1988, “Compelled medical treatment of pregnant women: life, liberty, and law in conflict”, Journal of the American Medical Association, 259(7): 1060–66. (Scholar)
- Nelson, James Lindemann, 2000, “The meaning of the act: reflections on the expressive force of reproductive decision making and policies”, in Parens and Asch (eds.), Prenatal Testing and Disability Rights, Washington: Georgetown University Press, 196-213. (Scholar)
- Parens, Erik and Asch, Adrienne (eds.), 2000, Prenatal Testing and Disability Rights, Washington: Georgetown University Press. (Scholar)
- Parfit, Derek, 1984, Reasons and Persons, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Pollitt, Katha, 1990, “Fetal rights: a new assault on feminism”, The Nation March 26: 410–411. (Scholar)
- Pollitt, Katha, 2004, “Pregnant and dangerous”, The Nation April 26, 9–10. (Scholar)
- Press, Nancy and Browner, Carole, 1995, “Risk, autonomy, and responsibility: informed consent for prenatal testing”, Hastings Center Report 25(3): S9–S12. (Scholar)
- Puls, Larry, Terry, R, and Hunter, James, 1997, “Primary vaginal cancer in pregnancy: difficulty in the ethical management”, Ethics and Medicine: An International Journal of Bioethics 13(3): 56–58. (Scholar)
- Purdy, Laura, 1994, “Case study: the baby in the body”, Hastings Center Report 24(1), 32. (Scholar)
- Purdy, Laura, 2001, “Medicalization, medical necessity, and feminist medicine”, Bioethics 15(3): 248–261. (Scholar)
- Roberts, Dorothy, 1996, “Reconstructing the patient: starting with women of colour”, in S. Wolf (ed.), Feminism and Bioethics: Beyond Reproduction, New York: Oxford University Press, 116-143. (Scholar)
- Robertson, John, 1996, “Genetic selection of offspring characteristics”, Boston University Law Review 76: 301–61. (Scholar)
- Robertson, John, 2003, “Procreative liberty in the era of genomics”, American Journal of Law and Medicine 29: 439–87. (Scholar)
- Roth, Rachel, 2003, “Making women pay: the hidden cost of fetal rights”, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. (Scholar)
- Rothchild, Joan, 2005, The Dream of the Perfect Child, Bloomington: Indiana University Press. (Scholar)
- Savulescu, Julian, 2001, “Procreative beneficence: why we should select the best children”, Bioethics 15(5–6): 413–426. (Scholar)
- Savulescu, Julian, 2007, “In defense of procreative beneficence”, Journal of Medical Ethics 33(5): 284–288. (Scholar)
- Savulescu, Julian, 2007a, “Future people, involuntary medical treatment in pregnancy and the duty of easy rescue”, Utilitas 19: 1–20. (Scholar)
- Schedler, George, 1991, “Does society have the right to force pregnant drug addicts to abort their fetuses?”, Social Theory and Practice 17(3): 369–84. (Scholar)
- Schedler, George, 1992, “Forcing pregnant drug addicts to abort: rights-based and utilitarian justifications” 18(3): 347–57. (Scholar)
- Schwartz, Peter, 2004, “Is the patient always right?”, Hastings Center Report 34: 13–14. Hastings Cent Rep 2004; 34(2): 13–14. (Scholar)
- Sherwin, Susan, 1992, No Longer Patient: Feminist Ethics and Health Care, Philadelphia: Temple University Press. (Scholar)
- Smith, G. C., et al, 2002, “Risk of perinatal death associated with labor after previous cesarean delivery in uncomplicated term pregnancies”, Journal of the American Medical Association 287: 2684–90. (Scholar)
- Steinbock, Bonnie, 1992, “The relevance of illegality”, Hastings Center Report 22(1): 19–22. (Scholar)
- Steinbock, Bonnie, 2007, “prenatal testing for adult-onset conditions: cui bon?” Reproductive Biomedicine Online 2: 38–42.
- Thornton, Terry E. and Paltrow, Lynn, 1991, “The rights of pregnant patients: Carder case brings bold policy initiatives”, HealthSpan 8(5): 10–16. (Scholar)
- Tremain, Shelley, 2006, “Reproductive freedom, self-regulation, and the government of impairment in utero”, Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy 21(1): 35–53. (Scholar)
- Van Bogaert, Louis-Jacques, 2006, “Rights of and duties to non-consenting patients: informed refusal in the developing world”, Developing World Bioethics 6(1): 13–22. (Scholar)
- Weijer, Charles, 1998, “Commentary: self interest is not the sole legitimate basis for making decisions”, British Medical Journal 316: 850. (Scholar)
- Young, Iris, 1994, “Punishment, treatment, empowerment: three approaches to policy for pregnant addicts”, Feminist Studies 20(1): 33–57. (Scholar)
Generated Tue Apr 30 19:56:04 2013
