The PhilPapers SurveysPreliminary Survey results (Back to contents)

Note: set response grain to "fine" for details on "other" responses.

Population  AOS Response details

A priori knowledge: yes or no?

Accept: yes 1368 / 3226 (42.4%)
Lean toward: yes 779 / 3226 (24.1%)
Lean toward: no 502 / 3226 (15.6%)
Accept: no 268 / 3226 (8.3%)
The question is too unclear to answer 95 / 3226 (2.9%)
Agnostic/undecided 63 / 3226 (2.0%)
Accept an intermediate view 45 / 3226 (1.4%)
Accept another alternative 25 / 3226 (0.8%)
Skip 24 / 3226 (0.7%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue 23 / 3226 (0.7%)
Accept both 12 / 3226 (0.4%)
Reject both 9 / 3226 (0.3%)
There is no fact of the matter 8 / 3226 (0.2%)
Other 5 / 3226 (0.2%)

Abstract objects: Platonism or nominalism?

Lean toward: nominalism 875 / 3226 (27.1%)
Lean toward: Platonism 593 / 3226 (18.4%)
Accept: nominalism 579 / 3226 (17.9%)
Accept: Platonism 423 / 3226 (13.1%)
Agnostic/undecided 156 / 3226 (4.8%)
Accept another alternative 125 / 3226 (3.9%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue 119 / 3226 (3.7%)
Reject both 110 / 3226 (3.4%)
Accept an intermediate view 99 / 3226 (3.1%)
The question is too unclear to answer 45 / 3226 (1.4%)
Skip 41 / 3226 (1.3%)
There is no fact of the matter 29 / 3226 (0.9%)
Accept both 19 / 3226 (0.6%)
Other 13 / 3226 (0.4%)

Aesthetic value: objective or subjective?

Lean toward: objective 762 / 3226 (23.6%)
Lean toward: subjective 740 / 3226 (22.9%)
Accept: subjective 609 / 3226 (18.9%)
Accept: objective 360 / 3226 (11.2%)
Accept an intermediate view 206 / 3226 (6.4%)
Accept both 119 / 3226 (3.7%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue 104 / 3226 (3.2%)
Agnostic/undecided 98 / 3226 (3.0%)
The question is too unclear to answer 82 / 3226 (2.5%)
Accept another alternative 63 / 3226 (2.0%)
Skip 30 / 3226 (0.9%)
Reject both 28 / 3226 (0.9%)
There is no fact of the matter 15 / 3226 (0.5%)
Other 10 / 3226 (0.3%)

Analytic-synthetic distinction: yes or no?

Lean toward: yes 959 / 3226 (29.7%)
Accept: yes 927 / 3226 (28.7%)
Lean toward: no 581 / 3226 (18.0%)
Accept: no 356 / 3226 (11.0%)
Agnostic/undecided 101 / 3226 (3.1%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue 92 / 3226 (2.9%)
Skip 51 / 3226 (1.6%)
The question is too unclear to answer 50 / 3226 (1.5%)
Accept an intermediate view 48 / 3226 (1.5%)
Accept both 18 / 3226 (0.6%)
Accept another alternative 17 / 3226 (0.5%)
Other 11 / 3226 (0.3%)
Reject both 9 / 3226 (0.3%)
There is no fact of the matter 6 / 3226 (0.2%)

Epistemic justification: internalism or externalism?

Lean toward: externalism 881 / 3226 (27.3%)
Lean toward: internalism 573 / 3226 (17.8%)
Accept: externalism 487 / 3226 (15.1%)
Accept: internalism 291 / 3226 (9.0%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue 266 / 3226 (8.2%)
Accept an intermediate view 198 / 3226 (6.1%)
Agnostic/undecided 144 / 3226 (4.5%)
Accept both 132 / 3226 (4.1%)
Skip 73 / 3226 (2.3%)
Reject both 51 / 3226 (1.6%)
The question is too unclear to answer 49 / 3226 (1.5%)
Accept another alternative 44 / 3226 (1.4%)
There is no fact of the matter 26 / 3226 (0.8%)
Other 11 / 3226 (0.3%)

External world: idealism, skepticism, or non-skeptical realism?

Accept: non-skeptical realism 1541 / 3226 (47.8%)
Lean toward: non-skeptical realism 764 / 3226 (23.7%)
Lean toward: skepticism 211 / 3226 (6.5%)
Lean toward: idealism 176 / 3226 (5.5%)
Accept: skepticism 99 / 3226 (3.1%)
Accept: idealism 79 / 3226 (2.4%)
Accept another alternative 60 / 3226 (1.9%)
Accept an intermediate view 53 / 3226 (1.6%)
The question is too unclear to answer 48 / 3226 (1.5%)
Reject all 39 / 3226 (1.2%)
Skip 30 / 3226 (0.9%)
Agnostic/undecided 28 / 3226 (0.9%)
Accept more than one 24 / 3226 (0.7%)
Reject one, undecided between others 22 / 3226 (0.7%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue 20 / 3226 (0.6%)
There is no fact of the matter 16 / 3226 (0.5%)
Other 16 / 3226 (0.5%)

Free will: compatibilism, libertarianism, or no free will?

Accept: compatibilism 873 / 3226 (27.1%)
Lean toward: compatibilism 788 / 3226 (24.4%)
Lean toward: libertarianism 303 / 3226 (9.4%)
Accept: libertarianism 288 / 3226 (8.9%)
Lean toward: no free will 255 / 3226 (7.9%)
Accept: no free will 236 / 3226 (7.3%)
Agnostic/undecided 112 / 3226 (3.5%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue 62 / 3226 (1.9%)
The question is too unclear to answer 61 / 3226 (1.9%)
Accept another alternative 53 / 3226 (1.6%)
Accept an intermediate view 38 / 3226 (1.2%)
Reject all 37 / 3226 (1.1%)
Reject one, undecided between others 32 / 3226 (1.0%)
There is no fact of the matter 30 / 3226 (0.9%)
Skip 24 / 3226 (0.7%)
Accept more than one 23 / 3226 (0.7%)
Other 11 / 3226 (0.3%)

God: theism or atheism?

Accept: atheism 1710 / 3226 (53.0%)
Accept: theism 427 / 3226 (13.2%)
Lean toward: atheism 426 / 3226 (13.2%)
Agnostic/undecided 227 / 3226 (7.0%)
Lean toward: theism 172 / 3226 (5.3%)
Reject both 55 / 3226 (1.7%)
Accept another alternative 52 / 3226 (1.6%)
The question is too unclear to answer 41 / 3226 (1.3%)
Accept an intermediate view 31 / 3226 (1.0%)
There is no fact of the matter 27 / 3226 (0.8%)
Skip 25 / 3226 (0.8%)
Other 16 / 3226 (0.5%)
Accept both 16 / 3226 (0.5%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue 1 / 3226 (0.0%)

Knowledge claims: contextualism, relativism, or invariantism?

Lean toward: contextualism 977 / 3226 (30.3%)
Lean toward: invariantism 476 / 3226 (14.8%)
Accept: contextualism 389 / 3226 (12.1%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue 372 / 3226 (11.5%)
Accept: invariantism 296 / 3226 (9.2%)
Agnostic/undecided 151 / 3226 (4.7%)
Lean toward: relativism 141 / 3226 (4.4%)
Skip 74 / 3226 (2.3%)
Accept: relativism 60 / 3226 (1.9%)
Accept more than one 47 / 3226 (1.5%)
The question is too unclear to answer 47 / 3226 (1.5%)
Reject one, undecided between others 45 / 3226 (1.4%)
Accept another alternative 42 / 3226 (1.3%)
Reject all 37 / 3226 (1.1%)
Accept an intermediate view 33 / 3226 (1.0%)
There is no fact of the matter 23 / 3226 (0.7%)
Other 16 / 3226 (0.5%)

Knowledge: empiricism or rationalism?

Lean toward: empiricism 813 / 3226 (25.2%)
Lean toward: rationalism 499 / 3226 (15.5%)
Accept: empiricism 441 / 3226 (13.7%)
Accept an intermediate view 373 / 3226 (11.6%)
Accept: rationalism 315 / 3226 (9.8%)
Accept both 231 / 3226 (7.2%)
The question is too unclear to answer 178 / 3226 (5.5%)
Reject both 117 / 3226 (3.6%)
Accept another alternative 106 / 3226 (3.3%)
Agnostic/undecided 64 / 3226 (2.0%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue 40 / 3226 (1.2%)
Skip 27 / 3226 (0.8%)
Other 11 / 3226 (0.3%)
There is no fact of the matter 11 / 3226 (0.3%)

Laws of nature: Humean or non-Humean?

Lean toward: non-Humean 784 / 3226 (24.3%)
Lean toward: Humean 693 / 3226 (21.5%)
Accept: non-Humean 688 / 3226 (21.3%)
Accept: Humean 334 / 3226 (10.4%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue 288 / 3226 (8.9%)
Agnostic/undecided 200 / 3226 (6.2%)
Skip 68 / 3226 (2.1%)
The question is too unclear to answer 49 / 3226 (1.5%)
Accept another alternative 41 / 3226 (1.3%)
Reject both 30 / 3226 (0.9%)
Accept an intermediate view 21 / 3226 (0.7%)
Other 12 / 3226 (0.4%)
Accept both 9 / 3226 (0.3%)
There is no fact of the matter 9 / 3226 (0.3%)

Logic: classical or non-classical?

Lean toward: classical 736 / 3226 (22.8%)
Accept: classical 696 / 3226 (21.6%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue 468 / 3226 (14.5%)
Lean toward: non-classical 407 / 3226 (12.6%)
Accept: non-classical 244 / 3226 (7.6%)
Accept both 221 / 3226 (6.9%)
Agnostic/undecided 141 / 3226 (4.4%)
The question is too unclear to answer 89 / 3226 (2.8%)
Skip 69 / 3226 (2.1%)
There is no fact of the matter 62 / 3226 (1.9%)
Accept an intermediate view 34 / 3226 (1.1%)
Accept another alternative 25 / 3226 (0.8%)
Reject both 22 / 3226 (0.7%)
Other 12 / 3226 (0.4%)

Mental content: internalism or externalism?

Lean toward: externalism 775 / 3226 (24.0%)
Accept: externalism 629 / 3226 (19.5%)
Lean toward: internalism 548 / 3226 (17.0%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue 283 / 3226 (8.8%)
Accept: internalism 282 / 3226 (8.7%)
Accept an intermediate view 152 / 3226 (4.7%)
Agnostic/undecided 145 / 3226 (4.5%)
Accept both 131 / 3226 (4.1%)
Skip 76 / 3226 (2.4%)
The question is too unclear to answer 64 / 3226 (2.0%)
Reject both 55 / 3226 (1.7%)
Accept another alternative 47 / 3226 (1.5%)
There is no fact of the matter 22 / 3226 (0.7%)
Other 17 / 3226 (0.5%)

Meta-ethics: moral realism or moral anti-realism?

Accept: moral realism 915 / 3226 (28.4%)
Lean toward: moral realism 779 / 3226 (24.1%)
Lean toward: moral anti-realism 550 / 3226 (17.0%)
Accept: moral anti-realism 447 / 3226 (13.9%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue 130 / 3226 (4.0%)
Agnostic/undecided 86 / 3226 (2.7%)
Accept an intermediate view 81 / 3226 (2.5%)
Accept another alternative 58 / 3226 (1.8%)
The question is too unclear to answer 53 / 3226 (1.6%)
Skip 48 / 3226 (1.5%)
Reject both 42 / 3226 (1.3%)
There is no fact of the matter 15 / 3226 (0.5%)
Other 11 / 3226 (0.3%)
Accept both 11 / 3226 (0.3%)

Metaphilosophy: naturalism or non-naturalism?

Accept: naturalism 870 / 3226 (27.0%)
Lean toward: naturalism 749 / 3226 (23.2%)
Accept: non-naturalism 417 / 3226 (12.9%)
Lean toward: non-naturalism 409 / 3226 (12.7%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue 287 / 3226 (8.9%)
The question is too unclear to answer 193 / 3226 (6.0%)
Agnostic/undecided 88 / 3226 (2.7%)
Skip 55 / 3226 (1.7%)
Accept an intermediate view 52 / 3226 (1.6%)
Reject both 31 / 3226 (1.0%)
Accept both 29 / 3226 (0.9%)
Accept another alternative 27 / 3226 (0.8%)
There is no fact of the matter 12 / 3226 (0.4%)
Other 7 / 3226 (0.2%)

Mind: physicalism or non-physicalism?

Accept: physicalism 1046 / 3226 (32.4%)
Lean toward: physicalism 695 / 3226 (21.5%)
Lean toward: non-physicalism 473 / 3226 (14.7%)
Accept: non-physicalism 468 / 3226 (14.5%)
The question is too unclear to answer 125 / 3226 (3.9%)
Agnostic/undecided 86 / 3226 (2.7%)
Accept an intermediate view 80 / 3226 (2.5%)
Accept another alternative 65 / 3226 (2.0%)
Reject both 48 / 3226 (1.5%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue 46 / 3226 (1.4%)
Accept both 39 / 3226 (1.2%)
Skip 33 / 3226 (1.0%)
There is no fact of the matter 14 / 3226 (0.4%)
Other 8 / 3226 (0.2%)

Moral judgment: cognitivism or non-cognitivism?

Accept: cognitivism 1026 / 3226 (31.8%)
Lean toward: cognitivism 846 / 3226 (26.2%)
Lean toward: non-cognitivism 444 / 3226 (13.8%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue 231 / 3226 (7.2%)
Accept: non-cognitivism 227 / 3226 (7.0%)
Accept an intermediate view 115 / 3226 (3.6%)
Agnostic/undecided 84 / 3226 (2.6%)
Skip 64 / 3226 (2.0%)
Accept both 58 / 3226 (1.8%)
The question is too unclear to answer 44 / 3226 (1.4%)
Accept another alternative 42 / 3226 (1.3%)
Reject both 25 / 3226 (0.8%)
There is no fact of the matter 11 / 3226 (0.3%)
Other 9 / 3226 (0.3%)

Moral motivation: internalism or externalism?

Lean toward: internalism 721 / 3226 (22.3%)
Lean toward: externalism 560 / 3226 (17.4%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue 498 / 3226 (15.4%)
Accept: internalism 434 / 3226 (13.5%)
Accept: externalism 357 / 3226 (11.1%)
Agnostic/undecided 168 / 3226 (5.2%)
Accept an intermediate view 126 / 3226 (3.9%)
Accept both 109 / 3226 (3.4%)
The question is too unclear to answer 84 / 3226 (2.6%)
Skip 79 / 3226 (2.4%)
Reject both 40 / 3226 (1.2%)
Accept another alternative 32 / 3226 (1.0%)
There is no fact of the matter 10 / 3226 (0.3%)
Other 8 / 3226 (0.2%)

Newcomb's problem: one box or two boxes?

Insufficiently familiar with the issue 1254 / 3226 (38.9%)
Accept: two boxes 403 / 3226 (12.5%)
Accept: one box 333 / 3226 (10.3%)
Lean toward: two boxes 305 / 3226 (9.5%)
Lean toward: one box 295 / 3226 (9.1%)
Agnostic/undecided 278 / 3226 (8.6%)
Skip 188 / 3226 (5.8%)
The question is too unclear to answer 51 / 3226 (1.6%)
There is no fact of the matter 50 / 3226 (1.5%)
Reject both 23 / 3226 (0.7%)
Other 17 / 3226 (0.5%)
Accept both 11 / 3226 (0.3%)
Accept an intermediate view 9 / 3226 (0.3%)
Accept another alternative 9 / 3226 (0.3%)

Normative ethics: deontology, consequentialism, or virtue ethics?

Lean toward: virtue ethics 541 / 3226 (16.8%)
Lean toward: consequentialism 496 / 3226 (15.4%)
Lean toward: deontology 428 / 3226 (13.3%)
Accept: consequentialism 290 / 3226 (9.0%)
Accept: virtue ethics 263 / 3226 (8.2%)
Accept more than one 230 / 3226 (7.1%)
Accept: deontology 228 / 3226 (7.1%)
Accept an intermediate view 132 / 3226 (4.1%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue 125 / 3226 (3.9%)
Accept another alternative 115 / 3226 (3.6%)
Agnostic/undecided 115 / 3226 (3.6%)
Reject all 90 / 3226 (2.8%)
There is no fact of the matter 48 / 3226 (1.5%)
Reject one, undecided between others 41 / 3226 (1.3%)
Skip 38 / 3226 (1.2%)
The question is too unclear to answer 31 / 3226 (1.0%)
Other 15 / 3226 (0.5%)

Perceptual experience: disjunctivism, qualia theory, representationalism, or sense-datum theory?

Insufficiently familiar with the issue 631 / 3226 (19.6%)
Lean toward: representationalism 584 / 3226 (18.1%)
Lean toward: qualia theory 308 / 3226 (9.5%)
Accept: representationalism 260 / 3226 (8.1%)
Lean toward: disjunctivism 259 / 3226 (8.0%)
Agnostic/undecided 214 / 3226 (6.6%)
Lean toward: sense-datum theory 140 / 3226 (4.3%)
Accept: qualia theory 127 / 3226 (3.9%)
Accept another alternative 106 / 3226 (3.3%)
Skip 102 / 3226 (3.2%)
Accept: disjunctivism 99 / 3226 (3.1%)
Reject all 99 / 3226 (3.1%)
Reject one or two, undecided between others 74 / 3226 (2.3%)
Accept more than one 61 / 3226 (1.9%)
Accept: sense-datum theory 50 / 3226 (1.5%)
The question is too unclear to answer 46 / 3226 (1.4%)
Accept an intermediate view 34 / 3226 (1.1%)
Other 24 / 3226 (0.7%)
There is no fact of the matter 8 / 3226 (0.2%)

Personal identity: biological view, psychological view, or further-fact view?

Lean toward: psychological view 754 / 3226 (23.4%)
Lean toward: biological view 341 / 3226 (10.6%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue 341 / 3226 (10.6%)
Accept: psychological view 317 / 3226 (9.8%)
Lean toward: further-fact view 269 / 3226 (8.3%)
Agnostic/undecided 224 / 3226 (6.9%)
Accept: biological view 176 / 3226 (5.5%)
Accept: further-fact view 138 / 3226 (4.3%)
Accept more than one 122 / 3226 (3.8%)
Accept another alternative 114 / 3226 (3.5%)
There is no fact of the matter 94 / 3226 (2.9%)
Reject all 84 / 3226 (2.6%)
Accept an intermediate view 77 / 3226 (2.4%)
Skip 68 / 3226 (2.1%)
The question is too unclear to answer 62 / 3226 (1.9%)
Reject one, undecided between others 26 / 3226 (0.8%)
Other 19 / 3226 (0.6%)

Politics: communitarianism, egalitarianism, or libertarianism?

Lean toward: egalitarianism 593 / 3226 (18.4%)
Lean toward: communitarianism 453 / 3226 (14.0%)
Accept: egalitarianism 381 / 3226 (11.8%)
Lean toward: libertarianism 360 / 3226 (11.2%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue 343 / 3226 (10.6%)
Accept: libertarianism 181 / 3226 (5.6%)
Agnostic/undecided 162 / 3226 (5.0%)
Accept: communitarianism 129 / 3226 (4.0%)
Accept more than one 119 / 3226 (3.7%)
Accept another alternative 98 / 3226 (3.0%)
Accept an intermediate view 90 / 3226 (2.8%)
Reject all 89 / 3226 (2.8%)
The question is too unclear to answer 75 / 3226 (2.3%)
Skip 69 / 3226 (2.1%)
Reject one, undecided between others 46 / 3226 (1.4%)
There is no fact of the matter 20 / 3226 (0.6%)
Other 18 / 3226 (0.6%)

Proper names: Fregean or Millian?

Insufficiently familiar with the issue 709 / 3226 (22.0%)
Lean toward: Fregean 665 / 3226 (20.6%)
Lean toward: Millian 513 / 3226 (15.9%)
Accept: Millian 338 / 3226 (10.5%)
Accept: Fregean 336 / 3226 (10.4%)
Agnostic/undecided 192 / 3226 (6.0%)
Skip 102 / 3226 (3.2%)
Reject both 87 / 3226 (2.7%)
Accept another alternative 81 / 3226 (2.5%)
Accept an intermediate view 74 / 3226 (2.3%)
The question is too unclear to answer 54 / 3226 (1.7%)
Accept both 32 / 3226 (1.0%)
There is no fact of the matter 28 / 3226 (0.9%)
Other 15 / 3226 (0.5%)

Science: scientific realism or scientific anti-realism?

Accept: scientific realism 1120 / 3226 (34.7%)
Lean toward: scientific realism 1001 / 3226 (31.0%)
Lean toward: scientific anti-realism 425 / 3226 (13.2%)
Accept: scientific anti-realism 152 / 3226 (4.7%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue 139 / 3226 (4.3%)
Accept an intermediate view 103 / 3226 (3.2%)
Agnostic/undecided 67 / 3226 (2.1%)
Reject both 51 / 3226 (1.6%)
The question is too unclear to answer 45 / 3226 (1.4%)
Accept another alternative 43 / 3226 (1.3%)
Skip 35 / 3226 (1.1%)
Accept both 24 / 3226 (0.7%)
There is no fact of the matter 13 / 3226 (0.4%)
Other 8 / 3226 (0.2%)

Teletransporter (new matter): survival or death?

Lean toward: survival 693 / 3226 (21.5%)
Lean toward: death 497 / 3226 (15.4%)
Accept: death 458 / 3226 (14.2%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue 455 / 3226 (14.1%)
Accept: survival 424 / 3226 (13.1%)
Agnostic/undecided 213 / 3226 (6.6%)
There is no fact of the matter 157 / 3226 (4.9%)
The question is too unclear to answer 118 / 3226 (3.7%)
Skip 93 / 3226 (2.9%)
Reject both 26 / 3226 (0.8%)
Accept both 25 / 3226 (0.8%)
Other 24 / 3226 (0.7%)
Accept another alternative 24 / 3226 (0.7%)
Accept an intermediate view 19 / 3226 (0.6%)

Time: A-theory or B-theory?

Insufficiently familiar with the issue 1213 / 3226 (37.6%)
Lean toward: B-theory 378 / 3226 (11.7%)
Accept: B-theory 330 / 3226 (10.2%)
Lean toward: A-theory 306 / 3226 (9.5%)
Agnostic/undecided 279 / 3226 (8.6%)
Accept: A-theory 190 / 3226 (5.9%)
Skip 175 / 3226 (5.4%)
Accept both 90 / 3226 (2.8%)
The question is too unclear to answer 77 / 3226 (2.4%)
Reject both 52 / 3226 (1.6%)
There is no fact of the matter 45 / 3226 (1.4%)
Accept another alternative 39 / 3226 (1.2%)
Accept an intermediate view 30 / 3226 (0.9%)
Other 22 / 3226 (0.7%)

Trolley problem (five straight ahead, one on side track, turn requires switching, what ought one do?): switch or don't switch?

Accept: switch 1270 / 3226 (39.4%)
Lean toward: switch 746 / 3226 (23.1%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue 277 / 3226 (8.6%)
Lean toward: don't switch 178 / 3226 (5.5%)
Agnostic/undecided 172 / 3226 (5.3%)
There is no fact of the matter 127 / 3226 (3.9%)
Accept: don't switch 109 / 3226 (3.4%)
The question is too unclear to answer 97 / 3226 (3.0%)
Skip 86 / 3226 (2.7%)
Reject both 65 / 3226 (2.0%)
Accept another alternative 37 / 3226 (1.1%)
Other 27 / 3226 (0.8%)
Accept an intermediate view 18 / 3226 (0.6%)
Accept both 17 / 3226 (0.5%)

Truth: correspondence, deflationary, or epistemic?

Lean toward: correspondence 787 / 3226 (24.4%)
Accept: correspondence 663 / 3226 (20.6%)
Lean toward: deflationary 447 / 3226 (13.9%)
Lean toward: epistemic 318 / 3226 (9.9%)
Accept: deflationary 223 / 3226 (6.9%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue 172 / 3226 (5.3%)
Accept: epistemic 129 / 3226 (4.0%)
Agnostic/undecided 107 / 3226 (3.3%)
Accept another alternative 71 / 3226 (2.2%)
Reject all 68 / 3226 (2.1%)
Accept more than one 60 / 3226 (1.9%)
Skip 58 / 3226 (1.8%)
The question is too unclear to answer 40 / 3226 (1.2%)
Accept an intermediate view 31 / 3226 (1.0%)
Reject one, undecided between others 28 / 3226 (0.9%)
Other 15 / 3226 (0.5%)
There is no fact of the matter 9 / 3226 (0.3%)

Zombies: inconceivable, conceivable but not metaphysically possible, or metaphysically possible?

Lean toward: conceivable but not metaphysically possible 633 / 3226 (19.6%)
Accept: conceivable but not metaphysically possible 506 / 3226 (15.7%)
Accept: metaphysically possible 396 / 3226 (12.3%)
Lean toward: metaphysically possible 381 / 3226 (11.8%)
Accept: inconceivable 308 / 3226 (9.5%)
Lean toward: inconceivable 299 / 3226 (9.3%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue 234 / 3226 (7.3%)
Agnostic/undecided 156 / 3226 (4.8%)
The question is too unclear to answer 87 / 3226 (2.7%)
Skip 64 / 3226 (2.0%)
There is no fact of the matter 58 / 3226 (1.8%)
Reject all 37 / 3226 (1.1%)
Other 27 / 3226 (0.8%)
Accept another alternative 19 / 3226 (0.6%)
Reject one, undecided between others 11 / 3226 (0.3%)
Accept an intermediate view 6 / 3226 (0.2%)
Accept more than one 4 / 3226 (0.1%)

Back to contents