This PDF can be freely shared online. Conceptual Disagreement about Justice: Verbal, but Not Merely Verbal Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review/Revue canadienne de philosophie, Volume 58, Issue 4 DOI: 10.1017/S0012217319000167 Published online: 31 January 2020, pp. 701-709 Print publication: December 2019 Read this article for free Summary In this paper, I introduce the articles contained in this special issue, and I briefly explain some of the main arguments presented in my book A Conceptual Investigation of Justice. A central claim in my book is that a verbal and yet also philosophically substantial disagreement over the word 'justice' lies at the heart of a number of issues in contemporary political philosophy. Over the course of introducing my book's arguments and the commentaries in this issue, I also offer an account of what it means for a dispute to be verbal, but not merely verbal. How does Cambridge Core Share work? Cambridge Core Share allows authors, readers and institutional subscribers to generate a URL for an online version of a journal article. Anyone who clicks on this link will be able to view a read-only, up-to-date copy of the published journal article.