A note on citations in this entry: where possible, we refer to primary texts using the author’s name, followed by the notation given in Long and Sedley 1987. For example, “Aetius, 26A” refers to chapter 26 of Long and Sedley’s collection, text A, whose author is Aetius. We use Long and Sedley’s translation unless otherwise noted.

Collections of primary texts

• von Arnim, H., 1903–5 Stoicorum Veterum Fragmenta Leipzig: Teubner. [SVF] (Scholar)
• Dufour, R, 2004, Chrysippe. Oeuvre philosophique, 2 vols. Paris: Les Belles Lettres. (Scholar)
• Hülser, K., 1987–88. Die Fragmente zur Dialektik der Stoiker, Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog Verlag. [FDS] (Scholar)
• Inwood, B., 2022. Later Stoicism, 155 BC to AD 200: An Introduction and Collection of Sources in Translation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Inwood, B. and L. P. Gerson, 1997, Hellenistic Philosophy 2nd ed. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing. [IG] (Scholar)
• Long, A. A. and D. N. Sedley, 1987, The Hellenistic Philosophers, 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press [LS] (Scholar)
• Nickel, R., 2009, Stoa und Stoiker. Auswahl der Fragmente und Zeugnisse, 2 vols. Dusseldorf: Artemis und Winkler (Scholar)

Primary texts by specific authors

• Bowen, A. and R. Todd, 2004, Cleomedes’ Lectures on Astronomy, Berkeley: University of California Press. [A translation of the Stoic Cleomedes’ work on astronomy, together with introduction and commentary.] (Scholar)
• Boys-Stones, G., 2018, L. Annaeus Cornutus: Greek Theology, Fragments and Testimonia, Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature. [Greek text with facing page translation, with introduction and notes] (Scholar)
• Edelstein, L. and I. G. Kidd, 1972, Posidonius, 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Greek and Latin texts; introduction in English] (Scholar)
• Graver, M., 2002, Cicero on the Emotions: Tusculan Disputations 3 and 4. Chicago: University of Chicageo Press. [English translation and notes] (Scholar)
• Graver, M. and A. A. Long, 2015, Seneca: Letters on Ethics to Lucilius, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [English translation of all 124 extant letters] (Scholar)
• Inwood, B., 2007, Seneca: Selected Philosophical Letters, Translated with Introduction and Commentary, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Pomeroy, A., 1999, Arius Didymus: Epitome of Stoic Ethics, Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature. [Greek text with facing page translation and notes]. (Scholar)
• Ramelli, I., 2009, Hierocles the Stoic: Elements of Ethics, Fragments and Excerpts, Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature. [Greek text with facing page translation. Extensive notes.] (Scholar)
• Van Staaten, M., 1962, Panaetii Rhodii Fragmenta, Leiden: Brill. (Scholar)

Useful Reference Works

• Algra, K., and J. Barnes, J. Mansfeld and M. Schofield (eds.), 1999, The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Arenson, K. (ed.), 2020, The Routledge Handbook of Hellenistic Philosophy, New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
• Inwood, B. (ed.), 2003, The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Sellars, J. (ed.), 2016, The Routledge Companion to the Stoic Tradition, New York: Routledge. (Scholar)

Introductions to Stoicism

• Brennan, T., 2005, The Stoic Life, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Cooper, J. M., 2012, Pursuits of Wisdom: Six Ways of Life in Ancient Philosophy, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
• Inwood, B., 2018, Stoicism: A Very Short Introduction, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Long, A. A., 2002, Epictetus: A Stoic and Socratic Guide to Life, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1986, Hellenistic Philosophy: Stoics, Epicureans, Skeptics, 2nd edition, London: Duckworth. (Scholar)
• Nussbaum, M., 1994, The Therapy of Desire, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
• Rist, J. M., 1969, Stoic Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Sandbach, F. H., 1994, The Stoics, 2nd edition, London: Duckworth. (Scholar)
• Sellars, J., 2006, Stoicism, Berkeley and Durham: University of California Press and Acumen, UK. (Scholar)
• Sharples, R. W., 1996, Stoics, Epicureans and Skeptics, London: Routledge. (Scholar)

A few collections, monographs, and some individual articles referred to above

• Annas, J., 1990, ‘Stoic Epistemology’, in S. Everson (ed.), Epistemology: Cambridge Companions to Ancient Thought I, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 184–203. (Scholar)
• –––, 1992, Hellenistic Philosophy of Mind, Berkeley: University of California Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1993, The Morality of Happiness, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Atherton, C., 1988, ‘Hand over Fist: The Failure of Stoic Rhetoric’, Classical Quarterly, 38(2): 392–427. (Scholar)
• –––, 1993. The Stoics on Ambiguity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Atherton, C. and D. Blank, 2003, ‘The Stoic Contribution to Traditional Grammar’, in B. Inwood (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 310–327. (Scholar)
• –––, 2013, ‘From Plato to Priscian: Philosophy’s Legacy to Grammar’, in K. Allen (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the History of Linguistics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 282–339. (Scholar)
• Bailey, D. T. J., 2014, ‘The Structure of Stoic Metaphysics’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 46: 253–309. (Scholar)
• Baltzly, D., 2003, ‘Stoic Pantheism’, Sophia, 34: 3–33. (Scholar)
• Baratin, M., 1989, La naissance de la syntaxe à Rome, Paris: Les Editions de Minuit. (Scholar)
• Barnes, J., 1997, Logic and the Imperial Stoa, Leiden: Brill. (Scholar)
• –––, 2007, Truth, etc: Six Lectures on Ancient Logic, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Barnes, J., Bobzien, S., and Mignucci, M., 1999, ‘Logic’, in K. Algra, et al. (eds.), The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 77–176. (Scholar)
• Barney, R., 2003, ‘A Puzzle in Stoic Ethics’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 24: 303–40. (Scholar)
• Betegh, G., 2003, ‘Cosmological Ethics in the Timaeus and Early Stoicism’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 24: 273–302. (Scholar)
• Blank, D. L., 1982, Ancient Philosophy and Grammar: The Syntax of Apollonius Dyscolus, Chico: Scholars Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2000, ‘The Organization of Grammar in Ancient Greece’, in S. Auroux et al. (eds.), History of the Language Sciences, Berlin: De Gruyter, 400–17. (Scholar)
• Bobzien, S., 1986, Die stoische Modallogik, Würzburg: Koenigshausen and Neumann. (Scholar)
• –––, 1996, ‘Stoic Syllogistic’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 14: 133–92. (Scholar)
• –––, 1998, Determinism and Freedom in Stoic Philosophy, Oxford: Clarendon. (Scholar)
• –––, 2002, ‘Chrysippus and the Epistemic Theory of Vagueness’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 102(1): 217–238. (Scholar)
• –––, 2012, ‘How to Give Someone Horns: Paradoxes of Presupposition in Antiquity’, Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy, 15: 159–84. (Scholar)
• –––, 2021, ‘Frege Plagiarized the Stoics’, in F. Leigh (ed.), Themes in Plato, Aristotle, and Hellenistic Philosophy: Keeling Lectures 2011–2018, London: University of London Press, 149–206. (Scholar)
• Bobzien, S. and S. Shogry, 2020, ‘Stoic Logic and Multiple Generality’, Philosophers’ Imprint, 20(31): 1–36. (Scholar)
• Brennan, T., 1996, ‘Reasonable Impressions’, Phronesis, 41(3): 318–334. (Scholar)
• –––, 2009, ‘Stoic Souls in Stoic Corpses’, in D. Frede and B. Reis (eds.), Body and Soul in Ancient Philosophy, Berlin: De Gruyter, 389–407. (Scholar)
• Brittain, C., 2002, ‘Non-Rational Perception in the Stoics and Augustine,’ Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 22: 253–308. (Scholar)
• Bronowski, A., 2019, The Stoics on Lekta. All There Is to Say, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Brunschwig, J., 1988, ‘La théorie stoïcienne du genre suprême et l’ontologie platonicienne’, reprinted and translated into English in his 1994 Papers in Hellenistic Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 92–157. (Scholar)
• Castagnoli, L., 2010, ‘How Dialectical Was Stoic Dialectic?’, in A. Nightingale and D. Sedley (eds.), Ancient Models of Mind: Studies in Human and Divine Rationality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 153–179. (Scholar)
• Caston, V., 1999, ‘Something or Nothing: The Stoics on Concepts and Universals’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 17: 145–213. (Scholar)
• –––, forthcoming, ‘The Stoics on Mental Representation’, in J. Klein and N. Powers (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Hellenistic Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press. [accessed online via author’s personal website] (Scholar)
• Cavini, W., 1993, ‘Chrysippus on Speaking Truly and the Liar’, in K. Döring and T. Ebert (eds.), Dialektiker und Stoiker: Zur Logik der Stoa und ihrer Vorläufer, Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 85–109. (Scholar)
• Christensen, J., 1962, An Essay on the Unity of Stoic Philosophy, Copenhagen: Munksgaard. (Scholar)
• Colish, M., 1985, The Stoic Tradition from Antiquity to the Early Middle Ages, 2 volumes, Leiden: E.J. Brill. (Scholar)
• Cooper, J.M., 1999a, ‘Eudaimonism, the Appeal to Nature, and “Moral Duty” in Stoicism’, in his Reason and Emotion, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 427–448. (Scholar)
• –––, 1999b, ‘Posidonius on Emotions’, in his Reason and Emotion, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 449–484. (Scholar)
• –––, 2004, ‘Justus Lipsius and the Revival of Stoicism in Late-Sixteenth-Century Europe’, in N. Brender and L. Krasnoff (eds.), New Essays on the History of Autonomy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 7–29. (Scholar)
• –––, 2005, ‘The Emotional Life of the Wise,’ in Southern Journal of Philosophy, 43 (Supplement): 176–218. (Scholar)
• –––, 2012, Pursuits of Wisdom: Six Ways of Life in Ancient Philosophy from Socrates to Plotinus, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
• Denyer, N., 1999, ‘The Master Argument of Diodorus Cronus: A Near Miss’, Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy, 2: 239–52. (Scholar)
• Durand, M., 2019, ‘What Does “This” Mean? Deixis and the Semantics of Demonstratives in Stoic Propositions’, Methodos 19. doi:10.4000/methodos.6023 (Scholar)
• Ebbesen, S., 2009, ‘Priscian and the Philosophers’ in M. Baratin, C. Colombat, L. Holtz (eds.). Priscien: transmission et refondation de la grammaire, de l’Antiquité aux Modernes, Turnhout: Brepols, 85–108. (Scholar)
• Engberg-Pedersen, T., 2000, Paul and the Stoics, Westminster: John Knox Press. [Specifically on the alleged correspondence between Paul and Seneca, see J. B. Lightfoot, The Letters of Paul and Seneca, London: Macmillan, 1890, and Aldo Moda, ‘Seneca e il Cristianesimo’, Henoch, 5 (1983): 93–109.] (Scholar)
• Engstrom S., and J. Whiting (eds.), 1996, Aristotle, Kant and the Stoics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Frede, M., 1977, ‘The Origins of Traditional Grammar’, reprinted in his 1987 Essays in Ancient Philosophy, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 338–359. (Scholar)
• –––, 1983, ‘Stoics and Skeptics on Clear and Distinct Impressions’, reprinted in his 1987 Essays in Ancient Philosophy, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 151–76. (Scholar)
• –––, 1994a, ‘The Stoic Notion of a Grammatical Case’, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies, 39: 13–24. (Scholar)
• –––, 1994b, ‘The Stoic Notion of a Lekton’, in S. Everson (ed.), Language: Cambridge Companions to Ancient Thought 3, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 109–128. (Scholar)
• –––, 1994c, ‘The Stoic Conception of Reason’, in K. Boudouris (ed.), Hellenistic Philosophy, Athens: International Society for Greek Philosophy and Culture, 50–63. (Scholar)
• –––, 1999, ‘Stoic Epistemology’, in K. Algra, et al. (eds.), The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 295–322. (Scholar)
• –––, 2011, A Free Will: Origins of the Notion in Ancient Thought, Berkeley: University of California Press. (Scholar)
• Gaskin, R., 1995, The Sea Battle and the Master Argument: Aristotle and Diodorus Cronus on the Metaphysics of the Future, Berlin: De Gruyter. (Scholar)
• –––, 1997, ‘The Stoics on Cases, Predicates and the Unity of the Proposition’, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies (Supplement), 68: 91–108. (Scholar)
• Gill, C., 2006, The Structured Self in Hellenistic and Roman Thought, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Goldschmidt, V., 1972, ‘῾Υπάρχειν et ὑφιστάναι dans la philosophie stoïcienne’, Revue Des Études Grecques, 85(406): 331–344.
• Gourinat, J-B., 2000, La Dialectique des Stoïciens, Paris: Vrin. (Scholar)
• Graver, M., 2007, Stoicism and Emotion, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
• Greene, B., 2018. The Imperfect Present: Stoic Physics of Time, University of California/San Diego Doctoral Dissertation. (Scholar)
• Hahm, D.E., 1977, The Origins of Stoic Cosmology, Columbus: Ohio State University Press. (Scholar)
• de Harven, V., 2015, ‘How Nothing Can Be Something. The Stoic Theory of Void’, Ancient Philosophy, 35(2): 405–429. (Scholar)
• –––, 2016, ‘Necessity, Possibility and Determinism in Stoic Thought’, in M. Cresswel, E. Mares and A. Rini (eds.), Logical Modalities from Aristotle to Carnap: The Story of Necessity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 70–90. (Scholar)
• Helle, R., 2018, ‘Hierocles and the Stoic Theory of Blending’, Phronesis, 63(1): 87–116. (Scholar)
• –––, 2021, ‘Self-Causation and Unity in Stoicism’, Phronesis, 66(2): 178–213. (Scholar)
• –––, 2022, ‘Colocation and the Stoic Definition of Blending’, Phronesis, 67(4): 462–497. (Scholar)
• Hensley, I., 2018, ‘On the Separability and Inseparability of the Stoic Principles’, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 56(2): 187–214. (Scholar)
• –––, 2020, ‘The Physics of Pneuma in Early Stoicism’, in S.M.P. Coughlin, D. Leith, and O. Lewis (eds.), The Concept of Pneuma after Aristotle, Berlin: Edition Topoi, 171–201. (Scholar)
• –––, 2021, ‘The Physics of Stoic Cosmogony’, Apeiron, 54(2): 161–187. (Scholar)
• Hudson, H., 1990, ‘A Response to A. A. Long’s “The Stoics on World-Conflagration and Everlasting Recurrence”’, The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 28: 149–58. (Scholar)
• Ierodiakonou, K., 1993, ‘The Stoic Division of Philosophy’, Phronesis, 38(1): 57–74. (Scholar)
• Ildefonse, F., 1997, La naissance de la grammaire dans l’antiquité grecque, Paris: Vrin. (Scholar)
• Inwood, B., 1985, Ethics and Human Action in Early Stoicism, Oxford: Clarendon. (Scholar)
• –––, 1999, ‘Rules and Reasoning in Stoic Ethics’, in K. Ierodiakonou (ed.), Topics in Stoic Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 95–127. (Scholar)
• –––, 2012, ‘How Unified is Stoicism Anyway?’, in R. Kamtekar (ed.), Virtue and Happiness: Essays in Honour of Julia Annas, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 223–244. (Scholar)
• Ju, A. E., 2009, ‘The Stoic Ontology of Geometrical Limits’, Phronesis, 54 (4–5): 371–389. (Scholar)
• Klein, J., 2015, ‘Making Sense of Stoic Indifferents’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 49: 227–281. (Scholar)
• –––, 2016, ‘The Stoic Argument from Oikeiо̄sis’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 50: 143–200. (Scholar)
• Lallot, J., 1988, ‘Origines et développement de la théorie des parties du discours en Grèce’, Langages, 92: 11–23. (Scholar)
• Lewis, E., 1995, ‘The Stoics on Identity and Individuation’, Phronesis, 40: 89–108. (Scholar)
• Long, A. A., 1971, ‘Language and Thought in Stoicism’, in his Problems in Stoicism, London: Athlone, 75–113. (Scholar)
• –––, 1985, ‘The Stoics on World-Conflagration and Everlasting Recurrence’, The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 23: 13–17. (Scholar)
• –––, 2002, ‘Zeno’s Epistemology and Plato’s Theaetetus’, in T. Scaltsas and A. S. Mason (eds.), Zeno of Citium and His Legacy: The Philosophy of Zeno, Larnaca: Municipality of Larnaca, 115–30. (Scholar)
• –––, 2008, ‘Philo on Stoic Physics’, in F. Alesse (ed.), Philo of Alexandria and Post-Aristotelian Philosophy, Leiden: Brill, 121–140. (Scholar)
• Lorenz, H., 2011, ‘Posidonius on the Nature and Treatment of the Emotions’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 40: 189–211. (Scholar)
• Luhtala, A., 2005, Grammar and Philosophy in Late Antiquity: A Study of Priscian’s Sources, Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. (Scholar)
• Magrin, S., 2018, ‘Nature and Utopia in Epictetus’ Theory of Oikeiōsis’, Phronesis, 63(3): 293–350. (Scholar)
• Meinwald, C., 2005, ‘Ignorance and Opinion in Stoic Epistemology’, Phronesis, 50(3): 215–231. (Scholar)
• Menn, S., 1995, ‘Physics as a Virtue’, Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium of Ancient Philosophy, 11(1): 1–34. (Scholar)
• –––, 1999, ‘The Stoic Theory of Categories’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 17: 215–247. (Scholar)
• Mignucci, M., 1999, ‘The Liar Paradox and the Stoics’, in K. Ierodiakonou (ed.), Topics in Stoic Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 54–70. (Scholar)
• Miller, F. and B. Inwood (eds.), 2003, Hellenistic and Early Modern Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Nawar, T., 2014, ‘The Stoic Account of Apprehension’, Philosophers’ Imprint, 14(29): 1–21. (Scholar)
• –––, 2017, ‘The Stoics on Identity, Identification, and Peculiar Qualities’, Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium of Ancient Philosophy, 32(1): 113–159. (Scholar)
• –––, 2020, ‘The Stoic Theory of the Soul’, in K. Arenson (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Hellenistic Philosophy, New York: Routledge, 148–159. (Scholar)
• –––, 2022, ‘Clear and Distinct Perception in the Stoics, Augustine, and William of Ockham’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Supplementary Volume), 96(1): 185–207. (Scholar)
• Obdrzalek, S., 2012, ‘From Skepticism to Paralysis: The Apraxia Argument in Cicero’s Academica’, Ancient Philosophy, 32(2): 369–392. (Scholar)
• Osler, M. J., 1991, Atoms, Pneuma and Tranquillity: Epicurean and Stoic themes in European Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Perin, C., 2005, ‘Stoic Epistemology and the Limits of Externalism’, Ancient Philosophy, 25(2): 383–401. (Scholar)
• von Prantl, C., 1855, Geschichte der Logik in Abendlande [History of Western Logic], Leipzig: Hirzel. (Scholar)
• Reydams-Schils, G., 1999, Demiurge and Providence: Stoic and Platonist Readings of Plato’s Timaeus, Turnhout: Brepols. (Scholar)
• Salles, R., 2005, The Stoics on Determinism and Compatibilism, Burlington VT: Ashgate. (Scholar)
• –––, 2009, God and Cosmos in Stoicism, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2015, ‘Two Early Stoic Theories of Cosmogony’, in A. Marmodoro and B. D. Prince (eds.), Causation and Creation in Late Antiquity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 11–30. (Scholar)
• –––, 2018, ‘Two Classic Problems in the Stoic Theory of Time’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 55: 133–184. (Scholar)
• Schofield, M., 1984, ‘Ariston of Chios and the Unity of Virtue’, Ancient Philosophy, 4(1): 83–96. (Scholar)
• –––, 1991, The Stoic Idea of the City, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Schwab, W., forthcoming, ‘Non-Perceptual Kataleptic Impressions in Stoicism’, Journal of the History of Philosophy. (Scholar)
• Sedley, D. N., 1982, ‘The Criterion of Stoic Identity’, Phronesis, 27: 255–75. (Scholar)
• –––, 1984, ‘The Stoic Theory of Universals’, The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 23: 87–92. (Scholar)
• –––, 1999, ‘Hellenistic Physics and Metaphysics’, in K. Algra, et al. (eds.), The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 355–411. (Scholar)
• –––, 2002, ‘Zeno’s Definition of Phantasia Katalēptikē’, in T. Scaltsas and A. S. Mason (eds.), Zeno of Citium and His Legacy: The Philosophy of Zeno, Larnaca: Municipality of Larnaca, 135–54. (Scholar)
• –––, 2003, ‘The School, from Zeno to Arius Didymus’, in B. Inwood (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 7–32. (Scholar)
• Sellars, J., 2011, ‘Stoic Ontology and Plato’s Sophist’, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies, 54: 185–203. (Scholar)
• Shogry, S., 2018, ‘Creating a Mind Fit for Truth: The Role of Expertise in the Stoic Account of the Kataleptic Impression’, Ancient Philosophy, 38(2): 357–381. (Scholar)
• –––, 2019, ‘What Do Our Impressions Say? The Stoic Theory of Perceptual Content and Belief Formation’, Apeiron, 52(1): 29–63. (Scholar)
• –––, 2021, ‘The Stoic Appeal to Expertise: Platonic Echoes in the Reply to Indistinguishability’, Apeiron, 54(2): 129–159. (Scholar)
• –––, 2022, ‘The Starting-Points for Knowledge: Chrysippus on How to Acquire and Fortify Insecure Apprehension’, Phronesis, 67(1): 62–98. (Scholar)
• Sluiter, I., 1990, Ancient Grammar in Context. Contributions to the Study of Ancient Linguistic Thought, Amsterdam: VU University Press. (Scholar)
• Sorabji, R., 1990, ‘Perceptual Content in the Stoics’, Phronesis, 35(3): 307–314. (Scholar)
• –––, 2000, Emotion and Peace of Mind: from Stoic Agitation to Christian Temptation, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Stojanović, P., 2019, ‘Zeno of Citium’s Causal Theory of Apprehensive Appearances’, Ancient Philosophy, 39(1): 151–174. (Scholar)
• Strange, S. and J. Zupko (eds.), 2004, Stoicism: Traditions and Transformations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Striker, G., 1987, ‘Origins of the Concept of Natural Law’, Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy, 2: 79–94. (Scholar)
• –––, 1996, Essays on Hellenistic Epistemology and Ethics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Swiggers, P., and A. Wouters, (eds.), 2002, Grammatical Theory and Philosophy of Language in Antiquity (Orbis Supplementa 19). Leuven: Peeters. (Scholar)
• Tieleman, T. L., 2007, ‘Panaetius’ Place in the History of Stoicism. With Special Reference to his Moral Psychology’, in A.M. Ioppolo and D.N. Sedley (eds.), Pyrrhonists, Patricians and Platonizers, Napoli: Bibliopolis, 103–142. (Scholar)
• Verbeke, G., 1983, The Presence of Stoicism in Medieval Thought, Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press. (Scholar)
• Vogt, K. M., 2008, Law, Reason, and the Cosmic City: Political Philosophy in the Early Stoa, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2012, Belief and Truth: A Skeptic Reading of Plato, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2022, ‘Vagueness and Kataleptic Impressions’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Supplement), 96(1): 165–183. (Scholar)