Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Logic of Belief Revision" by Sven Ove Hansson |
This is an automatically generated and experimental page
If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.
This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.
Citations annotated in gray refer to books or articles that are recommended for further introductory reading.
- Alchourrón, C.E., P. Gärdenfors, and D. Makinson, 1985, “On the Logic of Theory Change: Partial Meet Contraction and Revision Functions”, Journal of Symbolic Logic, 50: 510–530.
[The starting-point for all subsequent studies of belief revision.] (Scholar) - Alchourrón, C.E. and D. Makinson, 1981, “Hierarchies of Regulation and Their Logic”, in R. Hilpinen (ed.), New Studies in Deontic Logic, Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company, pp. 125–148. (Scholar)
- Alchourrón, C.E. and D. Makinson, 1982, “On the logic of theory change: Contraction functions and their associated revision functions”, Theoria, 48: 14–37. (Scholar)
- Arló-Costa, H., 1995, “Epistemic conditionals, snakes and stars”, in G. Crocco, L. Fariñas del Cerro, and A. Herzig (eds.), Conditionals: from Philosophy to Computer Science, Studies in Logic and Computation (Volume 5), Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Arló-Costa, H. and I. Levi, 1996, “Two notions of epistemic validity”, Synthese, 109: 217–262. (Scholar)
- Cantwell, J., 1997, “On the logic of small changes in hypertheories”, Theoria, 63: 54–89. (Scholar)
- –––, 1999, “Some logics of iterated revision”, Studia Logica, 7: 49–84.
[Iterated revision.] (Scholar) - Doyle, J., 1979, “A Truth Maintenance System”, Artificial Intelligence, 12: 231–272. (Scholar)
- Fagin, R., J.D. Ullman, and M.Y. Vardi, 1983, “On the semantics of updates in databases”, Proceedings of Second ACM SIGACT-SIGMOD, pp. 352-365. (Scholar)
- Fermé, E. and S.O. Hansson, 2001, “Shielded Contraction”, pp. 85–107 in H. Rott and M.-A. Williams (eds.), Frontiers of Belief Revision, Dordrecht: Kluwer. (Scholar)
- –––, 2011, “AGM 25
years. Twenty-Five Years of Research in Belief
Change”, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 40:
295–331.
[Overview of results from studies of belief revision in the AGM tradition.] (Scholar) - Fermé, Eduardo and Maurício D.L. Reis, 2011, “System of Spheres-based Multiple Contractions”, Journal of Philosophical Logic, in press. (Scholar)
- Fermé, E. and H. Rott, 2004, “Revision by comparison”, Artificial Intelligence, 157: 5–47. (Scholar)
- Fermé, E., K. Saez, and P. Sanz, 2003, “Multiple Kernel Contraction”, Studia Logica, 73: 183–195. (Scholar)
- Fuhrmann, A. and S.O. Hansson, 1994, “A Survey of Multiple Contraction”, Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 3: 39–74.
[Multiple contraction] (Scholar) - Gärdenfors, P., 1978, “Conditionals and Changes of Belief”, Acta Philosophica Fennica, 30: 381–404. (Scholar)
- –––, 1981, “An Epistemic Approach to Conditionals”, American Philosophical Quarterly, 18: 203–211. (Scholar)
- –––, 1986, “Belief Revision and the Ramsey Test for Conditionals”, Philosophical Review, 95: 81–93.
[The Ramsey Test.] (Scholar) - –––, 1987, “Variations on the Ramsey Test: More triviality results”, Studia Logica, 46: 319–325. (Scholar)
- –––, 1988, Knowledge in Flux. Modeling the Dynamics of Epistemic States, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[The AGM model.] (Scholar) - –––, 2011, “Notes on the history of ideas behind AGM”, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 40: 115–120. (Scholar)
- Gärdenfors, P., and D. Makinson, 1988, “Revisions of Knowledge Systems Using Epistemic Entrenchment”, Second Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Knowledge, pp. 83–95. (Scholar)
- Governatori, G. and A. Rotolo, 2010, “Changing legal systems: legal abrogations and annulments in Defeasible Logic”, Logic Journal of IGPL, 18: 157–194. (Scholar)
- Grove, A., 1988, “Two Modellings for Theory Change”, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 17: 157–170.
[The propositional model of belief change.] (Scholar) - Grüne-Yanoff, T. and S.O. Hansson, 2009, “From Belief Revision to Preference Change”, in T. Grüne-Yanoff and S.O. Hansson (eds.), Preference Change: Approaches from Philosophy, Economics and Psychology, Berlin: Springer, pp. 159–184. (Scholar)
- Hansson, S.O., 1989, “New Operators for Theory Change”, Theoria, 55: 114–132. (Scholar)
- –––, 1995, “Changes in Preference“, Theory and Decision, 38: 1–28. (Scholar)
- –––, 1999, A Textbook of Belief Dynamics. Theory Change and Database Updating, Dordrecht: Kluwer.
[Contains more details, and references, on most of the topics treated in this entry.] (Scholar) - –––, 2003, “Ten Philosophical Problems in Belief Revision”, Journal of Logic and Computation, 13: 37–49.
[Connections between belief revision and issues in informal philosophy.] (Scholar) - –––, 2010, “Multiple and Iterated Contraction Reduced to Single-Step Single-Sentence Contraction”, Synthese, 173: 153–177. (Scholar)
- Hansson, S.O., Fermé, E., Cantwell, J., and Falappa, M., 2001, “Credibility-Limited Revision”, Journal of Symbolic Logic, 66: 1581–1596.
[Non-prioritized belief revision.] (Scholar) - Hansson, S.O. and D. Makinson, 1997, “Applying Normative rules with restraint”, in M.L. Dalla Chiara, et al. (eds.), Logic and Scientific Method, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp 313–332. (Scholar)
- Harper, W., 1977, “Rational Conceptual Change”, PSA 1976, pp. 462–494. (Scholar)
- Katsuno, H., and A.O. Mendelzon, 1992, “On the Difference between Updating a Knowledge Base and Revising it”, in P. Gärdenfors (ed.), Belief Revision, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press pp. 183–203 (Scholar)
- Konieczny, S. and R. P. Pérez, 2008, “Improvement Operators“, Eleventh International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR08), pp. 177–186. (Scholar)
- Lang, J. and L. van der Torre, 2008, “From Belief Change to Preference Change”, in M. Ghallab, C.D. Spyropoulos, N. Fakotakis, and N.M. Avouris (eds.), ECAI 2008 – Proceedings of the 18th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Patras, Greece, July 21–25, 2008 (Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications: Volume 178), pp. 351–355. (Scholar)
- Levi, I., 1977, “Subjunctives, Dispositions and Chances”, Synthese, 34: 423–455. (Scholar)
- –––, 1980, The Enterprise of Knowledge, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1988, “Iteration of conditionals and the Ramsey test”, Synthese, 76: 49–81. (Scholar)
- –––, 1991, The Fixation of Belief and Its Undoing, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2004, Mild Contraction. Evaluating Loss of Information due to Loss of Belief, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
- Li, J., 1998, “A Note on Partial Meet Package Contraction”, Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 7: 139–142. (Scholar)
- Lindström, S. and W. Rabinowicz, 1991, “Epistemic entrenchment with incomparabilities and relational belief revision”, in A. Fuhrmann and M. Morreau (eds.), The Logic of Theory Change, Berlin: Springer, pp. 93–126. (Scholar)
- Makinson, D., 1997, “Screened Revision”, Theoria, 63 (1–2): 14–23. (Scholar)
- –––, 2003, “Ways of doing logic: what was new about AGM 1985”, Journal of Logic and Computation, 13: 5–15. (Scholar)
- Nayak, A. C., 1994, “Iterated Belief Change Based on Epistemic Entrenchment”, Erkenntnis, 41: 353–390. (Scholar)
- Reis, M.D.L. and E. Fermé, 2011, “Possible Worlds Semantics for Partial Meet Multiple Contraction”, Journal of Philosophical Logic, in press. (Scholar)
- Rott, H., 1986, “Ifs, though and because”, Erkenntnis, 25: 345–37. (Scholar)
- –––, 2001, Change, choice and inference. A study of belief revision and nonmonotonic reasoning, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
[The relation between belief change and rational choice.] (Scholar) - –––, 2009, “Shifting Priorities: Simple Representations for Twenty-seven Iterated Theory Change Operators”, in D. Makinson, J. Malinowski and H. Wansing (eds.) Towards Mathematical Philosophy (Trends in Logic: Volume 28), Berlin: Springer, pp. 269–296. (Scholar)
- Rott, H. and M. Pagnucco, 2000, “Severe Withdrawal (and Recovery)”, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 29: 501–547. (Scholar)
- Stalnaker, R., 1968, “A Theory of Conditionals”, in N. Rescher (ed.), Studies in Logical Theory, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 98–112. (Scholar)
Generated Tue May 14 07:44:16 2013
