Between 1930 and 1945, the Faculty of Protestant Theology at the University of Strasbourg took part in the intellectual and spiritual resistance to Nazism. In the 1930s, its Revue d’Histoire et de Philosophie religieuses commissioned articles from German theologians opposed to Nazi anti-Semitism. Its Francophile professors fought against the activities of autonomist students. During the relocation of the University of Strasbourg to Clermont-Ferrand (1939-1945), the Faculty of Theology shared the fate of the University. Several of its teachers and students were (...) deported or even murdered. (shrink)

The fact that Heidegger was finally absent from the ninth International Congress of Philosophy in 1937, despite having been invited, not only provides material for a biographical and sociological investigation into the practice of philosophy in the 1920s and 1930s, it is also of philosophical interest as far as the reception of Heidegger’s texts in France and the evolution of Heidegger’s thought are concerned. Two trajectories intersect and are examined here: that of Henry Corbin, who acted as Heidegger’s representative at (...) the Congress, and that of Heidegger, whose philosophical position, particularly on history, was undergoing substantial transformation at this time. (shrink)

This article aims to show that René Capitant was in some way a Resistant thinker even before the Second World War. It shows how this young Professor of public law tried to alert the French public opinion, by some shrewd essays on Nazism, on the serious danger represented by the hitlerian State even during its early period (1934-1939).

Traditional commentaries on Cavaillès’ philosophy acknowledges its Spinozist legacy. But it is generally content with Cavaillès’s statements to Raymond Aron, without identifying the elements that illustrate this link or, above all, those that contradict it. The authority of a friend, Georges Canguilhem, who took up Raymond Aron’s testimony at an official ceremony, and Gilles-Gaston Granger’s article “Cavaillès ou la montée vers Spinoza”, established for a long time the idea that everything had been said. This article questions the meaning and significance (...) of Cavaillès’s ‘I am a Spinozist’ in the promotion of the philosophy of the concept. (shrink)

A major figure of Resistance in the French philosophical milieu, Gorges Canguilhem started his teaching at the university of Strasbourg in Clermont-Ferrand in April 1941, arriving from Toulouse, a city in which he had already carried out antifascist activities. In this paper, we present Canguilhem’s teachings related to war, freedom and values, and his activities of Resistance properly said, which, regarding Clermont-Ferrand, began as soon as April 1941 before he was able to join the underground military forces of the Maquis (...) in June 1944, to participate in the Mont Mouchet battle, on which he left an important testimony. A heavy human toll was paid by the university of Strasbourg during the war and especially at the time of the Libération, in order to keep German troops fighting in the Mont Mouchet and at other locations in the Central part of France. (shrink)

The article highlights the points in common between Kant’s theory of biology and Canguilhem’s philosophy of medicine. It shows how these two conceptions contribute in complementary ways to a better understanding of freedom of action within the limits of biological naturality. Using Kant and Canguilhem as a starting point, an argument is put forward against biological reductionism—and for resistance against biopolitical instrumentalization of the life sciences for ideological-totalitarian purposes of homogenization and normalization.

L’ouvrage de Jean Quétier, Le Travail de parti de Marx. Intervenir dans les organisations ouvrières, publié aux Éditions de la Sorbonne (collection « La philosophie à l’œuvre ») explore de manière inédite les modalités d’interventions politiques de Marx au sein des organisations ouvrières. Parallèlement à ce premier opus, Jean Quétier publie la même année aux Éditions sociales (collection « Les essentielles ») une anthologie de textes de Marx intitulée Sur le parti révolutionnaire. S’ouvrant...

As a student in Clermont-Ferrand at the relocated Strasbourg University, Julien Freund (1921-1993) took part in the local actions of the Groupe Franc de Combat. The theme of resistance later found its way into his work as a philosopher and political scientist. This study, based on hitherto unpublished archival documents, attempts to synthesise his scattered remarks in an attempt to identify the main thrust of his work.

In 1942-1943, when he was completing his doctoral thesis in medicine, Georges Canguilhem gave at the Faculté des Lettres of Strasbourg relocated to Clermont-Ferrand a lecture on Les normes et le normal. In 1962-1963, he again gave a lecture at the Sorbonne, this time entitled La norme et le normal. The first of these lectures identified the “philosophical demon” that also inspired the medical thesis: the aim was to make philosophy a philosophy of values. The second does not abandon this (...) commitment. Canguilhem draws the conclusion that philosophy, whose task is the critical resolution of conflicts of values, cannot itself have one of these values as its norm. Hence the apparent paradox that “there is no such thing as philosophical truth”. (shrink)

This article addresses the question of engagement in French philosophy from the Munich Agreement to the Korean War. It focuses on establishing a little-known fact about the history of the concept of engagement: the role played by the individual and social ethics developed by Husserl in the early 1920s, through its personalist reception, in the genesis of the philosophies of engagement during our reference period. Paul-Louis Landsberg was, with his Reflections on Personal Engagement (1937), the main architect of the renewal (...) through which French personalism, breaking away from the strategy of purity, became a personalism of engagement. In the early 1920s, he had attended Husserl’s lectures in Freiburg, as he explained in the posthumous tribute “Husserl and the Idea of Philosophy” (1939). What did he take from Husserl? What did he choose to abandon? With the failure of transcendental rationalism, had rationalism reached the exhaustion of its meaning and the depletion of its possibilities? The philosophies of engagement that developed in post-war France stemmed largely from a critique of Husserlian rationalism, either by seeking to go beyond rationalism—the strategy of personalism—or by seeking to rebuild it on different grounds, not as transcendental rationalism, but as engaged rationalism. (shrink)

The question of the sublime remains considerable in Schopenhauer’s thought, insofar as it gives the essential clue to his ethical intentions. Schopenhauer’s emphasis on corporeality and the questioning of representation at the limits of his metaphysics of the Will, as well as his discourse on freedom without any reference to a moral law, mark a distance from the Kantian perspective. In this article, our aim is to examine Schopenhauer’s thought of the sublime while taking into account Kant’s analyses on the (...) subject. (shrink)

Il faut résister, combattre, affronter la mort. Ainsi l’exige la vérité, la raison. J. Cavaillès Y aurait-il jamais eu une résistance par les armes, et tant de sacrifices héroïques, s’il n’y avait pas eu d’abord une résistance intellectuelle? Y aurait-il eu de si nobles exemples d’engagement, s’il n’y avait eu d’abord des convictions ancrées dans la perception commune de « valeurs », qui valaient tant qu’on était prêt à leur sacrifier jusqu’à sa propre personne et sa vie en leur nom? (...) L’Univ... (shrink)

This study focuses on the political significance of the « Descartes Congress » of 1937 by placing it in the wake of previous international congresses of philosophy, in particular the Prague Congress of 1934—a date by which everyone already knew what « Hitlerism » represented on the intellectual, ideological and political levels. Intellectual relations between France and Germany were deteriorated by a German repressive policy, which forbade Husserl to come to France in 1937, despite the invitation sent to him by (...) the Organizing Committee of the Paris Congress. In 1937, attention focused on the constitution of the German delegation, and Heidegger’s participation. A study of the exchanges between Heidegger and the head of the delegation, Hans Heyse, supports the hypothesis that Heidegger refused very early on to endorse the ideological reception and « völkisch » interpretation of Being and Time, as found in Heyse and others. (shrink)

How can we explain the positive references of René Capitant, an anti-fascist jurist who observed the destabilization of the Weimar republic from Strasbourg, to Carl Schmitt, a critic of the Weimar constitution who would rally to nazism in 1933? Is it a reversal use? This article documents the fact that while opposing Schmitt on the conception of democracy and the values of equality and respect for the individual on which it is based, Capitant is sensitive to some of the strategic (...) arguments of the author of Legality and Lgitimacy on the limits of legalism in the face of enemies who seem to play the game of legality only to bring it down. (shrink)

Après deux ouvrages d’introduction à la pensée de Cornelius Castoriadis (Réinventer la politique après Marx et Pour l’autonomie, co-écrits avec Philippe Caumières), Arnaud Tomès revient avec un livre au contenu bien différent. Qu’est-ce qu’un imaginaire social?, publié chez Hermann, se propose de faire l’inventaire de l’appareillage théorique castoriadien en se focalisant sur un concept central : l’imaginaire. Le sous-titre témoigne de ce changement de ton : c’est « une discussion critique d...

Cavaillès is an enigmatic figure which raises, more than any other, the question of the relation between intellectual activity and resistance. Is there a link between his demanding philosophy of mathematics and his exemplary commitment in the information and action network he has contributed to form, and which he has lead and sustained with great courage? We will try to demonstrate that in his case, the commitment derives from the philosophical theses he defends and that one must search in his (...) conception of mathematics and their necessity the determinant cause of his action. (shrink)

La publication de D’Ailleurs, la Révélation par Jean-Luc Marion (Grasset, 2020) signale l’achèvement d’un travail de plus de quarante ans par un des plus remarquables penseurs de sa génération. L’importance de ce livre, sa longueur, et sa complexité rendent essentielle une réception rigoureuse et critique, à la fois par une analyse ciblée des nombreux fils tressant l’investigation historique et par une explication réinscrivant les idées de l’ouvrage dans des questions plus larges. L’une et l’...

In his dialogue with Blanchot (The Disavowed Community vs. The Unavowable Community), Jean-Luc Nancy intended to denounce, but without opposing another figure, the idea according to which the community of lovers, as exemplified by Marguerite Duras in The Disease of Death, would be the accomplishment of the community as a work of death. On the basis of a reading of Richard Dehmel’s poem, Verklärte Nacht (Transfigured Night), we would like here to outline the schema of a couple in which the (...) unspeakable is transfigured into the power of the advent of a shared community. (shrink)

Democracy cannot go with philosophical Episteme because it is put to the doxic test of maxims. This text associates this observation with what Nancy called democratic existence in its self-transcendence. A democracy recognizes itself in that it makes possible the existence in excess of the unshareable a-politics of our existences. Separation and representation are then imperatively required by the democratic transaction. The «with» thought by Nancy sketches such a figure, both the possibility of a being-together and the internal possibility of (...) an impossibility, a without-being-together in withdrawal. A democratic thought or philosophy, after Nancy, will be careful not to leave unabridged this set of questions. (shrink)

To touch the untouchable—an axiom which has belongs to the law of touch since Aristotle and runs through the work of Jean-Luc Nancy, as J. Derrida has remarked, seems inscribed at the heart of philosophy, the statut of which is laid down by Plato in the Symposium. Going back to this means playing again the relationship between sensible and intelligible, between body and flesh, between love and truth by weakening their opposition.

Being Alive. I Salute You Jean-LucIn this article, we bid farewell to Jean-Luc Nancy by attempting to think being-in-life in a dialogue with him. To do so, the mediation draws on a number of his key concepts, which are brought into play around the notion of life, such as breath, meaning, death, salvation, community, singular plural being, between-body, intimacy and cum. The article aims to show that Nancy is a thinker of finitude who has always given the last word to (...) life, to community, to the meaning of being and of the world. (shrink)

S’il fallait encore une occasion pour rendre à Jean-Luc Nancy l’hommage qu’on lui doit ici dans sa Wahlheimat et dans les – dans ses – Cahiers philosophiques de Strasbourg, on pourrait dire que ce volume répond à une apparition et à une disparition dont Nancy est à l’origine : d’une part, au trentième anniversaire de la parution du premier numéro des Cahiers créés par Jean-Luc Nancy et Philippe Lacoue-Labarthe en 1994 ; d’autre part, à la disparition de Jean-Luc Nancy, qui (...) nous a quitté en 20... (shrink)

There would be, beyond the work carried out with Philippe Lacoue-Labarthe on the Jena Romantics—the first phase of German Romanticism—in The Literary Absolute (1978; trans. 1988), a “romanticism”, recurrent and yet problematised, of Jean-Luc Nancy. Set forth in a little-known text on Flaubert, this “romanticism” reveals itself to be, not of a school of thought nor of a fantasy, but of a form insofar as it is conveyed by a very new regime of thinking. Moreover, it must itself be overcome, (...) by following the infinity of sense that the fragmentation of totalities qua the world imposes. (shrink)

This article endeavors to interpret the work of Jean-Luc Nancy through the idea of “anastasis”. Each time, something rises from the dead: meaning emerges from significance, the world from the unworldly aspects of globalization, Christianity from the decline of religion, the body from its Western devaluation in favor of the spirit, and community from the failure of state-controlled communism and rampant individualism. Could it be that life, in a unique manner across all those phenomena, arises from death and sustains itself (...) within it? (shrink)

Jean-Luc Nancy is a prolific thinker, not only because of an abundant body of work—more than a hundred titles—but also and above all because his thought, in the form of an opening, encourages and invites us to think what he himself has not put into question. So it is with the category of “milieu”. This category, of which Georges Canguilhem in his time marked the contemporaneity, is more relevant today than ever. It enables us to think differently about our world, (...) and about what makes the world our world. Who makes the “we,” when we think through the “milieu”? How can we think from the relationship first and not from a primordial subject? How, therefore, can we think of another subjectivity, beyond the reflexive subjectivity of the human? This study aims to show the conditions in which Nancy’s work can contribute in a powerful way to a thought of being-together from an ecosophical point of view. (shrink)

Jean-Luc Nancy’s work revolves around the concept of existence, modified or rather explicated as co-existence. Nancy performs the same operation on existence as Heidegger did on being-in-the-world. Indeed, just as Heidegger could say that there is not at first a subject, then a world, then the question of how the former accesses the latter, Nancy asserts, (with regard to Mitsein, being-with, sociality in the purest and most eminent sense), that there is not at first a subject, a self, then another (...) self, then the question of how one accesses the other, and how they can communicate together. We have to start from “us”, and from the sense that “we” are, i.e. from a “coexistential analytic”. (shrink)

Pendant le déroulement de cette journée doctorale consacrée à l’espace, je ne cessais pas d’être sollicité par une constatation toute simple, venue du fait même de cette rencontre : s’il y a, bien évidemment, d’autres thèmes sur lesquels peuvent se retrouver ou se recouper plusieurs recherches, il n’y en a peut-être pas beaucoup qui présentent autant que l’« espace » une sorte de force ou de prégnance qui renvoie, d’emblée, à la configuration d’une époque. À travers la diversité des questions...

Here I approach J.-L. Nancy’s texts related to the skin of “our world” and to “what happens to us”, by a reading or a contamination between his books and Derrida’s interpretation, particularly regarding “touch”. In a first step, I analyze the meaning of “touch”, I appeal to it with and beyond Derrida, emphasizing Nancy’s perspectives on the meaning/weight of thought/weighting and even on the idea of “transimmanence”; in a second step, I consider his analyses on the meaning of “the skin (...) of the world”, demonstrating that there is a sort of “de-ontologization” in the last Nancy: he weights the weight/meaning of the “world” differently, because he touches on the almost weightiness of the skin’s vapor and on the circulation of perspiring skins, which, for him, still give meaning to the world. Finally, I presume in Nancy’s thinking a contamination of the concept of “world” with that of time and even mind/spirit. (shrink)

This article proposes a rereading of the question of the body and of meaning in the work of Jean-Luc Nancy by considering the phenomenon of sound. The issues of tonality, voice and listening have been at the center of several of Nancy’s studies throughout his philosophical production, but it is from his last publication, the book Cruor, that the analysis of sound outward propagation acquires a major relevance in the thought of bodies. Sound implies a fragmentation which suspends all rhetoric (...) of contact and all spatial valorisation of the “between” (of the in-between, of between-us, of being-with). (shrink)

The aim of my paper is to highlight the issues at stake in Nancy’s assertion according to which ‘‘there is no ‘(final) Sense of sense’ in any of the senses of ‘sense’”. To this end, I examine his acknowledgement of the complete drying up of the regime of sense that has sustained the history of the West, and I show how his deconstruction unburdens “the sense of the world” from principles, reasons and ends, in order to think the fundamental incompletness (...) of a sense that shelters the singular-plural unfolding of existence and that cannot be appropriated, since it sends itself, sends back itself, and circulates without ever being settled. (shrink)

Je rappelle ici l’une des plus constantes préoccupations de la pensée de Jean-Luc Nancy : celle du destin d’un Occident qui, au moment même où il paraît accomplir son élargissement au monde entier, est amené à faire, de plus en plus, le constat de son propre effacement, de son déclin, ou de sa finitude. Je le fais tout en déplaçant quelque peu le point de vue d’où le problème se pose « normalement » car, comme c’est arrivé maintes fois dans (...) mes échanges avec Nancy lui-même, j’y fais jouer mon écart, ou mon arrabal hispanique. (shrink)