Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Pragmatics" by Kepa Korta |
This is an automatically generated and experimental page
If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.
This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.
- Asher, Nicholas and Alex Lascarides, 1998, “The semantics and pragmatics of presupposition,” Journal of Semantics, 15: 239–299. (Scholar)
- Austin, John L., 1956, “A plea of excuses,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, LVII: 1–30. Reprinted in Austin 1961. (Presidential address to the Aristotelian Society in 1956. Austin expresses his views on ordinary language and ordinary language philosophy.)
- Austin, John L., 1961, “Performative Utterances,” in J.O. Urmson and G.J. Warnock (eds.), Philosophical Papers, Oxford: Clarendon. (Austin presents the distinction between performative and constative utterances.) (Scholar)
- Austin, John L., 1962a, How to Do Things with Words, Oxford: Clarendon. (Written version of Austin's William James Lectures delivered at Harvard in 1955. He starts with the distinction performative/constative, then he blurs it to ground the ‘general theory of speech acts.’) (Scholar)
- Austin, John L. 1962b, Sense and Sensibilia, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Reconstructed from his manuscript notes by G.J. Warnock. Austin's critique of sense data theories of perception.) (Scholar)
- Bach, Kent, 1987, “On Communicative Intentions: A Reply to Recanati,” Mind and Language, 2: 141–154. (Scholar)
- Bach, Kent, 1994, “Conversational Impliciture,” Mind and Language, 9: 124–162. (Influential paper on the explicit and the implicit, distinguishing ‘implicIture’ (with an ‘i’) from implicatures.) (Scholar)
- Bach, Kent, 1999a, “The semantics-pragmatics distinction: What is it and why it matters,” in Ken Turner (ed.), The Semantics/Pragmatics Interface from Different Points of View, 1999, pp. 65–84. (Scholar)
- Bach, Kent, 1999b, “The myth of conventional implicature,” Linguistics and Philosophy, 22: 262–83. (Against Grice's category of conventional implicatures.) (Scholar)
- Bach, Kent, 2001, “Semantically speaking,” in I. Kenesei and R. M. Harnish (eds.) 2001, Perspectives on Semantics, Pragmatics, and Discourse. A Festschrift for Ferenc Kiefer, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (Scholar)
- Bach, Kent, 2004, “Pragmatics and the Philosophy of Language,” in Horn and Ward (eds.) 2004, pp. 463–87. (Scholar)
- Bach, Kent and Robert M. Harnish, 1979, Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. (Influential effort to integrate speech act theory and the Gricean theory of conversational implicatures). (Scholar)
- Bach, Kent and Robert M. Harnish, 1992, “How performatives really work: A reply to Searle,” Linguistics and Philosophy 15: 93–110. (Scholar)
- Bar-Hillel, Yehoshua, 1954, “Indexical Expressions,” Mind 63: 359–79. Reprinted in Kasher 1998, vol. 1, pp. 23–40. (Scholar)
- Beaver, David, 2002, “Presupposition in DRT,” in David Beaver, Luis Casillas, Brady Clark, and Stefan Kaufmann, editors, The Construction of Meaning., Stanford: CSLI Publications, 2002. (Scholar)
- Blackburn, Simon, 1984, Spreading the word: groundings in the philosophy of language, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Blakemore, Diane, 1992, Understanding Utterances, Oxford: Blackwell. (Introduction to Relevance Theory.) (Scholar)
- Burton-Roberts, Noel, 1989a, “On Horn's dilemma: Presupposition and negation,” Journal of Linguistics, 25, 95–125. (Scholar)
- Burton-Roberts, Noel, 1989b, The limits to debate: A revised theory of semantic presupposition., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Burton-Roberts, Noel, 1999, “Presupposition-cancellation and metalinguistic negation: a reply to Carston,” Journal of Linguistics, 35, 347–64. (Scholar)
- Cappelen, Herman & Ernest Lepore, 2005, Insensitive Semantics. A Defence of Semantic Minimalism and Speech Act Pluralism, Oxford: Blackwell. (Scholar)
- Cappelen, Herman & Ernest Lepore (2007), “Unarticulated constituents and hidden indexicals. An abuse of context in semantics,” in M. O'Rourke and C. Washington (eds.), Situating Semantics: Essays on the Philosophy of John Perry, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press/Bradford Books, pp. 199-214. (Scholar)
- Carnap, Rudolf, 1942, Introduction to Semantics, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- Carston, Robyn, 1988, “Implicature, explicature, and truth-conditional semantics,” in R. Kempson (ed.), Mental Representations: The Interface between Language and Reality, pp. 155–81. Reprinted in Davis (ed.) 1991, pp. 33–51 and in Kasher (ed.) 1998, pp. 436–79. (Scholar)
- Carston, Robyn, 1998, “Negation, ‘presupposition’ and the semantics-pragmatics distinction,” Journal of Linguistics 34, 309–50. (Scholar)
- Carston, Robyn, 1999, “The semantics/pragmatics distinction: A view from Relevance Theory,” in Ken Turner (ed.), The Semantics/Pragmatics Interface from Different Points of View, 1999, 85–125. (Scholar)
- Carston, Robyn, 1999a, “Negation, ‘presupposition’ and metarepresentation: a reply to Noel Burton-Roberts,” Journal of Linguistics, 35, 365–89. (Scholar)
- Carston, Robyn, 2002, Thoughts and Utterances. The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication, Oxford: Blackwell. (Comprehensive and detailed presentation of Carston's relevance-theoretic approach to pragmatics.) (Scholar)
- Carston, Robyn, 2005, “Relevance Theory, Grice and the neo-Griceans: a response to Laurence Horn's ‘Current issues in neo-Gricean pragmatics.’” Intercultural Pragmatics 2/3: 303–319. (Scholar)
- Chapman, Siobhan, 2005, Paul Grice, philosopher and linguist. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. (Intellectual biography of Paul Grice.) (Scholar)
- Clark, Herbert H., 2003. Pointing and placing. In S. Kita (ed.), Pointing. Where language, culture, and cognition meet, Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 243–268. (Scholar)
- Davies, Martin, 1995, “Philosophy of Language,” in N. Bunnin and E. Tsui-James (eds.) The Blackwell Companion to Philosophy, Oxford: Blackwell, 90–139. (Scholar)
- Davis, Steven, 1991, Pragmatics. A reader, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Comprehensive collection of fundamental papers in pragmatics.) (Scholar)
- Donnellan, Keith, 1966, “Reference and Definite Descriptions,” Philosophical Review, 75: 281–304. Reprinted in A. P. Martinich (ed.), The Philosophy of Language, 2nd edition. New York: Oxford University Press, 1990, pp. 235–247. (Scholar)
- Escandell, Victoria, 1993, Introducción a la pragmática., Barcelona: Anthropos. (Updated edition 1996, in Barcelona: Ariel.) (Introduction to Pragmatics in Spanish.) (Scholar)
- Fotion, Nick, 1995, “Pragmatics,” in T. Honderich (ed.), The Oxford Companion to Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Garmendia, Joana, 2010, “Irony is Critical,” Pragmatics and Cognition, 18(2): 397–421. (Scholar)
- Gazdar, Gerald, 1979, Pragmatics: Implicature, Presupposition, and Logical Form, New York: Academic Press. (Scholar)
- Green, Georgia, 1989. Pragmatics and Natural Language Understanding, Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum. (Scholar)
- Grice, H. Paul, 1957, “Meaning,” Philosophical Review 66: 377–88. Reprinted in H. P. Grice, 1989, pp. 213–23. (Grice's seminal paper on M-intentions.) (Scholar)
- Grice, H. Paul, 1967a, “Logic and conversation,” in D. Davison and G. Harman (eds.) 1975, The Logic of Grammar, Encino: Dickenson, pp. 64–75. Also published in P. Cole and J.L. Morgan (eds.) 1975 Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts, New York: Academic Press, pp. 41–58. Reprinted in Grice, 1989, pp. 22–40. (Grice's celebrated article on the theory of implicatures, presented in 1967 at Harvard University as the William James Lectures, and mimeographed and widely circulated before its double publication in 1975.) (Scholar)
- Grice, H. Paul, 1967b, “Further notes on logic and conversation,” in P. Cole (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 9: Pragmatics, New York: Academic Press, 1978. Reprinted in Grice, 1989: 41–57. (Scholar)
- Grice, H. Paul, 1968, “Utterer's Meaning, Sentence-Meaning, and Word-Meaning,” Foundations of Language, 4: 225–242. Reprinted in H. P. Grice, 1989, pp. 117–137. (Scholar)
- Grice, H. Paul, 1969, “Utterer's Meaning and Intentions,” Philosophical Review 78: 147–177. Reprinted in H. P. Grice, 1989, pp. 86–116. (Scholar)
- Grice, H. Paul, 1981, “Presupposition and Conversational Implicature,” in P. Cole (ed.), Radical Pragmatics, New York: Academic Press, 1981, pp. 183–97. Reprinted in H. P. Grice, 1989, pp. 269–82. (Scholar)
- Grice, H. Paul, 1982, “Meaning Revisited,” in N. V. Smith (ed.), Mutual Knowledge, London: Academic Press, pp. 223–243. Reprinted in H. P. Grice, 1989, pp. 283–303. (Scholar)
- Grice, H. Paul, 1989, Studies in the Way of Words, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press. (Posthumously published volume collecting most Grice's papers on language, meaning and communication and some other topics.) (Scholar)
- Harman, Gilbert, 1974, “Review of Meaning by S. Schiffer,” Journal of Philosophy, 70: PAGES. (Scholar)
- Heim, Irene, 1992, “Presupposition projection and the semantics of attitude verbs,” Journal of Semantics, 9: 183–221. (Scholar)
- Horn, Laurence R., 1984, “Toward a new taxonomy of pragmatic inference: Q-based and R-based implicature,” in D. Schiffrin (ed.) Meaning, Form and Use in Context (GURT '84), Washington: Georgetown University Press, 1984, pp. 11–42. (Scholar)
- Horn, Laurence R., 1989, A Natural History of Negation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Horn, Laurence R., 1995, “Presupposition and implicature,” in Shalom Lappin, editor, The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory, Oxford: Blackwell, 299–319. (Scholar)
- Horn, Laurence R., 2004, “Implicature,” in Horn and Ward (eds.) 2004, pp. 3–28. (Scholar)
- Horn, Laurence R. and Gregory Ward (eds.), 2004, The Handbook of Pragmatics, Oxford: Blackwell. (Collection of papers by philosophers, linguists and psychologists addressing fundamental issues in pragmatics.) (Scholar)
- Kamp, Hans, 2001, “The importance of presupposition,” in Christian Rohrer and Antje Rossdeutscher (eds.), Linguistic Form and its Justification (Selected papers from the SFB 340), Stanford: CSLI Publications, 2001. (Scholar)
- Kaplan, David, 1989, “Demonstratives,” in J. Almog, J. Perry and H. Wettstein (eds.), Themes From Kaplan, New York: Oxford University Press, 1989. (Scholar)
- Karttunen, Lauri, 1973, “Presuppositions and compound sentences,” Linguistic Inquiry, 4: 169–93. (Scholar)
- Karttunen, Lauri, 1974, “Presupposition and linguistic context,” Theoretical Linguistics, 1: 3–44. (Scholar)
- Karttunen, Lauri and Stanley Peters, 1979, “Conventional Implicature,” in C. K. Oh and D. Dinnen (eds.), Syntax and Semantics 11: Presupposition, New York: Academic Press. (Scholar)
- Kasher, Asa (ed.), 1998, Pragmatics: Critical Concepts, (6 vols.) London: Routledge. (Extensive collection of fundamental ‘classic’ articles in pragmatics, with interesting postscripts by the authors in many cases.) (Scholar)
- Katz, Jerrold J., 1977, Propositional structure and illocutionary force, New York: Crowell. (Scholar)
- Kempson, Ruth M., 1988, “Grammar and Conversational Principles,” in F. Newmeyer (ed.) Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey, Vol. II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 139–163. (Scholar)
- Korta, Kepa and John Perry, 2006a, “Three demonstrations and a funeral,” Mind and Language, 21/2: 166–186. (Scholar)
- Korta, Kepa and John Perry, 2006b, “Varieties of Minimalist Semantics”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, LXXXIII(2): 451–459. (Scholar)
- Korta, Kepa and John Perry, 2007a, “Radical minimalism, moderate contextualism”. In Gerhard Preyer and Georg Peter (eds.), Content and Context. Essays on Semantics and Pragmatics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 94–111. (Scholar)
- Korta, Kepa and John Perry, 2007b, “How to Say Things with Words”. In Savas L. Tsohatzidis (ed.), John Searle's Philosophy of Language: Force, Meaning, and Thought., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 169–189. (Scholar)
- Korta, Kepa and John Perry, 2008, “The Pragmatic Circle,” Synthese, 165(3): 347–357. (Scholar)
- Korta, Kepa and John Perry, 2011, Critical Pragmatics. An Inquiry into Reference and Communication, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Lepore, Ernest and Robert van Gulick (eds.), 1991, John Searle and his critics, Oxford: Blackwell. (Scholar)
- Levinson, Stephen, 1983, Pragmatics, New York: Cambridge University Press. (One of the first systematic introductions to pragmatics.) (Scholar)
- Levinson, Stephen, 2000. Presumptive Meanings, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press/Bradford Books. (Monograph presenting Levinson's theory of utterance-type-meaning and generalized conversational implicatures.) (Scholar)
- Lycan, William, 1995, “Philosophy of Language,” in R. Audi (ed.), The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 586–589. (Scholar)
- Montague, Richard, 1968, “Pragmatics,” in R. Klibansky (ed.) Contemporary Philosophy – La philosophie contemporaine, vol. 1, Florence: La Nuova Italia Editrice, pp. 102–22. Reprinted in R. Thomason (ed.) 1974, Formal Philosophy: Selected papers of Richard Montague, New Haven: Yale Univ. Press, pp. 95–118. (Scholar)
- Morris, Charles, 1938, “Foundations of the theory of signs,” in O. Neurath, R. Carnap and C. Morris (ed.), International Encyclopaedia of Unified Science I, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 77–138. Reprinted in C. Morris 1971, Writings on the general theory of signs, The Hague: Mouton. (Scholar)
- Neale, Stephen, 1992, “Paul Grice and the Philosophy of Language,” Linguistics and Philosophy, 15: 509–559. (Thorough review of Grice's Studies in the way of words). (Scholar)
- Neale, Stephen, 2004, “This, that, and the other,” in M. Reimer and A. Bezuidenhout (eds.) Descriptions and Beyond, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 68–182. (Scholar)
- Perry, John, 1986, “Thought without representation,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Supplementary volume), 60: 137–51. Reprinted in Perry 2000, pp. 171–188. (Scholar)
- Perry, John, 2000, The Problem of the Essential Indexical and Other Essays, expanded edition, Stanford: CSLI Publications. (Scholar)
- Perry, John, 2001, Reference and Reflexivity, Stanford: CSLI Publications. (Translated into Spanish by Kepa Korta and Rodrigo Agerri, Referencialismo Crítico, Stanford: CSLI Publications, 2006). (Scholar)
- Perry, John (2007), “Situating Semantics: A Response,” in M. O'Rourke and C. Washington (eds.), Situating Semantics: Essays on the Philosophy of John Perry, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press/Bradford Books, pp. 507–571. (Scholar)
- Recanati, François, 1986, “On Defining Communicative Intentions,” Mind and Language, 1: 213–242. (Scholar)
- Recanati, François, 1989, “The Pragmatics of What is Said,” Mind and Language, 4: 295–329. (Scholar)
- Recanati, François, 2002, “Unarticulated Constituents,” Linguistics and Philosophy, 25: 299–345. (Scholar)
- Recanati, François, 2004, Literal meaning, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Recanati's defence of a contextualist view on meaning.) (Scholar)
- Reichenbach, Hans, 1947, Elements of Symbolic Logic., New York: Macmillan. (Scholar)
- Reimer, Marga and Anne Bezuidenhout, A., 2004, Descriptions and beyond, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Collection of papers on the semantics and pragmatics of descriptions and other singular terms.) (Scholar)
- Schiffer, Stephen, 1972, Meaning, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
- Searle, John, 1965, “What is a speech act?” in M. Black (ed.), Philosophy in America, Ithaca: Cornell University Press. (Scholar)
- Searle, John, 1969, Speech Acts: An essay in the philosophy of language, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Presentation of Searle's seminal development of speech act theory, based on his Oxford Ph.D. thesis on Sense and Reference.) (Scholar)
- Searle, John, 1975a, “A taxonomy of illocutionary acts,” in K. Gunderson (ed.), Language. Mind and Knowledge, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. VII, Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 344–69. Reprinted in J. Searle, Expression and Meaning. Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979, pp. 1–29. (He criticizes Austin's taxonomy of illocutionary acts and presents an alternative one.)
- Searle, John, 1975b, “Indirect Speech Acts,” in P. Cole and J. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics Vol. 3: Speech Acts, New York: Academic Press. Reprinted in J. Searle, Expression and Meaning. Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979, pp. 30–57. (He presents indirect illocutionary acts as a particular case of non-literality.) (Scholar)
- Searle, John R., 1989, “How Performatives Work,” Linguistics and Philosophy, 12: 535–58. (Scholar)
- Soames, Scott, 1989, “Presupposition,” in D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner (eds.) Handbook of Philosophical Logic, vol IV: Topics in the philosophy of language., Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 553–616. (Scholar)
- Sperber, Dan and Deirdre Wilson, 1986, Relevance: Communication and Cognition, Oxford: Blackwell. (2nd revised edition, 1995) (Main presentation of Relevance Theory.) (Scholar)
- Sperber, Dan and Deirdre Wilson, 1987, “Précis of Relevance: Communication and Cognition,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 10: 697–754. (Scholar)
- Sperber, Dan and Deirdre Wilson, 2002, “Pragmatics, modularity and mindreading,” Mind and Language, 17: 3–23. (Scholar)
- Sperber, Dan and Wilson, Deirdre (2005), “Pragmatics,” in F. Jackson and M. Smith (eds.) Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Analytic Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 468–501. (Scholar)
- Stalnaker, Robert, 1970, “Pragmatics,” Synthese 22. Also in Davidson and Harman (eds.) 1972, Semantics for Natural Language, Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 380–97. Reprinted in Kasher (ed.) 1998, Pragmatics: Critical Concepts, (6 vols.) London: Routledge, pp. 55–70. Also in Stalnaker 1999, ch. 1. (Scholar)
- Stalnaker, Robert, 1999, Context and Content., Oxford: Oxford University press. (Scholar)
- Stanley, Jason, 2000, “Context and Logical Form,” Linguistics and Philosophy, 23: 391–424. (Scholar)
- Stanley, Jason and Zoltan G. Szabo, 2000, “On quantifier domain restriction,” Mind and Language, 15: 219–61. (Scholar)
- Strawson, Peter F., 1964, “Intention and Convention in Speech Acts,” The Philosophical Review, 73: 439–460. Reprinted in Strawson 1971, pp. 149–69. (Scholar)
- Strawson, Peter F., 1971, Logico-linguistic Papers, London: Methuen. (Scholar)
- Travis, Charles, 1997, “Pragmatics,” in B. Hale and C. Wright (eds) 1997, A Companion to the Philosophy of Language, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 87–107. (Scholar)
- Tsohatzidis Savas L., 1994, Foundations of Speech Acts, London: Routledge. (Scholar)
Generated Wed May 15 06:47:20 2013
