Linked bibliography for the SEP article "The Unity of Science" by Jordi Cat
This is an automatically generated and experimental page
If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.
This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.
- Auyang, S., 1995, How is Quantum Field Theory Possible? New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Baigrie, B.S., 1996, Picturing Knowledge, Toronto: University of Toronto Press. (Scholar)
- Bailey, J., 1976, The Uses of Division: Unity and Disharmony
in Literature, New York: Viking Press. (Scholar)
- Balzer, W., and Moulines, C. U., 1996, eds., Structuralist
Theory of Science, Focal Issues, New Results, Berlin: de
Gruyter.
- Barnes, E., 1992, “Explanatory unification and scientific understanding”, Proceedings of the 1992 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, 1: 3–12. (Scholar)
- Batterman, R., 2002, The Devil in the Details, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Beatty, J., 1995, “The Evolutionary Contingency
Thesis”, in G. Wolders and J. Lennox, eds., Concepts,
Theories, and Rationality in the Biological Sciences, Pittsburgh:
Pittsburgh University Press, 83–97. (Scholar)
- Bechtel, W., 1987, “Psycholinguistics as a Case of Cross-Disciplinary Research”, Synthese, 72(3): 293–311. (Scholar)
- Bedau, M.H., 2003, “Downward Causation and Autonomy in Weak
Emergence”, in Bedau and Humphreys 2008, 155–188. (Scholar)
- Bedau, M.H. and P. Humphreys, eds., 2008, Emergence,
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Belot, G., 2005, “Whose devil? Which details?”, Philosophy of Science, 72: 128–153. (Scholar)
- Bertoloni Meli, D., 2006, Thinking with Objects: The
Transformation of Mechanics in the Seventeenth Century,
Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. (Scholar)
- Bishop, R., 2006, “Patching physics and chemistry together”, Philosophy of Science, 72: 710–722. (Scholar)
- Bishop, R.C., 2012, “Fluid Convection, Constraint, and Causation”, Interface Focus, 2: 4–12. (Scholar)
- Bishop, R. C. and Atmanspacher, H. 2006 “Contextual Emergence in the Description of Properties”, Foundations of Physics, 36: 1753–1777. (Scholar)
- Bokulich, A., 2008, Reexamining the Quantum-Classical Relation: Beyond Reductionism and Pluralism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Bowker, G. and S. Star, 1999, Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Boyer-Kassem, T., C. Mayo-Wilson and M. Weisberg (eds.), 2018, Scientific Collaboration and Collective Knowledge, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Breitenbach, A. and Y. Choi, 2017, “Pluralism and the unity
of science”, The Monist, 100: 391–405. (Scholar)
- Brigandt, I. 2010. “Beyond Reduction and Pluralism: Toward an Epistemology of Explanatory Integration in Biology.” Erkenntnis, 73(3): 295–311. (Scholar)
- Campbell, D., 1974, “”Downward causation“ in hierarchically organized biological systems”, in F.J. Ayala and T. Dobzhansky, eds., Studies in the Philosophy of Biology, Los Angeles: University of California Press, 179–186. (Scholar)
- Cartwright, N., 1983, How the Laws of Physics Lie, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1989, Nature’s Capacities and
their Measurement, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1999, The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2007, Hunting Causes and Using Them: Approaches in Philosophy of Economics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Cartwright, N., J. Cat, L. Fleck and Thomas Uebel, 1996, Otto
Neurath: Philosophy Between Science and Politics, Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Cat, J., 1998, “The physicists’ debates on unification
in physics at the end of the 20th century”, Historical
Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences, vol. 28. part 2:
253–300. (Scholar)
- –––, 2000, “Must the microcausality condition be interpreted causally? Beyond reduction and matters of fact”, Theoria, 37: 59–85. (Scholar)
- –––, 2012, “Essay Review, S. Kellert, H.
Longino and K. waters, eds., Scientific Pluralism”,
Philosophy of Science, 79: 317–325. (Scholar)
- –––, 2014, “Maxwell’s color
statistics: from reduction of visible errors to reduction to invisible
molecules”, Studies in History and Philosophy of
Science, 48: 60–75. (Scholar)
- –––, 2016, “The performative construction
of natural kinds: mathematical application as practice”, in C.
Kendig (ed.), Natural Kinds and Classification in Scientific
Practice, New York: Routledge, 87–105. (Scholar)
- –––, 2021, “The unity of science”, in T.E. Uebel and Ch. Limbeck-Lilienau (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Logical Empiricism, London: Routledge, 176–184. (Scholar)
- –––, 2022a, “The metaphysical elements of the unity of science”, Metascience, 31(1): 93–96. (Scholar)
- –––, 2022b, “Synthesis and similarity in
science: analogy in the application of mathematics and application of
mathematics to analogy”, in S. Wuppuluri and A.C. Grayling,
(eds.), Metaphors and Analogies in Sciences and Humanities,
Cham: Springer, Synthese Library, 115–145. (Scholar)
- Cat, J., and N.W. Best, 2023, “Atomic number and isotopy before nuclear structure: multiple standards and evolving collaboration of chemistry and physics”, Foundations of Chemistry, 35: 66–99. doi:10.1007/s10698-022-09450-x (Scholar)
- Causey, R., 1977, Unity of Science, Dordrecht: Reidel. (Scholar)
- Chakravartty, A., 2011, “Scientific realism and ontological relativity”, The Monist, 94: 157–180. (Scholar)
- Chang, H., 2012, Is Water H2O? Evidence, Realism and Pluralism, Dordrecht: Springer. (Scholar)
- Churchland, P.M., 1981, “Eliminative materialism and the propositional attitudes”, Journal of Philosophy, 78: 67–90. (Scholar)
- Churchland, P.S., 1986, Neurophilosophy: Toward a Unified Science of the Mind/Brain, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Cleland, C., 2002, “Methodological and epistemic difference between historical science and experimental science”, Philosophy of Science, 69 (September): 474–496. (Scholar)
- Collins, H. and R. Evans, 2007, Rethinking Expertise, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Comte, A. (1830–1842) Cours de Philosophie Positive, Paris: Littré. (Scholar)
- Craver, C.F., 2007, Explaining the Brain. Mechanisms and the Mosaic Unity of Neuroscience, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
- Crutchfield, J., 1994, “The calculi of emergence:
computation, dynamics and induction”, Physica D, 75:
11–54. (Scholar)
- Crutchfield J., Hanson J., 1997, “Computational mechanics of
cellular automata: an example”, Physica D, 103:
169–189. (Scholar)
- Cummings, J.N. and S. Kiesler, 2005, “Collaborative research
across disciplinary and organizational boundaries”, Social
Studies of Science, 35(5): 703–722. (Scholar)
- Cunningham, B., 2021, “A prototypical conceptualization for
mechanisms”, Studies in the History and Philosophy of
Science, 85: 79–91.
- Currie, A., 2019, Scientific Knowledge and the Deep Past: History Matters, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- D’Alembert, J. and D. Diderot, eds., 1751–1772,
Encyclopédie, ou dictionnaire raisonné des sciences,
des arts at des métiers, Paris: Plon. (Scholar)
- Da Costa and S. French, 2003, Science and Partial Truth: A Unitary Approach to Models and Scientific Reasoning, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Darden, L., 2006, Reasoning in Biological Discoveries: Essays on Mechanisms, Interfield Theories, and Anomaly Resolution, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Darden, L. and N. Maull, 1977, “Interfield theories”, Philosophy of Science, 44: 43–64. (Scholar)
- Daston, L. and P. Galison, 2007, Objectivity, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Davidson, D., 1969, “The individuation of events”, in N. Rescher, ed., Essays in Honor of Carl G. Hempel, Dordrecht: Reidel, 216–34. (Scholar)
- De Regt, H.W. and D. Dieks, 2005, “A contextual approach to
scientific understanding”, Synthese, 144:
137–170.
- Dupré, J., 1993, The Disorder of Things. Metaphysical Foundations of the Disunity of Science, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- Ellis, G.F.R., D. Noble and T. O’Connor, 2012,
“Top-down causation: an integrating theme within and across the
sciences?”, Interface Focus, (February 6), 2(1):
1–3. (Scholar)
- Elgin, C.Z., 1996, Considered Judgment, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1997, Between the Absolute and the Arbitrary, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. (Scholar)
- Ereshefsky, M., 1992, “Eliminative pluralism”, Philosophy of Science, 59: 671–90. (Scholar)
- Eronen, M.I., 2013, “No levels, no problems: downward causation in neuroscience”, Philosophy of Science, 80: 1042–1052. (Scholar)
- Feyerabend, P.K., 1962, “Explanation, reduction and empiricism”, in H. Feigl and G. Maxwell, eds., Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 3, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 28–97. (Scholar)
- Fodor, J., 1974, “Special sciences, or the disunity of science as a working hypothesis”, Synthese, 28: 77–115. (Scholar)
- Forster, M. and E. Sober, 1994, “How to tell when simpler,
more unified, or less ad hoc theories will provide more accurate
predictions”, British Journal for Philosophy of
Science, 45: 1–35. (Scholar)
- Friedman, M., 1974, “Explanation and scientific understanding”, Journal of Philosophy, 71: 5–19. (Scholar)
- –––, 1992, Kant and the Exact Sciences, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- Frost-Arnold, G., 2005, “The large scale structure of logical empiricism: unity of science and the elimination of metaphysics”, Philosophy of Science, 72(5): 826–838. (Scholar)
- Galison, P., 1997, Image and Logic, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1998, “The americanization of unity
of science”, Daedalus, 127 (Winter): 45–71. (Scholar)
- Galison, P. and D. Stump, eds.,1996, The Disunity of Science.
Boundaries, Contexts and Power, Stanford: Stanford University
Press. (Scholar)
- Garber, D., 1992, Descartes’ Metaphysical Physics,
Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Gaukroger, S., 2002, Descartes’ System of Natural Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Gavroglu, K and A. Simões, 2012, Neither Physics Nor Chemistry. A History of Quantum Chemistry, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Giere, R.N., 1999, Science Without Laws. Science and Its Conceptual Foundations, Chicago: Chicago University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2006, Scientific Perspectivism, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Gillett, C., 2016, Reduction and Emergence in Science and Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Glennan, S., 1996, “Mechanisms and the nature of causation”, Erkenntnis, 44: 49–71. (Scholar)
- Glymour, C., 1969, “On some patterns of reduction”, Philosophy of Science, 37(3): 340–353. (Scholar)
- Glynn, 2010, Elegance in Science: The Beauty of Simplicity, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Gorman, M.E., 2002, “Levels of expertise and trading zones.
A framework for multidisciplinary collaboration”, Social
Studies of Science, 32(5/6): 933–938. (Scholar)
- Graff, H.J., 2015, Undisciplining Knowledge.
Interdisciplinarity in the Twentieth Century, Baltimore: Johns
Hopkins University Press. (Scholar)
- Grantham, T., 2004, “Conceptualizing the (dis)unity of science”, Philosophy of Science, 71: 133–155. (Scholar)
- Grene, Marjorie (ed.), 1969a, Anatomy of Knowledge,
London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. (Scholar)
- ––– (ed.), 1969b, Toward a Unity of Knowledge, New York: International Universities Press. (Scholar)
- ––– (ed.), 1971, Interpretations of Life and Mind: Essays around the Problem of Reduction, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, New York: Humanities Press. (Scholar)
- Griffiths, P.E., 2022, “Why the
‘interdisciplinarity’ push in universities is actually a
dangerous antidisciplinarity trend”, The Conversation,
Feb. 16, 2022
[Griffiths 2022 available online]. (Scholar)
- Grünbaum, A. and W.C. Salmon, eds.,1988, The Limitations
of Deductivism, Berkeley: University of California Press. (Scholar)
- Grüne-Yanoff, T., 2016, “Interdisciplinary success without integration”, European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 6: 343–360. (Scholar)
- Hacking, I., 1983, Representing and Intervening, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1996, “The disunities of
science”, in P. Galison and D. Stump 1996. (Scholar)
- Halonen, I. and J. Hintikka, 1999,
“Unification—it’s magnificent but is it
explanation?”, Synthese, 120: 27–47. (Scholar)
- Hardcastle, G.L., 2003, “Debabelizing science: the Harvard
Science of Science discussion group 1940–41”, in G.L.
Hardcastle and A. Richardson, eds., 2003, Logical Empiricism in
North America, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.,
170–196. (Scholar)
- Healey, R., 1991, “Holism and nonseparability”, Journal of Philosophy, 88: 393–421. (Scholar)
- Haug, M.C., 2010, “Realization, determination, and mechanisms”, Philosophical Studies, 150: 313–330. (Scholar)
- Hoefer, C., 2003, “For fundamentalism”, Philosophy of Science, 70: 1401–1412. (Scholar)
- Holton, G., 1973, The Thematic Origins of Scientific
Thought, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1993, “The Vienna Circle in exile: An
eye-witness report”, in F. Stadler, ed., Yearbook: Vienna
Circle Lectures, Boston: Kluwer. (Scholar)
- Holton, G., H. Chang and E. Jurkowitz, 1996, “How a
scientific discovery is made: a case history”, American
Scientist, 84(4): 364–375. (Scholar)
- Howhy, J., 2003, “Capacities, explanation and the
possibility of disunity”, International Studies in the
Philosophy of Science, 17(2): 179–190. (Scholar)
- Hoyningen-Huene, P., 2013, Systematicity, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Hubbs, G., M. O‘Rourke and S.H. Orzack (eds.), 2020, The
Toolbox Dialogue Initiative: The Power of Cross-Disciplinary
Practice, New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
- Hull, D., 1988, Science as Progress, Chicago: University
of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Humphreys, P., 1997, “How properties emerge”, Philosophy of Science, 64: 1–17. (Scholar)
- –––, 2004, Extending Ourselves: Computational Science, Empiricism, and Scientific Method, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2008, “Synchronic and diachronic emergence”, Minds & Machines, 18: 431–442 (Scholar)
- Humphreys, P., Huneman P., 2008, “Dynamical Emergence and Computation: an introduction”, Minds & Machines, 18: 425–430. (Scholar)
- Huneman, P., 2008a, “Emergence and adaptation”.Minds and Machines, 18: 493–520. (Scholar)
- Huneman, P., 2008b, Combinatorial vs. computational emergence:
emergence made ontological?, Philosophy of science, 75:
595—607. (Scholar)
- Huneman, P., 2010. “Determinism and predictability: lessons
from computational emergence”, Synthese, 185(2):
195–214. (Scholar)
- Jacobs, J.A., 2013, In Defense of Disciplines.
Interdisciplinarity and Specialization in Research University,
Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Janiak, A., Newton as Philosopher, Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
- Jones, C. and P. Galison, eds., 1998, Picturing Science,
Producing Art, London: Routledge. (Scholar)
- Kaiser, D., 2005, Drawing Theories Apart: The Dispersion of
Feynman Diagrams in Postwar Physics, Chicago: University of
Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Kincaid, H., 1997, Individualism and the Unity of Science, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield. (Scholar)
- Karaca, K., 2012, “Kitcher’s explanatory unification,
Kaluza-Klein theories, and the normative aspect of higher dimensional
unification in Physics”, British Journal for the Philosophy
of Science, 63(3): 287–312. (Scholar)
- Kamminga, H. and G. Somsen, eds., 2016, Pursuing the Unity of
Science: Ideology and Scientific Practice from the Great War to the
Cold War, Abingdon, Oxon.: Routledge. (Scholar)
- Kellert, S.H., 2008, Borrowed Knowledge. Chaos Theory and the Challenge of Learning Across Disciplines, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Kellert, S.H., H.E. Longino and C.K. Waters, eds., 2006,
Scientific Pluralism, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota
Press. (Scholar)
- Kendig, C., ed., 2016, Natural Kinds and Classification in Scientific Practice, New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
- Kevles, D. and L. Hood, 1992, The Code of Codes: Scientific and Social Issues in the Human Genome Project, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- Khalidi, M.A., 1998, “Natural kinds and cross-cutting categories”, Journal of Philosophy, 95(1): 33–50. (Scholar)
- –––, 2013, Natural Categories and Human Kinds: Classification in the Natural and Social Sciences, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Kim, J., 1993, Supervenience and Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Kincaid, H., 1996, Individualism and The Unity of Science, Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield. (Scholar)
- –––, 1997, Philosophical Foundations of the Social Sciences, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Kincaid, H, and J. van Bouwel, eds., 2023, The Oxford Handbook of
Philosophy of Political Science, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Kitcher, P., 1981, “Explanatory unification”, in Philosophy of Science, 48: 507. (Scholar)
- –––, 1984, “1953 and all that: A tale of
two sciences”, Philosophical Review, 93:
335–373.
- –––, 1986, “Projecting the order of nature”, in Kant’s Philosophy of Physical Science, R. E. Butts, ed., Dordrecht: Reidel, 201–235. (Scholar)
- –––, 1989, “Explanatory unification and the causal structure of the world” in P. Kitcher & W. Salmon, eds., Scientific Explanation, 410–505. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. (Scholar)
- Klein, J.T., 1990, Interdisciplinarity: History, Theory & Practice, Detroit: Wayne State university Press. (Scholar)
- Knorr-Cetina, K., 1992, Epistemic Cultures: How Scientists
Make Sense, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- Kockelmans, J., ed., 1979, Interdisciplinarity and Higher Education, University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press. (Scholar)
- Koster, E., 2009, “Understanding in historical science.
Intelligibility and judgment”, in H.W. de Regt, S. Leonelli and
K. Eigner, eds., 2009, Scientific Understanding, Pittsburgh,
Pa: University of Pittsburgh Press: 314–333. (Scholar)
- Kuhn, T.S., 1962, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Kuorikoski, J. and C. Marchionni, 2016, “Triangulation across the lab, th scanner and the field: the case of social preferences”, in European Journal of Philosophy of Science, 6: 361–376. (Scholar)
- –––, 2023, “Evidential variety and mixed methods research in social science”, Philosophy of Science, published online 16 February 2023. doi:10.1017/psa.2023.34 (Scholar)
- Kusch, Martin, 2010, “Hacking’s historical
epistemology: a critique of styles of reasoning”, Studies in
History and Philosophy of Science (Part A), 41(2):
158–173. (Scholar)
- Lange, M., 1995, “Are there natural laws concerning
particular species?”, Journal of Philosophy, 112:
43–451. (Scholar)
- –––, 2004, “Bayesianism and unification: A reply to Myrvold”, Philosophy of Science, 71: 205–215. (Scholar)
- Laursen, B.K., Ch. Gonnerman and S.J. Crowley, 2021, “Improving philosophical dialogue interventions to better resolve problematic value pluralism in collaborative environmental science”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 87: 54–71. (Scholar)
- Longino, H., 1998, Science as Social Knowledge, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2002, The Fate of Knowledge, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2013, Studying Human Behavior: How Scientists Investigate Aggression and Sexuality, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Lopes, D., 2009, “Drawing in a Social Science”, Perspectives on Science, 17(1): 5–25. (Scholar)
- Love, A.C. and A. Hüttemann (2011), “Comparing
part-whole explanations in biology and physics”, in D. Dieks,
W.J. Gonzalez, S. Hartmann, T. Uebel, and M. Weber, eds.,
Explanation, prediction, and confirmation, Berlin: Springer,
183–202. (Scholar)
- Lynch, M.P., 1998, Truth in Context. An Essay on Objectivity
and Pluralism, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Lynch, M. and S. Woolgar, 1990, Representation in Scientific Practice, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- MacLeod, M. and N.J. Nersessian, 2016, “Interdisciplinary problem-solving: emerging modes in integrative systems biology”, European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 6: 401–418. (Scholar)
- Mäki, U., 2016, “Philosophy of interdisciplinarity. what? why? how?”, European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 6: 327–342. (Scholar)
- Mäki, U. and M. MacLeod, 2016, “Interdisciplinarity in actiin: philosophy of science perspectives”, European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 6: 323–326. (Scholar)
- Massimi, M and C.D. McCoy (eds.), 2020, Understanding Perspectivism: Scientific Challenges and Methodological Prospects, London: Routledge. (Scholar)
- McAllister, J., 1996, Beauty and Revolution in Science, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. (Scholar)
- McArthur, D., 2006, “Contra Cartwright: structural realism, ontological pluralism and fundamentalism about laws”, Synthese, 151: 233–255. (Scholar)
- McGivern, P., 2008, “Reductive levels and multi-scale structure”, Synthese, 165: 53–75. (Scholar)
- McGrew, T., 2003, “Conformation, heuristics, and explanatory reasoning”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 54: 553–567. (Scholar)
- McLaughlin, P, 1991, Kant’s critique of teleology in
biological explanation, Evanston: Mellen Press. (Scholar)
- Meehl, P. and W. Sellars, 1956, “The Concept of emergence,” in H. Feigl, ed., The Foundations of Science and the Concepts of Psychology and Psychoanalysis, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 239–252. (Scholar)
- Meyering, T.C., 2000, “Physicalism and downward causation in psychology and the special sciences”, Inquiry, 43: 181–202. (Scholar)
- Milkowski, M. and M. Hohol, 2021, “Explanations in cognitive science: unification versus pluralism”, Synthese, 199 (Supplement 1): 1–17. (Scholar)
- Mill, J.S., 1843, System of Logic, London: John W.
Parker. (Scholar)
- Mitchell, S.D., 2003, Biological Complexity and Integrative Pluralism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- ––– 2009, Unsimple Truths. Science, Complexity and Policy, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Morgan, M. and M. Morrison, 1999, Models as Mediators, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Morgan, M. and N.M. Wise (eds.), 2017, Special Issue on Narrative
in Science, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science,
Volume 82. (Scholar)
- Morrison, M., 2000, Unifying Physical Theories. Physical Concepts and Mathematical Structures, New York: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Moulines, C.U., 2006, “Ontology, reduction, emergence: A general frame”, Synthese, 151: 313–323. (Scholar)
- Murdoch, I., 1992, Metaphysics as a Guide to Morals, London: Allen Lane. (Scholar)
- Myrvold, W., 2003, “A Bayesian account of the virtue of unification”, Philosophy of Science, 70: 399–423. (Scholar)
- –––, 2017, “On the evidential import of unification”, Philosophy of Science, 84(1): 92–114. (Scholar)
- Nagel, E., 1951, The Structure of Science, New York: Harcourt, Brace and World. (Scholar)
- Nathan, M.J., 2017, “Unificatory explanation”, British Journal for Philosophy of Science, 68: 163–186. (Scholar)
- Nersessian, N.J., 2022, Interdisciplinarity in the Making, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Nickles, T, 1973, “Two concepts of intertheoretic reduction”, Journal of Philosophy, 70: 181–201. (Scholar)
- Oppenheim, P. and H. Putnam, 1958, “The unity of science as a working hypothesis”, in H. Feigl, et al. (eds.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 2, Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press. (Scholar)
- Orrell, D., 2012, Truth or Beauty: Science or the Quest for Order, New Haven: Yale University Press. (Scholar)
- Osbeck, L. M., Nersessian, N. J., Malone, K. R., and W.C.
Newstetter, 2011, Science as Psychology, Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press. (Scholar)
- Patrick, K., 2018, “Unity as an epistemic virtue”, Erkenntnis, 83: 893–1002. (Scholar)
- Pearce, T., 2015, “‘Science organized’:
positivism and the Metaphysical Club, 1865–1875”,
Journal of the History of Ideas, 76(3): 441–465. (Scholar)
- Plutynski, A., 2005, “Explanatory unification and the early synthesis”, British Journal for Philosophy of Science 56: 595–609. (Scholar)
- Poirier, P., 2006, “Finding a place for elimination in inter-level reductionist activities: Reply to Wimsatt”, Synthese, 151: 477–483. (Scholar)
- Popper, K.R., 1935/1951, The Logic of Scientific Discovery, London: Unwin and Allen. (Scholar)
- Potochnik, A., 2017, Idealization and the Aims of Science, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Putnam, H., 1975, “The nature of mental states”, in
Philosophical Papers (Volume 2), Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 429–440. (Scholar)
- Ramsey, J., 1995, “Construction by reduction”, Philosophy of Science, 62: 1–20. (Scholar)
- Redhead, M.L.G. and P. Teller, 1991, “Particles, Particle Labels, and Quanta: the Toll of Unacknowledged Metaphysics”, Foundations of Physics, 21: 43–62. (Scholar)
- Repko, A.F., 2012, Interdisciplinarity: Process and
Theory, Thousand Oaks: Sage. (Scholar)
- Rescher, N., 1993, Pluralism, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
- Richards, R., 2008, The Tragic Sense of Life: Ernst Haeckel
and the Struggle over Evolutionary Thought, Chicago: University
of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Robinson, W.S., 2005, “Zooming in on downward causation”, Biology and Philosophy, 20: 117–136. (Scholar)
- Roche, W. and E. Sober, 2017, “Explanation = unification? A
new criticism of Friedman’s theory and a reply to an old
one”, Philosophy of Science, 84(3): 391–413. (Scholar)
- Rohrlich, F., 2001, “Realism despite cognitive antireductionism”, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 18: 73–88. (Scholar)
- Rosenberg, A., 1994, Instrumental Biology, or the Disunity of Science, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Rueger, A., 2005, “Perspectival models and theory unification”, British Journal for Philosophy of Science, 56: 579–594. (Scholar)
- Ruphy, S., 2005, “Why metaphysical abstinence should prevail in the debate on reductionism”, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 19: 105–121. (Scholar)
- –––, 2016, Scientific Pluralism Reconsidered, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. (Scholar)
- Ruttkamp, E., 2002, A Model-theoretic Realistic Interpretation of Science, Dordrecht: Kluwer. (Scholar)
- Ruttkamp, E.B. and J. Heidema, 2005, “Reviewing reduction in a preferential model-theoretic context”, International Studies in Philosophy of Science, 19: 123–146. (Scholar)
- Salmon, W., 1998, Causality and Explanation, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Sarkar, S.,1998, Genetics and Reductionism, New York: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Scerri, E., 1994, “Has chemistry been at least approximately reduced to quantum mechanics?” Proceedings of the 1994 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association (Volume 1): 160–170. (Scholar)
- Schaffner, K., 1967, “Approaches to reductionism”, Philosophy of Science, 34: 137–147. (Scholar)
- –––, 1993, Discovery and Explanation in Biology and Medicine, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2006, “Reduction: the Cheshire cat problem and a return to roots”, Synthese, 151: 377–402. (Scholar)
- Schupach, J., 2005, “On a Bayesian analysis of the virtue of unification”, Philosophy of Science, 72: 594–607. (Scholar)
- Schurz, G., 1999, “Explanation as unification”, Synthese, 120: 95–114. (Scholar)
- –––, 2015, “Causality and unification: how causality unifies statistical regularities”, Theoria, 30(1): 73–95. (Scholar)
- Schurz, G. and K. Lambert, 1994, “Outline of a theory of scientific understanding”, Synthese, 101: 65–120. (Scholar)
- Simon, H., 1996, The Sciences of the Artificial, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Sklar, L., 1967, “Types of inter-theoretic reduction”, British Journal for Philosophy of Science, 18: 109–124. (Scholar)
- –––, 2003, “Dappled theories in a uniform world”, Philosophy of Science, 70: 424–441. (Scholar)
- Slater, M.H., 2005, “Monism on the one hand, pluralism on the other”, Philosophy of Science, 72: 22–42. (Scholar)
- Smith, J., 2011, Divine Machines: Leibniz and the Sciences of
Life, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
- Smith, L.D., L.A. Best, D.A. Stubbs, J. Johnston and A.B.
Archibald, 2000, “Scientific graphs and the hierarchy of the
sciences: a Latourian survey of inscription practices”,
Social Studies of Science, 30(1): 73–94. (Scholar)
- Smocovitis, B., 1996, Unifying Biology, Princeton, NJ:
Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
- Snyder, L.J., 2006, Reforming Philosophy: A Victorian Debate on Science and Society, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Sober, E., 1999, “The Multiple realizability argument against reductionism”, Philosophy of Science, 66: 542–564. (Scholar)
- –––, 2003, “Two uses of unification”, in F. Stadler (ed.), The Vienna Circle and Logical Empiricism, Dordrecht: Kluwer, 205–216. (Scholar)
- –––, 2016, Ockham’s Razors. A
User’s Manual, New York: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Spector, M., 1978, Concepts of Reduction in Physical Science, Philadelphia: Temple University Press. (Scholar)
- Sullivan, J.A., 2017, “Coordinated pluralism as a means to facilitate integrative taxonomies of cognition”, Philosophical Explorations, 20(2): 129–145. (Scholar)
- Suppe, F., 1977, The Structure of Scientific Theories, Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press. (Scholar)
- Suppes, P, 1978, “The plurality of science”, P. Asquith and I. Hacking (eds.), PSA 1978: Proceedings of the 1978 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association (Volume 2), East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association: 3–16. (Scholar)
- Tahko, T.E., 2021, Unity of Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Teller, P., 2004, “How we dapple the world”, Philosophy of Science, 71: 425–447. (Scholar)
- Thalos, M., 2013, Without Hierarchy. The Scale Freedom of the Universe, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Toulmin, S., 1970, Physical Reality: Philosophical Essays on Twenty-century Physics, New York: Harper and Row. (Scholar)
- Uebel, T., 2007, Empiricism at the Crossroads: The Vienna
Circle’s Protocol-Sentence Debate, Chicago: Open
Court. (Scholar)
- van Bouwel, J., 2009a, “The problem with(out) consensus: the scientific consensus, deliberative democracy and agonistic pluralism”, in J. van Bouwel, ed., The Social Sciences and Democracy, London: Palgrave Macmillan. (Scholar)
- van Bouwel, J. (ed.), 2009b, The Social Sciences and Democracy, London: Palgrave Macmillan. (Scholar)
- van Gulick, R., 1992, “Nonreductive materialism and the nature of intertheoretical constraint”, in A. Beckmann, H. Flohr and J. Kim, eds., Emergence or Reduction? Essays on the Prospects of Nonreductive Physicalism, New York: de Gruyter. (Scholar)
- van Riel, R., 2014, The Concept of Reduction, Cham: Springer. (Scholar)
- Wayne, A., 1996, “Theoretical unity: the case of the standard model”, Perspectives on Science, 4: 391–407. (Scholar)
- –––, 2002, “Critical notice: Margaret
Morrison, Unifying scientific theories”, Canadian
Journal of Philosophy, 32: 117–138. (Scholar)
- Weber, E. and M. Van Dyck, 2002, “Unification and explanation”, Synthese, 131: 145–154. (Scholar)
- Wilson, J., 2021, Metaphysical Emergence, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Wimsatt, W., 1976, “Reductionism, levels of organization and the mind-body problem”, in G. Globus, I. Savodnik and G. Maxwell, eds., Consciousness and the Brain, 199–167, New York: Plenum. (Scholar)
- –––, 1980, “Reductionist research
strategies and their biases in the units of selection
controversy”, in T. Nickles, ed., Scientific Discovery: Case
studies, Dordrecht: Reidel. (Scholar)
- –––, 2006, “Reductionism and its heuristics: making methodological reductionism honest”, Synthese, 151: 445–475. (Scholar)
- Winsberg, E., M. Frisch, K.M. Darling and A. Fine, 2000,
“Review of Nancy Cartwright, The Dappled World: Essays on
the Boundaries of Science”, Journal of Philosophy,
97(7): 403–408. (Scholar)
- Wise, M.N., 2011, “Science as historical narrative”,
Erkenntnis, 75: 349–376. (Scholar)
- Wolfram S., 1984, “Universality and complexity in cellular
automata”, Physica D, 10: 1–35. (Scholar)
- –––, 2002, A New Kind of Science, Champaign, IL: Wolfram Media. (Scholar)
- Wood, A. and S.S. Hahn, 2011, The Cambridge History of Philosophy in the Nineteenth Century (1790–1870), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Woodward, J., 2003, Making Things Happen: A Causal Theory of
Explanation, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Wylie, A., 1999, “Rethinking unity as a ‘working
hypothesis’ for philosophy of science: How archeologists exploit
the disunities of science”, Perspectives on Science, 7:
293–317. (Scholar)
- –––, 2015, “A plurality of pluralisms: Collaborative practice in archeology”, in F. Padovani, A. Richardson and J.Y. Tsou (eds.), Objectivity in Science: New Perspectives from Science and Technology Studies (Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science: Volume 310), Cham: Springer, 189–210. (Scholar)