Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Feminist Perspectives on Science" by Alison Wylie |
This is an automatically generated and experimental page
If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.
This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.
- Alper, J., 1993, “The Pipeline Is Leaking Women All Along the Way”, Science, 260: 409–11. (Scholar)
- Anderson, E., 2004a, “How Not to Criticize Feminist Epistemology: a Review of Scrutinizing Feminist Epistemology” (Pinnick, Koertge, and Almeder 2003), Metascience, 13: 395–99. [Extended version is available online—see the Other Internet Resources.] (Scholar)
- –––, 2004b, “Uses of Value Judgments in Science: A General Argument, With Lessons From a Case Study of Feminist Research on Divorce”, Hypatia, 19:1, 1–24. (Scholar)
- –––, 1995a, “Feminist Epistemology: An Interpretation and a Defense”, Hypatia, 10:3 50–84. (Scholar)
- –––, 1995b, “Knowledge, Human Interests, and Objectivity in Feminist Epistemology”, Philosophical Topics, 23. (Scholar)
- Ardener, E., 1975, “Belief and the Problem of Women”, in Perceiving Women, Shirley Ardener (ed.), London: J. M. Dent and Sons. (Scholar)
- Ardener, S., (ed.), 1975, Perceiving Women, London: J. M. Dent and Sons. (Scholar)
- Barad, K., 2003, “Posthumanist Performativity: Toward and Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter”, Signs, 28:801–831. (Scholar)
- Biagioli, M., (ed.), 1999, The Science Studies Reader, Routledge: New York. (Scholar)
- Bleier, R., (ed.), 1986, Feminist Approaches to Science, New York: Routledge (Scholar)
- Blizzard, D., 2007, Looking Within: A Socio-cultural Examination of Fetoscopy, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Brizendine, L., 2006, The Female Brain, New York: Morgan Road Books. (Scholar)
- Brumfiel, E. M., 1991, “Weaving and Cooking: Women's Production in Aztec Mexico,” in J.M. Gero and M.W. Conkey (eds.), Engendering Archaeology: Women and Prehistory, Oxford: Blackwell. (Scholar)
- Bug, A., 2003, “Has Feminism Changed Physics?”, Signs, 28:881–899. (Scholar)
- Campbell, R., 1998, Illusions of Paradox: A Feminist Epistemology Naturalized, Maryland and Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield. (Scholar)
- Campion, P. and Shrum, W., 2004, “Gender and Science in Development: Women Scientists in Ghana, Kenya and India”, Science Technology and Human Values, 29:459–485. (Scholar)
- Chilly Collective, 1995, Breaking Anonymity: The Chilly Climate for Women Faculty, Waterloo ON: Wilfrid Laurier University Press. (Scholar)
- Clarke, A. E. and Olesen, V.L. (eds.), 1999, Revisioning Women, Health and Healing: Feminist, Cultural and Technoscience Perspectives, New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
- Code, L., 1993, “Taking Subjectivity into Account”, in Feminist Epistemologies, E. Potter and L. Alcoff, (eds.), New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
- –––, 1991, What Can She Know?, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. (Scholar)
- Cole, J., 1979, Fair Science: Women in the Scientific Community, New York: The Free Press. (Scholar)
- Cole, J.,and B. Singer, 1991, “A Theory of Limited Differences: Explaining the Productivity Puzzle in Science”, in The Outer Circle: Women in the Scientific Community, H. Zuckerman et al., New York: W. W. Norton. (Scholar)
- Creager, A., Lunbeck, E. and Schiebinger, L. (eds.), 2001, Feminism in Twentieth-Century Science, Technology, and Medicine, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Dahlberg, F., (ed.), 1981, Woman the Gatherer, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. (Scholar)
- Deigh, J., 1994, “Cognitivism in the Theory of Emotions”, Ethics, 104: 824–854. (Scholar)
- Ehrlich, C. and Research Group One, 1975, The Conditions of Feminist Research, Baltimore MD: Vacant Lots Press. (Scholar)
- Eichler, M., 1988, Nonsexist Research Methods: A Practical Guide, Boston: Allen & Unwin. (Scholar)
- Eichler, M. and J. Lapointe, 1985, On the Treatment of the Sexes in Research, Ottawa: Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. (Scholar)
- Epstein, S., 2007, Inclusion: The Politics of Difference in Medical Research, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1996, Impure Science: AIDS, Activism, and the Politics of Knowledge, Berkeley CA: University of California Press. (Scholar)
- Fausto-Sterling, A., 1992, “Building Two-Way Streets: The Case of Feminism and Science”, NWSA Journal, 4:336–49. (Scholar)
- –––, 1985, Myths of Gender: Biological Theories About Women and Men, New York: Basic Books. (Scholar)
- Fedigan, L. M., 1986, “The Changing Role of Women in Models of Human Evolution”, American Review of Anthropology, 15: 25–66. (Scholar)
- Fedigan, L. M., and L. Fedigan, 1989, “Gender and the Study of Primates”, in Critical Reviews of Gender and Anthropology, S. Morgan, (ed.), Washington, DC: American Anthropological Association. (Scholar)
- Fonow, M. M. and J. Cook (eds.), 1991, Beyond Methodology: Feminist Scholarship as Lived Research, Bloomington, Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press. (Scholar)
- Fortmann, L. (ed.), 2008, Participatory Research in Conservation and Rural Livelihoods: Doing Science Together, London: Wiley-Blackwell. (Scholar)
- Fujimura, J. H., 2006, “Sex Genes: A critical Sociomaterial Approach to the Politics and Molecular Genetics of Sex Determination”, Signs, 32:49–82. (Scholar)
- Galison, P., 1996, “Computer Simulations and the Trading Zone”, in The Disunity of Science, P. Galison and D. Stump (eds.), Stanford: Stanford University Press. (Scholar)
- Gilligan, C., 1982, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- Ginther, D. K., 2004, “Why Women Earn Less: Economic Explanations for the Gender Salary Gap in Science”, AWIS Magazine, 33: 6–10. (Scholar)
- Goodman, A. H., Heath, D., and Lindee, M. S. (eds.), 2003, Genetic Nature/Culture: Anthropology and Science beyond the Two-Culture Divide. Berkeley: University of California Press. (Scholar)
- Gorelick, S., 1991, “Contradictions of Feminist Methodology”, Gender & Society, 5: 459–77. (Scholar)
- Gottfried, H., (ed.), 1996, Feminism and Social Change: Bridging Theory and Practice, Urbana IL: University of Illinois Press. (Scholar)
- Greaves, L. and A. Wylie, 1995, “Women and Violence: Feminist Practice and Quantitative Method”, in Changing Methods: Feminist Transforming Practice, S. Burt and L., (eds.), Peterborough ON: Broadview Press. (Scholar)
- Greenwood, M. R. C. “Who Will Do the Science of the Future?: A Symposium on Careers of Women in Science.” 57–74. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press, 2000. (Scholar)
- Griffin, S., 1979, Woman and Nature: The Roaring Inside Her, London: The Woman's Press, Ltd. (Scholar)
- Gross, P. and N. Levitt, (eds.), 1994, Higher Superstition: The Academic Left and Its Quarrels with Science, Baltimore MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. (Scholar)
- Gross, P. et al., (eds.), 1996, The Flight from Science and Reason, New York: New York Academy of Sciences. (Scholar)
- Haack, S., 1993, “Knowledge and Propaganda: Reflections of an Old Feminist”, Partisan Review 60: 91–107. Reprinted in C. Pinnick et al., (eds.), 2003, Scrutinizing Feminist Epistemology: An Examination of Gender in Science, New Brunswick NJ: Rutgers University Press. (Scholar)
- Hall, K. Q., 2002, “Feminism, Disability, and Embodiment”, NWSA Journal, Special Issue: Feminist Disability Studies, 14:vii–xii. (Scholar)
- Hall, R. and B. Sandler, 1984, “Out of the Classroom: A Chilly Campus Climate for Women?”, Washington DC: Association of American Colleges. (Scholar)
- –––, 1982, “The Classroom Climate: A Chilly One for Women?”, Washington DC: Association of American Colleges. (Scholar)
- Haraway, D., 1991, Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature, New York, Routledge. (Scholar)
- –––, 1989, Primate Visions: Gender, Race, and Nature in the World of Modern Science, New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
- Harding, S., 2006, Science and Social Inequality: Feminist and Postcolonial Issues, Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1998, Is Science Multicultural? Postcolonialisms, Feminisms, and Epistemologies, Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1997, “Comment on Hekman's ‘Truth and Method: Feminist Standpoint Theory Revisited’: Whose Standpoint Needs the Regimes of Truth and Reality?”, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 22: 382–391. (Scholar)
- –––, 1993a, “Rethinking Standpoint Epistemology: What Is ”Strong Objectivity“?”, in Feminist Epistemologies, L. Alcoff and E. Potter (eds.), New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
- –––, (ed.), 1993b, The “Racial” Economy of Science: Toward a Democratic Future, Bloomington: Indiana University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1991, Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women's Lives, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1987, “Is There a Feminist Method?”, in Feminism and Methodology, S. Harding, (ed.), Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1986, The Science Question in Feminism, Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press. (Scholar)
- Hartsock, N., 1983, “The Feminist Standpoint: Developing the Ground for a Specifically Feminist Historical Materialism”, in Discovering Reality: Feminist Perspectives on Epistemology, Metaphysics, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, S. Harding and M. Hintikka, (eds.), Boston MA: D. Reidel Publishing Company. (Scholar)
- Hastorf, C. A., 1991, “Gender, Space, and Food in Prehistory,” in J.M. Gero and M.W. Conkey (eds.), Engendering Archaeology: Women and Prehistory , Oxford: Blackwell. (Scholar)
- Hayles, N. K., 1993, “Constrained Constructivism: Locating Scientific Inquiry in the Theater of Representation”, in Realism and Representation, G. Levine (ed.), University of Wisconsin Press: Madison. (Scholar)
- Hekman, S., 1997, “Truth and Method: Feminist Standpoint Theory Revisited”, Signs, 22: 341–65. (Scholar)
- Hess, D. J., 1997, Science Studies: An advanced Introduction, New York: New York University Press. (Scholar)
- Hesse-Biber, S., (ed.), 2007, Handbook of Feminist Research, New York: Sage. (Scholar)
- Hesse-Biber, S. and M. L. Yaiser, 2004, Feminist Perspectives on Social Research, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Hickey, S., and G. Mohan, eds. , 2004, Participation: From Tyranny to Transformation? Exploring New Approaches to Participation in Development, New York: Zed Books. (Scholar)
- Hubbard, R., 2003, “Science, Power, Gender: How DNA Became the Book of Life”, Signs, 28:791_799. (Scholar)
- –––, 1990, The Politics of Women's Biology New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press. (Scholar)
- Irigaray, L., 1989, “Is the Subject of Science Sexed?” in Feminism and Science. N. Tuana (ed.). Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press: 58–68. (Scholar)
- Jacobson, H. E., 1997, “How to Study Your Own Community: Research from the Perspective of Women.” Vancouver, B.C.: Women's Research Center. (Scholar)
- Kafer, A., 2003, “Compulsory Bodies: Reflections on Heterosexuality and Able-bodiedness”, Journal of Women's History, 15:77–89 (Scholar)
- Keller, E. F., 1995, “The Origin, History, and Politics of the Subject Called ‘Gender and Science’: A First Person Account”, Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, S. Jasanoff, G. E. Markle, J. C. Petersen and T. Pinch (eds.), Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. (Scholar)
- –––, 1992, Secrets of Life, Secrets of Death: Essays on Language, Gender and Science, New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
- Keller, E. F., 1987, “Feminism and Science”, Sex and Scientific Inquiry, S. Harding and J. F. O'Barr (eds.), Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1985, Reflections on Gender and Science, New Haven: Yale University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1983, A Feeling for the Organism: The Life and Work of Barbara McClintock, New York: W. H. Freeman and Company. (Scholar)
- –––, 1978, “Gender and Science”, Psychoanalysis & Contemporary Thought 1: 409–33. (Scholar)
- Kelly-Gadol, J., 1977, “Did Women Have a Renaissance?”, in Becoming Visible: Women in European History, R. Gridenthal and C. Koonz, (eds.), Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Co. (Scholar)
- –––, 1976, “The Social Relation of the Sexes: Methodological Implications of Women's History”, Signs, 1: 809–23. (Scholar)
- Kittay, E., A. Silvers, and S. Wendell (eds.) 2001, Hypatia Special Issue: Feminism and Disability 16.4. (Scholar)
- Kohlstedt, S. G., and Longino, H., 1997, “The Woman, Gender, and Science Question: What Do Research on Women in Science and Research on Gender Have to do with Each Other?” Osiris, 2nd Series, 12:3–15. (Scholar)
- Layne, L., 2002, Motherhood Lost: A Feminist Account of Pregnancy Loss in America, New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
- Lederman, M. and Bartsch, I., (eds.), 2001, The Gender and Science Reader, New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
- Lee, R. B. and I. DeVore, (eds.), 1968, Man the Hunter, Chicago: Aldine. (Scholar)
- Lerner, B. H., 2001, The Breast Cancer Wars: Hope, Fear and the Pursuit of a Cure in Twentieth-Century America, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Levins, R., and Lewontin, R., 1985, The Dialectical Biologist, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- Lloyd, E., 1993, “Pre-Theoretical Assumptions in Evolutionary Explanations of Female Sexuality”, Philosophical Studies, 69: 139–53. (Scholar)
- –––, 1995, “Objectivity and the Double Standard for Feminist Epistemologies”, Synthese 104: 351–381. (Scholar)
- –––, 2005, The Case of the Female Orgasm: Bias in the Science of Evolution, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- Longino, H. E., 2002, The Fate of Knowledge, Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1995, “Gender, Politics, and the Theoretical Virtues”, Synthese, 104: 383–97. (Scholar)
- –––, 1994, “In Search of Feminist Epistemology”, The Monist, 77: 472–85. (Scholar)
- –––, 1993, “Subjects, Power, and Knowledge: Description and Prescription in Feminist Philosophies of Science”, in Feminist Epistemologies, L. M. Alcoff and E. Potter (eds.), New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
- –––, 1987, “Can There Be a Feminist Science?”, Hypatia, 2:51–64. (Scholar)
- Longino, H., and R. Doell, 1983, “Body, Bias, and Behavior: A Comparative Analysis of Reasoning in Two Areas of Biological Science”, Signs, 9: 206–27. (Scholar)
- Lorde, A., 1984, “The Master's Tools Will Never Dismantle the Master's House”, in Sister Outsider, A. Lorde, (ed.), Freedom CA: The Crossing Press. (Scholar)
- Maddox, B., 2002, Rosalind Franklin: The Dark Lady of DNA, New York: Harper Collins. (Scholar)
- Maguire, P., 19878, Doing Participatory Research: A Feminist Approach, Amherst, MA: The Center for International education, University of Massachusetts. (Scholar)
- Martin, E., 1994, Flexible Bodies: Tracking Immunity in American Culture From the Days of Polio to the Age of Aids, Boston: Beacon Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1991, “The Egg and the Sperm: How Science Has Constructed a Romance Based on Stereotypical Male-Female Roles”, Signs, 16: 485-501. (Scholar)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1999, “A Study on the Status of Women Faculty in Science at MIT”, The MIT Faculty Newsletter 11. (Scholar)
- Mayberry, M., Subramaniam, B., and Weasel, L. (eds.), 2001, Feminist Science Studies: A New Generation, New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
- Merchant, C., 1980/90, The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology, and the Scientific Revolution, New York: Harper and Row. (Scholar)
- Mies, M., 1983, “Towards a Methodology for Feminist Research”, in Theories of Women's Studies, G. Bowles and R. D. Klein, (eds.), London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Scholar)
- Minkler, M. (ed.), 2004, Community Organizing and Community Building for Health, 2nd ed., New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press. (Scholar)
- Minkler, M., and N. B. Wallerstein (eds.), 2003, Community Based Participatory Research for Health. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. (Scholar)
- Naples, N. A., 2003, Feminism and Method: Ethnography, Discourse Analysis, and Activist Research, New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
- National Academies of Sciences, Committee on Maximizing the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering, 2006, Beyond Bias and Barriers: Fulfilling the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering, Washington D.C.: The National Academies Press. (Scholar)
- Nelson, A., 2006, “‘A Black Mass’ as Black Gothic: Myth and Medicine in African American Cultural Nationalism,” in New Thoughts on the Black Arts Movement, L. G. Collins and M. Crawford (eds.), New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press. (Scholar)
- Nelson, L. H, 1996, “Empiricism Without Dogmas,” in Feminism, Science and the Philosophy of Science, L. H. Nelson and J. Nelson (eds.), Dordrecht, Boston and London: Kluwer Academic Publishers. (Scholar)
- –––, 1995, “Feminist Naturalized Philosophy of Science”, Synthese 104: 399–421. (Scholar)
- –––, 1993, “Epistemological Communities”, in L. Alcoff and E. Potter (eds.), Feminist Epistemologies, New York and London: Routledge. (Scholar)
- –––, 1990, Who Knows: From Quine to a Feminist Empiricism, Philadelphia: Temple University Press. (Scholar)
- Nelson, L. H., and J. Nelson, 1994, “No Rush to Judgement”, The Monist, 77: 486–508. (Scholar)
- Novick, P., 1988, That Noble Dream: The ‘Objectivity Question’ and the American Historical Profession, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Okruhlik, K., 1994, “Gender and the Biological Sciences”, in Biology & Society : Reflections on Methodology, M. Matthen and R. Ware, (eds.), Calgary: University of Calgary. (Scholar)
- Pérez Sedeño, E., 2001, “Gender: The Missing Factor in STS”, in Visions of STS: Counterpoints in Science, Technology and Society Studies, S. H. Cutcliffe and C. Mitcham (eds.), Albany: SUNY Press. (Scholar)
- Pinnick, C., 2005, “The Failed Feminist Challenge to ‘Fundamental Epistemology’”, Science & Education, 14: 103–16. (Scholar)
- Pinnick, C. et al., (eds.), 2003, Scrutinizing Feminist Epistemology: An Examination of Gender in Science, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press. (Scholar)
- Potter, E., 2006, Feminism and Philosophy of Science, New York and London: Routledge. (Scholar)
- –––, 2001, Gender and Boyle's Law of Gases, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1995, “Good Science and Good Philosophy of Science”, Synthese, 104: 423–439. (Scholar)
- –––, 1988, “Modeling the Gender Politics in Science”, Hypatia, 3:19–34. (Scholar)
- Ramey, E., 1992, “A Look at Gender in Science: Review of the Outer Circle: Women in the Scientific Community, Edited by Harriet Zuckerman, Jonathan R. Cole, and John T. Bruer”, The Washington Post, April 1 1992, 1. (Scholar)
- Rapp, R., 1999, Testing Women Testing the Fetus: The social impact of amniocentesis in America, Routledge, New York. (Scholar)
- Reardon, J., 2005, Race to the Finish: Identity and Governance in an Age of Genomics, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
- Reinharz, S., 1992a, Feminist Methods in Social Research, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1992b, “The Principles of Feminist Research: A Matter of Debate”, in The Knowledge Explosion: Generations of Feminist Scholarship, in C. Kramarae and D. Spender, (eds.), New York: Teachers College Press. (Scholar)
- Reskin, B., 2003, “Including Mechanisms in Our Models of Ascriptive Inequality”, American Sociological Review, 68: 1–21. (Scholar)
- Roofless Women (Roofless Women's Action Research Mobilization), 1997, “Lifting the Voices of Homeless Women: Summary of Findings and Recommendations,” Boston, MA: Women's Institute for Housing and Economic Development. (Scholar)
- Rolison, D., 2000, “A ‘Title IX’ Challenge to Academic Chemistry-Isn't a Millennium of Affirmative Action for White Men Sufficient?” Women in the Chemical Workforce, Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, pp 74–93. [Available online]
- Rose, H., 1994, Love, Power and Knowledge: Towards a Feminist Transformation of the Sciences, Cambridge: Polity Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1983, “Hand, Brain, and Heart: A Feminist Epistemology for the Natural Sciences”, Signs, 9:73–90. (Scholar)
- Rosser, S. V., 2002, “Twenty_five Years of NWSA: Have We Built the Two_Way Streets Between Women's Studies and Women in Science and Technology?” NWSA Journal, 14:103–28. (Scholar)
- –––, 2000, Women, Science, and Society: The Crucial Union, New York: Teacher's College Press. (Scholar)
- Rossiter, M., 1995, Women Scientists in America: Before Affirmative Action, 1940–1972, Baltimore, MC: Johns Hopkins University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1993, “The Matthew Matilda Effect in Science”, Social Studies of Science, 23: 325–41. (Scholar)
- –––, 1982, Women Scientists in America: Struggles and Strategies to 1940, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins. (Scholar)
- –––, 1981, “Fair Enough?: Review of J. R. Cole, Fair Science, and L. S. Hornig, Climbing the Academic Ladder”, Isis, 72: 99–103. (Scholar)
- Sandler, B. R., 1986, “The Campus Climate Revisited: Chilly for Women Faculty, Administrators, and Graduate Students”, in Project on the Status and Education of Women, Washington, D.C.: Association of American Colleges. (Scholar)
- Schiebinger, L., (ed.), 2003, Signs, 28. (Scholar)
- –––, 1999a, Has Feminism Changed Science?, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1999b, “How Women Contribute”, Science, New Series, 285: 835. (Scholar)
- Scott, J. W., 1991, “The Evidence of Experience”, Critical Inquiry, 17: 773–97. (Scholar)
- Seymour, E. and Hewitt, N. M., 1997, Talking about Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave the Sciences, Boulder, Colorado: Westview. (Scholar)
- Shalala, D. E., 2006, “Preface”, in Beyond Bias and Barriers: Fulfilling the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering, National Academy of Sciences, Committee on Maximizing the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering, Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press. (Scholar)
- Slocum, S., 1975, “Woman the Gatherer: Male Bias in Anthropology”, in Toward an Anthropology of Women, R. Reiter, (ed.), New York: Monthly Review Press. (Scholar)
- Smith, D. E., 1978, “A Peculiar Eclipsing: Women's Exclusion from Man's Culture”, Women's Studies International Quarterly, 1: 281–95. (Scholar)
- _–––, 1974, “Women's Perspective as a Radical Critique of Sociology”, Sociological Inquiry, 44: 7–13. (Scholar)
- Sonnert, G. and G. Holton, 1995, Who Succeeds in Science? The Gender Dimension, New Brunswick NJ: Rutgers University Press. (Scholar)
- Spanier, B. B., 1995, Im/Partial Science: Gender Ideology in Molecular Biology, Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press. (Scholar)
- Sperling, S., 1991, “Baboons with Briefcases: Feminism, Functionalism, and Sociobiology in the Evolution of Primate Gender”, Signs, 17: 1–27. (Scholar)
- Squier, S. and Littlefield, M., 2004, “Feminist Theory and/of Science: Feminist Theory Special Issue”, Feminist Theory, 5:123–232. (Scholar)
- Stanley, L. and S. Wise, 1983, Breaking Out: Feminist Consciousness and Feminist Research, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Scholar)
- Star, S. L., (ed.), 1995, Ecologies of Knowledge: Work and Politics in Science and Technology, Albany: SUNY Press. (Scholar)
- Steele, C. M., 1997, “A Threat in the Air: How Stereotypes Shape Intellectual Identity and Performance”, American Psychologist, 52: 613–29. (Scholar)
- Stewart, A. et al., 1997, Separating Together, New York: Guilford Press. (Scholar)
- Strum, S. C. and L. M. Fedigan, (eds.), 2000, Primate Encounters: Models of Science, Gender, and Society, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Suchman, L., 2008, “Feminist STS and the Sciences of the Artificial”, in The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, Third Edition Hackett, E. J., O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch, and J. Wajcman (eds.) Cambridge, Massachusetts and London: The MIT Press: pp139–164. (Scholar)
- Summers, L. H., 2005, Remarks at NBER Conference on Diversity in the Science and Engineering Workforce, Harvard University, Office of the President, January 14, 2005, http://www.president.harvard.edu/speeches/summers_2005/nber.php (Scholar)
- Traweek, S., 1988, Beamtimes and Lifetimes: The World of High Energy Physicists, Cambridge: Harvard University Press (Scholar)
- Tuana, N., (ed.), 1989, Feminism and Science, Bloomington: Indiana University Press. (Scholar)
- Valian, V., 1999, Why So Slow? The Advancement of Women, Cambridge MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Wallerstein, J. et al., 2000, The Unexpected Legacy of Divorce, New York: Hyperion. (Scholar)
- Wallerstein, J. and J. Kelly, 1980, Surviving the Breakup, New York: Basic. (Scholar)
- Watson, P. J. and M.C. Kennedy, 1991, “The Development of Horticulture in the Eastern Woodlands of North America: Women's Role”, in J.M. Gero and M.W. Conkey (eds.) Engendering Archaeology: Women and Prehistory, Oxford: Blackwell. (Scholar)
- Wertheim, M., 1995, Pythagoras' Trousers: God, Physics and the Gender Wars, New York: Random House. (Scholar)
- West, M. and J. Curtis, 2006, “AAUP Faculty Gender Equity Indicators”, Washington D.C.: American Association of University Professors. (Scholar)
- Whelan, E., 2001, “Politics by Other Means: Feminism and Mainstream Science Studies”, Canadian Journal of Sociology/ Cahiers canadiens de sociologie, 26: 535–581. (Scholar)
- Widnall, S., 1988, “Voices from the Pipeline”, Science, 241: 1740–45. (Scholar)
- Wilmsen, C., W. Elemendorf, L. Fisher, J. Ross, B. Sarathy, and G. Wells (eds.), 2008, Partnerships for Empowerment: Participatory Research for Community-Based Natural Resource Management, London: Earthscan Publications. (Scholar)
- Woolf, Virginia, 1938, Three Guineas, London: Hogarth Press. (Scholar)
- Wyer, M., Cookmeyer, D., Barbercheck, M., Ozturk, H., and Wayne, M., (eds.), 2001, Women, Science and Technology: A Reader in Feminist Science Studies, Routledge: New York & London. (Scholar)
- Wylie, A., 2007, “The Feminism Question in Science: What Does It Mean to ‘Do Social Science as a Feminist’?”, in Handbook of Feminist Research, S. Hesse-Biber, New York: Sage. (Scholar)
- –––, 2003, “Why Standpoint Theory Matters: Feminist Standpoint Theory”, in Philosophical Explorations of Science, Technology, and Diversity, R. Figueroa and S. Harding, (eds.), New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
- –––, 1997, “Good Science, Bad Science, or Science as Usual?: Feminist Critiques of Science”, in Women in Human Evolution, L. D. Hager, (ed.), New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
- –––, 1995a, “Doing Philosophy as a Feminist: Longino on the Search for a Feminist Epistemology”, Philosophical Topics, 23: 345–58. (Scholar)
- –––, 1995b, “The Contexts of Activism on ‘Climate’ Issues,” in Breaking Anonymity, in The Chilly Collective (eds.), Waterloo Ont: Wilfrid Laurier University Press, pp. 26–60. (Scholar)
- –––, 1992, “Reasoning About Ourselves: Feminist Methodology in the Social Sciences”, in Women and Reason, E. Harvey and K. Okruhlik, (eds.), Ann Arbor MI: University of Michigan Press, pp. 611–624. (Scholar)
- Wylie, A., J. R. Jakobsen, G. Fosado, 2008, Women, Work, and the Academy: Strategies for Responding to ‘Post-civil Rights Era’ Gender Discrimination, New Feminist Solutions, New York: Barnard Center for Research on Women. [Available online] (Scholar)
- Xie, Y. and K. A. Shauman, 2003, Women in Science: Career Processes and Outcomes, Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- Young, R. M., and E. Balaban, 2006, “Psychoneuroindoctrinology”, (review of Brizendine 2006), Nature, 443(12 October): 634. (Scholar)
- Zare, R. N., 2006, “Sex, Lies, and Title IX”, Chemical & Engineering News, 84.20: 46–49. [Available online] (Scholar)
Generated Sat Apr 27 02:50:59 2013
