Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Absolute and Relational Theories of Space and Motion" by Nick Huggett |
This is an automatically generated and experimental page
If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.
This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.
Works cited in text
- Aristotle, 1984, The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation, J. Barnes (ed.), Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
- Barbour, J. and Bertotti, B., 1982, “Mach's Principle and the Structure of Dynamical Theories,” Proceedings of the Royal Society (London), 382: 295-306. (Scholar)
- –––, 1977, “Gravity and Inertia in a Machian Framework,” Nuovo Cimento, 38B: 1-27. (Scholar)
- Brill, D. R. and Cohen, J., 1966, “Rotating Masses and their effects on inertial frames,” Physical Review 143: 1011-1015. (Scholar)
- Brown, H. R., 2005, Physical Relativity: Space-Time Structure from a Dynamical Perspective, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Descartes, R., 1983, Principles of Philosophy, R. P. Miller and V. R. Miller (trans.), Dordrecht, London: Reidel. (Scholar)
- Dorling, J., 1978, “Did Einstein need General Relativity to solve the Problem of Space? Or had the Problem already been solved by Special Relativity?,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 29: 311-323. (Scholar)
- Earman, J., 1989, World Enough and Spacetime: Absolute and Relational Theories of Motion. Boston: M.I.T. Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1970, “Who's Afraid of Absolute Space?,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 48: 287-319. (Scholar) (Scholar)
- Einstein, A., 1918, “Prinzipielles zur allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie,” Annalen der Physik, 51: 639-642. (Scholar)
- –––, 1907, “Über das Relativitätsprinzip und die aus demselben gezogenen Folgerungen,” Jahrbuch der Radioaktivität und Electronik 4: 411-462. (Scholar)
- Einstein, A., Lorentz, H. A., Minkowski, H. and Weyl, H., 1952, The Principle of Relativity. W. Perrett and G.B. Jeffery, trs. New York: Dover Books. (Scholar)
- Föppl, A. “Über absolute und relative Bewegung,” Sitzungsberichte der Münchener Akad.. 35:383. (Scholar)
- Friedländer, B. and J., 1896, Absolute und relative Bewegung, Berlin: Leonhard Simion. (Scholar)
- Friedman, M., 1983, Foundations of Space-Time Theories: Relativistic Physics and Philosophy of Science, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
- Garber, D., 1992, Descartes' Metaphysical Physics, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Garber, D. and J. B. Rauzy, 2004, “Leibniz on Body, Matter and Extension,” The Aristotelian Society: Supplementary Volume, 78: 23-40. (Scholar)
- Hartz, G. A. and J. A. Cover, 1988, “Space and Time in the Leibnizian Metaphysic,” Nous, 22: 493-519. (Scholar)
- Hoefer, C., 1994, “Einstein's Struggle for a Machian Gravitation Theory,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 25: 287-336. (Scholar)
- Huggett, N., 2006, “The Regularity Account of Relational Spacetime,” Mind, 115: 41-74. (Scholar)
- –––, 2000, “Space from Zeno to Einstein: Classic Readings with a Contemporary Commentary,” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 14: 327-329. (Scholar)
- Lange, L., 1885, “Ueber das Beharrungsgesetz,” Berichte der Königlichen Sachsischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Leipzig, Mathematisch-physische Classe 37 (1885): 333-51. (Scholar)
- Leibniz, G. W., 1989, Philosophical Essays, R. Ariew and D. Garber (trans.), Indianapolis: Hackett Pub. Co. (Scholar)
- Leibniz, G. W., and Samuel Clarke, 1715–1716, “Correspondence”, in The Leibniz-Clarke Correspondence, Together with Extracts from Newton's “Principia” and “Opticks”, H. G. Alexander (ed.), Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1956. (Scholar)
- Lodge, P., 2003, “Leibniz on Relativity and the Motion of Bodies,” Philosophical Topics, 31: 277-308. (Scholar)
- Mach, E., 1883, Die Mechanik in ihrer Entwickelung, historisch-kritisch dargestellt. 2nd edition. Leipzig: Brockhaus. English translation (6th edition, 1960): The Science of Mechanics, La Salle, Illinois: Open Court Press. (Scholar)
- Malament, D., 1995, “Is Newtonian Cosmology Really Inconsistent?,” Philosophy of Science 62, no. 4. (Scholar)
- Maudlin, T., 1993, “Buckets of Water and Waves of Space: Why Space-Time is Probably a Substance,” Philosophy of Science, 60:183-203. (Scholar)
- Minkowski, H. (1908). “Space and time,” In Einstein, et al. (1952), pp. 75-91. (Scholar)
- Nerlich, Graham, 1994, The Shape of Space (2nd edition), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Neumann, C., 1870, Ueber die Principien der Galilei-Newton'schen Theorie. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner, 1870. (Scholar)
- Newton, I., 2004, Newton: Philosophical Writings, A. Janiak (ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Newton, I. and I. B. Cohen, 1999, The Principia: Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy, I. B. Cohen and A. M. Whitman (trans.), Berkeley ; London: University of California Press. (Scholar)
- Norton, J., 1995, “Mach's Principle before Einstein,” in J. Barbour and H. Pfister (eds.) Mach's Principle: From Newton's Bucket to Quantum Gravity: Einstein Studies, Vol. 6. Boston: Birkhäuser, pp.9-57. (Scholar)
- Norton, J., 1993, “A Paradox in Newtonian Cosmology,” in M. Forbes , D. Hull and K. Okruhlik (eds.) PSA 1992: Proceedings of the 1992 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association. Vol. 2. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 412-20. (Scholar)
- –––, 1992, “Einstein, Nordström and the Early Demise of Scalar, Lorentz-Covariant Theories of Gravitation,” Archive for History of Exact Sciences, 45: 17-94. (Scholar)
- Pooley, O., 2002, the Reality of Spacetime, D.Phil thesis, Oxford University. (Scholar)
- Ray, C., 1991, Time, Space and Philosophy, New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
- Roberts, J. T., 2003, “Leibniz on Force and Absolute Motion,” Philosophy of Science, 70: 553-573. (Scholar)
- Rynasiewicz, R., 1995, “By their Properties, Causes, and Effects: Newton's Scholium on Time, Space, Place, and Motion — I. The Text,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 26: 133-153. (Scholar)
- Sklar, L., 1974, Space, Time and Spacetime, Berkeley: University of California Press. (Scholar)
- Stein, H., 1977, “Some Philosophical Prehistory of General Relativity,” in Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 8: Foundations of Space-Time Theories: , J. Earman, C. Glymour and J. Stachel (eds.), Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1967, “Newtonian Space-Time,” Texas Quarterly, 10: 174-200. (Scholar)
- Wheeler, J.A. and Ciufolini, I., 1995, Gravitation and Inertia, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton U. Press. (Scholar)
Notable Philosophical Discussions of the Absolute-Relative Debates
- Barbour, J. B., 1982, “Relational Concepts of Space and Time,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 33: 251-274. (Scholar)
- Belot, G., 2000, “Geometry and Motion,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 51: 561-595. (Scholar)
- Butterfield, J., 1984, “Relationism and Possible Worlds,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 35: 101-112. (Scholar)
- Callender, C., 2002, “Philosophy of Space-Time Physics,” in The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Science, P. Machamer (ed.), Cambridge: Blackwell. 173-198. (Scholar)
- Carrier, M., 1992, “Kant's Relational Theory of Absolute Space,” Kant Studien, 83: 399-416. (Scholar)
- Dieks, D., 2001, “Space-Time Relationism in Newtonian and Relativistic Physics,” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 15: 5-17. (Scholar)
- Disalle, R., 1995, “Spacetime Theory as Physical Geometry,” Erkenntnis, 42: 317-337. (Scholar)
- Earman, J., 1986, “Why Space is Not a Substance (at Least Not to First Degree),” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 67: 225-244. (Scholar)
- –––, 1970, “Who's Afraid of Absolute Space?,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 48: 287-319. (Scholar)
- Earman, J. and J. Norton, 1987, “What Price Spacetime Substantivalism: The Hole Story,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 38: 515-525. (Scholar)
- Hoefer, C., 2000, “Kant's Hands and Earman's Pions: Chirality Arguments for Substantival Space,” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 14: 237-256. (Scholar)
- –––, 1998, “Absolute Versus Relational Spacetime: For Better Or Worse, the Debate Goes on,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 49: 451-467. (Scholar)
- –––, 1996, “The Metaphysics of Space-Time Substantialism,” Journal of Philosophy, 93: 5-27. (Scholar)
- Huggett, N., 2000, “Reflections on Parity Nonconservation,” Philosophy of Science, 67: 219-241. (Scholar)
- Le Poidevin, R., 2004, “Space, Supervenience and Substantivalism,” Analysis, 64: 191-198. (Scholar)
- Malament, D., 1985, “Discussion: A Modest Remark about Reichenbach, Rotation, and General Relativity,” Philosophy of Science, 52: 615-620. (Scholar)
- Maudlin, T., 1993, “Buckets of Water and Waves of Space: Why Space-Time is Probably a Substance,” Philosophy of Science, 60: 183-203. (Scholar)
- –––, 1990, “Substances and Space-Time: What Aristotle would have Said to Einstein,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 531-561. (Scholar)
- Mundy, B., 1992, “Space-Time and Isomorphism,” Proceedings of the Biennial Meetings of the Philosophy of Science Association, 1: 515-527. (Scholar)
- –––, 1983, “Relational Theories of Euclidean Space and Minkowski Space-Time,” Philosophy of Science, 50: 205-226. (Scholar)
- Nerlich, G., 2003, “Space-Time Substantivalism,” in The Oxford Handbook of Metaphysics, M. J. Loux (ed.), Oxford: Oxford Univ Pr. 281-314. (Scholar)
- –––, 1996, “What Spacetime Explains,” Philosophical Quarterly, 46: 127-131. (Scholar)
- –––, 1994, What Spacetime Explains: Metaphysical Essays on Space and Time, New York: Cambridge Univ Pr. (Scholar)
- –––, 1973, “Hands, Knees, and Absolute Space,” Journal of Philosophy, 70: 337-351. (Scholar)
- Rynasiewicz, R., 2000, “On the Distinction between Absolute and Relative Motion,” Philosophy of Science, 67: 70-93. (Scholar)
- –––, 1996, “Absolute Versus Relational Space-Time: An Outmoded Debate?,” Journal of Philosophy, 93: 279-306. (Scholar)
- Teller, P., 1991, “Substance, Relations, and Arguments about the Nature of Space-Time,” Philosophical Review, 363-397. (Scholar)
- Torretti, R., 2000, “Spacetime Models for the World,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 31B: 171-186. (Scholar)
Generated Tue May 7 09:50:32 2013
