Results for 'Peter A. Ubel'

(not author) ( search as author name )
996 found
Order:
  1. Spiritual Values in the Setting of Health Care Priorities-Peter Ubel Replies.P. A. Ubel - 2000 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 10 (1):108-108.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2.  21
    Behavioral Equipoise: A Way to Resolve Ethical Stalemates in Clinical Research.Robert Silbergleit & Peter A. Ubel - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (2):1 - 8.
    Randomized trials depend on clinicians feeling that they are morally justified in allowing their patients to be randomized across treatment arms. Typically such justification rides on what has been called ?clinical equipoise??when there is disagreement of opinion among the community of experts about whether one treatment is better than another, then physicians can ethically enter their patients into a clinical trial, even if individual physicians are not at equipoise. Recent debates over prominent studies, however, illustrate that controversy can be easily (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  3.  16
    Confessions of a Bedside Rationer: Commentary on Hurst and Danis.Peter A. Ubel - 2007 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 17 (3):267-269.
    : Samia Hurst and Marion Danis provide a thoughtful framework for how to judge the morality of bedside rationing decisions. In this commentary, I applaud Hurst and Danis for advancing the level of debate about bedside rationing. But when I attempt to apply the framework to my own clinical practice, I conclude that the framework comes up short.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4.  10
    Ignorance of Hedonic Adaptation to Hemodialysis: A Study Using Ecological Momentary Assessment.Jason Riis, George Loewenstein, Jonathan Baron, Christopher Jepson, Angela Fagerlin & Peter A. Ubel - 2005 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 134 (1):3-9.
  5.  25
    AJOB Empirical Bioethics: A Home for Empirical Bioethics Scholarship.Chris Feudtner, Jeremy Sugarman, Barbara A. Koenig, Peter A. Ubel, Richard F. Ittenbach, Laura Weiss Roberts & Laurence B. McCullough - 2014 - Ajob Empirical Bioethics 5 (1):1-2.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6. Jonathan Baron and David A. Asch “A Report From the USA: Social Responsibility, Personal Responsibility, and Prognosis in Public Judgements About Transplant Allocation.”. [REVIEW]Peter A. Ubel & Arthur L. Caplan - 1999 - Bioethics 13:57-68.
  7.  35
    Péter Rózsa. Rekurzív Definiciók, Melyek Változó Számu Korábbi Függvényertéket Használnak Fel. Matematikai Lapok , Vol. 5 , Pp. 7–9. An Abstract of XX 176.Péter Rózsa. Ujabb Bizonyítás Arra, Hogy a Csillag-Kalmár-Féle Elemi Függvények Osztálya Szükebb, Mint a Primitiv-Rekurzív Függvényeké. Matematikai Lapok , Vol. 5 , Pp. 244–252. Hungarian Version of XX 282.Péter Rózsa. Kalmár László Matematikai Munkássága . Ebd., Bd. 6 , S. 138–150. [REVIEW]R. Péter - 1957 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 22 (3):295-296.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8.  14
    In Defense of “Denial”: Difficulty Knowing When Beliefs Are Unrealistic and Whether Unrealistic Beliefs Are Bad.J. S. Blumenthal-Barby & Peter A. Ubel - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (9):4-15.
    Bioethicists often draw sharp distinctions between hope and states like denial, self-deception, and unrealistic optimism. But what, exactly, is the difference between hope and its more suspect cousins? One common way of drawing the distinction focuses on accuracy of belief about the desired outcome: Hope, though perhaps sometimes misplaced, does not involve inaccuracy in the way that these other states do. Because inaccurate beliefs are thought to compromise informed decision making, bioethicists have considered these states to be ones where intervention (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  9.  17
    Empowerment Failure: How Shortcomings in Physician Communication Unwittingly Undermine Patient Autonomy.Peter A. Ubel, Karen A. Scherr & Angela Fagerlin - 2017 - American Journal of Bioethics 17 (11):31-39.
    Many health care decisions depend not only upon medical facts, but also on value judgments—patient goals and preferences. Until recent decades, patients relied on doctors to tell them what to do. Then ethicists and others convinced clinicians to adopt a paradigm shift in medical practice, to recognize patient autonomy, by orienting decision making toward the unique goals of individual patients. Unfortunately, current medical practice often falls short of empowering patients. In this article, we reflect on whether the current state of (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  10.  17
    Truth Be Told: Not All Nudging is Bullshit.Jennifer Blumenthal-Barby & Peter A. Ubel - 2018 - Journal of Medical Ethics 44 (8):547-547.
    > ‘The fact about himself that the bullshitter hides, on the other hand, is that the truth-values of his statements are of no central interest to him; what we are not to understand is that his intention is neither to report the truth nor conceal it. It is just this lack of connection to a concern with truth—this indifference to how things really are—that is the essence of bullshit.’1 > —Harry Frankfurt In his paper, Nudging, informed consent, and bullshit, William (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  11.  25
    The Challenge of Measuring Community Values in Ways Appropriate for Setting Health Care Priorities.Peter A. Ubel - 1999 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 9 (3):263-284.
    : The move from a notion that community values ought to play a role in health care decision making to the creation of health care policies that in some way reflect such values is a challenging one. No single method will adequately measure community values in a way appropriate for setting health care priorities. Consequently, multiple methods to measure community values should be employed, thereby allowing the strengths and weaknesses of the various methods to complement each other. A preliminary research (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  12.  15
    Response to Open Peer Commentaries on ‘‘In Defense of ‘Denial’: Difficulty Knowing When Beliefs Are Unrealistic and Whether Unrealistic Beliefs Are Bad”.J. S. Blumenthal-Barby & Peter A. Ubel - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (9):3-5.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  13.  37
    Lying to Insurance Companies: The Desire to Deceive Among Physicians and the Public.Rachel M. Werner, G. Caleb Alexander, Angela Fagerlin & Peter A. Ubel - 2004 - American Journal of Bioethics 4 (4):53-59.
    This study examines the public's and physicians' willingness to support deception of insurance companies in order to obtain necessary healthcare services and how this support varies based on perceptions of physicians' time pressures. Based on surveys of 700 prospective jurors and 1617 physicians, the public was more than twice as likely as physicians to sanction deception (26% versus 11%) and half as likely to believe that physicians have adequate time to appeal coverage decisions (22% versus 59%). The odds of public (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  14.  8
    In Defense of Nudging When the Stakes Are High.Monica E. Lemmon & Peter A. Ubel - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (5):62-63.
    Volume 19, Issue 5, May 2019, Page 62-63.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15.  8
    Why It's Not Time for Health Care Rationing.Peter A. Ubel - 2015 - Hastings Center Report 45 (2):15-19.
  16.  25
    Gunmen and Ice Cream Cones: Harm to Autonomy and Harm to Persons.J. S. Blumenthal-Barby & Peter A. Ubel - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics 16 (11):13-14.
  17.  8
    Solid-Organ Transplantation in HIV-Infected Patients.Scott D. Halpern, Peter A. Ubel & Arthur L. Caplan - forthcoming - Center for Bioethics Papers.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  18.  19
    Social Acceptability, Personal Responsibility, and Prognosis in Public Judgments and Transplant Allocation.Peter A. Ubel, Jonathan Baron & David A. Asch - 1999 - Bioethics 13 (1):57–68.
  19.  10
    Disability and Sunshine: Can Hedonic Predictions Be Improved by Drawing Attention to Focusing Illusions or Emotional Adaptation?Peter A. Ubel, George Loewenstein & Christopher Jepson - 2005 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 11 (2):111-123.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  20.  3
    Agency Is Messy: Get Used to It.Peter A. Ubel - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics 14 (9):37-38.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  21.  15
    Autonomy: What's Shared Decision Making Have to Do With It?Peter A. Ubel, Karen A. Scherr & Angela Fagerlin - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (2):11-12.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  22. Commentary : How Did We Get Into This Mess?Peter A. Ubel - 2005 - In Don A. Moore (ed.), Conflicts of Interest: Challenges and Solutions in Business, Law, Medicine, and Public Policy. Cambridge University Press.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  23.  9
    The Ethics of Swimming Pools.Peter A. Ubel - 2007 - Hastings Center Report 37 (4):51-55.
  24.  8
    The Predictable Irrationality of Righteous Minds, and the Work of Ethicists.Peter A. Ubel - 2013 - Hastings Center Report 43 (3):18-22.
  25.  10
    Are Patients Willing to Participate in Medical Education?Peter A. Ubel & Ari Silver-Isenstadt - 1999 - Journal of Clinical Ethics 11 (3):230-235.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  26.  5
    The Author Replies.Peter A. Ubel - 2015 - Hastings Center Report 45 (4):4-4.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  27.  9
    Science and Behavior.Robert Silbergleit & Peter A. Ubel - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (2):W1 - W2.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  28.  4
    How Did We Get Into This Mess?Peter A. Ubel - 2005 - In Don A. Moore (ed.), Conflicts of Interest: Challenges and Solutions in Business, Law, Medicine, and Public Policy. Cambridge University Press. pp. 142.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  29.  3
    The Experimental Imperative.Peter A. Ubel - 2011 - Hastings Center Report 41 (2):3-3.
  30. Another Voice: The Experimental Imperative.Peter A. Ubel - forthcoming - Hastings Center Report.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  31.  30
    Toward a Broader View of Values in Cost‐Effectiveness Analysis of Health.Paul Menzel, Marthe R. Gold, Erik Nord, Jose-Louis Pinto-Prades, Jeff Richardson & Peter Ubel - 1999 - Hastings Center Report 29 (3):7-15.
  32.  22
    Failure to Discount for Conflict of Interest When Evaluating Medical Literature: A Randomised Trial of Physicians.G. K. Silverman, G. F. Loewenstein, B. L. Anderson, P. A. Ubel, S. Zinberg & J. Schulkin - 2010 - Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (5):265-270.
    Context Physicians are regularly confronted with research that is funded or presented by industry. Objective To assess whether physicians discount for conflicts of interest when weighing evidence for prescribing a new drug. Design and setting Participants were presented with an abstract from a single clinical trial finding positive results for a fictitious new drug. Physicians were randomly assigned one version of a hypothetical scenario, which varied on conflict of interest: ‘presenter conflict’, ‘researcher conflict’ and ‘no conflict’. Participants 515 randomly selected (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  33.  46
    The Six Most Essential Questions in Psychiatric Diagnosis: A Pluralogue Part 3: Issues of Utility and Alternative Approaches in Psychiatric Diagnosis. [REVIEW]Phillips James, Frances Allen, A. Cerullo Michael, Chardavoyne John, S. Decker Hannah, B. First Michael, Ghaemi Nassir, Greenberg Gary, C. Hinderliter Andrew, A. Kinghorn Warren, G. LoBello Steven, B. Martin Elliott, L. Mishara Aaron, Paris Joel, M. Pierre Joseph, W. Pies Ronald, A. Pincus Harold, Porter Douglas, Pouncey Claire, A. Schwartz Michael, Szasz Thomas, C. Wakefield Jerome, G. Waterman, Whooley Owen & Zachar Peter - 2012 - Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 7:9-.
    In face of the multiple controversies surrounding the DSM process in general and the development of DSM-5 in particular, we have organized a discussion around what we consider six essential questions in further work on the DSM. The six questions involve: 1) the nature of a mental disorder; 2) the definition of mental disorder; 3) the issue of whether, in the current state of psychiatric science, DSM-5 should assume a cautious, conservative posture or an assertive, transformative posture; 4) the role (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  34.  11
    Can a Moral Reasoning Exercise Improve Response Quality to Surveys of Healthcare Priorities?M. Johri, L. J. Damschroder, B. J. Zikmund-Fisher, S. Y. H. Kim & P. A. Ubel - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (1):57-64.
    Objective: To determine whether a moral reasoning exercise can improve response quality to surveys of healthcare priorities Methods: A randomised internet survey focussing on patient age in healthcare allocation was repeated twice. From 2574 internet panel members from the USA and Canada, 2020 (79%) completed the baseline survey and 1247 (62%) completed the follow-up. We elicited respondent preferences for age via five allocation scenarios. In each scenario, a hypothetical health planner made a decision to fund one of two programmes identical (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  35.  31
    Pricing Life: Why It's Time for Health Care Rationing, by Peter A. Ubel, M.D. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2000. 208 Pp. $25.00. [REVIEW]Leonard M. Fleck - 2001 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 10 (2):214-218.
    This is a book for reflective laypersons and health professionals who wish to better understand what the problem of healthcare rationing is all about. Ubel says clearly in the Introduction that it is unlikely that professional economists or philosophers are going to be very satisfied with this effort. For him it is more important (p. xix). This is a reasonable aim made achievable by Ubel's clear and engaging writing style. Probably the people who most need to be drawn (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  36.  19
    Peter A. Ubel's "Pricing Life".Robert M. Veatch - 2001 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 44 (1):108-116.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  37.  11
    Book Review: Peter A Ubel, Free Market Madness: Why Human Nature is at Odds with Economics and Why It Matters, Harvard Business Press: Boston, Massachusetts, 2009, 257pp.: 1312111054321, US$26.95. [REVIEW]G. Marrocco - 2010 - Nursing Ethics 17 (2):274-274.
  38.  13
    Ubel, Peter A., M.D. Pricing Life: Why It’s Time for Health Care Rationing.Carr J. Smith - 2002 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 2 (3):566-567.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  39.  36
    Does Elusive Becoming in Fact Characterize H. D. Lewis' View of the Mind?: PETER A. BERTOCCI.Peter A. Bertocci - 1979 - Religious Studies 15 (3):399-405.
    It was a little over ten years ago, 1967–8, that H. D. Lewis delivered the first series of Gifford lectures, The Elusive Mind, in the University of Edinburgh. It was my privilege that year to be an auditor in the Seminar at King's College that Professor Lewis was conducting with his students in the area of this topic. I had already read the works in which, in the midst of neo-orthodox and existentialist religious movements, he had devoted himself to critical (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  40.  24
    A Principle of Responsive Adjustment: Peter A. French.Peter A. French - 1984 - Philosophy 59 (230):491-503.
    I. On the morning of 28 November 1979 flight TE-901, a DC-10 operated by Air New Zealand Limited, took off from Auckland, New Zealand, on a sightseeing passenger flight over a portion of Antarctica. The pilot in command was Captain Collins. The following are paragraphs from the official Report of the Royal Commission that inquired into the events surrounding that flight.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  41.  23
    Peter A. Stanwick Sarah D. Stanwick.Peter A. Stanwick - 1998 - Journal of Business Ethics 17:195-204.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  42.  16
    Selected Works of Peter A. Boodberg.Albert E. Dien, Alvin P. Cohen & Peter A. Boodberg - 1982 - Journal of the American Oriental Society 102 (2):422.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  43.  32
    Peter A. French and Howard K. Wettstein (Eds): The American Philosophers (Midwest Studies in Philosophy, Vol. XXVIII).Pierfrancesco Basile - 2010 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 18 (4):726-730.
    (2010). Peter A. French and Howard K. Wettstein (eds): The American Philosophers (Midwest Studies in Philosophy, vol. XXVIII) British Journal for the History of Philosophy: Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 726-730.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  44. The Foundations of Analytic Philosophy / Editors, Peter A. French, Theodore E. Uehling, Jr., Howard K. Wettstein, Associate Editor, Jeffery Johnson. [REVIEW]Peter A. French, Theodore Edward Uehling & Howard K. Wettstein - 1981
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  45.  10
    Reflections on Ethics and Responsibility: Essays in Honor of Peter A. French.Zachary J. Goldberg (ed.) - 2017 - Springer.
    The original essays in this book address the influential writings of Peter A. French on the nature of responsibility, ethics, and moral practices. French’s contributions to a wide spectrum of philosophical discussions have made him a dominant figure in the fields of normative ethics, meta-ethics, applied ethics, as well as legal and political philosophy. Many of French’s deepest insights come from identifying and exploring the scope and nature of moral responsibility and human agency as they appear in actual events, (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  46. Chapter Nineteen Evolutionary Genius and the Intensity of Artistic Life: Who Makes Musical History? Peter A. Kulichkin.Peter A. Kulichkin - 2007 - In L. I͡A Dorfman, Colin Martindale & Vladimir Petrov (eds.), Aesthetics and Innovation. Cambridge Scholars Press. pp. 363.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  47. Contemporary Perspectives in the Philosophy of Language Edited by Peter A. French, Theodore E. Uehling, Jr., Howard K. Wettstein. --. [REVIEW]Howard K. Wettstein, Theodore Edward Uehling & Peter A. French - 1979 - University of Minnesota Press.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  48. Exploring Evil and Philosophical Failure: A Critical Notice of Peter van Inwagen's *The Problem of Evil.John Martin Fischer & Neal A. Tognazzini - 2007 - Faith and Philosophy 24 (4):458-474.
    In his recent book on the problem of evil, Peter van Inwagen argues that both the global and local arguments from evil are failures. In this paper, we engagevan Inwagen’s book at two main points. First, we consider his understanding of what it takes for a philosophical argument to succeed. We argue that while his criterion for success is interesting and helpful, there is good reason to think it is too stringent. Second, we consider his responses to the global (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  49. Peter Boghossian, A Manual for Creating Atheists. [REVIEW]Rick Repetti - 2014 - Science, Religion and Culture 1 (2):93-96.
    Book review of Peter Boghossian, A Manual for Creating Atheists, Pitchstone Publishing, 2013, 280pp., $14.95, ISBN 978-1939578099 (paperback). Foreword by Michael Shermer. Science, Religion & Culture 1:2 (August 2014), 93-96 .
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  50. Against Theodicy: A Response to Peter Forrest.N. N. Trakakis - 2010 - Sophia 49 (1):129-140.
    In responding to Peter Forrest’s defence of ‘tough-minded theodicy’, I point to some problematic features of theodicies of this sort, in particular their commitment to an anthropomorphic conception of God which tends to assimilate the Creator to the creaturely and so diminishes the otherness and mystery of God. This remains the case, I argue, even granted Forrest’s view that God may have a very different kind of morality from the one we mortals are subject to.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
1 — 50 / 996