Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Mohist Canons" by Chris Fraser |
This is an automatically generated and experimental page
If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.
This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.
(Only works in English are listed.)
- Chang, Chih-wei, 1998, “The Road Not Taken: The Convergence/Divergence of Logic and Rhetoric in the Mohist ‘Xiaoqu’,” Tamkang Review, 28.3: 77–94 (Scholar)
- Chong, Chaehyun, 1999, “The Neo-Mohist Conception of Bian (Disputation),” Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 26.1: 1–19 (Scholar)
- Fraser, Chris, 2003, “Introduction: Later Mohist Logic, Ethics and Science After Twenty-Five Years,” in Later Mohist Logic, Ethics and Science, reprint edition, Hong Kong: Chinese University of Hong Kong Press (Scholar)
- Fraser, Chris, 2007a, “Language and Ontology in Early Chinese Thought,” Philosophy East and West, 57.4: 420–56 (Scholar)
- Fraser, Chris, 2007b, “More Mohist Marginalia: A Reply to Makeham on Later Mohist Canon and Explanation B67,” Journal of Chinese Philosophy and Culture, 2: 227–59 (Scholar)
- Garrett, Mary, 1993, “Classical Chinese Conceptions of Argumentation and Persuasion,” Argumentation and Advocacy , 29.3: 105–15 (Scholar)
- Geaney, Jane, 1999, “A Critique of A. C. Graham's Reconstruction of the ‘Neo-Mohist Canons,’” Journal of the American Oriental Society, 119.1: 1–11 (Scholar)
- –––, 2002, On the Epistemology of the Senses in Early Chinese Thought, Monographs of the Society for Asian and Comparative Philosophy 19, Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press (Scholar)
- Graham, A. C., 1989, Disputers of the Tao, LaSalle: Open Court (Scholar)
- –––, 2003, Later Mohist Logic, Ethics and Science, reprint edition, Hong Kong: Chinese University Press (original edition 1978) (Scholar)
- Hansen, Chad, 1983, Language and Logic in Ancient China, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan (Scholar)
- –––, 1987, Review of Graham, Later Mohist Logic, Ethics and Science, Philosophy East and West, 37.2: 241–44 (Scholar)
- –––, 1992, A Daoist Theory of Chinese Thought, Oxford: Oxford University Press (Scholar)
- Harbsmeier, Christoph, 1980, Review of Graham, Later Mohist Logic, Ethics and Science, in Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, 43.3: 617–19 (Scholar)
- –––, 1993, “Conceptions of Knowledge in Ancient China,” in H. Lenk and G. Paul (eds.), Epistemological Issues in Classical Chinese Philosophy, Albany, NY: SUNY Press (Scholar)
- –––, 1998, Science and Civilisation in China, Vol. 7, Part 1: Language and Logic, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Scholar)
- Hu Shih, 1922, The Development of the Logical Method in Ancient China, Shanghai: Commercial Press (Scholar)
- Johnston, Ian, 2000, “Choosing the Greater and Choosing the Lesser: A Translation and Analysis of the Daqu and Xiaoqu Chapters of the Mozi,” Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 27.4: 375–407 (Scholar)
- Lau, D. C., 1952/3, “Some Logical Problems in Ancient China,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (New Series), 53: 189–204 (Scholar)
- Leslie, Donald, 1964, Argument by Contradiction in Pre-Buddhist Chinese Reasoning, Canberra: Australian National University (Scholar)
- Makeham, John, 1989, “Mohist Marginalia: A New Interpretation and Translation of Canon and Explanation B 67 in the New-Mohist Summa,” Papers on Far Eastern History, 39: 167–176 (Scholar)
- –––, 1994, Name and Actuality in Early Chinese Thought, Albany: SUNY Press (Scholar)
- Paul, Gregor, 1993, “Equivalent Axioms of Aristotelian, or Traditional European, and Later Mohist Logic,” in Hans Lenk and Gregor Paul, eds., Epistemological Issues in Classical Chinese Philosophy, Albany: SUNY Press, 119–136 (Scholar)
- Reding, Jean-Paul, 1986, “Analogical Reasoning in Early Chinese Philosophy,” Asiatische Studien, 40.1, 40–56 (Scholar)
- –––, 1986, “Greek and Chinese Categories: A Reexamination of the Problem of Linguistic Relativism,” Philosophy East and West, 36.4, 349–374 (Scholar)
- Robins, Dan, 2010, “The Later Mohists and Logic,” History and Philosophy of Logic, 31.3, 247–285 (Scholar)
- Willman, Marshall, 2010, “Logical Analysis and Later Mohist Logic: Some Comparative Reflections,” Comparative Philosophy, 1.1, 53–77 (Scholar)
- Zhang, Chunpo, and Jialong Zhang, 1997, “Logic and Language in Chinese Philosophy,” in Companion Encyclopedia of Asian Philosophy, Brian Carr (ed.), London: Routledge. (Scholar)
- Zhang, Jialong, and Fenrong Liu, 2007, “Some Thoughts on Mohist Logic,” in A Meeting of the Minds: Proceedings of the Workshop on Logic, Rationality and Interaction, Johan van Benthem, Shier Ju and Frank Veltman (eds.), London: College Publications, 85–102 (Scholar)
- Zong, Desheng, 2000, “Studies of Intensional Contexts in Mohist Writings,” Philosophy East and West, 50.2, 208–229 (Scholar)
Generated Sun May 5 05:15:09 2013
