A comprehensive Covid-19 response—the need for economic evaluation

New England Journal of Medicine 386 (26):2449–2451 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Although policymakers and investigators still struggle to quantify and compare the effects of various Covid-related interventions, we are steadily amassing data that could help inform choices. The pandemic’s medical, social, and economic harms have been immense, and they warrant a continuous policy response. All decision makers use some type of mental model to weigh the pros and cons of various policy options. Rigorous economic evaluation formalizes this process. Value judgments will still be required, but economic evaluation can make the decision-making process more systematic, comprehensive, and transparent.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Vietnam’s Response to the COVID-19 Outbreak.Sanja Ivic - 2020 - Asian Bioethics Review 12 (3):341-347.
Use and misuse of metrics in research evaluation.Ronald N. Kostoff - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (2):109-120.
Emergency Basic Income during the Pandemic.Jurgen de Wispelaere & Leticia Morales - 2021 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 30 (2):248-254.
COVID-19 and inequalities: the need for inclusive policy response.Farah Naz, Muhammad Ahmad & Asad Umair - 2021 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 43 (3):1-5.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-06-18

Downloads
156 (#123,382)

6 months
85 (#57,766)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Govind Persad
University of Denver

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references