The Defense of Oral Interaction in the Midst of Whatsapp Use in the Learning Environment

This research aimed to explain the defense of oral interactions in the presence of information and communication technologies such as WhatsApp (WA) as well as to explore some of the positive contributions of WA used in building the Real Life Communication especially in the learning environment. By applying the Exploratory design, this research involved 4 participants from various educational backgrounds as a purposively selected data source indicated as WA users at once. Data were collected through Focus Group Discussion, Interview, and Observation and analyzed by several stages i.e. data reduction, displaying data, categorizing, and verifying and concluding. The results showed that oral interactions can decrease both in the language community and learning environment as the dominant use of WA that is not wise. Nevertheless, the use of WA applications also had some positive contributions in building a real relationship. Finally, the assumption that the negative impact of using the WA application should be able to change the mindset and positive attitude of the scholars in initiating and defending an oral interaction in the learning environment.

previous researchers underestimated the influence of social networks because they did not take into account the individual variance of actual behaviors in social networks' (Choi, Lee, & Metzgar, 2017). They assume that previous researchers too or less estimate the influence of social networking because previous researchers did not pay attention to the variance of individual attitudes in social networking systems. The individual attitude here certainly depends on how his mindset as a member of the language community in using social networking applications. In other words, what tendencies he will display when interacting within a language community, whether by using Computer-Mediated Communication or with the Face-to-Face talk system. Paul and Lester say '... a great deal of attention has been described over the years by conversation analysts' (Paul, Warren, & Lester, 2016). Here it is very clear that Conversational Analysts have clearly described how online communication is so different from Face to Face (F2F) interactions. As is known that the use of WA applications are very popular among the people in Jakarta and surrounding areas while Facebook (FB) and BBM tend to be used by people in Sulawesi island. This, according to the authors' observations, undoubtedly negatively impacted the F2F communication system for the authors that it constitutes one of the most human characteristics as a social being requiring oral interaction with other humans (F2F). It can be argued that the cause of this situation is likely not by the WA application but rather to its users or perhaps even the other way around.
Previous research has provided some clear results regarding the use of Computer-Mediated Communication such as WA, Facebook, Twitter, and so on. Some results show advantages for a particular domain so that they are impressed that the use of such an application is really useful. However, there are things that have not been highlighted from previous studies so that now, I am trying to highlight certain things that for me need to be examined as a series of social phenomena that also need to be known to the public, in particular, the language community. In this regard, this study aims to gain a transient view and description of the defense of the main functions of oral interaction (F2F) with the presence of Computer-Mediated Communication such as WA and the impact of its usage as an online talk application to the reality of verbal interaction in the language community.
Based on the aforementioned research objectives, several problems can be formulated namely a) does oral interaction can survive as a hallmark of the language community with the presence of closed-network like WhatsApp? b) how can a Closed-network like this make a positive contribution to building a real live communication in the learning environment?

B. Methodology
This research applied an exploratory design with a qualitative approach. The exploratory research aims to gain a deeper knowledge of an object by exploring the parts that have not been highlighted by previous researchers (Patton, 2002) so as to enable the emergence of a temporary answer (hypothesis) (Cohen, Manion, & Morrison, 2007). The data in this study came from several participants involved in a Focus Group Discussion (FGD), interview, and observation. By that, all data in this study were collected through FGD activities and observations made on the characteristics of the research focus. FGD activities were conducted by involving 4 participants selected from a different educational background by discussing several topics that had been prepared and certainly related to the focus and sub-focus in this research. The results of the FGD and interview activities were transcribed to facilitate the researchers in performing the process of data analysis. The data that had been collected and then analyzed qualitatively by reducing in aiming to remove or reduce the form of data that was considered inadequate or unrelated to the research focus.
Furthermore, data organized from the reduction process were included in the help table in order to display data in the form of classification. After that, the data that had been classified was then analyzed to bring up the theme which was further explored. The result of the exploration of the theme was then verified to the conclusion that was the answer to the research question that had been formulated previously. Arung

C. Findings and Discussion
This study aimed to reveal the defense of oral interactions within a community with the presence of Android applications such as WA that impressed supplementary of human's way of interacting with each other. Next, this study also aimed to see the positive contribution of WA use in human social interaction in establishing Real Live Communication, especially in the learning environment.

The Defense of Oral Interaction with Closed-network Presence like WhatsApp
Every human being must have the instinct of a good relationship with each other as part of the existence of his life and at the same time as a spiritual need. An interaction involves the various elements that are also the determinants of the success of interpersonal and intergroup relationships. The elements in question are linguistic elements that include phonology, morphology, syntax, semantics, and pragmatics that can be transferred verbally and nonverbally. Next is a psychological element that involves mind, emotion, and willingness. The third element is the social and cultural elements that include patterns of community life, identity, customs, and imaging.
Referring to these three elements, an oral interaction should have these three elements in order for their survival to be maintained. Its survival depends entirely on the involvement of these elements because they are strong supports in the struggle and maintenance of a good relationship.
Technological advances, particularly in information and communication systems, have led to the emergence of a memorable phenomenon that a relationship can be woven constantly in a virtual world. This certainly invites a variety of polemics that specifically focus on verbal and non-verbal interactions. Almost all interactions are done under unreal conditions and situations. However, interpersonal and intergroup interactions still exist with the use of information and communication technology. The need for technology is unavoidable but on the other hand, its presence can have a negative impact on human life specifically on patterns of oral interaction.
Based on the results of data analysis obtained through FGD, interviews, and observations, it can be said that F2F interaction will not be able to exist when the use of technology applications of WA and the like is more dominated the activities of human interaction in any environment. What is more, this situation is supported by several things, among them as follows.
a) The need for technology b) Interest and curiosity of human beings towards something new c) Hope for an immediate desire d) The dominance of hedonism and materialism In this respect, research participants are deeply concerned about the existence of oral interactions. According to their experience and observations, oral interactions have begun to decline since the use of WA and the like is of concern to many people for use in interacting or communicating and establishing social networks, even homes, family members have less experience and feel the impact of oral interactions. The real or F2F communications that build the real relationships in any environment such as learning environment becomes more skeptic and tend to ignore genetic relationships. The four items mentioned before are not wrong behavior since the aim of using technology is only for human easyness, not for building the real and long life interaction.

Positive Contribution of WA Application in Establishing the Real Live Communication in the Learning Environment
The result of data analysis shows so much negative impact of WA application usage. However, some of the positive contributions that the WA application can make in establishing a tangible relationship are visible to users who can be wise in its use. The positive contribution shown is as follows.
The result of data analysis shows so much negative impact of WA application use. However, some of the positive contributions that the WA application can make in establishing a real relationship if the user can be wise in their use. The positive contributions shown are as follows. a) Facilitating access to a variety of information as needed by scholars with a relatively cheap cost and with short content. b) Extending tentative social networks and solidarity in the learning environment. c) Stimulating the initiation of interpersonal and inter-group relationships in the learning environment. d) Providing interaction services to many people at once wherever and whenever. e) Facilitating certain tasks in the learning environment. Positive things described should be the basis for building a wiser attitude toward the use of WA application and the like in the learning environment. Integrity and consistency in attitude are needed in addressing the use of technology such as WA application and the like. It should be understood that excessive consumer attitudes can result in a decrease in competitiveness and creativity. On the other hand, the lack of oral interaction can lead to reduced analytical and critical power to a real phenomenon that can lead to a person's cognitive weaknesses. In oral interactions, the three elements previously mentioned (linguistic, psychological, and social & cultural) are actually more noticeable and felt when compared to interactions with computerized tools or WA technology applications and the like. The stronger the three elements, the clearer and richer the shared knowledge when interacting. This can improve the scholars' shared knowledge in order to facilitate their learning process.
It cannot be denied that some people feel the benefits of using WA applications and the like, but the benefits of psychological relationships are temporarily ignored. Research participants gave the view that the use of WA applications and the like would unwise mislead a person's social psyche, could lead to misunderstandings and misinterpretations, diminish actual forms of expression of attention and affection, reduce sincerity in expression, and character shifts which may be more of an isolative and skeptical attitude. As a consequence, scholars tend to be skeptic to their community for a shared knowledge through F2F communication.
Based on this and taking into consideration the defense of oral interactions, researchers have instead focused on the negative impacts caused by the use of WA application and the like with the purpose of keeping and maintaining oral interaction as a basic human need in existence. If we all agree that the dominance of oral interaction is a shared need that needs to be improved then we all need to think and understand that any negative form of unwholesome use of WA application and the like can actually undermine the existence of oral interactions. In other words, that one of the basic needs in life has been ignored and torn down. Wise and persistent interactions are the interactions that should be initiated orally until each individual involved in the oral interaction has felt and experienced intimate closeness in the learning environment and then can think to support it with the help of technology such as WA applications and the like.
Therefore, a wise attitude in using WA application and the like is very important to consider in the learning environment. In addition, the use of that application only to provide brief and practical information, never think of replacing oral interactions with the use of WA application and the like, use only at the time of the vacant, the application can be used only in remote conditions and as much as possible to initiate and expect oral interaction in the learning process, as well as consistency of interaction management through WA, needs to be determined at the beginning so as to be more directed.

D. Conclusion
The defense of verbal interactions can be worried about weakening because the use of WA application technology and the like is not wise so it takes a wise attitude in dealing with its use. Positive contributions that can be felt through the use of WA applications should not ignore the psychological benefits of an oral interaction. The negative impact of unwise use of WA application can be the basis of thinking and attitude to keep and maintain verbal or oral interactions so that the balance between human creativity in inventing technology and its use is maintained, especially in the learning environment.