Results for 'Vuko Andrić'

(not author) ( search as author name )
29 found
Order:
  1. God and Eternal Boredom.Vuko Andrić & Attila Tanyi - 2017 - Religious Studies 53 (1):51-70.
    God is thought to be eternal. Does this mean that he is timeless? Or is he, rather, omnitemporal? In this paper we want to show that God cannot be omnitemporal. Our starting point, which we take from Bernard Williams’ article on the Makropulos Case, is the intuition that it is inappropriate for persons not to become bored after a sufficiently long sequence of time has passed. If God were omnitemporal, he would suffer from boredom. But God is the greatest possible (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  2.  90
    Objective Consequentialism and the Rationales of ‘ “Ought” Implies “Can” ’.Vuko Andrić - 2017 - Ratio 30 (1):72-87.
    This paper argues that objective consequentialism is incompatible with the rationales of ‘ “ought” implies “can” ’ – with the considerations, that is, that explain or justify this principle. Objective consequentialism is the moral doctrine that an act is right if and only if there is no alternative with a better outcome, and wrong otherwise. An act is obligatory if and only if it is wrong not to perform it. According to ‘ “ought” implies “can” ’, a person is morally (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  3.  8
    Hedonism, Desirability and the Incompleteness Objection.Vuko Andrić - forthcoming - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4. The Case of the Miners.Vuko Andric - 2012 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy (1):1-8.
    This discussion note attempts to show that, pace Niko Kolodny and John MacFarlane, the Miners case intuitively speaks in favor of subjectivism. I argue that properly understood the intuitively correct judgements concerning the case are compatible with subjectivism. My argument is based, among other things, on a comparison between the Minders case and other cases as well as on considerations of blameworthiness.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  5.  71
    Is Objective Consequentialism Compatible with the Principle That “Ought” Implies “Can”?Vuko Andrić - 2016 - Philosophia 44 (1):63-77.
    Some philosophers hold that objective consequentialism is false because it is incompatible with the principle that “ought” implies “can”. Roughly speaking, objective consequentialism is the doctrine that you always ought to do what will in fact have the best consequences. According to the principle that “ought” implies “can”, you have a moral obligation to do something only if you can do that thing. Frances Howard-Snyder has used an innovative thought experiment to argue that sometimes you cannot do what will in (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  6. Objective Consequentialism and the Licensing Dilemma.Vuko Andrić - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 162 (3):547-566.
    Frank Jackson has put forward a famous thought experiment of a physician who has to decide on the correct treatment for her patient. Subjective consequentialism tells the physician to do what intuitively seems to be the right action, whereas objective consequentialism fails to guide the physician’s action. I suppose that objective consequentialists want to supplement their theory so that it guides the physician’s action towards what intuitively seems to be the right treatment. Since this treatment is wrong according to objective (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  7.  10
    Benjamin Kiesewetter: The Normativity of Rationality.Vuko Andrić - 2018 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 21 (5):1241-1243.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8. Multi-Dimensional Consequentialism and Degrees of Rightness.Vuko Andrić & Attila Tanyi - 2016 - Philosophical Studies 173 (3):711-731.
    In his recent book, The Dimensions of Consequentialism, Martin Peterson puts forward a new version of consequentialism that he dubs ‘multidimensional consequentialism’. The defining thesis of the new theory is that there are irreducible moral aspects that jointly determine the deontic status of an act. In defending his particular version of multidimensional consequentialism, Peterson advocates the thesis—he calls it DEGREE—that if two or more moral aspects clash, the act under consideration is right to some non-extreme degree. This goes against the (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9. Is It Bad to Be Disabled? Adjudicating Between the Mere-Difference and the Bad-Difference Views of Disability.Vuko Andrić & Joachim Wündisch - 2015 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 9 (3):1–16.
    This paper examines the impact of disability on wellbeing and presents arguments against the mere-difference view of disability. According to the mere-difference view, disability does not by itself make disabled people worse off on balance. Rather, if disability has a negative impact on wellbeing overall, this is only so because society is not treating disabled people the way it ought to treat them. In objection to the mere-difference view, it has been argued, roughly, that the view licenses the permissibility of (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10. Multidimensional Consequentialism and Risk.Vuko Andrić & Attila Tanyi - 2016 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 19 (1):49-57.
    In his new book, The Dimensions of Consequentialism, Martin Peterson proposes a version of multi-dimensional consequentialism according to which risk is one among several dimensions. We argue that Peterson’s treatment of risk is unsatisfactory. More precisely, we want to show that all problems of one-dimensional (objective or subjective) consequentialism are also problems for Peterson’s proposal, although it may fall prey to them less often. In ending our paper, we address the objection that our discussion overlooks the fact that Peterson’s proposal (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11.  54
    The Ramifications of Error Theories About the Deontic.Vuko Andrić - 2015 - Acta Analytica 30 (4):429-445.
    Error theories about practical deontic judgements claim that no substantive practical deontic judgement is true. Practical deontic judgements are practical in the sense that they concern actions, and they are deontic in the sense that they are about reasons, rightness, wrongness, and obligations. This paper assumes the truth of an error theory about practical deontic judgements in order to examine its ramifications. I defend three contentions. The first is that, if so-called fitting-attitude analyses of value fail, the truth of some (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  12.  8
    How Do Affected Interests Support Global Democracy?Vuko Andrić - 2017 - Journal of Global Ethics 13 (3):264-278.
    ABSTRACTIn this paper, I critique one way of arguing for global democracy on grounds of affected interests and defend another. A famous argument for global democracy, which I call the Demos-Based Argument, attempts to justify global democracy based on the claim that affected interests vindicate individual claims to democratic participation or representation. I analyze and evaluate the Demos-Based Argument and consider different ways of interpreting and justifying its crucial premise: the Principle of Affected Interests. The result is that the argument (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13.  51
    Can Groups Be Autonomous Rational Agents? A Challenge to the List-Pettit Theory.Vuko Andrić - 2014 - In Anita Konzelmann Ziv & Hans Bernhard Schmid (eds.), Institutions, Emotions, and Group Agents - Contributions to Social Ontology. Springer. pp. 343-353.
    Christian List and Philip Pettit argue that some groups qualify as rational agents over and above their members. Examples include churches, commercial corporations, and political parties. According to the theory developed by List and Pettit, these groups qualify as agents because they have beliefs and desires and the capacity to process them and to act on their basis. Moreover, the alleged group agents are said to be rational to a high degree and even to be fit to be held morally (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  14.  45
    Eine Kritik an Norbert Hoersters Theorie der Normenvertretung.Vuko Andrić - 2010 - Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 64 (1):62-83.
    Norbert Hoerster has tried to show on the basis of what I call special and general interests that it is rational to endorse moral judgements. I argue that Hoerster’s attempt to vindicate the rationality of moral judgements fails. By appealing to special interests Hoerster can only establish the rationality of endorsing judgements that – by Hoerster’s own standards – are not moral judgements because they do not pass the test of generalization. While the appeal to general interests, on the other (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15.  3
    Is It Bad to Be Disabled?Vuko Andric & Joachim Wundisch - 2015 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 9 (3):1-17.
    This paper examines the impact of disability on wellbeing and presents arguments against the mere-difference view of disability. According to the mere-difference view, disability does not by itself make disabled people worse off on balance. Rather, if disability has a negative impact on wellbeing overall, this is only so because society is not treating disabled people the way it ought to treat them. In objection to the mere-difference view, it has been argued, roughly, that the view licenses the permissibility of (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  16. David Gauthiers kontraktualistische Moralbegründung.Vuko Andrić - 2010 - Aufklärung Und Kritik 33:80-104.
    This paper offers a critique of David Gauthier’s contractarian moral theory. I point out morally counter-intuitive implications of Gauthier’s theory – for example, with respect to societies with slavery or concerning the protection of animals – as well as theoretically unattractive features, such as the overly optimistic assumption of translucent agents. However, contractarian moral theories can be improved by correcting the theoretically unattractive features. Moreover, though some morally counter-intuitive implications cannot be avoided, whether we should accept these implications ultimately depends (...)
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  17.  5
    Iñigo González-Ricoy and Axel Gosseries : Institutions for Future Generations.Vuko Andrić - forthcoming - Erkenntnis:1-6.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  18. Ein Plädoyer für den Rechtsnormen-Konsequentialismus.Vuko Andrić & Martin Kerz - 2014 - Archiv für Rechts- Und Sozialphilosophie 140:87-98.
    How can legal norms be morally evaluated? In this paper we discuss and defend consequentialism about legal norms. According to this doctrine, the legitimacy of legal norms depends entirely on the consequences of the norms’ validity. Consequentialism about legal norms shares the advantages of both act- and rule-consequentialism while avoiding the respective disadvantages. In particular, consequentialism about legal norms has prima-facie plausibility like act-consequentialism and for similar reasons: it qualifies as a version of collective act-consequentialism. At the same time, the (...)
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  19.  25
    The Dimensions of Consequentialism: Reply to Schmidt, Brown, Howard-Snyder, Crisp, Andric and Tanyi, and Gertken.Martin Peterson - 2016 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 19 (1):71-82.
    In this article I respond to comments and objections raised in the special issue on my book The Dimensions of Consequentialism. I defend my multi-dimensional consequentialist theory against a range of challenges articulated by Thomas Schmidt, Campbell Brown, Frances Howard-Snyder, Roger Crisp, Vuko Andric and Attila Tanyi, and Jan Gertken. My aim is to show that multi-dimensional consequentialism is, at least, a coherent and intuitively plausible alternative to one-dimensional theories such as utilitarianism, prioritarianism, and mainstream accounts of egalitarianism. I (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  20.  3
    Gesture’s Neural Language.Michael Andric & Steven L. Small - 2012 - Frontiers in Psychology 3.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  21.  17
    The Neurobiology of Receptive-Expressive Language Interdependence.Anthony Steven Dick & Michael Andric - 2013 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (4):352 - 353.
    With a focus on receptive language, we examine the neurobiological evidence for the interdependence of receptive and expressive language processes. While we agree that there is compelling evidence for such interdependence, we suggest that Pickering & Garrod's (P&G's) account would be enhanced by considering more-specific situations in which their model does, and does not, apply.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  22.  13
    Pregnancy Outcomes Among Infertile Patients with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Treated with Metformin.Mileva Milosavljević, Milan Stefanović, Ranko Kutlešić, Predrag Vukomanović & Aleksandra Andrić - 2006 - Facta Universitatis 13 (3):172-176.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  23.  12
    Europe Ends at Travnik: Ivo Andrić's Bosnian Chronicle.Sascha Talmor - 1998 - The European Legacy 3 (1):84-99.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  24.  5
    Ivo Andriç'in Drina Köprüsü Adlı Romanı Bağlamında Hayatlara Uzanan Köprüler.Sibel Bayram - 2014 - Journal of Turkish Studies 9 (Volume 9 Issue 9):271-271.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  25. Stanko Andrić, The Miracles of St. John Capistran. Budapest and New York: Central European University Press, 2000. Pp. X, 454; Black-and-White Figures, Tables, and Maps. $49.95. [REVIEW]Laura A. Smoller - 2002 - Speculum 77 (4):1228-1229.
  26.  1
    The Miracles of St. John Capistran. Stanko Andrić.Laura A. Smoller - 2002 - Speculum 77 (4):1228-1229.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  27.  17
    Introduction to the Guest Edited Section: World Government.Attila Tanyi - 2017 - Journal of Global Ethics 13 (3):260-263.
    In this introduction, I first present the general problematic of the special section. Our world faces several existential challenges war, and global injustice) and some would argue that the only adequate answer to these challenges is setting up a world government. I then introduce the contributions that comprise the scholarly body of the special section: Andrić on global democracy; Hahn on global political reconciliation; Pinheiro Walla on Kant and world government; Miklós & Tanyi on institutional consequentialism and world governance. (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  28.  3
    Sign, Meaning, and Proper Name: Controversial Places in Derrida's Discourse.Kristina Peternai Andrić - 2009 - Filozofska Istrazivanja 29 (3):525-541.
  29.  2
    Znak, značenje i vlastito ime: kontroverzna mjesta u Derridaovom diskurzu.Kristina Peternai Andrić - 2009 - Filozofska Istrazivanja 29 (3):525-541.
    No categories
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark