Afterlife beliefs: category specificity and sensitivity to biological priming

Religion, Brain and Behavior 1 (1):5-17 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Adults have been shown to attribute certain properties more frequently than others to the dead. This category-specific pattern has been interpreted in terms of simulation constraints, whereby it may be harder to imagine the absence of some states than others. Afterlife beliefs have also shown context-sensitivity, suggesting that environmental exposure to different types of information might influence adults? reasoning about post-death states. We sought to clarify category and context effects in adults afterlife reasoning. Participants read a story describing the death of a human protagonist after exposure to a biological prime, an emotional prime, or no prime. Emotions, desires, and epistemic states were more frequently attributed to the dead character than biological, psychobiological, and perceptual states, partially replicating previous findings. The biological prime decreased the attribution of certain post-death states relative to the control condition, whereas the emotional prime had no effect. Simulation theory does not provide a satisfactory explanation of the present findings, which may be better accounted for by conflict between different cognitive systems that are engaged in thinking about the dead.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,471

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

An unconstrained mind: Explaining belief in the afterlife.Philip Robbins & Anthony I. Jack - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (5):484-484.
On Imagining the Afterlife.K. Mitch Hodge - 2011 - Journal of Cognition and Culture 11 (3-4):367-389.
Cognitive Foundations of Afterlife Beliefs.K. Mitch Hodge - 2010 - Dissertation, Queen's University Belfasst
Why immortality alone will not get me to the afterlife.K. Mitch Hodge - 2011 - Philosophical Psychology 24 (3):395-410.
The folk psychology of souls.Jesse M. Bering - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (5):453-+.
Afterlife.WIlliam Hasker - 2010 - The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Death, nothingness, and subjectivity.Thomas W. Clark - 2006 - In Daniel Kolak & Raymond Martin (eds.), The experience of philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 15-20.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-02-15

Downloads
69 (#238,870)

6 months
14 (#188,120)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Sue Lock
University of Glasgow

Citations of this work

Dead-Survivors, the Living Dead, and Concepts of Death.K. Mitch Hodge - 2018 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 9 (3):539-565.
Who Wants to Live Forever?Claire White - 2017 - Journal of Cognition and Culture 17 (5):419-436.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references