Works by Godfrey

• Godfrey of Fontaines. Les Philosophes Belges, Louvain: Institut Supérieur de Philosophie de l’Université.
  • Vol. 2 (=PB 2): Les quatres premiers Quodlibets de Godefroid de Fontaines (1904), M. De Wulf, A. Pelzer, eds. (Scholar)
  • Vol. 3: Les Quodlibets cinq, six et sept (1914), M. De Wulf, J. Hoffmans, eds.
  • Vol. 4: Le huitième Quodlibet, Le Neuvième Quodlibet, Le dixième Quodlibet (1924, 1928, 1931), J. Hoffmans, ed.
  • Vol 5: Les Quodlibets onze et douze, Les Quodlibets treize et quatorze (1932, 1935), J. Hoffmans, ed.
  • Vol. 14: Le Quodlibet XV et trois Questions ordinaires de Godefroid de Fontaines (1937), O. Lottin, ed.
• Godfrey of Fontaines. Disputed Questions. Some have been edited in scattered publications. For a list see Wippel, 1981, pp. xxxi–xxxiii. For an edition of Disputed Question 18, now see J. Celeyrette and J.-L. Solère, “Edition de la question ordinaire no 18, ‘De intensione virtutum’, de Godefroid de Fontaines,” in Florilegium Mediaevale. Études offertes à Jacqueline Hamesse à l’occasion de son éméritat, J. Meirinhos and Olga Weijers, eds. Louvain-la-Neuve: Fédération Internationale des Instituts d’Études Médiévales (2009),pp. 83–107.

Secondary Literature

As some of the more recent entries in this bibliography suggest by their titles, there has been a renewed interest on the part of scholars in certain aspects of Godfrey’s moral and political philosophy, although a complete presentation of his moral philosophy still remains to be written. While de Lagarde’s early long article on his political and social philosophy is dated, it is still useful. Helpful on his views on the relationship between the individual good and the common good (and many related topics) are chapters 8 and 9 in Kempshall, 1999. This should now be supplemented by Osborne, 2005, 139–50, and Osborne, 2015. All three studies offer important comparisons of Godfrey with other leading figures of his time. Marmursztejn (2006) offers many particular instances of Godfrey’s thinking about various practical matters while developing her theme of different quodlibetal Masters’ understanding of their role and their authority in determining disputed issues. Lambertini (2006) does much the same with respect to Godfrey’s positions and those of several other Masters concerning a number of political issues in their respective Quodlibetal disputations. Knuuttila (2016) briefly explains Godfrey’s explanation of how one who loves oneself may love the common good or love God more than oneself and compares this with the view of Henry of Ghent.

• Aiello, A. and R. Wielockx, 2008. Goffredo di Fontaines, aspirante baccelliere sentenziario: le autografe “Notulae de scientia theologie” e la cronologia del ms. Paris BnF lat. 16297 (Corpus Christianorum Autographa Medii Aevi, 6) Turnhout: Brepols Publishers. (Scholar)
• Côté, A., 2007. “L’objet et la cause de la conaissance selon Godefroid de Fontaines.” Freiburger Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Theologie, pp. 409–29.
• Celeyrette, J. and Solère, J.-L., 2002. “Godefroid de Fontaines et la théorie de la succession dans l’intensification des formes,” in P.J.J.M. Bakker, ed., with E. Faye and Christophe Grellard. Chemins de la Pensée Médiévale. Études offertes à Zéno Kaluza Brepols: Fédération Internationale des Instituts d’Études Médiévales, pp. 79–112. (Scholar)
• –––, 2009. “Édition de la question ordinaire No.18, ‘De intensione virtutum’, de Godefroid de Fontaines,” in J. Merinos and O.Weijers, eds. Florilegium Médiaevale. Études offertes à Jacqueline Hamesse à l’occasion de son éméritat. Louvain-la-Neuve: Fédération Internationale des I’nstituts d’Études Médiévales, pp. 83–107. (Scholar)
• Cross, R., 2002. The Metaphysics of the Incarnation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Dales, R., 1990. Medieval Discussions of the Eternity of the World. Leiden: E.J. Brill. (Scholar)
• De Wulf, M., 1904. Un théologien-philosophe du XIIIe siècle. Étude sur la vie, les oeuvres et l’influence de Godefroid de Fontaines. Brussels: M. Hayez. (Scholar)
• Duin, J.J., 1959. “La bibliothèque philosophique de Godefroid de Fontaines,” Estudios Lulianos 3, pp. 21–36, 136–60. (Scholar)
• Dumont, S.D., 2009. “Godfrey of Fontaines and the Succession Theory of Forms at Paris in the Early Fourteenth Century,” in S. Brown, T. Dewender, and T. Kobusch, eds., Philosophical Debates at Paris in the Earlier Fourteenth Century. Leiden: Brill, pp. 39–125. (Scholar)
• Field, S.L., 2009. “The Master and Marguerite: Godfrey of Fontaines’ Praise of The Mirror of Simple Souls,” Journal of Medieval History 35, pp. 136–49. (Scholar)
• Hartman, P., 2014. “Causation and Cognition: Durand of St.-Pourçain and Godfrey of Fontaines on the Cause of a Cognitive Act,” in A. Speer, Guy Guildtops, and T. Jeschke, eds., Durand of Saint-Pourçain and His Sentences Commentary: Historical, Philosophical, and Theological Issues, Philosophical Archives copy vl, pp. 229–56. (Scholar)
• Kempshall, M.S., 1999. The Commom Good in Late Medieval Political Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
• Kent, B., 1995. Virtues of the Will: The Transformation of Ethics in the Late Thirteenth-Century. Washington, D.C.: Catholic University of American Press. (Scholar)
• de Lagarde, G., 1943–1945. “La philosophie sociale d’Henri de Gand et de Godefroid de Fontaines.” Archives d’Histoire Doctrinale et Littéraire du Moyen Age, pp. 73–142. (Scholar)
• Lambertini, R., 2006, “Political Quodlibeta”, in C. Schabel, ed., Theological Quodlibeta in the Middle Ages: The Thirteenth Century. Leiden-Boston: Brill, pp. 439–74. (Scholar)
• Marrone, S., 2001. The Light of Thy Countenance. Science and Knowledge of God in the Thirteenth Century. Vol. 2: God at the Core of Cognition. Leiden: Brill. (Scholar)
• Maier, A., 1951 (2nd ed.), 1968 (rev. 3rd ed.). Zwei Grundprobleme der scholastischen Naturphilosophie. Das Problem der intensivum Grösse, Die Impetustheorie. Rome: Edizione di storia e letteratura.
• Maurer, A., 1999. The Philosophy of William of Ockham in Light of Its Principles. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies. (Scholar)
• Marmursztejn, E., 2006, “A Normative Power in the Making”, in C. Schabel, ed. Theological Quodlibeta in the Middle Ages: The Thirteenth Century. Leiden-Boston: Brill, pp. 345–402. (Scholar)
• Osborne, T.M., 2005. Love of Self and Love of God in Thirteenth-Century Ethics. Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2013. “Giles of Rome, Henry of Ghent, and Godfrey of Fontaines on Whether to See God is to Love Him,” Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie médiévales 80, pp.57–76. (Scholar)
• Paulus, J., 1938. Henri de Gand. Essai sur les tendances de sa métaphysique. Paris: J. Vrin. (Scholar)
• Porro, P., 1996. “Possibilità ed Esse essentiae in Enrico di Gand,” in W. Vanhamel, ed., Henry of Ghent. Proceedings of the International Colloquium on the Occasion of the 700^th Anniversary of his Death (1293). Leuven: Leuven University Press, pp. 211–53. (Scholar)
• Putallaz, F.X., 1995. Insolente liberté. Controverses et condemnations au XIIIe siècle. Fribourg: Éditions Universitaires/Paris: Éditions du Cerf. (Scholar)
• Sylla, E., 1981. “Godfrey of Fontaines on Motion with Respect to Quantity of the Eucharist,” in A. Maieru and A.P. Bagliani, eds., Studi sul xiv secolo in memoria di Anneliese Maier. Rome: Studia e letteratura 151, pp. 105–41. (Scholar)
• Wielockx, R., 2009. Boethii Daci Quaestiones super Librum De anima I–II with Fioravanti, G., Anonymi Boethio Daco Usi Quaestiones Metaphysicae. (Corpus Philosophorum Danicorum Medii Aevi, 14) Copenhagen: University Press of Southern Denmark. (Scholar)
• –––, 2014. “Henri de Gand et Gilles de Rome à la lumièire de la bibliothèque de Godefroid de Fontaines,” in V. Cordonier and T. Suarez-Nani, eds., L’Aristotélisme Exposé. Fribourg: Academic Press, pp. pp. 181–259. (Scholar)
• Wippel, J.F., 1979. “Godfrey of Fontaines on Intension and Remission of Accidental Forms,” Franciscan Studies 39, pp. 316–55. (Scholar)
• –––, 1981. The Metaphysical Thought of Godfrey of Fontaines. A Study in Late Thirteenth-Century Philosophy. Washington, D.C.: The Catholic University of America Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1984. “Possible Sources for Godfrey of Fontaines’ Views on the Act-Potency Composition of Simple Creatures,” Mediaeval Studies 46, pp. 222–44. (Scholar)
• –––, 1984a. Metaphysical Themes in Thomas Aquinas. Washington, D.C.: The Catholic University of America Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1986. “The Role of the Phantasm in Godfrey of Fontaines’ Theory of Intellection,” in C. Wenin, ed., L’homme et son univers au moyen âge (Actes du septième congrès internationale de philosophie médiévale [30 Août-4 Septembre 1982]), Vol. 2, pp. 573–82. (Scholar)
• –––, 2001. “Godfrey of Fontaines at the University of Paris in the Last Quarter of the Thirteenth Century,” in J.A. Aertsen, K. Emery, Andreas Speer, eds., Nach der Verurteilung von 1277. Philosophie und Theologie an der Universität von Paris im letzten Viertel des 13. Jahrhunderts. Studien und Texte (Miscellanea Mediaevalia, 28). Berlin-New York: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 359–89. (Scholar)
• –––, 2006. “Godfrey of Fontaines’ Quodlibet XIV on Justice as a General Virtue: Is It Really a Quodlibet?”, in C. Schabel, ed., Theological Quodlibets in the Middle Ages: The Thirteenth Century. Leiden-Boston: Brill, pp. 287–344. (Scholar)
• ––– 2012.“Metaphysical Composition of Angels in Bonaventure, Aquinas, and Godfrey of Fontaines”in T. Hoffmann, ed., A Companion to Angels in Medieval Philosophy. Leiden-Boston: Brill, pp. 45–78. (Scholar)