Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Hume's Aesthetics" by Ted Gracyk |
This is an automatically generated and experimental page
If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.
This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.
Hume's Works
The abbreviations and texts cited above are as follows:
| [T] | A Treatise of Human Nature, edited by L. A. Selby-Bigge, 2nd ed. revised by P.H. Nidditch, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975. [Page references above are to this edition.] |
| A Treatise of Human Nature, edited by David Fate Norton and Mary J. Norton, Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 2000. | |
| [EHU] | An Enquiry concerning Human Understanding, in Enquiries concerning Human Understanding and concerning the Principles of Morals, edited by L. A. Selby-Bigge, 3rd edition revised by P. H. Nidditch, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975. |
| [EHUa] | An Enquiry concerning Human Understanding, edited by Tom L. Beauchamp, Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 1999. |
| [EPM] | An Enquiry concerning the Principles of Morals, in Enquiries concerning Human Understanding and concerning the Principles of Morals, edited by L. A. Selby-Bigge, 3rd edition revised by P. H. Nidditch, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975.[Page references above are to this edition.] |
| Enquiry concerning the Principles of Morals, edited by Tom L. Beauchamp, Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 1998. | |
| [HL] | The Letters of David Hume, edited by J.Y.T. Greig, 2 volumes, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1932. |
| [PW] | The Philosophical Works of David Hume, edited by T. H. Green and T. H. Grose. 4 volumes, London: Longman, Green, 1874–75. [Page references above to individual essays are to volume 3 of this edition.] |
| [CL] | “Of Civil Liberty,” in PW, Volume 3. |
| [E] | “Of Eloquence,” in PW, Volume 3. |
| [SRW] | “Of Simplicity and Refinement in Writing,” in PW, Volume 3. |
| [S] | “The Sceptic,” in PW, Volume 3. |
| [DOT] | “Of the Delicacy of Taste and Passion,” in PW, Volume 3. |
| [SOT] | “Of the Standard of Taste,” in PW, Volume 3. |
| [OT] | “Of Tragedy,” in PW, Volume 3. |
Works on Hume's Aesthetics
- Carroll, Noël (1984). “Hume's Standard of Taste,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 43: 181–94. (Scholar)
- Costelloe, Timothy M. (2003). “Hume, Kant, and the ‘Antinomy of Taste’,” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 41: 165–85. (Scholar)
- ––– (2007). Aesthetics and Morals in the Philosophy of David Hume (Routledge Studies in Eighteenth Century Philosophy), London: Routledge. (Scholar)
- Dadlez, Eva M. (2002). “The Vicious Habits of Entirely Fictitious People: Hume on the Moral Evaluation of Art,” Philosophy and Literature, 26: 143–56. (Scholar)
- Galgut, Elisa (2001). “The Poetry and the Pity: Hume's Account of Tragic Pleasure,” British Journal of Aesthetics, 41: 411–24. (Scholar)
- Gracyk, Theodore (1994). “Rethinking Hume's Standard of Taste,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 52: 168–82. (Scholar)
- ––– (2011). “Delicacy in Hume's Aesthetic Theory,” Journal of Scottish Philosophy, 9: 1–16. (Scholar)
- Guyer, Paul (2005). “The Standard of Taste and the ‘Most Ardent Desire of Society’,” in Paul Guyer, Values of Beauty: Historical Essays in Aesthetics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 37–74. (Scholar)
- Hester, Marcus (1979). “Hume on Principles and Perceptual Ability,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 37: 295–302. (Scholar)
- Jones, Peter (1993). “Hume's Literary and Aesthetic Theory,” in David Fate Norton (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Hume, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 255–280. (Scholar)
- Kivy, Peter (1967). “Hume's Standard of Taste: Breaking the Circle,” British Journal of Aesthetics, 7: 57–66. (Scholar)
- ––– (1983). “Hume's Neighbor's Wife: An Essay in the Evolution of Hume's Aesthetics,” British Journal of Aesthetics, 23: 195–208. (Scholar)
- ––– (2011). “Remarks on the Varieties of Prejudice in Hume's Essay on Taste,” Journal of Scottish Philosophy, 9: 111–15. (Scholar)
- Korsmeyer, Carolyn (1976). “Hume and the Foundations of Taste,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 35: 201–15. (Scholar)
- ––– (1995). “Gendered Concepts and Hume's Standard of Taste,” in P. Z. Brand and Carolyn Korsmeyer (eds.), Feminism and Tradition in Aesthetics, University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, pp. 49–65. (Scholar)
- Levinson, Jerrold (2002). “Hume's Standard of Taste: The Real Problem,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 60: 227–238. (Scholar)
- ––– (2003). “The Real Problem Sustained: Reply to Wieand”, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 61: 398–99. (Scholar)
- MacLachlan, Christopher (1986). “Hume and the Standard of Taste”, Hume Studies, 12: 18–38. (Scholar)
- MacMillan, Claude (1986). “Hume, Points of View and Aesthetic Judgments”, The Journal of Value Inquiry, 20: 109–23. (Scholar)
- Marshall, David (1995). “Arguing by Analogy: Hume's Standard of Taste,” Eighteenth-Century Studies, 28: 323-43. (Scholar)
- Mason, Michelle (2001). “Moral Prejudice and Aesthetic Deformity: Rereading Hume's ‘Of the Standard of Taste’,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 59: 59–71. (Scholar)
- Mothersill, Mary (1989). “Hume and the Paradox of Taste,” in George Dickie, Richard Sclafani and Robin Ronald (eds.), Aesthetics: A Critical Anthology, New York: St. Martin's Press: 269–86. (Scholar)
- ––– (1998). “Hume, David, ‘Of the Standard of Taste’” in Michael Kelly (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Aesthetics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, Volume 2: 428–33. (Scholar)
- Neill, Alex (1998). “‘An Unaccountable Pleasure’: Hume on Tragedy and the Passions,” Hume Studies, 24: 335–354. (Scholar)
- ––– (1992). “Yanal and Others on Hume on Tragedy,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 50: 151–154. (Scholar)
- ––– (1999) “Hume's ‘Singular Phænomenon’,” British Journal of Aesthetics, 39: 112–125. (Scholar)
- Osborne, Harold (1967). “Hume's Standard and the Diversity of Aesthetic Taste,” British Journal of Aesthetics, 7: 50–56. (Scholar)
- Perricone, Christopher (1995). “The Body and Hume's Standard of Taste,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 53: 371–8. (Scholar)
- Ribeiro, Brian (2007). “Hume's Standard of Taste and the de gustibus Sceptic,” British Journal of Aesthetics, 47: 16–28. (Scholar)
- Rose, Mary Carman (1976). “The Importance of Hume in the History of Western Aesthetics,” British Journal of Aesthetics, 16: 218–29. (Scholar)
- Ross, Stephanie (2008). “Humean Critics: Real or Ideal?,” British Journal of Aesthetics, 48: 20–28. (Scholar)
- Saccamano, Neil (2011). “Aesthetically Non-Dwelling: Sympathy, Property, and the House of Beauty in Hume's Treatise,” Journal of Scottish Philosophy, 9: 37–58. (Scholar)
- Shelley, James (1994). “Hume's Double Standard of Taste,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 52: 437–45. (Scholar)
- ––– (1998). “Hume and the Nature of ‘Taste’,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 56: 29–38. (Scholar)
- ––– (2001). “Empiricism: Hutcheson and Hume”, in Berys Gaut and Dominic M. Lopes (eds.), Routledge Companion to Aesthetics, London: Routledge: 37–49. (Scholar)
- ––– (2004). “Hume's Principles of Taste: A Reply to Dickie,” British Journal of Aesthetics, 44: 84–89. (Scholar)
- Shiner, Roger A. (1996). “Hume and the Causal Theory of Taste,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 54: 237–49. (Scholar)
- Shusterman, Richard (1989). “Of the Scandal of Taste: Social Privilege as Nature in the Aesthetic Theories of Hume and Kant,” Philosophical Forum, 20: 211–29. (Scholar)
- Siebert, Donald T. (1989). “The Sentimental Sublime in Hume's History of England,” Review of English Studies New Series, 40: 352–72. (Scholar)
- Sverdlik, Steven (1986). “Hume's Key and Aesthetic Rationality,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 45: 69–76. (Scholar)
- Townsend, Dabney (2001). Hume's Aesthetic Theory: Taste and Sentiment, London: Routledge. (Scholar)
- Wieand, Jeffrey (1983). “Hume's Two Standards of Taste,” Philosophical Quarterly, 34: 129–42. (Scholar)
- ––– (2003). “Hume's Real Problem,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 61: 395–98. (Scholar)
- Winegar, Reed (2011). “Good Sense, Art, and Morality in Hume's ‘Standard of Taste,’” Journal of Scottish Philosophy, 9: 17–35. (Scholar)
- Yanal, Robert J. (1991). “Hume and Others on the Paradox of Tragedy,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 49: 75–76. (Scholar)
- Zangwill, Nick (2001). “Hume, Taste, and Teleology,” in The Metaphysics of Beauty, Ithaca: Cornell University Press: 149–65. (Scholar)
Related Works on Hume and His Context
- Addison, Joseph, and Steele, Richard (1879). The Spectator, Alexander Chalmers (ed.), New York: D. Appleton. (Scholar)
- Coleman, Francis X. J. (1971). The Aesthetic Thought of the French Enlightenment, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. (Scholar)
- Dickie, George (1996). The Century of Taste, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Duncan, Elmer H. (1970). “The Ideal Aesthetic Observer: a Second Look”, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 29: 47–52. (Scholar)
- Hipple, Walter John Jr. (1967). The Beautiful, the Sublime, and the Picturesque in Eighteenth Century Aesthetic Theory, Carbondale, IL: The Southern Illinois University Press. (Scholar)
- Jones, Peter (1982). Hume's Sentiments: Their Ciceronian and French Context, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. (Scholar)
- Kivy, Peter (2003). The Seventh Sense: Francis Hutcheson & Eigteenth-Century British Aesthetics, 2nd ed., Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
- Savile, Anthony (1988). Aesthetic Reconstructions, Oxford: Basil Blackwell. (Scholar)
Generated Tue Apr 30 19:56:55 2013
