Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Mohist Canons" by Chris Fraser
This is an automatically generated and experimental page
If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.
This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.
(Only works in English are listed.)
- Brindley, Erica F., 2020, “Capturing the World in Words:
Later Mohist Hemeneutic Theories on Language and
Disputation,” Early China, 43: 93–121. (Scholar)
- Chang, Chih-wei, 1998, “The Road Not Taken: The
Convergence/Divergence of Logic and Rhetoric in the Mohist
‘Xiaoqu’,” Tamkang Review, 28(3):
77–94 (Scholar)
- Chong, Chaehyun, 1999, “The Neo-Mohist Conception of Biàn (Disputation),” Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 26(1): 1–19 (Scholar)
- Chong, Chaehyun, 2018, “Why is Loving a Thief not the Same as Loving All Men for the Mohists?” Asian Philosophy, 28(3): 215–23. (Scholar)
- Fraser, Chris, 2003, “Introduction: Later Mohist Logic,
Ethics and Science After Twenty-Five Years,” in Later
Mohist Logic, Ethics and Science, reprint edition, Hong Kong:
Chinese University of Hong Kong Press (Scholar)
- –––, 2007a, “Language and Ontology in Early Chinese Thought,” Philosophy East and West, 57(4): 420–56 (Scholar)
- –––, 2007b, “More Mohist Marginalia: A
Reply to Makeham on Later Mohist Canon and Explanation B67,”
Journal of Chinese Philosophy and Culture, 2:
227–59 (Scholar)
- –––, 2011, “Knowledge and Error in Early Chinese Thought,” Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy, 10(2): 127–48 (Scholar)
- –––, 2012, “Truth in Moist Dialectics,” Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 39(3): 351–68 (Scholar)
- –––, 2013, “Distinctions, Judgment, and Reasoning in Classical Chinese Thought,” History and Philosophy of Logic, 34(1): 1–24 (Scholar)
- –––, 2018, “Rationalism and Anti-rationalism in Later Mohism and the Zhuangzi,” in Carine Defoort and Roger T. Ames (eds.), Having a Word with Angus Graham, Albany: SUNY Press, 251–274. (Scholar)
- –––, forthcoming, “Realism about Kinds in Later Mohism,” Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy, 20(1). (Pagination not yet available.) (Scholar)
- Fung, Yiu-Ming, 2012, “A Logical Perspective on the Parallelism in Later Moism,”Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 39(3): 333–350 (Scholar)
- Garrett, Mary, 1993, “Classical Chinese Conceptions of
Argumentation and Persuasion,” Argumentation and
Advocacy, 29(3): 105–15 (Scholar)
- Geaney, Jane, 1999, “A Critique of A. C. Graham’s
Reconstruction of the ‘Neo-Mohist Canons,’”
Journal of the American Oriental Society, 119(1):
1–11 (Scholar)
- –––, 2002, On the Epistemology of the Senses in Early Chinese Thought (Monographs of the Society for Asian and Comparative Philosophy 19), Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press (Scholar)
- Graham, A. C., 1989, Disputers of the Tao, LaSalle: Open Court (Scholar)
- –––, 2003, Later Mohist Logic, Ethics and Science, reprint edition, Hong Kong: Chinese University Press (original edition 1978) (Scholar)
- Hansen, Chad, 1983, Language and Logic in Ancient China, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan (Scholar)
- –––, 1987, Review of Graham, Later Mohist
Logic, Ethics and Science, Philosophy East and West,
37(2): 241–44
- –––, 1992, A Daoist Theory of Chinese Thought, Oxford: Oxford University Press (Scholar)
- Harbsmeier, Christoph, 1980, Review of Graham, Later Mohist
Logic, Ethics and Science, in Bulletin of the School of
Oriental and African Studies, 43(3): 617–19
- –––, 1993, “Conceptions of Knowledge in
Ancient China,” in H. Lenk and G. Paul (eds.),
Epistemological Issues in Classical Chinese Philosophy,
Albany, NY: SUNY Press (Scholar)
- –––, 1998, Science and Civilisation in
China, Vol. 7, Part 1: Language and Logic, Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press (Scholar)
- Hu Shih, 1922, The Development of the Logical Method in Ancient China, Shanghai: Commercial Press (Scholar)
- Johnston, Ian, 2000, “Choosing the Greater and Choosing the
Lesser: A Translation and Analysis of the Daqu and
Xiaoqu Chapters of the Mozi,” Journal of
Chinese Philosophy, 27(4): 375–407 (Scholar)
- Lau, D. C., 1952/3, “Some Logical Problems in Ancient China,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (New Series), 53: 189–204 (Scholar)
- Leslie, Donald, 1964, Argument by Contradiction in Pre-Buddhist Chinese Reasoning, Canberra: Australian National University (Scholar)
- Liu, Fenrong, and Jialong Zhang, 2010, “New Perspectives on Moist Logic,”Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 37(4): 605–21 (Scholar)
- Lucas, Thierry, 2005, “Later Mohist Logic, Lei, Classes, and Sorts”Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 32(3): 349–65 (Scholar)
- –––, 2012, “Definitions in the Upper Part of the Moist Canons,”Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 39(3): 386–403 (Scholar)
- Makeham, John, 1989, “Mohist Marginalia: A New
Interpretation and Translation of Canon and Explanation B 67 in the
New-Mohist Summa,” Papers on Far Eastern
History, 39: 167–76 (Scholar)
- –––, 1994, Name and Actuality in Early Chinese Thought, Albany: SUNY Press (Scholar)
- Paul, Gregor, 1993, “Equivalent Axioms of Aristotelian, or
Traditional European, and Later Mohist Logic,” in Hans Lenk and
Gregor Paul, eds., Epistemological Issues in Classical Chinese
Philosophy, Albany: SUNY Press, 119–136 (Scholar)
- Reding, Jean-Paul, 1986, “Analogical Reasoning in Early
Chinese Philosophy,” Asiatische Studien, 40(1):
40–56 (Scholar)
- –––, 1986, “Greek and Chinese Categories: A Reexamination of the Problem of Linguistic Relativism,” Philosophy East and West, 36(4): 349–374 (Scholar)
- Robins, Dan, 2010, “The Later Mohists and Logic,” History and Philosophy of Logic, 31(3): 247–285 (Scholar)
- –––, 2012, “Names, Cranes, and the Later
Mohists and Logic,” Journal of Chinese Philosophy,
39(3): 369–385 (Scholar)
- Saunders, Frank, Jr., 2014, “Semantics without Truth in Later Mohist Philosophy of Language,” Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy, 13(2): 215–229 (Scholar)
- Stephens, Daniel J., 2017, “Realism and Conventionalism in Later Mohist Semantics,” Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy, 16(4): 521–542 (Scholar)
- Sturgeon, Donald, 2013, Knowledge in Early Chinese Thought, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Hong Kong (Scholar)
- Willman, Marshall, 2010, “Logical Analysis and Later Mohist Logic: Some Comparative Reflections,” Comparative Philosophy, 1(1): 53–77 (Scholar)
- Yuan, Jinmei, 2012, “Analogical Propositions in Moist Texts,” Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 39(3): 404–423 (Scholar)
- Zhang, Chunpo, and Jialong Zhang, 1997, “Logic and Language
in Chinese Philosophy,” in Companion Encyclopedia of Asian
Philosophy, Brian Carr (ed.), London: Routledge. (Scholar)
- Zhang, Jialong, and Fenrong Liu, 2007, “Some Thoughts on
Mohist Logic,” in A Meeting of the Minds: Proceedings of the
Workshop on Logic, Rationality and Interaction, Johan van
Benthem, Shier Ju and Frank Veltman (eds.), London: College
Publications, 85–102 (Scholar)
- Zong, Desheng, 2000, “Studies of Intensional Contexts in Mohist Writings,” Philosophy East and West, 50(2): 208–229 (Scholar)