Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Reductionism in Biology" by Ingo Brigandt |
This is an automatically generated and experimental page
If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.
This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.
- Allen, G.E. (1975), Life science in the twentieth century. New York: Wiley. (Scholar)
- Allchin, D. (2008), “Marxism and cell biology: can political perspective enrich science?” American Biology Teacher 70:303–305. (Scholar)
- Balzer, W., and C.M. Dawe (1986a), “Structure and comparison of genetic theories: (1) classical genetics”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 37:55–69. (Scholar)
- ––– (1986b), “Structure and comparison of genetic theories: (2) the reduction of character-factor genetics to molecular genetics”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 37:177–191. (Scholar)
- Beatty, J. (1990), “Evolutionary anti-reductionism: historical reflections”, Biology and Philosophy 5:197–210. (Scholar)
- Bechtel, W. (1986), “The nature of scientific integration”, in W. Bechtel (ed.), Integrating scientific disciplines, Dordrecht: M. Nijhoff, 3–52. (Scholar)
- ––– (1993), “Integrating sciences by creating new disciplines: the case of cell biology”, Biology and Philosophy 8:277–299. (Scholar)
- ––– (2006), Discovering cell mechanisms: the creation of modern cell biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- ––– (2008), Mental mechanisms: philosophical perspectives on cognitive neuroscience. London: Routledge. (Scholar)
- ––– (2010), “The downs and ups of mechanistic research: circadian rhythm research as an exemplar”, Erkenntnis 73:313–328. (Scholar)
- Bechtel, W., and A. Abrahamsen (2005), “Explanation: a mechanist alternative”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 36:412–441. (Scholar)
- ––– (2010), “Dynamic mechanistic explanation: computational modeling of circadian rhythms as an exemplar for cognitive science”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 41:321–333. (Scholar)
- ––– (2011), “Complex biological mechanisms: cyclic, oscillatory, and autonomous”, in C.A. Hooker (ed.), Philosophy of complex systems (Handbook of the philosophy of science, Vol. 12), Amsterdam: Elsevier / North Holland, 257–285. (Scholar)
- Bechtel, W., and A. Hamilton (2007), “Reduction, integration, and the unity of science: natural, behavioral, and social sciences and the humanities”, in T.A.F. Kuipers (ed.), General philosophy of science: focal issues, New York: Elsevier, 377–430. (Scholar)
- Bechtel, W., and R. Richardson (1993), Discovering complexity: decomposition and localization as strategies in scientific research. Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
- Beckner, M. (1959), The biological way of thought. New York: Columbia University Press. (Scholar)
- Bernard, C. (1957 [1865]), An introduction to the study of experimental medicine. Translated by H.C. Greene. New York: Dover Publications. (Scholar)
- Bickle, J. (2003), Philosophy and neuroscience: a ruthlessly reductive approach. Dordrecht: Kluwer. (Scholar)
- ––– (2006), “Reducing mind to molecular pathways: explicating the reductionism implicit in current cellular and molecular neuroscience”, Synthese 151:411–434. (Scholar)
- ––– (2008), “Real reduction in real neuroscience: metascience, not philosophy of science (and certainly not metaphysics!)”, in J. Hohwy and J. Kallestrup (eds.), Being reduced: new essays on reduction, explanation, and causation, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 34–51. (Scholar)
- Bishop, R.C. (2010), “Whence chemistry?” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 41:171–177. (Scholar)
- Bizarri, M., A. Cucina, F. Conti, and F. D'Anselmi (2008), “Beyond the oncogene paradigm: understanding complexity in cancerogenesis”, Acta Biotheoretica 56:173–196. (Scholar)
- Björkelund, H., L. Gedda, and K. Anderson (2011), “Comparing the epidermal growth factor interaction with four different cell lines: intriguing effects imply strong dependency of cellular context”, PLoS ONE 6:e16536. (Scholar)
- Boogerd, F.C., F.J. Bruggeman, J.-H.S. Hofmeyr, and H.V. Westerhoff (2007), “Towards philosophical foundations of Systems Biology: introduction”, in F.C. Boogerd, F.J. Bruggeman, J.-H.S. Hofmeyr, and H.V. Westerhoff (eds.), Systems biology: philosophical foundations, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 3–19. (Scholar)
- Boogerd, F.C., F.J. Bruggeman, C. Jonker, H. Looren de Jong, A. Tamminga, J. Treur, H.V. Westerhoff, and W. Wijngaards (2002), “Inter-level relations in computer science, biology, and psychology”, Philosophical Psychology 15: 463–471. (Scholar)
- Brandon, R. (1996), “Reductionism versus holism versus mechanism”, in Concepts and methods in evolutionary biology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 179–204. (Scholar)
- Brigandt, I. (2006), “Philosophical issues in experimental biology”, Biology and Philosophy 21:423–435. (Scholar)
- ––– (2010), “Beyond reduction and pluralism: toward an epistemology of explanatory integration in biology”, Erkenntnis 73:295–311. (Scholar)
- ––– (2011), “Philosophy of biology”, in S. French and J. Saatsi (eds.), The Continuum companion to the philosophy of science, London: Continuum Press, 246–267. (Scholar)
- ––– (2012), “Explanation in biology: reduction, pluralism, and explanatory aims”, Science & Education. doi:10.1007/s11191-011-9350-7 (Scholar)
- Brigandt, I., and A.C. Love (2010), “Evolutionary novelty and the evo-devo synthesis: field notes”, Evolutionary Biology 37:93–99. (Scholar)
- Bruggeman, F.J., H.V. Westerhoff, and F.C. Boogerd (2002), “BioComplexity: a pluralist research strategy is necessary for a mechanistic explanation of the ‘live’ state”, Philosophical Psychology 15:411–440. (Scholar)
- Burian, R.M. (1993), “Unification and coherence as methodological objectives in the biological sciences”, Biology and Philosophy 8:301–318. (Scholar)
- ––– (2004), “Molecular epigenesis, molecular pleiotropy, and molecular gene definitions”, History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 26:59–80. (Scholar)
- Byron, J.M. (2007), “Whence philosophy of biology?” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 58:409–422. (Scholar)
- Camazine, S., J.-L. Deneubourg, N.R. Franks, J. Sneyd, G. Theraulaz, and E. Bonabeau (2001), Self-organization in biological systems. Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
- Cassirer, E. (1950), The problem of knowledge: philosophy, science, and history since Hegel. Translated by W.H. Woglom and C. Hendel. New Haven: Yale University Press. (Scholar)
- Causey, R.L. (1972a), “Attribute-identities in microreductions”, The Journal of Philosophy 69:407–422. (Scholar)
- ––– (1972b), “Uniform microreductions”, Synthese 25:176–218. (Scholar)
- Coleman, P. (2007), “Frontier at your fingertips”, Nature 446:379. (Scholar)
- Coleman, W. (1977), Biology in the nineteenth century: problems of form, function, and transformation. New York: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Cooper, J.M. (1987), “Hypothetical necessity and natural teleology”, in A. Gotthelf and J.G Lennox (eds.), Philosophical issues in Aristotle's biology, New York: Cambridge University Press, 243–274. (Scholar)
- Couch, M.B. (2005), “Functional properties and convergence in biology”, Philosophy of Science 72:1041–1051. (Scholar)
- ––– (2009), “Multiple realization in comparative perspective”, Biology & Philosophy 24:505–519. (Scholar)
- Craver, C.F. (2005), “Beyond reduction: mechanisms, multifield integration and the unity of neuroscience”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 36:373–395. (Scholar)
- ––– (2006), “When mechanistic models explain”, Synthese 153:355–376. (Scholar)
- ––– (2007), Explaining the brain: mechanisms and the mosaic unity of neuroscience. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- ––– (2009), “Mechanisms and natural kinds”, Philosophical Psychology 22:575–594. (Scholar)
- Craver, C.F., and W. Bechtel (2007), “Top-down causation without top-down causes”, Biology and Philosophy 22:547–563 . (Scholar)
- Culp, S., and P. Kitcher (1989), “Theory structure and theory change in contemporary molecular biology”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 40:459–483. (Scholar)
- Darden, L. (2005), “Relations among fields: Mendelian, cytological and molecular mechanisms”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 36:349–371. (Scholar)
- ––– (2006), Reasoning in biological discoveries: essays on mechanisms, interfield relations, and anomaly resolution. New York: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Darden, L., and C.F. Craver (2002), “Strategies in the interfield discovery of the mechanism of protein synthesis”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 33:1–28. (Scholar)
- Darden, L., and N. Maull (1977), “Interfield theories”, Philosophy of Science 44:43–64. (Scholar)
- Davidson, D. (1970), “Mental events”, in L. Foster and J.W. Swanson (eds.), Experience and theory, London: Duckworth, 79–101. (Scholar)
- Delaporte, F., ed. (1994), A vital rationalist: selected writings from Georges Canguilhem. New York: Zone Books. (Scholar)
- Delehanty, M. (2005), “Emergent properties and the context objection to reduction”, Biology and Philosophy 20:715–734. (Scholar)
- Des Chene, D. (2001), Spirits and clocks: machine and organism in Descartes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. (Scholar)
- De Backer, P., D. De Waele, and L. van Speybroeck (2010), “Ins and outs of systems biology vis-à-vis molecular biology: continuation or clear-cut?” Acta Biotheoretica 58:15–49. (Scholar)
- Dizadji-Bahmani, F., R. Frigg, and S. Hartmann (2010), “Who's afraid of Nagelian reduction?” Erkenntnis 73:393–412. (Scholar)
- Dowell, J.L. (2006), “Formulating the thesis of physicalism: an introduction”, Philosophical Studies 131:1–23. (Scholar)
- Drabble, M. (2006), The sea lady: a late romance. Orlando, FL: Harcourt. (Scholar)
- Dupré, J. (1993), The disorder of things: metaphysical foundations of the disunity of science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- Elwick, J. (2007), Styles of scientific reasoning in the British life sciences: shared assumptions, 1820–1858. London: Pickering & Chatto. (Scholar)
- Fehr, C. (2004), “Feminism and science: mechanisms without reductionism”, Feminist Formations 16:136–156. (Scholar)
- Ferguson, N. (2007), “Capturing human behaviour”, Nature 446:733. (Scholar)
- Feyerabend, P.K. (1962), “Explanation, reduction and empiricism”, in H. Feigl and G. Maxwell (eds.), Scientific explanation, space, and time (Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 3), Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 28–97. (Scholar)
- ––– (1965a), “On the ‘meaning’ of scientific terms”, The Journal of Philosophy 62:266–274. (Scholar)
- ––– (1965b), “Problems of empiricism”, in R.G. Colodny (ed.), Beyond the edge of certainty: essays in contemporary science and philosophy, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 145–260. (Scholar)
- Fodor, J.A. (1974), “Special sciences (or: the disunity of sciences as a working hypothesis)”, Synthese 28:97–115. (Scholar)
- ––– (1975), The language of thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- ––– (1997), “Special sciences: still autonomous after all these years”, in J.A. Tomberlin (ed.), Mind, causation and world (Philosophical Perspectives, Vol. 11), Oxford: Blackwell, 149–163. (Scholar)
- Frost-Arnold, G. (2004), “How to be an anti-reductionist about developmental biology: response to Laubichler and Wagner”, Biology and Philosophy 19:75–91. (Scholar)
- Frydman, J. (2001), “Folding of newly translated proteins in vivo: the role of molecular chaperones”, Annual Review of Biochemistry 70:603–647. (Scholar)
- Gasper, P. (1992), “Reductionism and instrumentalism in genetics”, Philosophy of Science 59:655–670. (Scholar)
- Gerson, E.H. (1998), The American system of research: evolutionary biology, 1890–1950. Department of Sociology, University of Chicago, Ph.D. thesis. (Scholar)
- Gilbert, S.F., and S. Sarkar (2000), “Embracing complexity: organicism for the 21st century”, Developmental Dynamics 219:1–9. (Scholar)
- Gillett, C. (2002), “The dimensions of realization: a critique of the standard view”, Analysis 62:316–323. (Scholar)
- ––– (2003), “The metaphysics of realization, multiple realizability, and the special sciences”, The Journal of Philosophy 100:591–603. (Scholar)
- ––– (2010), “Moving beyond the subset model of realization: the problem of qualitative distinctness in the metaphysics of science”, Synthese 177:165–192. (Scholar)
- Glennan, S.S. (1996), “Mechanisms and the nature of causation”, Erkenntnis 44:49–71. (Scholar)
- Godfrey-Smith, P. (2008), “Reduction in real life”, in J. Hohwy and J. Kallestrup (eds.), Being reduced: new essays on reduction, explanation, and causation, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 52–74. (Scholar)
- Goldenfeld, N., and L.P. Kadanoff (1999), “Simple lessons from complexity”, Science 284:87–89. (Scholar)
- Goldenfeld, N., and C.R. Woese (2007), “Biology's next revolution”, Nature 445:369. (Scholar)
- Goldstein, K. (2000 [1934/1963]), The organism: a holistic approach to biology derived from pathological data in man. New York: Zone Books. (Scholar)
- Goudge, T.A. (1961), The ascent of life: a philosophical study of the theory of evolution. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. (Scholar)
- Grantham, T.A. (1999), “Explanatory pluralism in paleobiology”, Philosophy of Science 66:S223–S236. (Scholar)
- ––– (2004a), “Conceptualizing the (dis)unity of science”, Philosophy of Science 71:133–155. (Scholar)
- ––– (2004b), “The role of fossils in phylogeny reconstruction, or why is it difficult to integrate paleontological and neontological evolutionary biology?” Biology and Philosophy 19:687–720. (Scholar)
- ––– (2007), “Is macroevolution more than successive rounds of microevolution?” Palaeontology 50:75–85. (Scholar)
- Grene, M. (1987), “Hierarchies in biology”, American Scientist 75:504–510. (Scholar)
- Grene, M., and D. Depew (2004), The philosophy of biology: an episodic history. New York: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Griesemer, J. (2000), “Reproduction and the reduction of genetics”, in P. Beurton, R. Falk, and H.-J. Rheinberger (eds.), The concept of the gene in development and evolution: historical and epistemological perspectives, New York: Cambridge University Press, 240–285. (Scholar)
- ––– (2002), “Limits of reproduction: a reductionistic research strategy in evolutionary biology”, in M.H.V. Van Regenmortel and D.L. Hull (eds.), Promises and limits of reductionism in the biomedical sciences, New York: John Wiley & Sons, 211–231. (Scholar)
- ––– (2011), “Heuristic reductionism and the relative significance of epigenetic inheritance in evolution”, in B. Hallgrímsson and B.K. Hall (eds.), Epigenetics: linking genotype and phenotype in development and evolution, Berkeley: University of California Press, 14–40. (Scholar)
- Guimerà, R., and L.A. Nunes Amaral (2005), “Functional cartography of complex metabolic networks”, Nature 433:895–900. (Scholar)
- Harvey, W. (1981 [1651]), Disputations touching on the generation of animals. Translated by G. Whitteridge. Oxford: Blackwell. (Scholar)
- Hempel, C.G., and P. Oppenheim (1965 [1948]), “Studies in the logic of explanation”, in C.G. Hempel, Aspects of scientific explanation and other essays in the philosophy of science, New York: Free Press, 245–290. (Scholar)
- Hogenesch, J.B., and H.R. Ueda (2011), “Understanding systems-level properties: timely stories from the study of clocks”, Nature Reviews Genetics 12:407–416. (Scholar)
- Hooker, C.A. (1981), “Towards a general theory of reduction”, Dialogue 20:35–59, 201–236, 496–529. (Scholar)
- –––, ed. (2011), Philosophy of complex systems (Handbook of the philosophy of science, Vol. 10). Amsterdam: Elsevier / North Holland. (Scholar)
- Hoyningen-Huene, P. (1989), “Epistemological reductionism in biology: intuitions, explications, and objections”, in P. Hoyningen-Huene and F.M. Wuketits (eds.), Reductionism and systems theory in the life sciences. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 29–44. (Scholar)
- Hull, D. (1972), “Reductionism in genetics – biology or philosophy?” Philosophy of Science 39:491–499. (Scholar)
- ––– (1974), Philosophy of biological science. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. (Scholar)
- ––– (1976), “Informal aspects of theory reduction”, in R.S. Cohen and A. Michalos (eds.), Proceedings of the 1974 meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 653–670. (Scholar)
- ––– (1979), “Discussion: reduction in genetics”, Philosophy of Science 46:316–320. (Scholar)
- Hüttemann, A. (2004), What's wrong with microphysicalism? London: Routledge. (Scholar)
- Hüttemann, A., and A.C. Love (2011), “Aspects of reductive explanation in biological science: intrinsicality, fundamentality, and temporality”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 62:519–549. (Scholar)
- Jaeger, G., and S. Sarkar (2003), “Coherence, entanglement, and reductionist explanation in quantum physics”, in A. Ashtekar, R.S. Cohen, D. Howard, J. Renn, S. Sarkar, and A. Shimony (eds.), Revisiting the foundations of relativistic physics: Festschrift in honor of John Stachel, Dordrecht: Kluwer, 523–542. (Scholar)
- Kauffman, S.A. (1971), “Articulation of parts explanations in biology and the rational search for them”, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 8:257–272. (Scholar)
- ––– (1993), The origins of order: self-organization and selection in evolution. New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Keller, E.F. (2002), Making sense of life: explaining biological development with models, metaphors, and machines. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- Keller, E.F., and H.E. Longino, eds. (1996), Feminism and science. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Kellert, S.H. (1993), In the wake of chaos: unpredictable order in dynamical systems. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Kellert, S.H., H.E. Longino, and C.K. Waters (2006), “Introduction: the pluralist stance”, in S.H. Kellert, H.E. Longino, and C.K. Waters (eds.), Scientific pluralism (Minnesota Studies in Philosophy of Science, Vol. 19), Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, vii–xxix. (Scholar)
- Kemeny, J.G., and P. Oppenheim (1956), “On reduction”, Philosophical Studies 7:6–19. (Scholar)
- Kim, J. (1992), “Multiple realization and the metaphysics of reduction”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52:1–26. (Scholar)
- ––– (1998), Mind in a physical world. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- ––– (2005), Physicalism, or something near enough. Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
- Kimbrough, S.O. (1978), “On the reduction of genetics to molecular biology”, Philosophy of Science 46:389–406. (Scholar)
- Kincaid, H. (1997), Individualism and the unity of science: essays on reduction, explanation, and the special sciences. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield. (Scholar)
- Kirschner, M.W. (2005), “The meaning of systems biology”, Cell 121:503–504. (Scholar)
- Kitano, H. (2004), “Biological robustness”, Nature Reviews Genetics 5:826–837. (Scholar)
- Kitcher, P. (1984), “1953 and all that: a tale of two sciences ”, Philosophical Review 93:335–373.
- ––– (1999a), “The hegemony of molecular biology”, Biology and Philosophy 14:195–210. (Scholar)
- ––– (1999b), “Unification as a regulative ideal”, Perspectives on Science 7:337–348. (Scholar)
- Korn, R.W. (2002), “Biological hierarchies, their birth, death and evolution by natural selection”, Biology and Philosophy 17:199–221. (Scholar)
- ––– (2005), “The emergence principle in biological hierarchies”, Biology and Philosophy 20:137–151. (Scholar)
- Krohs, U., and W. Callebaut (2007), “Data without models merging with models without data”, in F.C. Boogerd, F.J. Bruggeman, J.-H.S. Hofmeyr, and H.V. Westerhoff (eds.), Systems biology: philosophical foundations, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 181–213. (Scholar)
- Kuhn, T. (1962), The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Kung, C., D.M. Kenski, S.H. Dickerson, R.W. Howson, L.F. Kuyper, H.D. Madhani, and K.M. Shokat (2005), “Chemical genomic profiling to identify intracellular targets of a multiplex kinase inhibitor”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 102:3587–3592. (Scholar)
- Lafrançois, T. (2006), Taxonomic resolution in ecology. Department of Philosophy, University of Minnesota, Ph.D. thesis. (Scholar)
- Lamarck, J.B. (1984 [1809]), Zoological philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Laubichler, M.D., and G.P. Wagner (2001), “How molecular is molecular developmental biology? A reply to Alex Rosenberg's Reductionism redux: computing the embryo”, Biology and Philosophy 16:53–68. (Scholar)
- Le Guyader, H. (2004), Étienne Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, 1772–1844: a visionary naturalist. Translated by M. Grene. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- LePoidevin, R. (2005), “Missing elements and missing premises: a combinatorial argument for the ontological reduction of chemistry”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56:117–134. (Scholar)
- Lennox, J.G. (1983), “Robert Boyle's defense of teleological inference in experimental science”, Isis 74:38–52. (Scholar)
- ––– (2001), Aristotle's philosophy of biology: studies in the origin of life science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- ––– (2006), “The comparative study of animal development: William Harvey's Aristotelianism”, in J.E.H. Smith (ed.), The problem of animal generation in early modern philosophy, New York: Cambridge University Press, 21–46. (Scholar)
- Lenoir, T. (1982), The strategy of life: teleology and mechanics in nineteenth century German biology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Levins, R., and R. Lewontin (1985), The dialectical biologist. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- Lillie, R.S. (1934), “The problem of vital organization”, Philosophy of Science 1:296–312. (Scholar)
- ––– (1942), “Living systems and non-living systems”, Philosophy of Science 9:307–322. (Scholar)
- ––– (1948), “Some aspects of theoretical biology”, Philosophy of Science 15:118–134. (Scholar)
- Lloyd, E.A. (2002), “Reductionism in medicine: social aspects of health”, in M.H.V. Van Regenmortel and D.L. Hull (eds.), Promises and limits of reductionism in the biomedical sciences, New York: John Wiley & Sons, 67–82. (Scholar)
- Loeb, J. (1912), The mechanistic conception of life: biological essays. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Longino, H.E. (1990), Science as social knowledge: values and objectivity in scientific inquiry. Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
- ––– (1996), “Cognitive and non-cognitive values in science: rethinking the dichotomy”, in L.H. Nelson and J. Nelson (eds.), Feminism, Science and the Philosophy of Science, Dordrecht: Kluwer, 39–58. (Scholar)
- ––– (2000), “Toward an epistemology for biological pluralism”, in R. Creath and J. Maienschein (eds.), Biology and epistemology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 261–286. (Scholar)
- ––– (2002), The fate of knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
- Look, B.C. (2006), “Blumenbach and Kant on mechanism and teleology in nature: the case of the formative drive”, in J.E.H. Smith (ed.), The problem of animal generation in early modern philosophy, New York: Cambridge University Press, 355–374. (Scholar)
- Looren de Jong, H. (2006), “Explicating pluralism: where the mind to molecule pathway gets off the track – reply to Bickle”, Synthese 151:435–443. (Scholar)
- Love, A.C. (2005). Explaining evolutionary innovation and novelty: a historical and philosophical study of biological concepts. Department of History and Philosophy of Science, University of Pittsburgh, Ph.D. thesis. (Scholar)
- ––– (2006), “Taking development seriously: who, what, where, why, when, how?” Biology and Philosophy 21:575–589. (Scholar)
- ––– (2007), “The hedgehog, the fox, and reductionism in biology”, Evolution 61:2736–2738. (Scholar)
- ––– (2008a), “Explaining evolutionary innovation and novelty: criteria of adequacy and multidisciplinary prerequisites”, Philosophy of Science 75:874–886. (Scholar)
- ––– (2008b), “Explaining the ontogeny of form: philosophical issues”, in A. Plutynski and S. Sarkar (eds.), The Blackwell companion to philosophy of biology, Malden: Blackwell, 223–247. (Scholar)
- ––– (2012), “Hierarchy, causation and explanation: ubiquity, locality and pluralism”, Interface Focus 2: 115–125. (Scholar)
- Love, A.C., I. Brigandt, K. Stotz, D. Schweitzer, and A. Rosenberg (2008), “More worry, less love?” Review symposium of Alex Rosenberg's Darwinian reductionism: or, how to stop worrying and love molecular biology. Metascience 17:1–26. (Scholar)
- Love, A.C. and A. Hüttemann (2011), “Comparing part-whole explanations in biology and physics”, in D. Dieks, W.J. Gonzalez, S. Hartmann, T. Uebel, and M. Weber (eds.), Explanation, prediction, and confirmation, Berlin: Springer, 183–202. (Scholar)
- Machamer, P., L. Darden, and C.F. Craver (2000), “Thinking about mechanisms”, Philosophy of Science 67:1–25. (Scholar)
- Magner, L.N. (1994), A history of the life sciences. New York: Marcel Dekker.
- Maienschein, J. (1991), Transforming traditions in American biology, 1880–1915. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. (Scholar)
- ––– (2000), “Competing epistemologies and developmental biology”, in R. Creath and J. Maienschein (eds.), Biology and epistemology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 122–137. (Scholar)
- Maull, N.L. (1977), “Unifying science without reduction”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 8:143–162. (Scholar)
- Mayr, E. (2004), What makes biology unique? Considerations on the autonomy of a scientific discipline. New York: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- McKirahan, R.D., Jr. (1978), “Aristotle's subordinate sciences”, British Journal for the History of Science 11:197–220. (Scholar)
- ––– (1992), Principles and proofs: Aristotle's theory of demonstrative science. Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
- Mikkelson, G.M. (2004), “Biological diversity, ecological stability, and downward causation”, in M. Oksanen and J. Pietarinen (eds.), Philosophy and biodiversity, New York: Cambridge University Press, 119–129. (Scholar)
- Mitchell, S.D. (2002), “Integrative pluralism”, Biology and Philosophy 17:55–70. (Scholar)
- ––– (2003), Biological complexity and integrative pluralism. New York: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- ––– (2009), Unsimple truths: science, complexity, and policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Morange, M. (2006), “Post-genomics, between reduction and emergence”, Synthese 151:355–360. (Scholar)
- Moss, L. (2002), What genes can't do. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Nagel, E. (1949), “The meaning of reduction in the natural sciences”, in R.C. Stauffer (ed.), Science and civilization, Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 99–138. (Scholar)
- ––– (1961), The structure of science: problems in the logic of scientific explanation. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World. (Scholar)
- Nagel, T. (1998), “Reductionism and antireductionism”, in G.R. Bock and J.A. Goode (eds.), The limits of reductionism in biology, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 3–10. (Scholar)
- Needham, J. (1936), Order and life. Cambridge and London: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Nickles, T. (1973), “Two concepts of intertheoretic reduction”, The Journal of Philosophy 70:181–201. (Scholar)
- Noble, D. (1998), “Reduction and integration in understanding the heart”, in G.R. Bock and J.A. Goode (eds.), The limits of reductionism in biology, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 56–72. (Scholar)
- ––– (2006), The music of life: biology beyond genes. New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- O'Malley, M.A., and O.S. Soyer (2012), “The roles of integration in molecular systems biology”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 43:58–68. (Scholar)
- Okasha, S. (2006), Evolution and the levels of selection. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Oppenheim, P., and H. Putnam (1958), “The unity of science as a working hypothesis”, in H. Feigl, M. Scriven and G. Maxwell (eds.), Concepts, theories, and the mind-body problem (Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 2), Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 3–36. (Scholar)
- Polanyi, M. (1968), “Life's irreducible structure”, Science 160:1308–1312. (Scholar)
- Popa, T.M. (2005), Aristotle on material dispositions in Meteorology IV. Department of Classics, University of Pittsburgh, Ph.D. thesis. (Scholar)
- Potochnik, A. (2011) “A Neurathian conception of the unity of science”, Erkenntnis 74:305–319. (Scholar)
- Potochnik, A., and B. McGill (2012) “The limitations of hierarchical thinking”, Philosophy of Science 79:120–$$140. (Scholar)
- Putnam, H. (1975), “Philosophy and our mental life”, in Mind, language, and reality (Philosophical papers, Vol. 2), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 291–303. (Scholar)
- Ramsey, J.L. (1997), “Molecular shape, reduction, explanation and approximate concepts”, Synthese 111:233–251. (Scholar)
- Richards, R.J. (2000), “Kant and Blumenbach on the Bildungstrieb: a historical misunderstanding”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 31:11–32. (Scholar)
- Repko, A.F. (2008), Interdisciplinary research: process and theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. (Scholar)
- Robert, J.S. (2004), Embryology, epigenesis, and evolution: taking development seriously. New York: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Robinson, W.S. (2005), “Zooming in on downward causation”, Biology and Philosophy 20:117–136. (Scholar)
- Rosenberg, A. (1978), “The supervenience of biological concepts”, Philosophy of Science 45:368–386. (Scholar)
- ––– (1985), The structure of biological science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- ––– (1994), Instrumental biology or the disunity of science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- ––– (1997), “Reductionism redux: computing the embryo”, Biology and Philosophy 12:445–470. (Scholar)
- ––– (2006), Darwinian reductionism: or, how to stop worrying and love molecular biology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Rueger, A. (2000), “Physical emergence, diachronic and synchronic”, Synthese 124:297–322. (Scholar)
- Rueger, A., and P. McGivern (2010), “Hierarchies and levels of reality”, Synthese 176:379–397. (Scholar)
- Ruse, M. (1971), “Reduction, replacement, and molecular biology”, Dialectica 25:39–72. (Scholar)
- ––– (1976), “Reduction in genetics”, in R.S. Cohen and A. Michalos (eds.), Proceedings of the 1974 meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 633–651. (Scholar)
- Russell, E.S. (1970 [1930]), The interpretation of development and heredity: a study in biological method. Freeport: Books for Libraries Press. (Scholar)
- Sachse, C. (2007), Reductionism in the philosophy of science. Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag. (Scholar)
- Salmon, W.C. (1971), Statistical explanation and statistical relevance. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. (Scholar)
- Salthe, S.N. (1985), Evolving hierarchical systems: their structure and representation. New York: Columbia University Press. (Scholar)
- ––– (1993), Development and evolution: complexity and change in biology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Sankey, H. (1994), The incommensurability thesis. Brookfield: Ashgate Publishing. (Scholar)
- Sarkar, S. (1992), “Models of reduction and categories of reductionism”, Synthese 91:167–194. (Scholar)
- ––– (1998), Genetics and reductionism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- ––– (2005 [1991]), “Reductionism and functional explanation in molecular biology”, in Molecular models of life: philosophical papers on molecular biology, Cambridge: MIT Press, 117–144. (Scholar)
- Scerri, E.R. (1994), “Has quantum chemistry been at least approximately reduced to quantum mechanics?” in D. Hull, M. Forbes, and R. Burian (eds.), Proceedings of the biennial meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, Vol. 1, East Lansing: Philosophy of Science Association, 160–170. (Scholar)
- ––– (2000), “The failure of reduction and how to resist disunity of the sciences in the context of chemical education”, Science & Education 9:405–425. (Scholar)
- Schaffner, K.F. (1967), “Approaches to reduction”, Philosophy of Science 34:137–147. (Scholar)
- ––– (1969), “The Watson-Crick model and reductionism”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 20:325–348. (Scholar)
- ––– (1974), “The peripherality of reductionism in the development of molecular biology”, Journal of the History of Biology 7:111–139. (Scholar)
- ––– (1976), “Reductionism in biology: prospects and problems”, in R.S. Cohen and A. Michalos (eds.), Proceedings of the 1974 meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 613–632. (Scholar)
- ––– (1993), Discovery and explanation in biology and medicine. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- ––– (1996), “Theory structure and knowledge representation in molecular biology”, in S. Sarkar (ed.), The philosophy and history of molecular biology: new perspectives, Dordrecht: Kluwer, 27–46. (Scholar)
- ––– (2006), “Reduction: the Cheshire cat problem and a return to roots”, Synthese 151:377–402. (Scholar)
- Singer, E.A., Jr. (1934), “Beyond mechanism and vitalism”, Philosophy of Science 1:273–295. (Scholar)
- ––– (1946), “Mechanism, vitalism, naturalism: a logico-historical study”, Philosophy of Science 13:81–99. (Scholar)
- Sklar, L. (1967), “Types of inter-theoretic reduction”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 18:109–124. (Scholar)
- Slack, J.M.W. (2006), Essential developmental biology, 2nd ed. Malden: Blackwell. (Scholar)
- Sloan, P.R., ed. (1992), Richard Owen: the Hunterian lectures in comparative anatomy, May and June 1837. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Smith, J.E.H., ed. (2006), The problem of animal generation in early modern philosophy. New York: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Sober, E. (1999), “The multiple realizability argument against reductionism”, Philosophy of Science 66:542–564. (Scholar)
- Soto, A.M., and C. Sonnenschein (2005), “Emergentism as a default: cancer as a problem of tissue organization”, Journal of Biosciences 30:103–119. (Scholar)
- ––– (2006), “Emergentism by default: a view from the bench”, Synthese 151:361–376. (Scholar)
- Stotz, K. (2006a), “Molecular epigenesis: distributed specificity as a break in the central dogma”, History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 28:527–544. (Scholar)
- –––. (2006b), “With ‘genes’ like that, who needs an environment? Postgenomics's argument for the ‘ontogeny of information’”, Philosophy of Science 73:905–917. (Scholar)
- Strevens, M. (2008), Depth: an account of scientific explanation. Harvard, Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- Sullivan, J.A. (2009), “The multiplicity of experimental protocols: a challenge to reductionist and non-reductionist models of the unity of neuroscience”, Synthese 167:511–539. (Scholar)
- Suppes, P. (1957), Introduction to logic. Princeton: Van Nostrand. (Scholar)
- Szostak, R. (2002), “How to do interdisciplinarity: integrating the debate”, Issues in Integrative Studies 20:103–122. (Scholar)
- ––– (2009). The causes of economic growth: interdisciplinary perspectives. Berlin: Springer. (Scholar)
- Tabery, J.G. (2004), “Synthesizing activities and interactions in the concept of a mechanism”, Philosophy of Science 71:1–15. (Scholar)
- Thompson, D'A.W. (1992 [1917/1942]), On growth and form. New York: Dover Publications. (Scholar)
- Valentine, J.W., and C.L. May (1996), “Hierarchies in biology and paleontology”, Paleobiology 22:23–33. (Scholar)
- Vance, R.E. (1996), “Heroic antireductionism and genetics: a tale of one science”, Philosophy of Science 63:S36–S45. (Scholar)
- van der Steen, W.J. (1993), “Towards disciplinary disintegration in biology”, Biology and Philosophy 8:259–275. (Scholar)
- van Fraassen, B. (2002), The empirical stance. New Haven: Yale University Press. (Scholar)
- von Bertalanffy, L. (1933), Modern theories of development: an introduction to theoretical biology. London: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Walter, S., and M. Eronen (2011), “Reduction, multiple realizability and levels of reality”, in S. French and J. Saatsi (eds.), The Continuum companion to the philosophy of science, London: Continuum Press,138–156. (Scholar)
- Waters, C.K (1990), “Why the antireductionist consensus won't survive the case of classical Mendelian genetics”, in A. Fine, M. Forbes, and L. Wessels (eds.), Proceedings of the biennial meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, Vol. 1, East Lansing: Philosophy of Science Association, 125–139. (Scholar)
- ––– (1994), “Genes made molecular”, Philosophy of Science 61:163–185. (Scholar)
- ––– (2000), “Molecules made biological”, Revue Internationale de Philosophie 4:539–564. (Scholar)
- ––– (2004), “What was classical genetics?” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 35:783–809. (Scholar)
- ––– (2007), “Causes that make a difference”, The Journal of Philosophy 104:551–579. (Scholar)
- ––– (2008), “Beyond theoretical reduction and layer-cake antireduction: how DNA retooled genetics and transformed biological practice”, in M. Ruse (ed.), The Oxford handbook of philosophy of biology, New York: Oxford University Press, 238–262. (Scholar)
- Weber, M. (2005), Philosophy of experimental biology. New York: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- ––– (2008), “Causes without mechanisms: experimental regularities, physical laws, and neuroscientific explanation”, Philosophy of Science 75:995–1007. (Scholar)
- Weiskopf, D.A. (2011), “The functional unity of special science kinds”, British Journal for Philosophy of Science 62:233–258. (Scholar)
- Westerhoff, H.V., and D.B. Kell (2007), “The methodologies of systems biology”, in F.C. Boogerd, F.J. Bruggeman, J.-H.S. Hofmeyr, and H.V. Westerhoff (eds.), Systems biology: philosophical foundations, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 23–70. (Scholar)
- Whitesides, G.M., and R.F. Ismagilov (1999), “Complexity in chemistry”, Science 284:89–92. (Scholar)
- Wilson, R.A. (2004), Boundaries of the mind: the individual in the fragile sciences: cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- ––– (2005), Genes and the agents of life: the individual in the fragile sciences: biology. New York: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Wilson, R.A., and C.F. Craver (2007), “Realization”, in P. Thagard (ed.), Philosophy of psychology and cognitive science (Handbook of the philosophy of science, Vol. 12), Amsterdam: Elsevier / North Holland, 31–54. (Scholar)
- Wimsatt, W.C. (1974), “Complexity and organization”, in K.F. Schaffner and R.S. Cohen (eds.), Proceedings of the 1972 meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 67–86. (Scholar)
- ––– (1976a), “Reductionism, levels of organization and the mind-body problem”, in G. Globus, G. Maxwell, and I. Savodnik (eds.), Consciousness and the brain: scientific and philosophic strategies, New York: Plenum Press, 205–267. (Scholar)
- ––– (1976b), “Reductive explanation: a functional account”, in R.S. Cohen and A. Michalos (eds.), Proceedings of the 1974 meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 671–710. (Scholar)
- ––– (1979), “Reductionism and reduction”, in P.D. Asquith and H.E. Kyburg (eds.), Current research in philosophy of science, East Lansing: Philosophy of Science Association, 352–377. (Scholar)
- ––– (1980), “Reductionistic research strategies and their biases in the units of selection controversy”, in T. Nickles (ed.), Scientific discovery: case studies, Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 213–259. (Scholar)
- ––– (1986), “Forms of aggregativity”, in A. Donagan, A.N. Perovich, Jr., and M.V. Wedin (eds.), Human nature and natural knowledge, Dordrecht: Reidel, 259–291. (Scholar)
- ––– (1997), “Aggregativity: reductive heuristics for finding emergence”, Philosophy of Science 64:S372–S384. (Scholar)
- ––– (2002), “Functional organization, analogy, and inference”, in A. Ariew, R. Cummins, and M. Perlman (eds.), Functions: new essays in the philosophy of psychology and biology, New York: Oxford University Press, 173–221. (Scholar)
- ––– (2006), “Reductionism and its heuristics: making methodological reductionism honest”, Synthese 151:445–475. (Scholar)
- ––– (2007), Re-engineering philosophy for limited beings: piecewise approximations to reality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- Winther, R.G. (2006), “Parts and theories in compositional biology”, Biology and Philosophy 21:471–499. (Scholar)
- ––– (2009), “Schaffner's model of theory reduction: critique and reconstruction”, Philosophy of Science 76:119–142. (Scholar)
- ––– (2011), “Part-whole science”, Synthese 178:397–427. (Scholar)
- Wolf, A., ed. (1966), The correspondence of Spinoza. New York: Russell & Russell. (Scholar)
- Woodger, J.H. (1929), Biological principles: a critical study. New York: Harcourt. (Scholar)
- Woodward, J. (2003), Making things happen: a theory of causal explanation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- ––– (1952), Biology and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Wouters, A. (2005), “The functions debate in philosophy”, Acta Biotheoretica 53:123–151. (Scholar)
- Wylie, A. (1999), “Rethinking unity as a ‘working hypothesis’ for philosophy of science: how archeologists exploit the disunities of science”, Perspectives on Science 7:293–317. (Scholar)
- Yashiro, K., H. Shiratori, and H. Hamada (2007), “Haemodynamics determined by a genetic programme govern asymmetric development of the aortic arch”, Nature 450:285–288. (Scholar)
- Zuckert, R. (2010), Kant on beauty and biology: an interpretation of the ‘Critique of Judgment’. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
Generated Tue May 7 10:21:09 2013
