Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Action at a Distance in Quantum Mechanics" by Joseph Berkovitz |
This is an automatically generated and experimental page
If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.
This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.
- Albert, D. (1992), Quantum Mechanics and Experience, Cambridge Mass.: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- Albert, D. and Loewer, B. (1988), “Interpreting the many-worlds interpretation”, Synthese 77, 195-213. (Scholar)
- ––– (1995), “Tails of Schrödinger's cat”, in R. Clifton (1996b), pp. 81-92. (Scholar)
- Alexander, H. G. (1956) (ed), The Leibniz-Clarke Correspondence, Manchester: Manchester University Press (new reprint, 1998). (Scholar)
- Arntzenius, F. (1992), “Apparatus independence in proofs of non-locality”, Foundations of Physics Letters 5, 517-525. (Scholar)
- ––– (1994), “Spacelike connections”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45, 201-17. (Scholar)
- ––– (1998), “Curiouser and curiouser: problems for modal interpretations of quantum mechanics”, in Dieks and Vermaas 1998, pp. 337-377. (Scholar)
- Bacciagaluppi, G. (1995), “A Kochen-Specker theorem in the modal interpretation of quantum mechanics”, International Journal of Theoretical Physics 34, 1205-1216. (Scholar)
- ––– (1996), “Topics in the modal interpretation of quantum mechanics”, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Cambridge. (Scholar)
- ––– (2000), “Delocalized properties in the modal interpretation of a continuous model of decoherence”, Foundations of Physics 30, 1431-1444. (Scholar)
- ––– (2002), “Remarks on space-time and Locality in Everett's interpretation”, in Placek and Butterfield (2002), pp. 105-122. (Scholar)
- Bacciagaluppi, G. and Hemmo, M. (1996), “Modal interpretations, decoherence and measurements”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 27, 239-277. (Scholar)
- Bacciagaluppi, G. and Dickson, M. (1999), “Dynamics for modal interpretations”, Foundations of Physics 29, 1165-1201. (Scholar)
- Ballentine, L. E. and Jarrett, J. (1997), “Bell's theorem: does quantum mechanics contradict relativity?”, American Journal of Physics 55, 785-792. (Scholar)
- Barnum, H., Caves, C. M., Finkelstein J., Fuchs, C. A. and Schack R. (2000), “Quantum probability from decision theory?”, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A 456, 1175-1182. (Scholar)
- Barrett, J. (1999), The Quantum Mechanics of Minds and Worlds, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Bassi, A. and Ghirardi, G. C. (1999), “More about dynamical reduction and the enumeration principle”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50, 719-734. (Scholar)
- ––– (2001), “Counting marbles: reply to Clifton and Monton”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52, 125-130. (Scholar)
- Bell, J. (1964), “On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox”, Physics 1, 195-200. Reprinted in Bell (1987), pp. 14-21. (Scholar)
- ––– (1966), “On the problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics”, Reviews of Modern Physics 38, 447-452. Reprinted in Bell (1987), pp. 1-13. (Scholar)
- ––– (1971), “Introduction to the hidden-variable question”, in B. Espagnat (ed), Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Proceedings of the International School of Physics ‘Enrico Fermi’, Academic Press, New York-London, pp. 171-181. Reprinted in Bell (1987), pp. 29-39. (Scholar)
- ––– (1975a), “The theory of local beables”, TH-2053-Cern. Reprinted in Epistemological Letters March 1976 and Bell (1987), pp. 52-62. (Scholar)
- ––– (1975b), “Locality in quantum mechanics: reply to critics”, Epistemological Letters, Nov. 1975, 2-6. Reprinted in Bell (1987), pp. 63-66. (Scholar)
- ––– (1976), “How to teach special relativity”, Progress in Scientific Culture, Vol. 1, No 2. Reprinted in Bell 1987b, pp. 67-80. (Scholar)
- ––– (1982), “On the impossible pilot wave”, Foundations of Physics 12, 989-999. Reprinted in Bell 1987, pp. 159-168. (Scholar)
- ––– (1987a), “Are there quantum jumps?”, In C. W. Kilmister (ed.) Schrödinger: Centenary of a Polymath, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 41-52. Reprinted in Bell (1987), pp. 201-212. (Scholar)
- ––– (1987b), Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Bene, G. and Dieks, D. (2002), “A perspectival version of the modal interpretation of quantum mechanics and the origin of macroscopic behavior”, Foundations of Physics 32, 645-671.
- Berkovitz, J. (1995a), “What econometrics cannot teach quantum mechanics?”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 26, 163-200. (Scholar)
- ––– (1995b), “Quantum Nonlocality: an analysis of the implications of Bell's theorem and quantum correlations for nonlocality”, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Cambridge. (Scholar)
- ––– (1998a), “Aspects of quantum non-locality I: superluminal signalling, action-at-a-distance, non-separability and holism”,Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 29, 183-222. (Scholar)
- ––– (1998b), “Aspects of quantum non-Locality II: superluminal causation and relativity”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 29, 509-545. (Scholar)
- ––– (2001), “On chance in causal loops”, Mind 110, 1-23. (Scholar)
- ––– (2002), “On causal loops in the quantum realm”, in T. Placek and J. Butterfield (2002), pp. 235-257. (Scholar)
- Berkovitz, J. and Hemmo, M. (2006a), “How to reconcile modal interpretations of quantum mechanics with relativity”, forthcoming in Philosophy of Science. [Earlier version available online.] (Scholar)
- ––– (2006b), “A modal interpretation in terms of relational properties”, in W. Demopoulos and I. Pitowsky (eds.), Physical Theory and Its Interpretation: Essays in Honor of Jeffrey Bub, Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science, New York: Springer, pp. 1-28.
- Bohm, D. (1951), Quantum Theory, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. (Scholar)
- ––– (1952), “A suggested interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of hidden variables. I & II”, Physical Review 85, 166-179 and 180-193.
- ––– (1953), “Proof that probability density approaches |ψ|2 in causal interpretation of the quantum theory”, Physical Review 89(2), 15. (Scholar)
- Bohm, D., and Bub, J. (1966), “A proposed solution of the measurement problem in quantum mechanics by a hidden variable theory”, Reviews of Modern Physics 38, 453-469.
- Bohm, D., and Hiley, B. J. (1993), The Undivided Universe: An Ontological Interpretation of Quantum Theory, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Scholar)
- Bohm, D., Schiller, R. and Tiomno, J. (1955), “A causal interpretation of the Pauli equation”, Supplemento al Nuovo Cimento 1, 48-66. (Scholar)
- Bub, J. (1992), “Quantum mechanics without the projection postulate”, Foundations of Physics 22, 737-754. (Scholar)
- ––– (1994), “How to interpret quantum mechanics”, Erkenntnis 41, 253-273. (Scholar)
- ––– (1997), Interpreting the Quantum World, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Bub, J. and Clifton, R (1996), “A uniqueness theorem for ‘no collapse’ interpretations of quantum mechanics”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 27, 181-217.
- Butterfield, J. N. (1989), “A space-time approach to the Bell inequality”, in Cushing and McMullin (1989), pp. 114-144. (Scholar)
- ––– (1992a), “Bell's theorem: what it takes”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 42, 41-83. (Scholar)
- ––– (1992b), “David Lewis meets John Bell”, Philosophy of Science 59, 26-43. (Scholar)
- ––– (1994), “Outcome dependence and stochastic Einstein locality”, in. D. Prawitz and D. Westerstähl (1994) (eds), Logic and Philosophy of Science in Uppsala, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 385-424. (Scholar)
- ––– (1995), “Words, minds and quanta”, Aristotelian Society Supplementary 69, 113-158. (Scholar)
- ––– (1996), “Whither the minds?”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47, 200-221. (Scholar)
- Butterfield, J. N., Fleming, G. N., Ghirardi, G. C. and Grassi, R. (1993), “Parameter dependence in dynamical models for state reductions”, International Journal of Theoretical Physics 32, 2287-2303. (Scholar)
- Cartwright, N. (1989), Nature's Capacities and Their Measurements, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
- Chang, H. and Cartwright, N. (1993), “Causality and realism in the EPR experiment”, Erkenntnis 38, 169-190. (Scholar)
- Clauser, J. F. and Horne, M. A. (1974), “Experimental consequences of objective local theories”, Physical Review D 10, 526-535. (Scholar)
- Clauser, J. F., Horne, M. A., Shimony, A., and Holt, R. A. (1969), “Proposed experiment to test local hidden-variable theories”, Physical Review Letters 23, 880-884. (Scholar)
- Clifton, R. K. (1991),“Nonlocality in quantum mechanics: signalling, counterfactuals, probability and causation”, Ph.D. thesis, Cambridge University. (Scholar)
- ––– (1995), “Independently motivating the Kochen-Dieks modal interpretation of quantum mechanics”, British Journal for Philosophy of Science 46, 33-57. (Scholar)
- ––– (1996a): “The properties of modal interpretations of quantum mechanics”, British Journal for Philosophy of Science 47 (1996): 371-398. (Scholar)
- ––– (ed.) (1996b), Perspectives on Quantum Reality: Non-Relativistic, Relativistic and Field-Theoretic, Dordrecht: Kluwer. (Scholar)
- ––– (2000), “The modal interpretation of algebraic quantum field theory”, Physics Letters A 271, 167-177. (Scholar)
- Clifton, R. K., Butterfield, J. N. and Redhead, M. L. G. (1990), “Nonlocal influences and possible worlds—a Stapp in the wrong direction”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 41, 5-58. (Scholar)
- Clifton, R. K. and Monton, B. (1999), “Losing your marbles in wavefunction collapse theories”, British Journal for Philosophy of Science 50, 697-717. (Scholar)
- ––– (2000), “Counting marbles with ‘accessible’ mass density: a reply to Bassi and Ghirardi”, British Journal for Philosophy of Science 51, 155-164. (Scholar)
- Cohen, I. B. (1978), Isaac Newton's Papers & Letters on Natural Philosophy, 2nd edition, Cambridge, Mass. and London. (Scholar)
- Costa de Beauregard, O. (1977), “Time symmetry and the Einstein paradox”, Il Nuovo Cimento 42B, 41-64. (Scholar)
- ––– (1979), “Time symmetry and the Einstein paradox – II”, Il Nuovo Cimento 51B, 267-279. (Scholar)
- ––– (1985), “On some frequent but controversial statements concerning the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations”, Foundations of Physics 15, 871-887. (Scholar)
- Cramer, J. (1980), “Generalised absorber theory and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox”, Physical Review D 22, 362-376. (Scholar)
- ––– (1986), “The transactional interpretation of quantum mechanics”, Reviews of Modern Physics 58, 647-687. (Scholar)
- Cushing, J. (1994), Quantum Mechanics: Historical Contingency and the Copenhagen Hegemony, Chicago: Chicago University Press. (Scholar)
- Cushing, J. and McMullin E., (eds) (1989), Philosophical Consequences of Quantum Theories: Reflections on Bell's Theorem, Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press. (Scholar)
- Cushing, J., Fine, A. and Goldstein, S. (eds) (1996), Bohmian Mechanics and Quantum Theory: An Appraisal, Dordrecht: Kluwer. (Scholar)
- Deutsch, D. (1999), “Quantum theory of probability and decisions”, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A 455, 3129-3137. (Scholar)
- Dewdney, C. Holland, P. R. and Kyprianidis, A. (1987), “A causal account of non-local Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen spin correlations”, Journal of Physics A 20(14), 4717-4732. (Scholar)
- De Witt, B. S. (1970), “Quantum Mechanics and Reality”, Physics Today 23, No. 9, 30-35. Reprinted in De Witt and Graham (1973), pp. 155-165. (Scholar)
- ––– (1971), “The many-universes interpretation of quantum mechanics”, in B. d'Espagnat (ed), Foundations of Quantum Mechanics: Proceedings of the International School of Physics ‘Enrico Fermi’, Course IL, New York: Benjamin, pp. 211-62. Reprinted in DeWitt and Graham (1973), pp. 167-218. (Scholar)
- DeWitt, B. S., and Graham, N. (eds) (1973), The Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
- Dickson, M (1993), “Stapp's theorem without counterfactual committments: Why it fails nonetheless”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 24, 791-814. (Scholar)
- ––– (1995), “Reply to H. Stapp's Comment”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 25, 965-966. (Scholar)
- ––– (1996a), “Is Bohm's theory local?”, in Clifton (1996b), pp. 321-330. (Scholar)
- ––– (1996b), “Determinism and locality in quantum systems”, Synthese 107, 52-82. (Scholar)
- ––– (1998),Quantum Chance and Nonlocality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Dickson, M. and Clifton, R. (1998), “Lorentz invariance in modal interpretations”, in Dieks and Vermaas 1998, pp. 9-47. (Scholar)
- Dieks, D. (1988) “The formalism of quantum mechanics: an objective description of reality?”, Annalen der Physik 7, 174-190. (Scholar)
- ––– (1989), “Resolution of the measurement problem through decoherence of the quantum state”, Physics Letters A 142, 439-446. (Scholar)
- Dieks, D. and Vermaas, P. (eds) (1998), The Modal Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, Dordrecht: Kluwer. (Scholar)
- Donald, M. (1990) “Quantum theory and the brain”, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A 427, 43-93. (Scholar)
- ––– (1995), “A mathematical characterization of the physical structure of observables”, Foundations of Physics 25, 529-571.
- Dowe, P. (2000), Physical Causation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Dürr, D., Goldstein, S. and Zanghì, N. (1992a), “Quantum equilibrium and the origin of absolute uncertainty”, J. of Statistical Physics 67, 843-907. (Scholar)
- ––– (1992b), “Quantum mechanics, randomness, and deterministic reality”, Physics Letters A 172, 6-12. (Scholar)
- ––– (1996), “Bohmian mechanics as the foundations of quantum mechanics”, in Cushing, Fine and Goldstein (1996), pp. 21-44. (Scholar)
- ––– (1997), “Bohmian mechanics and the meaning of the wave function”, in Cohen, R. S., Horne, M., and Stachel, J., (eds.), Experimental Metaphysics—Quantum Mechanical Studies for Abner Shimony, Volume One,Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 193, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. (Scholar)
- Earman, J. and Ruetsche, L. (2005), “Relativistic invariance and modal interpretations”, Philosophy of Science 72, 557-583. (Scholar)
- Eberhard, P. (1978), “Bell's theorem and different concepts of locality”, Nuovo Cimento 46B, 392-419. (Scholar)
- Einstein, A. (1948), “Quantenmechanik und wirklichkeit”, Dialectica 2, 320-324. (Scholar)
- Einstein, A., Podolsky, R. and Rosen, N. (1935), “Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?”, Physics Review 47, 777-780 (Scholar)
- Esfeld, M. (2001), Holism in Philosophy of Mind and Philosophy of Physics, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. (Scholar)
- Everett, H. (1957a), “On the foundations of quantum mechanics”, Ph.D. thesis, Princeton University. (Scholar)
- ––– (1957b), “‘Relative state’ formulation of quantum mechanics”, Reviews of Modern Physics 29, 454-62. Reprinted in DeWitt and Graham (1973), pp. 141-150. (Scholar)
- ––– (1973), “The theory of universal wave function”, in DeWitt and Graham (1973), pp. 3-140. (Scholar)
- Fine, A. (1981), “Correlations and physical locality”, in P. Asquith and R. Giere (eds), PSA 1980, vol. 2, East Lansing, Michigan: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 535-562. (Scholar)
- ––– (1982a), “Hidden variables, joint probability, and the Bell inequalities”, Physical Review Letters 48, 291-295. (Scholar)
- ––– (1982b), “Joint distributions, quantum correlations and commuting observables”, Journal of Mathematical Physics 23, 1306-1310. (Scholar)
- ––– (1986), The Shaky Game, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- ––– (1989a), “Correlations and efficiency: testing the Bell inequalities”, Foundations of Physics 19, 453-478. (Scholar)
- ––– (1989b), “Do correlations need to be explained?”, in Cushing and McMullin (1989), pp. 175-194. (Scholar)
- Fleming, G. N. (1989), “Lorentz invariant state reduction, and localization”, in A. Fine and M. Forbes (eds), PSA 1988, vol. 2, East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 112-126. (Scholar)
- ––– (1992), “The objectivity and invariance of quantum predictions”, in D. M. Hull, M. Forbes and Q. Okruhlik (eds), PSA 1992 Vol. 1, pp. 104-13, East Lansing: Philosophy of Science Association. (Scholar)
- ––– (1996) “Just how radical is hyperplane dependence?”, in Clifton (1996b), pp. 11-28. (Scholar)
- Fleming, G. N. and Bennett, H. (1989), “Hyperplane dependence in relativistic quantum mechanics”, Foundations of Physics 19, 231-267. (Scholar)
- Friedman, M. (1983), Foundations of Spacetime Theories: Relativistic Physics and Philosophy of Science. Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
- Frigg, R. (2003), “On the property structure of realist collapse interpretations of quantum mechanics and the so-called ‘counting anomaly’”, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 17, 43-57. (Scholar)
- Gell-Mann, M., and Hartle, J. B. (1990), “Quantum mechanics in the light of quantum cosmology”, in W. H. Zurek (ed), Complexity, Entropy, and the Physics of Information, Proceedings of the Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Sciences of Complexity, vol. VIII, Redwood City, CA: Addison-Wesley, pp. 425-458. (Scholar)
- Ghirardi, G. C. (1996), “Properties and events in a relativistic context: revisiting the dynamical reduction program”, Foundations of Physics Letters 9, 313-355. (Scholar)
- Ghirardi, G. C., Rimini, A. and Weber, T. (1980), “A general argument against superluminal transmission through the quantum mechanical measurement process”, Lettere Al Nuovo Cimento 27, 293-298.
- ––– (1986), “Unified dynamics for microscopic and macroscopic systems”, Physical Review D 34, 470-491. (Scholar)
- Ghirardi, G. C., Pearle, P. and Rimini, A. (1990), “Markov processes in Hilbert space and continuous spontaneous localisation of systems of identical particles”, Physical Review A 42, 78-89. (Scholar)
- Ghirardi, G. C., Grassi, R., Butterfield, J., and Fleming, G. N. (1993), “Parameter dependence and outcome dependence in dynamic models for state-vector reduction”, Foundations of Physics, 23, 341-364. (Scholar)
- Ghirardi, G. C., and Bassi, A. (1999), “Do dynamical reduction models imply that arithmetic does not apply to ordinary macroscopic objects”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50, 49-64. (Scholar)
- Ghirardi, G. C. and Grassi, R. (1994), “Outcome predictions and property attribution: the EPR argument reconsidered”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 25, 397-423. (Scholar)
- Gill, R. D. (2003), “On an argument of David Deutsch”, in M. Schürmann and U. Franz (eds), Quantum Probability and Infinite Dimensional Analysis, World Scientific, pp. 277-292. [Preprint available online.] (Scholar)
- Greaves, H. (2004), “Understanding Deutsch's probability in a deterministic multiverse”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 34, 423-456. (Scholar)
- Greenberger, D. M., Horne, M., and Zeilinger, A. (1989), “Going beyond Bell's theorem”, in M. Kafatos (ed), Bell's Theorem, Quantum Theory, and Conception of the Universe, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 69-72. (Scholar)
- Greenberger, D.M., Horne, M.A., Shimony, A., Zeilinger, A. (1990),“Bell's theorem without inequalities”, American Journal of Physics 58, 1131-1143. (Scholar)
- Healey, R. (1989), The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- ––– (1991) “Holism and nonseparability”, Journal of Philosophy 88, 393-421. (Scholar)
- ––– (1992), “Chasing quantum causes: how wild is the goose?”, Philosophical Topics 20,181-205. (Scholar)
- ––– (1994), “Nonseparable processes and causal explanation”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 25, 337-374. (Scholar)
- Hellman, G. (1982), “Stochastic Einstein locality and the Bell theorems”, Synthese 53, 461-503. (Scholar)
- Hemmo, M. (1996a), “Quantum mechanics without collapse: modal interpretations, histories and many worlds”, Ph.D. Thesis, Cambridge University. (Scholar)
- ––– (1996b), “Possible worlds in the modal interpretation”, Philosophy of Science, Supplement to Vol. 63, S330-S337. (Scholar)
- Hemmo, M. and Pitowsky, I. (2003), “Probability and nonlocality in many minds interpretations of quantum mechanics”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 54, 225-243. [Preprint available online.] (Scholar)
- ––– (2005), “Quantum probability and many worlds”, forthcoming in Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics. (Scholar)
- Henry, J. (1994), “Pray do not ascribe that notion to me…”, in J. E. Force and R. H. Popkin (eds), The Books of Nature and Scripture, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 123-147. (Scholar)
- Hesse, M. B. (1969), Forces and Fields: The Concept of Action At A Distance in the History of Physics, London: Thomas Nelson and Sons. (Scholar)
- Holland, P. R. (1993), The Quantum Theory of Motion, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Howard, D. (1985). “Einstein on locality and separability”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 16, pp. 171-201. (Scholar)
- ––– (1989), “Holism, separability and the metaphysical implications of the Bell experiments”, in Cushing and McMullin (1989), pp. 224-253. (Scholar)
- Hughes, R. I .G (1989), The Structure and Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, Cambridge Mass.: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- Jarrett, J. (1984), “On the physical significance of the locality conditions in the Bell arguments”, Noûs 18, 569-589. (Scholar)
- ––– (1989), “Bell's theorem: a guide to the implications”, in Cushing and McMullin (1989), pp. 60-79. (Scholar)
- Jones, M. and Clifton, R. (1993), “Against experimental metaphysics”, in P. A. French et al. (eds), Midwest Studies in Philosophy XVIII, Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 297-316. (Scholar)
- Jordan, T. F. (1983), “Quantum correlations do not transmit signals”, Physics Letters A 94, 264. (Scholar)
- Kastner, R. (2006), “Cramer's transactional interpretation and causal loop problems”, Synthese 150 no. 1, 1-14. [Earlier version available online.] (Scholar)
- Kim, J. (1978), “Supervenience and nomological incommensurables”, American Philosophical Quarterly 15, 149-156. (Scholar)
- Kochen, S. (1985), “A new interpretation of quantum mechanics”, in P. Lathi and P. Mittelstaedt (eds), Symposium on the Foundations of Modern Physics, Singapore: World Scientific, pp. 151-169.
- Kochen, S. and Specker, E. (1967), “The problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics”, Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics 17, 59-87. Reprinted in Hooker (1975), pp. 293-328. (Scholar)
- Krips, H. (1987), The Metaphysics of Quantum Theory, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
- Kronz, F. (1990a), “Jarrett completeness and superluminal signals”, in A. Fine, M. Forbes and L. Wessels (eds), PSA 1990, East Lansing: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 227-239. (Scholar)
- ––– (1990b), “Hidden locality, conspiracy and superluminal signals”, Philosophy of Science 57, 420-444. (Scholar)
- Langton, R. and Lewis, D. (1998), “Defining ‘intrinsic’”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 58, 333-45. Reprinted in D. Lewis, Papers in Metaphysics and Epistemology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 116-132. (Scholar)
- Laudisa, F. (1995), “Einstein, Bell and nonseparable realism”, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46, 309-329. (Scholar)
- Lewis, D. (1986), Philosophical Papers, Vol. 2, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Lewis, P. J. (1997), “Quantum mechanics, orthogonality and counting”, British Journal for Philosophy of Science 48, 313-328. (Scholar)
- ––– (2003a), “Four strategies for dealing with the counting anomaly in spontaneous collapse theories of quantum mechanics”, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 17 no. 2, 137-142. (Scholar)
- Lockwood, M. (1996a), “Many minds interpretation of quantum mechanics”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47, 159-188. (Scholar)
- ––– (1996b), “Many minds interpretations of quantum mechanics: replies to replies”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47, 445-461. (Scholar)
- Malament, D. (1996), “In defense of dogma: Why there cannot be a quantum mechanical theory of (localizable) particles?”, in Clifton 1996b, pp. 1-10. (Scholar)
- Maudlin, T. (1994), Quantum Nonlocality and Relativity, Oxford: Blackwell. (Scholar)
- ––– (1996), “Space-time in the quantum world” in Cushing, Fine and Goldstein (1996), pp. 285-307. (Scholar)
- McLaughlin, B. P. (1994), “Varieties of supervenience”, in E. Savellos and O. Yalchin (eds), Supervenience: New Essays, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 16-59. (Scholar)
- McMullin, E. (1989), “The explanation of distant action: historical notes”, in Cushing and McMullin (1989), pp. 272-302. (Scholar)
- Mermin, N. D. (1990), “Quantum mysteries revisited”, American Journal of Physics 58, 731-734. (Scholar)
- -––– (1998), Mermin, N.D., “What is quantum mechanics trying to tell us?”, American Journal of Physics 66, 753-767. (Scholar)
- Myrvold, W. (2002a), “Modal interpretations and relativity”, Foundations of Physics 32, 1773-1784. (Scholar)
- ––– (2002b), “On peaceful coexistence: is the collapse postulate incompatible with relativity?’ Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 33, 435-466. [Preprint available from the author.] (Scholar)
- Parker, D. (2003), “Finding your Marbles in wavefunction collapse theories”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 34, 607-620. (Scholar)
- Pearle, P. (1976), “Reduction of statevector by a nonlinear Schrödinger equation”, Physical Review D 13, 857-868. (Scholar)
- ––– (1989), “Combining stochastic dynamical state-vector reduction with spontaneous localization”, Physical Review A 39, 2277-2289. (Scholar)
- ––– (1996), “Wavefunction collapse models with nonwhite noise”, in Clifton (1996), pp. 93-109. (Scholar)
- Pitowsky, I. (1989), Quantum Probability—Quantum Logic, Lecture Notes in Physics 321, New York: Springer-Verlag. (Scholar)
- Placek, T. and J. Butterfield (eds) (2002), Non-locality and Modality, Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Research Workshop on Modality, Probability and Bell's Theorems, Kluwer. (Scholar)
- Price, H. (1984), “The philosophy and physics of affecting the past”, Synthese 16, 299-323. (Scholar)
- ––– (1994), “A neglected route to realism about quantum mechanics”, Mind 103, 303-336.
- ––– (1996), Time's Arrow and Archimedes’ Point. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- ––– (2006), “Decision-based probabilities in the Everett Interpretation: Comments on Wallace and Greaves”, a typescript. (Scholar)
- Redhead, M. L. G. (1987), Incompleteness, Nonlocality, and Realism, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
- ––– (1989), “Nonfactorizability, stochastic causality, and passion-at-a-distance”, in Cushing and McMullin (1989), pp. 145-153. (Scholar)
- Redhead, M. L. G. and La Rivière, P. (1997), “ The relativistic EPR argument”, in R. S. Cohen, M. Horne and J. Stachel (eds.), Potentiality, Entanglement and Passion-at-a-Distance (Kluwer, Dordrecht), pp. 207-215. (Scholar)
- Reichenbach, H. (1956), The Direction of Time, Berkley, Calif.: University of California Press. (Scholar)
- Salmon, W. (1998), Causality and Explanation, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Saunders, S. (1995), “Time, quantum mechanics and decoherence”, Synthese 102, 235-266. (Scholar)
- ––– (1998), “Time, quantum mechanics, and probability”, Synthese, 114, 405-444. [Preprint available from the author.] (Scholar)
- ––– (2004), “Derivation of the Born rule from operational assumptions”, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A, 460, 1-18. [Preprint available online.] (Scholar)
- ––– (2005), preprint of “What is probability?”, forthcoming in A. Elitzur, S. Dolev and N. Kolenda (eds), Quo Vadis Quantum Mechanics, New York: Springer. [Preprint available online.] (Scholar)
- Shimony, A. (1984), “Controllable and uncontrollable non-locality”, in S. Kamefuchi et al. (eds), Foundations of Quantum Mechanics in Light of the New Technology, Tokyo: Physical Society of Japan, pp. 225-230. Reprinted in Shimony (1993), pp. 130-139. (Scholar)
- ––– (1993), Search for Naturalistic Worldview, Vol. 2, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Spekkens, R. W. and Sipe, J. E. (2001a), “Non-orthogonal core projectors for modal interpretations of quantum mechanics”, Foundations of Physics 31, 1403-1430. (Scholar)
- ––– (2001b), “A modal interpretation of quantum mechanics based on a principle of entropy minimization”, Foundations of Physics 31, 1431-1464.
- Stairs, A. (1989), “Jarrett's locality Condition and Causal Paradox”, in A. Fine and M. Forbes (eds), PSA 1988, East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 318-325. (Scholar)
- Stapp, H. (1989), “Quantum nonlocality and the description of nature”, in Cushing and McMullin 1989, pp. 154-174. (Scholar)
- ––– (1990), “Comments on nonlocal influences and possible worlds”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 41, 59-72. (Scholar)
- ––– (1994), “Comments on "Stapp's theorem without counterfactuals"”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 25, 929-934. (Scholar)
- Suppes, P. and M. Zanotti (1976), “On the determinism of hidden variable theories with strict correlation and conditional statistical independence of observables”, in P. Suppes (1976) (ed), Logic and Probability in Quantum Mechanics, Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 445-455. (Scholar)
- Sutherland, R. I. (1983), “Bell's theorem and backwards-in-time causality”, International Journal of Theoretical Physics 22, 377-384. (Scholar)
- ––– (1998), “Density formalism for quantum theory”, Foundations of Physics 28 no. 7, 1158-1190. (Scholar)
- Teller, P. (1986a), “Relational holism and quantum mechanics”, British Journal for Philosophy of Science 37, 71-81. (Scholar)
- ––– (1986b) “Space-time as a physical quantity”, in R. Kargon and P. Achinstein (eds), Kelvin's Baltimore Lectures and Modern Theoretical Physics, MIT Press, pp. 425-448. (Scholar)
- ––– (1989), “Relativity, relational holism and quantum mechanics”, in Cushing and McMullin (1989), pp. 208-223. (Scholar)
- Vaidman, L., (1998), “On schizophrenic experiences of the neutron or why we should believe in the many-worlds interpretation of quantum theory”, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 12, 245-261. [Preprint available online.] (Scholar)
- Valentini, A. (1991a), “Signal locality, uncertainty and the subquantum H-Theorem. I”, Physics Letters A 156, 5-11. (Scholar)
- ––– (1991b), “Signal locality, uncertainty and the subquantum H-Theorem. II”, Physics Letters A 158, 1-8. (Scholar)
- ––– (1992), On the Pilot-Wave Theory of Classical, Quantum and Subquantum Physics, Ph.D. Thesis, International School of Advanced Studies, Trieste, Italy. (Scholar)
- ––– (1996), “Pilot-wave theory of fields, gravitation and cosmology”, in Cushing, Fine and Goldstein (1996), pp. 45-66. (Scholar)
- van Fraassen, B. C. (1973), “Semantic analysis of quantum logic”, in C. A. Hooker (ed), Contemporary Research in the Foundations and Philosophy of Quantum Theory, Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 180-213. (Scholar)
- ––– (1981), “A modal interpretation of quantum mechanics”, in E. Beltrametti and B. C. van Fraassen (eds), Current Issues in Quantum Mechanics, New York: Plenium, pp. 229-258.
- ––– (1982), “The charybids of realism”, Synthese 52, 25-38. Reprinted in Cushing and McMullin (1989), pp. 97-113. (Scholar)
- ––– (1991), Quantum Mechanics: An Empiricist View, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Vermaas, P. E. (1997), “A no-go theorem for joint property ascriptions in modal interpretations of quantum mechanics”, Physical Review Letters 78, 2033-2037.
- ––– (1999), A Philosopher's Understanding of Quantum Mechanics: Possibilities and Impossibilities of a Modal Interpretation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Vermaas, P. E. and Dieks, D. (1995) “The modal interpretation of quantum mechanics and its generalisation to density Operators”, Foundations of Physics 25, 145-158. (Scholar)
- Vink, J. (1993), “Quantum mechanics in terms of discrete beables”, Physical Review A 48, 1808-1818. (Scholar)
- Wallace, D. (2003), “Everettian Rationality: defending Deutsch's approach to probability in the Everett interpretation”, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 34, 415-438. [Preprint available online.] (Scholar)
- Winsberg, E. and Fine, A. (2003), “Quantum life: interaction, entanglement and separation”, Journal of Philosophy 100, 80-97. (Scholar)
Generated Wed May 8 03:26:30 2013
