Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Neo-Kantianism" by Jeremy Heis
This is an automatically generated and experimental page
If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.
This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.
Works By Neo-Kantians
- Cassirer, Ernst, 1906, Das Erkenntnisproblem in der Philosophie und Wissenschaft der neueren Zeit. Erster Band, Berlin: Bruno Cassirer. (Scholar)
- –––, 1907a, Das Erkenntnisproblem in der Philosophie und Wissenschaft der neueren Zeit. Zweiter Band, Berlin: Bruno Cassirer. (Scholar)
- –––, 1907b, “Kant und die moderne Mathematik”, Kant-Studien, 12: 1–40. (Scholar)
- –––, 1910, Substanzbegriff und Funktionsbegriff. Untersuchungen über die Grundfragen der Erkenntniskritik, Berlin: Bruno Cassirer. Translated in Substance and Function & Einstein’s Theory of Relativity by Swabey and Swabey, Chicago: Open Court, 1923. (Scholar)
- –––, 1912, “Hermann Cohen und die Erneuerung der Kantischen Philosophie”, Kant-Studien 17: 252–273. Translated as “Hermann Cohen and the Renewal of Kantian Philosophy” by Lydia Patton, in NKR, pp. 221–235. (Scholar)
- –––, 1918, Kants Leben und Lehre, Berlin: Bruno Cassirer. Translated as Kant’s Life and Thought by James Haden, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1981. (Scholar)
- –––, 1921, Zur Einstein’schen
Relativitätstheorie, Berlin: Bruno Cassirer. Translated in
Substance and Function & Einstein’s Theory of
Relativity by Swabey and Swabey, Chicago: Open Court, 1923. (Scholar)
- –––, 1936, Determinismus und Indeterminismus in der modernen Physik, Göteborg: Göteborgs Högskolas Årsskrift 42. Translated as Determinism and Indeterminism in Modern Physics by O. Theodor Benfey, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1954. (Scholar)
- Cohen, Hermann, 1883, Das Prinzip der Infinitesimal-Methode und seine Geschichte, Berlin: Dümmler. Partially translated as The Principle of the Infinitesimal Method and its History by D. Hyder and L. Patton, in NKR, pp. 101–116. (Scholar)
- –––, 1885, Kants Theorie der Erfahrung, 2nd ed., Berlin: Dümmler. 1st ed: 1871. Partially translated as Kant’s Theory of Experience by D. Hyder in NKR, pp. 107–116. (Scholar)
- –––, 1898, “Biographisches Vorwort und
Einleitung mit kritischem Nachtrag”, in Friedrich Lange,
Geschichte des Materialismus und Kritik seiner Bedeutung in der
Gegenwart, 6th ed., Leipzig: Baedeker, pp.
xv–lxxvi. Second, expanded revision of “Einleitung”,
appears in the 7th ed. of Lange, Geschichte, 1902. Partially
translated (from the 9th ed., Leipzig: F. Brandstetter,
1914–5) as “Introduction, with Critical Remarks” by
Lydia Patton in NKR, pp. 117–136. (Scholar)
- –––, 1902, Logik der reinen Erkenntnis. Berlin: Bruno Cassirer. (Scholar)
- –––, 1904, System der Philosophie, Zweiter Teil: Ethik der reinen Willens, Berlin: Bruno Cassirer. (Scholar)
- –––, 1912, System der Philosophie, Dritter
Teil: Ästhetik der reinen Gefühls, Berlin: Bruno
Cassirer. (Scholar)
- –––, 1919, Die Religion der Vernunft aus den Quellen des Judentums, Leipzig: Fock. Translated as Religion of Reason: Out of the Sources of Judaism, by Simon Kaplan, New York: Frederick Unger, 1972. (Scholar)
- Lask, Emil, 1902, Fichtes Idealismus und die Geschichte, Tübingen und Leipzig: Mohr Siebeck. (Scholar)
- –––, 1908, “Gibt es einen Primat der praktischen Vernunft in der Logik?”, in Gesammelte Schriften I, Eugen Herrigel (ed.), Tübingen: Mohr, 1923, pp. 347–56. (Scholar)
- –––, 1911, Die Logik der Philosophie und die Kategorienlehre. Eine Studie über den Herrschaftsbereich der logischen Form, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. Translated as The Logic of Philosophy and the Doctrine of Categories, by Christian Braun, Free Association Books, 1999; partially translated by Arun Iyer in NKR, pp. 401–427. (Scholar)
- –––, 1912, Die Lehre vom Urteil, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. (Scholar)
- Luft, Sebastian (ed.), 2015 [NKR], The Neo-Kantian Reader, New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
- Natorp, Paul, 1881, Descartes’ Erkenntnistheorie. Eine
Studie zur Vorgeschichte des Kritizismus, Marburg: Elwert. (Scholar)
- –––, 1887, “Ueber objektive und subjektive Begründung der Erkenntniss”, Philosophische Monatshefte 23: 257–286. Translated as “On the Objective and Subjective Grounding of Knowledge”, by Phillips, L., Kolb, D., Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 12 (1981): 245–266. Reprinted in NKR, pp. 164–179. (Scholar)
- –––, 1903, Platos Ideenlehre: Eine Einführung in den Idealismus, Leipzig: Dürr. (Scholar)
- –––, 1905, Philosophische Propadeutik,
2nd ed., Marburg: Elwert. (Scholar)
- –––, 1910, Die logischen Grundlagen der exakten Wissenschaft, Leipzig and Berlin. Partially translated as The Logical Foundations of Exact Science, by Frances Bottenberg, in NKR, pp. 198–213. (Scholar)
- –––, 1911, Philosophie: Ihr Problem und ihre Probleme: Einführung in den kritischen Idealismus, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. (Scholar)
- –––, 1912a, “Kant und die Marburger Schule”, Kant-Studien 17: 193–221. Translated as “Kant and the Marburg School”, by Frances Bottenberg, in NKR, pp. 180–197. (Scholar)
- –––, 1912b, Allgemeine Psychologie nach
kritischer Methode, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. (Scholar)
- Rickert, Heinrich, 1888, Zur Lehre von der Definition, 2nd ed., Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1915. 1st ed: 1888. (Scholar)
- –––, 1902, Die Grenzen der naturwissenschaftlichen Begriffsbildung. Eine logische Einleitung in die historischen Wissenschaften, 6th improved ed., Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1929. 1st ed: 1902. Translated (abridged) as The Limits of Concept Formation in Natural Science, by Guy Oakes, Cambridge University Press, 1986; partially excerpted in NKR, pp. 331–383. Page citations are to the excerpts in NKR. (Scholar)
- –––, 1911, “Das Eine, die Einheit und die Eins. Bemerkungen zur Logik des Zahlbegriffs”, Logos, 2: 26–78. (Scholar)
- –––, 1915, Der Gegenstand der Erkenntnis. Eine Einführung in die Transzendentalphilosophie, 3rd ed., Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. 1st ed: 1892; 2nd ed: 1904; 4th and 5th: 1921. (Scholar)
- –––, 1934, “Kennen und Erkennen. Kritische Bemerkungen zum theoretischen Intuitionismus”, Kant-Studien, 39: 139–155. Translated as “Knowing and Cognizing” by Jon Burmeiser, in NKR, pp. 384–395. (Scholar)
- Windelband, Wilhelm, 1883, “Kritische oder Genetische Methode?” in Präludien, vol.2, 5th ed., pp. 99–135. Translated as “Critical or Genetic Method?” by Alan Duncan, in NKR, pp. 271–286. (Scholar)
- –––, 1891, Geschichte der Philosophie. Translated as A History of Philosophy: With Especial Reference to the Formation and Development of Its Problems and Conceptions, by James H. Tufts, London: Macmillan, 1893. (Scholar)
- –––, 1894, “Geschichte und Naturwissenschaft”, in Präludien, vol.2, 5th ed., pp. 136–160. Translated as “History and Natural Science”, by Guy Oakes, in NKR, pp. 287–298. (Scholar)
- –––, 1910, “Kulturphilosophie und transzendentaler Idealismus”, in Präludien, vol.2, 5th ed., pp. 279–294. Translated as “Philosophy of Culture and Transcendental Idealism”, by Alan Duncan, in NKR, pp. 317–324. (Scholar)
- –––, 1915, Präludien. Aufsätze und Reden zur Philosophie und ihrer Geschichte, 2 Vols., 5th expanded edition, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. 1st ed.: 1883. 2nd ed.: 1902; 3rd ed.: 1907; 4th ed.: 1911. (Scholar)
Other Primary Sources
- Dilthey, Wilhelm, 1883, Einleitung in die
Geisteswissenschaften, Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot. Translated
as Introduction to the Human Sciences, by R.A. Makkreel and
F. Rodi, in Selected Works, vol. I, Princeton: Princeton
University Press, 1989, pp. 47–242. (Scholar)
- –––, 1894, “Ideen über eine beschreibende und zergliedernde Psychologie”, reprinted in Gesammelte Schriften, vol.5, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1924, pp. 139–240. Translated as “Ideas for a Descriptive and Analytic Psychology”, by R.A. Makkreel and F. Rodi in Selected Works, vol. II, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010, pp. 115–210. (Scholar)
- Fischer, Kuno, 1860, Kants Leben und die Grundlagen seiner Lehre, Mannheim. (Scholar)
- Frege, Gottlob, 1884, Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik. Eine logisch-mathematische Untersuchung über den Begriff der Zahl, Breslau: Koebner. Translated as The Foundations of Arithmetic, by J.L. Austin, Oxford: Blackwell, 1955. (Scholar)
- Helmholtz, Hermann, 1867, Handbuch der physiologischen
Optik, Leipzig: Leopold Voss. Published in parts from 1856 to
1866, then published in toto in 1867 as Volume Nine of the
Allgemeinen Encyclopädie der Physik, ed. Gustav
Karsten. (Scholar)
- –––, 1868, “Über die Thatsachen,
welche der Geometrie zu Grunde liegen”, Nachrichten von der
Königl. Gesellschaft der Wissenschaft zu Göttingen, 9:
193–221. Translated as “On the Facts Underlying
Geometry”, by M.F. Lowe, in Epistemological Writings,
Robert Cohen and Yehuda Elkana (eds.), Boston: Reidel, 1977,
pp.39–58. (Scholar)
- –––, 1878, “Die Thatsachen in der
Wahrnehmung”, in Vorträge und Reden,
5th ed., vol.2, Braunschweig: Vieweg und Sohn, 1903.
Translated as “The Facts of Perception”, in Selected
Writings of Hermann von Helmholtz, edited, with an introduction,
by Russell Kahl, Middletown, Connecticut: Wesleyan University Press,
1971. (Scholar)
- Hertz, Heinrich, 1894, Die Prinzipien der Mechanik in neuem Zusammenhange dargestellt, Leipzig. Translated as Principles of Mechanics, by D.E. Jones and J.T. Walley, New York: Macmillan, 1899. (Scholar)
- Husserl, Edmund, 1900, Logical Investigations, translated by J. N. Findlay, London: Routledge 1973. (Scholar)
- Kant, Immanuel, 1781/7, Critique of Pure Reason, translated by Paul Guyer and Allen Wood., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999. (Scholar)
- –––, 1783, Prolegomena to Any Future
Metaphysics that will be able to Come Forward as Science,
translated by G. Hatfield, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
2004. (Scholar)
- –––, 1786, Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science, translated by Michael Friedman, in Theoretical Philosophy after 1781, Henry Allison and Peter Heath (eds.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002, pp. 171–269. (Scholar)
- –––, 1902– [Ak], Gesammelte Schriften,
ed. Königlich Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaft.
29 vols., Berlin: DeGruyter. (Scholar)
- Lange, Friedrich, 1866, Geschichte der Materialismus,
Iserlohn: J. Baedeker. Expanded 2nd ed.: 1873–75.
Translated as History of Materialism and Crticism of Its
Importance, by Ernest Chester Thomas, London: Trübner and
Co., 1880. (Scholar)
- Liebmann, Otto, 1865, Kant und die Epigonen. Eine kritische Abhandlung, Stuttgart: C. Schober. (Scholar)
- Lotze, Hermann, 1874, Logik. Drei Bücher vom Denken, vom Untersuchen und vom Erkennen, 2nd ed., Leipzig: S. Hirze, 1880. Translated as Logic, under the editorship of Bernard Bosanquet, Oxford: Clarendon, 1888. (Scholar)
- –––, 1856–64, Mikrokosmus: Ideen zur
Naturgeschichte und Geschichte der Menschheit, 3 vols., Leipzig:
Hirzel. Translated as Microcosmus: An Essay Concerning Man and His
Relation to the World, 2 vols., by E. Hamilton and E. E. C.
Jones, Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1885. (Scholar)
- Russell, Bertrand, 1903, Principles of Mathematics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Zeller, Eduard, 1862, “Ueber Bedeutung und Aufgabe der
Erkenntnistheorie”, Heidelberg: K. Groos. Reprinted in
Vorträge und Abhandlungen, Zweite Sammlung, Leipzig:
1877, pp. 479–526. Translated as “The Theory of Cognition:
Its Import and Problem”, Journal of Speculative
Philosophy 9(1), 1875: 33–48. (Scholar)
Secondary Sources Cited
- Anderson, R. Lanier, 2005, “Neo-Kantianism and the Roots of Anti-Psychologism”, British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 13(2): 287–323. doi:10.1080/09608780500069319 (Scholar)
- Beiser, Frederick C., 2011, The German Historicist Tradition, Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199691555.001.0001 (Scholar)
- –––, 2014a, After Hegel. German Philosophy 1840–1900, Princeton & Oxford: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2014b, The Genesis of Neo-Kantianism, 1796–1880, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198722205.001.0001 (Scholar)
- Emundts, Dina, 2008, “Emil Lask on Judgment and Truth”, Philosophical Forum 39(2): 263–281. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9191.2007.00295.x (Scholar)
- Friedman, Michael, 2000, A Parting of the Ways: Carnap, Cassirer, and Heidegger, Chicago/La Salle: Open Court. (Scholar)
- Heis, Jeremy, 2010, “‘Critical Philosophy Begins at the Very Point Where Logistic Leaves Off’: Cassirer’s Response to Frege and Russell”, Perspectives on Science 18(4): 383–408. doi:10.1162/posc_a_00015 (Scholar)
- –––, 2014, “Realism, Functions, and the A Priori: Ernst Cassirer’s Philosophy of Science” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 48: 10–19. doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2014.08.003 (Scholar)
- Makkreel, Rudolf, 2010, “Wilhelm Dilthey and the Neo-Kantians: On the conceptual distinction between Geisteswissenschaften and Kulturwissenschaften”, in Neo-Kantianism in Contemporary Philosophy, Rudolf Makkreel and Sebastian Luft (eds.), Bloomington/Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, pp. 253–271. (Scholar)
- Makkreel, Rudolf and Luft, Sebastian, 2010, “Dilthey and the
Neo-Kantians: the dispute over the status of the human and cultural
sciences”, in Routledge Companion to Nineteenth Century
Philosophy, Dean Moyar (ed.), New York: Routledge, pp.
554–597. (Scholar)
- Richardson, Alan, 2006, “‘The Fact of Science’
and Critique of Knowledge: Exact Science as Problem and Resource in
Marburg Neo-Kantianism”, in The Kantian Legacy in
Nineteenth-century Science, Michael Friedman and Alfred Nordmann
(eds.), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 211–226. (Scholar)
- Ryckman, Thomas, 2005, The Reign of Relativity: Philosophy in Physics, 1915–1925, New York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/0195177177.001.0001 (Scholar)
- Schnädelbach, Herbert, 1984, Philosophy in Germany: 1831–1933, translated by Eric Matthews, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
Selected Secondary Sources
- Beiser, Frederick C., 2013, Late German Idealism. Trendelenburg & Lotze, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199682959.001.0001 (Scholar)
- Chignell, Andrew (ed.), 2008, Philosophical Forum 39:2.
Special Issue on Neo-Kantianism. (Scholar)
- Biagioli, Francesca, 2014, “Hermann Cohen and Alois Riehl on Geometrical Empiricism”, HOPOS, 4(1): 83–105. doi:10.1086/675400 (Scholar)
- Friedman, Michael, 2005, “Ernst Cassirer and the Philosophy of Science”, in Continental Philosophy of Science, Gary Gutting (ed.), Oxford: Blackwell, pp.71–83. (Scholar)
- Gabriel, Gottfried, 1989, “Einleitung”, in Rudolf
Hermann Lotze, Logik. Drittes Buch. Vom Erkennen. Hamburg:
Meiner, pp. ix–xxvii (Scholar)
- Holzhey, Helmut, 1986, Cohen und Natorp, Basel/Stuttgart: Schwabe.
- Vol. I: Ursprung und Einheit. Die Geschichte der ‚Marburger Schule’ als Auseinandersetzung um die Logik des Denkens; (Scholar)
- Vol. 2: Der Marburger Neukantianismus in Quellen. Zeugnisse
kritischer Lektüre. Briefe der Marburger. Dokumente zur
Philosophiepolitik der Schule.
- Köhnke, Klaus Christian, 1991, The Rise of Neo-Kantianism: German Academic Philosophy between Idealism and Positivism, translated by R.J. Hollingdale, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Luft, Sebastian, 2013, “Einleitung des Herausgebers”,
in Paul Natorp, Allgemeine Psychologie nach kritischer
Methode, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, pp.
xi–xl (Scholar)
- –––, 2015, The Space of Culture: Towards a Neo-Kantian Philosophy of Culture (Cohen, Natorp, & Cassirer), Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198738848.001.0001 (Scholar)
- –––, 2015, “Editor’s
Introduction” in The Neo-Kantian Reader, Oxford:
Routledge, pp. xx–xxxi. (Scholar)
- Luft, Sebastian and Tyler Friedman (eds.), 2015, The Philosophy of Ernst Cassirer: A Novel Assessment, De Gruyter. (Scholar)
- Makkreel, Rudolf and Sebastian Luft (eds.), 2010, Neo-Kantianism in Contemporary Philosophy, Bloomington/Indianapolis: Indiana University Press. (Scholar)
- Munk, Reinier (ed.), 2005, Hermann Cohen’s Critical
Idealism. Dordrecht: Springer. (Scholar)
- Ollig, Hans-Ludwig, 1979, Der Neukantianismus. Stuttgart:
Metzler. (Scholar)
- Patton, Lydia, 2005, “The Critical Philosophy Renewed”, Angelaki, 10(1): 109–118. (Scholar)
- Pollok, Konstantin, 2010, “The ‘Transcendental
Method’: On the Reception of the Critique of Pure
Reason in Neo-Kantianism”, in Cambridge Companion to
Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, Paul Guyer (ed.),
Cambridge: Cambridge UP, pp. 346–379.
doi:10.1017/ccol9780521883863.016 (Scholar)
- Poma, Andrea, 1988 [1997], The Critical Philosophy of Hermann
Cohen (Filosofia critica di Hermann Cohen), translated
by John Denton, Albany, NY: SUNY Press. (Scholar)
- Sieg, Ulrich, 1994, Aufstieg und Niedergang des Marburger Neukantianismus. Die Geschichte einer philosophischen Schulgemeinschaft, Würzburg: K & N. (Scholar)
- Staiti, Andrea and Nicolas De Warren (eds.), 2015, New Approaches to Neo-Kantianism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9781139506717 (Scholar)
- Willey, Thomas A, 1978, Back to Kant. The Revival of
Kantianism in German Social and Historical Thought,
1860–1914, Detroit: Wayne State University Press. (Scholar)