Linked bibliography for the SEP article "The Unity of Science" by Jordi Cat |
This is an automatically generated and experimental page
If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.
This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.
- Auyang. S., 1995, How is Quantum Field Theory Possible? New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Baigrie, B.S., 1996, Picturing Knowledge, Toronto: University of Toronto Press. (Scholar)
- Bailey, J., 1976, The Uses of Division: Unity and Disharmony in Literature, New York: Viking Press. (Scholar)
- Balzer, W., and Moulines, C. U., 1996, eds., Structuralist Theory of Science, Focal Issues, New Results, Berlin: de Gruyter.
- Barnes, E., 1992, “Explanatory unification and scientific understanding”, PSA 1992, vol. 1, 3–12. (Scholar)
- Batterman, R., 2002, The Devil in the Details, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Beatty, J., 1995, “The Evolutionary Contingency Thesis”, in G. Wolders and J. Lennox, eds., Concepts, Theories, and Rationality in the Biological Sciences, Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh University Press, 83–97. (Scholar)
- Bechtel, W., 1987, “Psycholinguistics as a Case of Cross-Disciplinary Research”, Synthese 72, n. 3, 293–311. (Scholar)
- Bedau, M.H., 2003, “Downward Causation and Autonomy in Weak Emergence”, in Bedau and Humphreys 2008, 155–188. (Scholar)
- Bedau, M.H. and P. Humphreys, eds., 2008, Emergence, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Belot, G., 2005, “Whose devil? Which details?”, Philosophy of Science 72: 128–153. (Scholar)
- Bertoloni Meli, D., 2006, Thinking with Objects: The Transformation of Mechanics in the Seventeenth Century, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. (Scholar)
- Bishop, R., 2006, “Patching physics and chemistry together”, Philosophy of Science 72: 710–722. (Scholar)
- Bishop, R.C., 2012, “Fluid Convection, Constraint, and Causation”, Interface Focus 2: 4–12. (Scholar)
- Bishop, R. C. and Atmanspacher, H. 2006 “Contextual Emergence in the Description of Properties”, Found. Phys. 36, 1753 – 1777. (Scholar)
- Bowker, G. and S. Starr, 1999, Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Brigandt, I. 2010. “Beyond Reduction and Pluralism: Toward an Epistemology of Explanatory Integration in Biology.” Erkenntnis. 73(3), 295–311. (Scholar)
- Campbell, D., 1974, ““Downward causation” in hierarchically organized biological systems”, in F.J. Ayala and T. Dobzhansky, eds., Studies in the Philosophy of Biology, Los Angeles: University of California Press, 179–186. (Scholar)
- Cartwright, N., 1983, How the Laws of Physics Lie, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1989, Nature's Capacities and their Measurement, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1999, The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2007, Hunting Causes and Using Them: Approaches in Philosophy of Economics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Cartwright, N., J. Cat, L. Fleck and Thomas Uebel, 1996, Otto Neurath: Philosophy Between Science and Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Cat, J., 1998, “The physicists' debates on unification in physics at the end of the 20th century”, Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences, vol. 28. part 2: 253–300. (Scholar)
- –––, 2000, “Must the microcausality condition be interpreted causally? Beyond reduction and matters of fact”, Theoria 37: 59–85. (Scholar)
- –––, 2001, “On Understanding: Maxwell on the methods of illustration and scientific metaphor”, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 33B, 3: 395–442. (Scholar)
- –––, 2005, “Modelling cracks and cracking models: structures, mechanisms, boundary conditions, constraints, inconsistencies and the proper domains of natural laws”, Synthese 146, n. 3: 441–481. (Scholar)
- –––, 2006, “On fuzzy empiricism and fuzzy-set models of causality: What is all the fuzz about?”, Philosophy of Science 73, n. 1, January 2006. (Scholar)
- –––, 2010, “On Reduction: Analyzing Theories and Synthesizing Models; Cooperation and Compromises”, Discussion Papers Series, Centre for the Philosophy of the Natural and Social Sciences, London School of Economics, London. (Scholar)
- –––, 2012, “Essay Review, S. Kellert, H. Longino and K. waters, eds., Scientific Pluralism”, Philosophy of Science 79: 317–325. (Scholar)
- –––, forthcoming a, From the Human Sciences to Philosophy of Science.
- –––, forthcoming b, Master of Fields: James Clerk Maxwell's Concrete, Constructive and Connective Natural Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, forthcoming c, Physics Beyond Laws and Theories: The Limits of Unity, Universality and Precision, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins. (Scholar)
- Cat, J., H. Chang and N. Cartwright, 1996, “Otto Neurath: Politics and the unity of science”, in Galison and Stump, 1996. (Scholar)
- Causey, R., 1977, Unity of Science, Dordrecht: Reidel. (Scholar)
- Chakravartty, A., 2011, “Scientific Realism and Ontological Relativity”, The Monist 94: 157–180. (Scholar)
- Churchland, P.M., 1981, “Eliminative materialism and the propositional attitudes”, Journal of Philosophy 78: 67–90. (Scholar)
- Churchland, P.S., 1986, Neurophilosophy: Toward a Unified Science of the Mind/Brain, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Cleland, C., 2002, “Methodological and epistemic difference between historical science and experimental science”, Philosophy of Science, 69 (September 2002) pp. 474–496. (Scholar)
- Collins, H. and R. Evans, 2007, Rethinking Expertise, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Comte, A. (1830–1842) Cours de Philosophie Positive, Paris: Littré. (Scholar)
- Craver, C.F., 2007, Explaining the Brain. Mechanisms and the Mosaic Unity of Neuroscience, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
- Crutchfield, J., 1994, “The calculi of emergence: computation, dynamics and induction”, Physica D 75: 11–54. (Scholar)
- Crutchfield J., Hanson J., 1997, “Computational mechanics of cellular automata: an example”, Physica D 103: 169–189. (Scholar)
- Cummings, J.N. and s. Kiesler, 2005, “Collaborative Research Across Disciplinary and Organizational Boundaries”, Social Studies of Science 35, 5, 703–722. (Scholar)
- D'Alembert, J. and D. Diderot, eds., 1751–1772, Encyclopédie, ou dictionnaire raisonné des sciences, des arts at des métiers, Paris: Plon. (Scholar)
- Da Costa and S. French, 2003, Science and Partial Truth: A Unitary Approach to Models and Scientific Reasoning, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Darden, L, 2006, Reasoning in Biological Discoveries: Essays on Mechanisms, Interfield Theories, and Anomaly Resolution, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Darden, L. and N. Maull, 1977, “Interfield theories”, Philosophy of Science 44: 43–64. (Scholar)
- Daston, L. and P. Galison, 2007, Objectivity, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Davidson, D., 1969, “The individuation of events”, in N. Rescher, ed., Essays in Honor of Carl G. Hempel, Dordrecht: Reidel, 216–34. (Scholar)
- De Regt, H.W. and D. Dieks, 2005, “A contextual approach to scientific understanding”, Synthese 144: 137–170.
- Dupré, J., 1993, The Disorder of Things. Metaphysical Foundations of the Disunity of Science, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- Ereshefsky, M., 1992, “Eliminative pluralism”, Philosophy of Science 59:671–90. (Scholar)
- Ellis, G.F.R., D. Noble and T. O'Connor, 2012, “Top-down causation: an integrating theme within and across the sciences?”, Interface Focus February 6, 2012, 2(1), 1–3. (Scholar)
- Elgin, C.Z., 1996, Considered Judgment, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1997, Between the Absolute and the Arbitrary, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press (Scholar)
- Feyerabend, P.K., 1962, “Explanation, reduction and empiricism”, in H. Feigl and G. Maxwell, eds., Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 3, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 28–97. (Scholar)
- Fodor, J., 1974, “Special sciences, or the disunity of science as a working hypothesis”, Synthese 28: 77–115. (Scholar)
- Forster, M. and E. Sober, 1994, “How to tell when simpler, more unified, or less ad hoc theories will provide more accurate predictions”, British J. for Philosophy of Science 45: 1–35. (Scholar)
- Friedman, M., 1974, “Explanation and scientific understanding”, in J. of Philosophy 71: 5. (Scholar)
- –––, 1992, Kant and the Exact Sciences, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- Galison, P., 1997, Image and Logic, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- –––,1998, “The americanization of unity of science”, in Daedalus127, Winter 1998, 45–71. (Scholar)
- Galison, P. and D. Stump, eds.,1996, The Disunity of Science. Boundaries, Contexts and Power, Stanford: Stanford University Press. (Scholar)
- Garber, D., 1992, Descartes' Metaphysical Physics, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Gaukroger, S., 2002, Descartes' System of Natural Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Giere, R.N., 1999, Science Without Laws (science and its conceptual foundations), Chicago: Chicago University Press. (Scholar)
- Glennan, S., 1996, “Mechanisms and the nature of causation”, Erkenntnis 44: 49–71. (Scholar)
- Glymour, C., 1969, “On some patterns of reduction”, Philosophy of Science 37, n.3: 340–353. (Scholar)
- Gorman, M.E., 2002, “Levels of expertise and trading zones. A framework for multidisciplinary collaboration”, Social Studies of Science, 32, n. 5/6: 933–938. (Scholar)
- Grantham, T., 2004, “Conceptualizing the (dis)unity of science”, Philosophy of Science 71: 133–155. (Scholar)
- Grene, Marjorie (ed.). 1969. Anatomy of Knowledge. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. (Scholar)
- ––– ed., 1969, Toward a Unity of Knowledge. Psychological Issues. Vol. 6, No. 2. (Scholar)
- ––– ed., 1971, Interpretations of Life and Mind: Essays around the Problem of Reduction. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, New York: Humanities Press. (Scholar)
- Grünbaum, A. and W.C. Salmon, 1988, The Limitations of Deductivism, Berkeley: University of California Press. (Scholar)
- Hacking, I., 1983, Representing and Intervening, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1996, “The disunities of science”, in P. Galison and D. Stump 1996. (Scholar)
- Halonen, I. and J. Hintikka, 1999, “Unification—it's magnificent but is it explanation?”, Synthese 120: 27–47. (Scholar)
- G.L. Hardcastle 2003, “Debabelizing science: The Harvard Science of Science discussion group 1940–41”, in G.L. Hardcastle and A. Richardson, eds., 2003, Logical Empiricism in North America, Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press., 170–196. (Scholar)
- Healey, R., 1991, “Holism and nonseparability”, Journal of Philosophy 88, 393–421. (Scholar)
- Hoefer, C., 2003, “For fundamentalism”, Philosophy of Science 70: 1401–1412. (Scholar)
- Holton, G., 1973, The Thematic Origins of Scientific Thought, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1993, “The Vienna Circle in exile: An eye-witness report”, in F. Stadler, ed., Yearbook: Vienna Circle Lectures, Boston: Kluwer. (Scholar)
- Holton, G., H. Chang and E. Jurkowitz, 1996, “How a scientific discovery is made: a case history”, American Scientist 84 n.4, 364–375. (Scholar)
- Howhy, J, 2003, “Capacities, explanation and the possibility of disunity”, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 17, n.2: 179–190. (Scholar)
- Hull, D., 1988, Science as Progress, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Humphreys, P., 1997, “How properties emerge”, Philosophy of Science 64: 1–17. (Scholar)
- –––, 2004, Extending Ourselves: Computational Science, Empiricism, and Scientific Method, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2008, “Synchronic and diachronic emergence”, Minds & Machines, 18:431–442 (Scholar)
- Humphreys, P., Huneman P., 2008, “Dynamical Emergence and Computation: An Introduction”, Minds & Machines, 18: 425–430 (Scholar)
- Huneman, P., 2008a, “Emergence and adaptation”.Minds and Machines, 18: 493–520. (Scholar)
- Huneman, P., 2008b, Combinatorial vs. computational emergence: emergence made ontological?, Philosophy of science, 75: 595—607. (Scholar)
- Huneman, P., 2010. “Determinism and predictability: lessons from computational emergence”, Synthese, 2010, online first. (Scholar)
- Janiak, A., Newton as Philosopher, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Jones, C. and P. Galison, eds., 1998, Picturing Science, Producing Art, London: Routledge. (Scholar)
- Kaiser, D., 2005, Drawing Theories Apart: The Dispersion of Feynman Diagrams in Postwar Physics, Chicago, University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Karaca, K., 2012, “Kitcher's explanatory unification, Kaluza-Klein theories, and the normative aspect of higher dimensional unification in Physics”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 63, n.3, 287–312. (Scholar)
- Kellert, S.H., 2008, Borrowed Knowledge. Chaos Theory and the Challenge of Learning Across Disciplines, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Kellert, S.H., H.E. Longino and C.K. Waters, 2006, Scientific Pluralism, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. (Scholar)
- Kevles, D. and L. Hood, 1992, The Code of Codes: Scientific and Social Issues in the Human Genome Project, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- Khalidi, M.A., 1998, “Natural kinds and cross-cutting categories”, Journal of Philosophy 95, n.1: 33–50. (Scholar)
- Kim, J., 1993, Supervenience and Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Kincaid, H., 1996, Individualism and The Unity of Science, Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield. (Scholar)
- –––, 1997, Philosophical Foundations of the Social Sciences, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Kitcher, P., 1981, “Explanatory unification”, in Philosophy of Science 48: 507. (Scholar)
- –––, 1984, “1953 and all that: A tale of two sciences”, Philosophical Review 93: 335–373.
- –––, 1986, “Projecting the order of nature”, inKant's Philosophy of physical Science, ed. R. E. Butts, Dordrecht: Reidel, 201–235. (Scholar)
- –––, 1989, “Explanatory unification and the causal structure of the world” in P. Kitcher & W. Salmon, eds., Scientific Explanation, 410–505. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. (Scholar)
- Knorr-Cetina, K., 1992, Epistemic Cultures: How Scientists Make Sense, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- Kockelmans, J., 1979, ed., Interdisciplinarity and Higher Education, University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
- Kuhn, T.S., 1962, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Koster, E., 2009, “Understanding in historical science. Intelligibility and judgment”, in H.W. de Regt, S. Leonelli and K. Eigner, eds, 2009, Scientific Understanding, Pittsburgh, Pa: University of Pittsburgh Press: 314–333. (Scholar)
- Lange, M., 1995, “Are there natural laws concerning particular species?”, Journal of Philosophy 112: 43–451. (Scholar)
- –––, 2004, “Bayesianism and unification: A reply to Myrvold”, Philosophy of Science 71: 205–215. (Scholar)
- Longino, H., 1998, Science as Social Knowledge, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2001, The Fate of Knowledge, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
- Lopes, D., 2009, “Drawing in a Social Science”, Perspectives on Science 17, n. 1, 5–25. (Scholar)
- Love, A.C. and A. Hüttemann (2011), “Comparing part-whole explanations in biology and physics”, in D. Dieks, W.J. Gonzalez, S. Hartmann, T. Uebel, and M. Weber (eds.), Explanation, prediction, and confirmation, Berlin: Springer, 183–202. (Scholar)
- Lynch, M.P., 1998, Truth in Context. An Essay on Objectivity and Pluralism, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Lynch, M. and S. Woolgar, 1990, Representation in Scientific Practice, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- McArthur, D., 2006, “Contra Cartwright: Structural realism, ontological pluralism and fundamentalism about laws”, Synthese 151: 233–255. (Scholar)
- McGivern, P., 2008, “Reductive Levels and Multi-scale Structure”, Synthese 165, 53–75. (Scholar)
- McGrew, T., 2003, “Conformation, heuristics, and explanatory reasoning”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 54: 553–567. (Scholar)
- McLaughlin, P, 1991, Kant's critique of teleology in biological explanation, Evanston: Mellen Press. (Scholar)
- Meehl, P. and W. Sellars, 1956, “The Concept of emergence,” in H. Feigl, ed., The Foundations of Science and the Concepts of Psychology and Psychoanalysis, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 239–252. (Scholar)
- Meyering, T.C., 2000, “Physicalism and downward causation in psychology and the special sciences”, Inquiry 43: 181–202. (Scholar)
- Mitchell, S.D., 2003, Biological Complexity and Integrative Pluralism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- ––– 2009, Unsimple Truths. Science, Complexity and Policy, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Morgan, M. and M. Morrison, 1999, Models as Mediators, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Morrison, M., 2000, Unifying Physical Theories. Physical Concepts and Mathematical Structures, New York: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Moulines, C.U., 2006, “Ontology, reduction, emergence: A general frame”, Synthese 151: 313–323. (Scholar)
- Murdoch, I., 1992, Metaphysics as a Guide to Morals, London: Allen Lane. (Scholar)
- Myrvold, W., 2003, “A Bayesian account of the virtue of unification”, Philosophy of Science 70: 399–423. (Scholar)
- Nagel, E., 1951, The Structure of Science, New York: Harcourt, Brace and World. (Scholar)
- Nickles, T, 1973, “Two Concepts of Intertheoretic Reduction”, Journal of Philosophy 70:181–201 (Scholar)
- Oppenheim, P. and H. Putnam, 1958, “The unity of science as a working hypothesis”, in H. Feigl et al., eds., Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 2, Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press. (Scholar)
- Osbeck, L. M., Nersessian, N. J., Malone, K. R., and W.C. Newstetter, 2011, Science as Psychology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Plutynski, A., 2005, “Explanatory unification and the early synthesis”, British Journal for Philosophy of Science 56: 595–609. (Scholar)
- Poirier, P., 2006, “Finding a place for elimination in inter-level reductionist activities: Reply to Wimsatt”, Synthese 151: 477–483. (Scholar)
- Popper, K.R., 1935/1951, The Logic of Scientific Discovery, London: Unwin and Allen. (Scholar)
- Putnam, H., 1975, “The nature of mental states”, in Philosophical Papers, vol. 2, 429–440, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Ramsey, J., 1995, “Construction by reduction”, Philosophy of Science 62: 1–20. (Scholar)
- Redheard, M.L.G. and P. Teller, 1991, “Particles, Particle
Labels, and Quanta: the
Toll of Unacknowledged Metaphysics”, Foundations of Physics 21:43–62. (Scholar) - Repko, A.F., 2012, Interdisciplinarity: Process and Theory, Thousand Oaks: Sage. (Scholar)
- Rescher, N., 1993, Pluralism, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
- Richards, R., 2008, The Tragic Sense of Life: Ernst Haeckel and the Struggle over Evolutionary Thought, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Robinson, W.S., 2005, “Zooming in on downward causation”, Biology and Philosophy 20: 117–136. (Scholar)
- Rohrlich, F., 2001, “Realism despite cognitive antireductionism”, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 18: 73–88. (Scholar)
- Rosenberg, A., 1994, Instrumental Biology, or the Disunity of Science, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Rueger, A., 2005, “Perspectival models and theory unification”, British Journal for Philosophy of Science 56: 579–594. (Scholar)
- Ruphy, S., 2005, “Why metaphysical abstinence should prevail in the debate on reductionism”, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 19: 105–121. (Scholar)
- Ruttkamp, E., 2002, A Model-theoretic Realistic Interpretation of Science, Dordrecht: Kluwer. (Scholar)
- Ruttkamp, E.B. and J. Heidema, 2005, “Reviewing reduction in a preferential model-theoretic context”, International Studies in Philosophy of Science, 19: 123–146. (Scholar)
- Sarkar, S.,1998, Genetics and Reductionism, New York: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Scerri, E., 1994, “Has chemistry been at least approximately reduced to quantum mechanics?” PSA 1994, vol. 1: 160–170. (Scholar)
- Schaffner, K., 1967, “Approaches to reductionism”, Philosophy of Science 34: 137–147. (Scholar)
- –––, 1993, Discovery and Explanation in Biology and Medicine, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2006, “Reduction: the Cheshire cat problem and a return to roots”, Synthese 151: 377–402. (Scholar)
- Schupach, J., 2005, “On a Bayesian analysis of the virtue of unification”, Philosophy of Science 72: 594–607. (Scholar)
- Schurz, G., 1999, “Explanation as unification”, Synthese 120: 95–114. (Scholar)
- Schurz, G. and K. Lambert, 1994, “Outline of a theory of scientific understanding”, Synthese 101: 65–120. (Scholar)
- Simon, H., 1996, The Sciences of the Artificial, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Sklar, L., 1967, “Types of inter-theoretic reduction”, British Journal for Philosophy of Science 18: 109–124. (Scholar)
- –––, 2003, “Dappled theories in a uniform world”, Philosophy of Science 70: 424–441. (Scholar)
- Smith, J, 2011, Divine Machines: Leibniz and the Sciences of Life, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
- Smith, L.D., L.A. Best, D.A. Stubbs, J. Johnston and A.B. Archibald, 2000, “Scientific Graphs and the Hierarchy of the Sciences: A Latourian Survey of Inscription Practices”, Social Studies of Science 30, n. 1, 73–94. (Scholar)
- Smocovitis, B., 1996, Unifying Biology, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
- Snyder, L.J., 2006, Reforming Philosophy: A Victorian Debate on Science and Society, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Sober, E., 1999, “The Multiple Realizability Argument Against Reductionism”, Philosophy of Science 66, 542 – 564. (Scholar)
- –––, 2003, “Two uses of unification”, in F. Stadler, ed., The Vienna Circle and Logical Empiricism, 205–216, Dordrecht: Kluwer. (Scholar)
- Spector, M, 1978, Concepts of Reduction in Physical Science, Philadelphia: Temple University Press. (Scholar)
- Suppe, F., 1977, The Structure of Scientific Theories, Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press. (Scholar)
- Suppes, P, 1978, “The plurality of science”, P. Asquith and I. Hacking, eds, PSA 1978: Proceedings of the 1978 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, vol. 2, East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association: 3–16 (Scholar)
- Teller, P., 2004, “How we dapple the world”, Philosophy of Science 71: 425–447. (Scholar)
- Klein, Julie, 1990, Interdisciplinarity. History, Theory & Practice, Detroit: Wayne State University Press. (Scholar)
- Toulmin, S., 1970, Physical Reality: Philosophical Essays on Twenty-century Physics, New York: Harper and Row. (Scholar)
- Tribe, K., 2005, Strategies of Economic Order, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Van Bouwels, J., 2009, “The Problem With(out) Consensus: The Scientific Consensus, Deliberative Democracy and Agonistic Pluralism”, in J. van Bouwels, ed., The Social Sciences and Democracy, London: Palgrave Macmillan. (Scholar)
- van Gulick, R., 1992, “Nonreductive materialism and the nature of intertheoretical constraint”, in Beckmann, Flohr and Kim, Emergence or Reduction? Essays on the Prospects of Nonreductive Physicalism, New York: de Gruyter. (Scholar)
- Wayne, A., 1996, “Theoretical unity: the case of the standard model”, Perspectives on Science 4: 391–407. (Scholar)
- –––, 2002, “Critical notice: Margaret Morrison, Unifying scientific theories”, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 32: 117–138. (Scholar)
- Weber, E. and M. Van Dyck, 2002, “Unification and explanation”, Synthese 131: 145–154. (Scholar)
- Wimsatt, W, 1976, “Reductionism, levels of organization and the mind-body problem”, in G. Globus, I. Savodnik and G. Maxwell, eds., Consciousness and the Brain, 199–167, New York: Plenum. (Scholar)
- –––, 1980, “Reductionist research strategies and their biases in the units of selection controversy”, in T. Nickles, ed., Scientific discovery: Case studies, Dordrecht: Reidel. (Scholar)
- –––, 2006, “Reductionism and its heuristics: Making methodological reductionism honest”, Synthese 151: 445–475. (Scholar)
- Winsberg, E., M. Frisch, K.M. Darling and A. Fine, 2000, “Review of Nancy Cartwright, The Dappled World: Essays on the Boundaries of Science”, Journal of Philosophy 97 (7): 403–408. (Scholar)
- Wolfram S., 1984, “Universality and complexity in cellular automata”, Physica D 10: 1–35. (Scholar)
- –––, 2002, A New Kind of Science, Champaign, IL: Wolfram Media. (Scholar)
- Wood, A. and S.S. Hahn, 2011, The Cambridge History of Philosophy in the Nineteenth Century (1790–1870), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Woodward, J., 2003, Making Things Happen: A Causal Theory of Explanation, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Generated Fri May 17 00:55:54 2013
