The PhilPapers SurveysPreliminary Survey results (Back to contents)

Note: set response grain to "fine" for details on "other" responses.

Population  AOS Response details

A priori knowledge: yes or no?

Accept: yes 839 / 1803 (46.5%)
Lean toward: yes 399 / 1803 (22.1%)
Lean toward: no 259 / 1803 (14.4%)
Accept: no 130 / 1803 (7.2%)
The question is too unclear to answer 66 / 1803 (3.7%)
Agnostic/undecided 30 / 1803 (1.7%)
Accept an intermediate view 24 / 1803 (1.3%)
Accept another alternative 14 / 1803 (0.8%)
Skip 13 / 1803 (0.7%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue 12 / 1803 (0.7%)
Accept both 5 / 1803 (0.3%)
There is no fact of the matter 5 / 1803 (0.3%)
Reject both 4 / 1803 (0.2%)
Other 3 / 1803 (0.2%)

Abstract objects: Platonism or nominalism?

Lean toward: nominalism 446 / 1803 (24.7%)
Lean toward: Platonism 357 / 1803 (19.8%)
Accept: Platonism 298 / 1803 (16.5%)
Accept: nominalism 290 / 1803 (16.1%)
Agnostic/undecided 87 / 1803 (4.8%)
Accept another alternative 81 / 1803 (4.5%)
Reject both 61 / 1803 (3.4%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue 54 / 1803 (3.0%)
Accept an intermediate view 51 / 1803 (2.8%)
The question is too unclear to answer 32 / 1803 (1.8%)
Skip 19 / 1803 (1.1%)
There is no fact of the matter 16 / 1803 (0.9%)
Other 7 / 1803 (0.4%)
Accept both 4 / 1803 (0.2%)

Aesthetic value: objective or subjective?

Lean toward: objective 489 / 1803 (27.1%)
Lean toward: subjective 368 / 1803 (20.4%)
Accept: subjective 285 / 1803 (15.8%)
Accept: objective 241 / 1803 (13.4%)
Accept an intermediate view 121 / 1803 (6.7%)
The question is too unclear to answer 63 / 1803 (3.5%)
Accept both 59 / 1803 (3.3%)
Agnostic/undecided 51 / 1803 (2.8%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue 43 / 1803 (2.4%)
Accept another alternative 42 / 1803 (2.3%)
Skip 17 / 1803 (0.9%)
Reject both 14 / 1803 (0.8%)
Other 5 / 1803 (0.3%)
There is no fact of the matter 5 / 1803 (0.3%)

Analytic-synthetic distinction: yes or no?

Accept: yes 595 / 1803 (33.0%)
Lean toward: yes 520 / 1803 (28.8%)
Lean toward: no 302 / 1803 (16.7%)
Accept: no 215 / 1803 (11.9%)
Agnostic/undecided 39 / 1803 (2.2%)
The question is too unclear to answer 36 / 1803 (2.0%)
Accept an intermediate view 24 / 1803 (1.3%)
Skip 21 / 1803 (1.2%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue 17 / 1803 (0.9%)
Accept another alternative 13 / 1803 (0.7%)
Accept both 9 / 1803 (0.5%)
Reject both 5 / 1803 (0.3%)
Other 4 / 1803 (0.2%)
There is no fact of the matter 3 / 1803 (0.2%)

Epistemic justification: internalism or externalism?

Lean toward: externalism 488 / 1803 (27.1%)
Lean toward: internalism 305 / 1803 (16.9%)
Accept: externalism 300 / 1803 (16.6%)
Accept: internalism 167 / 1803 (9.3%)
Accept an intermediate view 124 / 1803 (6.9%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue 107 / 1803 (5.9%)
Agnostic/undecided 83 / 1803 (4.6%)
Accept both 83 / 1803 (4.6%)
Skip 37 / 1803 (2.1%)
The question is too unclear to answer 36 / 1803 (2.0%)
Accept another alternative 33 / 1803 (1.8%)
Reject both 23 / 1803 (1.3%)
There is no fact of the matter 11 / 1803 (0.6%)
Other 6 / 1803 (0.3%)

External world: idealism, skepticism, or non-skeptical realism?

Accept: non-skeptical realism 978 / 1803 (54.2%)
Lean toward: non-skeptical realism 404 / 1803 (22.4%)
Lean toward: skepticism 88 / 1803 (4.9%)
Lean toward: idealism 83 / 1803 (4.6%)
Accept another alternative 41 / 1803 (2.3%)
Accept: skepticism 40 / 1803 (2.2%)
Accept: idealism 40 / 1803 (2.2%)
The question is too unclear to answer 31 / 1803 (1.7%)
Accept an intermediate view 26 / 1803 (1.4%)
Reject all 20 / 1803 (1.1%)
Skip 13 / 1803 (0.7%)
There is no fact of the matter 8 / 1803 (0.4%)
Agnostic/undecided 8 / 1803 (0.4%)
Reject one, undecided between others 6 / 1803 (0.3%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue 6 / 1803 (0.3%)
Accept more than one 6 / 1803 (0.3%)
Other 5 / 1803 (0.3%)

Free will: compatibilism, libertarianism, or no free will?

Accept: compatibilism 564 / 1803 (31.3%)
Lean toward: compatibilism 440 / 1803 (24.4%)
Accept: libertarianism 152 / 1803 (8.4%)
Lean toward: libertarianism 149 / 1803 (8.3%)
Lean toward: no free will 127 / 1803 (7.0%)
Accept: no free will 106 / 1803 (5.9%)
Agnostic/undecided 65 / 1803 (3.6%)
The question is too unclear to answer 40 / 1803 (2.2%)
Accept another alternative 33 / 1803 (1.8%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue 32 / 1803 (1.8%)
Accept an intermediate view 21 / 1803 (1.2%)
Reject all 18 / 1803 (1.0%)
Reject one, undecided between others 17 / 1803 (0.9%)
There is no fact of the matter 13 / 1803 (0.7%)
Skip 9 / 1803 (0.5%)
Accept more than one 9 / 1803 (0.5%)
Other 8 / 1803 (0.4%)

God: theism or atheism?

Accept: atheism 1041 / 1803 (57.7%)
Lean toward: atheism 216 / 1803 (12.0%)
Accept: theism 210 / 1803 (11.6%)
Agnostic/undecided 117 / 1803 (6.5%)
Lean toward: theism 85 / 1803 (4.7%)
The question is too unclear to answer 30 / 1803 (1.7%)
Accept another alternative 28 / 1803 (1.6%)
Reject both 26 / 1803 (1.4%)
Skip 14 / 1803 (0.8%)
Accept an intermediate view 14 / 1803 (0.8%)
There is no fact of the matter 11 / 1803 (0.6%)
Other 9 / 1803 (0.5%)
Accept both 1 / 1803 (0.1%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue 1 / 1803 (0.1%)

Knowledge claims: contextualism, relativism, or invariantism?

Lean toward: contextualism 522 / 1803 (29.0%)
Lean toward: invariantism 330 / 1803 (18.3%)
Accept: contextualism 227 / 1803 (12.6%)
Accept: invariantism 198 / 1803 (11.0%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue 163 / 1803 (9.0%)
Agnostic/undecided 95 / 1803 (5.3%)
Lean toward: relativism 46 / 1803 (2.6%)
The question is too unclear to answer 36 / 1803 (2.0%)
Skip 35 / 1803 (1.9%)
Accept: relativism 27 / 1803 (1.5%)
Accept another alternative 26 / 1803 (1.4%)
Reject one, undecided between others 23 / 1803 (1.3%)
Accept more than one 23 / 1803 (1.3%)
Accept an intermediate view 19 / 1803 (1.1%)
There is no fact of the matter 12 / 1803 (0.7%)
Reject all 12 / 1803 (0.7%)
Other 9 / 1803 (0.5%)

Knowledge: empiricism or rationalism?

Lean toward: empiricism 426 / 1803 (23.6%)
Lean toward: rationalism 286 / 1803 (15.9%)
Accept: empiricism 261 / 1803 (14.5%)
Accept an intermediate view 212 / 1803 (11.8%)
Accept: rationalism 183 / 1803 (10.1%)
The question is too unclear to answer 134 / 1803 (7.4%)
Accept both 118 / 1803 (6.5%)
Reject both 63 / 1803 (3.5%)
Accept another alternative 55 / 1803 (3.1%)
Agnostic/undecided 28 / 1803 (1.6%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue 14 / 1803 (0.8%)
Skip 13 / 1803 (0.7%)
There is no fact of the matter 6 / 1803 (0.3%)
Other 4 / 1803 (0.2%)

Laws of nature: Humean or non-Humean?

Accept: non-Humean 466 / 1803 (25.8%)
Lean toward: non-Humean 453 / 1803 (25.1%)
Lean toward: Humean 350 / 1803 (19.4%)
Accept: Humean 171 / 1803 (9.5%)
Agnostic/undecided 120 / 1803 (6.7%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue 119 / 1803 (6.6%)
The question is too unclear to answer 31 / 1803 (1.7%)
Accept another alternative 26 / 1803 (1.4%)
Skip 26 / 1803 (1.4%)
Reject both 13 / 1803 (0.7%)
Accept an intermediate view 12 / 1803 (0.7%)
Other 8 / 1803 (0.4%)
There is no fact of the matter 5 / 1803 (0.3%)
Accept both 3 / 1803 (0.2%)

Logic: classical or non-classical?

Accept: classical 456 / 1803 (25.3%)
Lean toward: classical 418 / 1803 (23.2%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue 232 / 1803 (12.9%)
Lean toward: non-classical 173 / 1803 (9.6%)
Accept: non-classical 147 / 1803 (8.2%)
Accept both 115 / 1803 (6.4%)
Agnostic/undecided 89 / 1803 (4.9%)
The question is too unclear to answer 58 / 1803 (3.2%)
There is no fact of the matter 39 / 1803 (2.2%)
Skip 36 / 1803 (2.0%)
Accept an intermediate view 16 / 1803 (0.9%)
Accept another alternative 15 / 1803 (0.8%)
Other 5 / 1803 (0.3%)
Reject both 4 / 1803 (0.2%)

Mental content: internalism or externalism?

Lean toward: externalism 455 / 1803 (25.2%)
Accept: externalism 427 / 1803 (23.7%)
Lean toward: internalism 260 / 1803 (14.4%)
Accept: internalism 141 / 1803 (7.8%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue 124 / 1803 (6.9%)
Agnostic/undecided 87 / 1803 (4.8%)
Accept an intermediate view 77 / 1803 (4.3%)
Accept both 76 / 1803 (4.2%)
The question is too unclear to answer 45 / 1803 (2.5%)
Skip 35 / 1803 (1.9%)
Accept another alternative 32 / 1803 (1.8%)
Reject both 23 / 1803 (1.3%)
There is no fact of the matter 12 / 1803 (0.7%)
Other 9 / 1803 (0.5%)

Meta-ethics: moral realism or moral anti-realism?

Accept: moral realism 564 / 1803 (31.3%)
Lean toward: moral realism 453 / 1803 (25.1%)
Lean toward: moral anti-realism 288 / 1803 (16.0%)
Accept: moral anti-realism 223 / 1803 (12.4%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue 50 / 1803 (2.8%)
Agnostic/undecided 47 / 1803 (2.6%)
Accept an intermediate view 44 / 1803 (2.4%)
Accept another alternative 42 / 1803 (2.3%)
The question is too unclear to answer 38 / 1803 (2.1%)
Skip 23 / 1803 (1.3%)
Reject both 20 / 1803 (1.1%)
There is no fact of the matter 5 / 1803 (0.3%)
Other 4 / 1803 (0.2%)
Accept both 2 / 1803 (0.1%)

Metaphilosophy: naturalism or non-naturalism?

Accept: naturalism 529 / 1803 (29.3%)
Lean toward: naturalism 383 / 1803 (21.2%)
Accept: non-naturalism 257 / 1803 (14.3%)
Lean toward: non-naturalism 217 / 1803 (12.0%)
The question is too unclear to answer 141 / 1803 (7.8%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue 115 / 1803 (6.4%)
Agnostic/undecided 49 / 1803 (2.7%)
Skip 28 / 1803 (1.6%)
Accept an intermediate view 28 / 1803 (1.6%)
Reject both 17 / 1803 (0.9%)
Accept another alternative 17 / 1803 (0.9%)
Accept both 12 / 1803 (0.7%)
There is no fact of the matter 7 / 1803 (0.4%)
Other 3 / 1803 (0.2%)

Mind: physicalism or non-physicalism?

Accept: physicalism 599 / 1803 (33.2%)
Lean toward: physicalism 382 / 1803 (21.2%)
Accept: non-physicalism 273 / 1803 (15.1%)
Lean toward: non-physicalism 248 / 1803 (13.8%)
The question is too unclear to answer 93 / 1803 (5.2%)
Accept an intermediate view 45 / 1803 (2.5%)
Agnostic/undecided 43 / 1803 (2.4%)
Accept another alternative 42 / 1803 (2.3%)
Reject both 25 / 1803 (1.4%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue 17 / 1803 (0.9%)
Accept both 12 / 1803 (0.7%)
Skip 12 / 1803 (0.7%)
There is no fact of the matter 8 / 1803 (0.4%)
Other 4 / 1803 (0.2%)

Moral judgment: cognitivism or non-cognitivism?

Accept: cognitivism 661 / 1803 (36.7%)
Lean toward: cognitivism 471 / 1803 (26.1%)
Lean toward: non-cognitivism 218 / 1803 (12.1%)
Accept: non-cognitivism 122 / 1803 (6.8%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue 97 / 1803 (5.4%)
Accept an intermediate view 72 / 1803 (4.0%)
Agnostic/undecided 39 / 1803 (2.2%)
The question is too unclear to answer 29 / 1803 (1.6%)
Accept another alternative 27 / 1803 (1.5%)
Accept both 26 / 1803 (1.4%)
Skip 25 / 1803 (1.4%)
Reject both 9 / 1803 (0.5%)
Other 5 / 1803 (0.3%)
There is no fact of the matter 2 / 1803 (0.1%)

Moral motivation: internalism or externalism?

Lean toward: internalism 404 / 1803 (22.4%)
Lean toward: externalism 308 / 1803 (17.1%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue 268 / 1803 (14.9%)
Accept: internalism 250 / 1803 (13.9%)
Accept: externalism 221 / 1803 (12.3%)
Agnostic/undecided 100 / 1803 (5.5%)
The question is too unclear to answer 67 / 1803 (3.7%)
Accept an intermediate view 57 / 1803 (3.2%)
Skip 43 / 1803 (2.4%)
Accept both 38 / 1803 (2.1%)
Reject both 22 / 1803 (1.2%)
Accept another alternative 17 / 1803 (0.9%)
Other 5 / 1803 (0.3%)
There is no fact of the matter 3 / 1803 (0.2%)

Newcomb's problem: one box or two boxes?

Insufficiently familiar with the issue 599 / 1803 (33.2%)
Accept: two boxes 278 / 1803 (15.4%)
Agnostic/undecided 195 / 1803 (10.8%)
Lean toward: two boxes 180 / 1803 (10.0%)
Accept: one box 178 / 1803 (9.9%)
Lean toward: one box 170 / 1803 (9.4%)
Skip 112 / 1803 (6.2%)
The question is too unclear to answer 31 / 1803 (1.7%)
There is no fact of the matter 25 / 1803 (1.4%)
Other 10 / 1803 (0.6%)
Reject both 10 / 1803 (0.6%)
Accept both 7 / 1803 (0.4%)
Accept another alternative 7 / 1803 (0.4%)
Accept an intermediate view 1 / 1803 (0.1%)

Normative ethics: deontology, consequentialism, or virtue ethics?

Lean toward: virtue ethics 280 / 1803 (15.5%)
Lean toward: consequentialism 271 / 1803 (15.0%)
Lean toward: deontology 256 / 1803 (14.2%)
Accept: consequentialism 164 / 1803 (9.1%)
Accept: deontology 148 / 1803 (8.2%)
Accept more than one 143 / 1803 (7.9%)
Accept: virtue ethics 126 / 1803 (7.0%)
Accept an intermediate view 82 / 1803 (4.5%)
Agnostic/undecided 76 / 1803 (4.2%)
Accept another alternative 59 / 1803 (3.3%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue 55 / 1803 (3.1%)
Reject all 50 / 1803 (2.8%)
The question is too unclear to answer 25 / 1803 (1.4%)
There is no fact of the matter 20 / 1803 (1.1%)
Skip 20 / 1803 (1.1%)
Reject one, undecided between others 17 / 1803 (0.9%)
Other 11 / 1803 (0.6%)

Perceptual experience: disjunctivism, qualia theory, representationalism, or sense-datum theory?

Lean toward: representationalism 351 / 1803 (19.5%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue 303 / 1803 (16.8%)
Accept: representationalism 172 / 1803 (9.5%)
Lean toward: qualia theory 172 / 1803 (9.5%)
Lean toward: disjunctivism 155 / 1803 (8.6%)
Agnostic/undecided 128 / 1803 (7.1%)
Accept: qualia theory 68 / 1803 (3.8%)
Accept: disjunctivism 66 / 1803 (3.7%)
Accept another alternative 60 / 1803 (3.3%)
Reject all 55 / 1803 (3.1%)
Lean toward: sense-datum theory 55 / 1803 (3.1%)
Skip 48 / 1803 (2.7%)
The question is too unclear to answer 39 / 1803 (2.2%)
Reject one or two, undecided between others 37 / 1803 (2.1%)
Accept more than one 34 / 1803 (1.9%)
Accept: sense-datum theory 24 / 1803 (1.3%)
Accept an intermediate view 19 / 1803 (1.1%)
Other 11 / 1803 (0.6%)
There is no fact of the matter 6 / 1803 (0.3%)

Personal identity: biological view, psychological view, or further-fact view?

Lean toward: psychological view 432 / 1803 (24.0%)
Lean toward: biological view 215 / 1803 (11.9%)
Accept: psychological view 188 / 1803 (10.4%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue 140 / 1803 (7.8%)
Lean toward: further-fact view 134 / 1803 (7.4%)
Agnostic/undecided 130 / 1803 (7.2%)
Accept: biological view 110 / 1803 (6.1%)
Accept: further-fact view 78 / 1803 (4.3%)
Accept another alternative 67 / 1803 (3.7%)
Accept more than one 61 / 1803 (3.4%)
There is no fact of the matter 58 / 1803 (3.2%)
Reject all 48 / 1803 (2.7%)
The question is too unclear to answer 45 / 1803 (2.5%)
Accept an intermediate view 41 / 1803 (2.3%)
Skip 30 / 1803 (1.7%)
Reject one, undecided between others 17 / 1803 (0.9%)
Other 9 / 1803 (0.5%)

Politics: communitarianism, egalitarianism, or libertarianism?

Lean toward: egalitarianism 358 / 1803 (19.9%)
Accept: egalitarianism 237 / 1803 (13.1%)
Lean toward: communitarianism 232 / 1803 (12.9%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue 187 / 1803 (10.4%)
Lean toward: libertarianism 165 / 1803 (9.2%)
Agnostic/undecided 84 / 1803 (4.7%)
Accept: libertarianism 77 / 1803 (4.3%)
Accept more than one 70 / 1803 (3.9%)
Accept another alternative 68 / 1803 (3.8%)
The question is too unclear to answer 67 / 1803 (3.7%)
Accept: communitarianism 62 / 1803 (3.4%)
Accept an intermediate view 59 / 1803 (3.3%)
Reject all 49 / 1803 (2.7%)
Skip 44 / 1803 (2.4%)
Reject one, undecided between others 27 / 1803 (1.5%)
Other 11 / 1803 (0.6%)
There is no fact of the matter 6 / 1803 (0.3%)

Proper names: Fregean or Millian?

Lean toward: Fregean 366 / 1803 (20.3%)
Lean toward: Millian 322 / 1803 (17.9%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue 312 / 1803 (17.3%)
Accept: Millian 236 / 1803 (13.1%)
Accept: Fregean 185 / 1803 (10.3%)
Agnostic/undecided 116 / 1803 (6.4%)
Accept another alternative 51 / 1803 (2.8%)
Accept an intermediate view 48 / 1803 (2.7%)
Skip 47 / 1803 (2.6%)
Reject both 42 / 1803 (2.3%)
The question is too unclear to answer 37 / 1803 (2.1%)
Accept both 16 / 1803 (0.9%)
There is no fact of the matter 15 / 1803 (0.8%)
Other 10 / 1803 (0.6%)

Science: scientific realism or scientific anti-realism?

Accept: scientific realism 740 / 1803 (41.0%)
Lean toward: scientific realism 524 / 1803 (29.1%)
Lean toward: scientific anti-realism 204 / 1803 (11.3%)
Accept: scientific anti-realism 83 / 1803 (4.6%)
Accept an intermediate view 55 / 1803 (3.1%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue 51 / 1803 (2.8%)
The question is too unclear to answer 33 / 1803 (1.8%)
Agnostic/undecided 31 / 1803 (1.7%)
Reject both 28 / 1803 (1.6%)
Accept another alternative 26 / 1803 (1.4%)
Skip 13 / 1803 (0.7%)
There is no fact of the matter 6 / 1803 (0.3%)
Accept both 5 / 1803 (0.3%)
Other 4 / 1803 (0.2%)

Teletransporter (new matter): survival or death?

Lean toward: survival 392 / 1803 (21.7%)
Accept: death 295 / 1803 (16.4%)
Lean toward: death 272 / 1803 (15.1%)
Accept: survival 234 / 1803 (13.0%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue 200 / 1803 (11.1%)
Agnostic/undecided 130 / 1803 (7.2%)
There is no fact of the matter 100 / 1803 (5.5%)
The question is too unclear to answer 69 / 1803 (3.8%)
Skip 52 / 1803 (2.9%)
Reject both 13 / 1803 (0.7%)
Accept another alternative 13 / 1803 (0.7%)
Other 12 / 1803 (0.7%)
Accept an intermediate view 11 / 1803 (0.6%)
Accept both 10 / 1803 (0.6%)

Time: A-theory or B-theory?

Insufficiently familiar with the issue 626 / 1803 (34.7%)
Accept: B-theory 213 / 1803 (11.8%)
Lean toward: B-theory 195 / 1803 (10.8%)
Lean toward: A-theory 182 / 1803 (10.1%)
Agnostic/undecided 176 / 1803 (9.8%)
Accept: A-theory 106 / 1803 (5.9%)
Skip 103 / 1803 (5.7%)
Accept both 58 / 1803 (3.2%)
The question is too unclear to answer 42 / 1803 (2.3%)
There is no fact of the matter 27 / 1803 (1.5%)
Reject both 24 / 1803 (1.3%)
Accept another alternative 19 / 1803 (1.1%)
Accept an intermediate view 19 / 1803 (1.1%)
Other 13 / 1803 (0.7%)

Trolley problem (five straight ahead, one on side track, turn requires switching, what ought one do?): switch or don't switch?

Accept: switch 752 / 1803 (41.7%)
Lean toward: switch 439 / 1803 (24.3%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue 131 / 1803 (7.3%)
Agnostic/undecided 99 / 1803 (5.5%)
Lean toward: don't switch 85 / 1803 (4.7%)
There is no fact of the matter 64 / 1803 (3.5%)
The question is too unclear to answer 48 / 1803 (2.7%)
Skip 47 / 1803 (2.6%)
Accept: don't switch 45 / 1803 (2.5%)
Reject both 31 / 1803 (1.7%)
Accept another alternative 26 / 1803 (1.4%)
Other 16 / 1803 (0.9%)
Accept an intermediate view 13 / 1803 (0.7%)
Accept both 7 / 1803 (0.4%)

Truth: correspondence, deflationary, or epistemic?

Lean toward: correspondence 453 / 1803 (25.1%)
Accept: correspondence 429 / 1803 (23.8%)
Lean toward: deflationary 261 / 1803 (14.5%)
Accept: deflationary 154 / 1803 (8.5%)
Lean toward: epistemic 138 / 1803 (7.7%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue 59 / 1803 (3.3%)
Accept: epistemic 58 / 1803 (3.2%)
Agnostic/undecided 58 / 1803 (3.2%)
Accept another alternative 40 / 1803 (2.2%)
Reject all 37 / 1803 (2.1%)
Accept more than one 29 / 1803 (1.6%)
The question is too unclear to answer 23 / 1803 (1.3%)
Skip 23 / 1803 (1.3%)
Reject one, undecided between others 16 / 1803 (0.9%)
Accept an intermediate view 12 / 1803 (0.7%)
Other 7 / 1803 (0.4%)
There is no fact of the matter 6 / 1803 (0.3%)

Zombies: inconceivable, conceivable but not metaphysically possible, or metaphysically possible?

Lean toward: conceivable but not metaphysically possible 359 / 1803 (19.9%)
Accept: conceivable but not metaphysically possible 272 / 1803 (15.1%)
Accept: metaphysically possible 223 / 1803 (12.4%)
Lean toward: metaphysically possible 211 / 1803 (11.7%)
Lean toward: inconceivable 173 / 1803 (9.6%)
Insufficiently familiar with the issue 145 / 1803 (8.0%)
Accept: inconceivable 145 / 1803 (8.0%)
Agnostic/undecided 95 / 1803 (5.3%)
The question is too unclear to answer 64 / 1803 (3.5%)
There is no fact of the matter 32 / 1803 (1.8%)
Skip 30 / 1803 (1.7%)
Reject all 21 / 1803 (1.2%)
Other 16 / 1803 (0.9%)
Accept another alternative 9 / 1803 (0.5%)
Reject one, undecided between others 4 / 1803 (0.2%)
Accept an intermediate view 3 / 1803 (0.2%)
Accept more than one 1 / 1803 (0.1%)

Back to contents