Year:

  1.  19
    Bringing Responsibility to Justice.Alexander Brown - 2017 - Ethical Perspectives 24 (3):363-404.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2.  3
    HREC Members' Personal Values Influence Decision Making in Contentious Cases.Boris Handal, Kevin Watson, Keagan Brewer, Marc Fellman, Marguerite Maher & Hannah Ianiello - 2017 - Ethical Perspectives 24 (3):405-439.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3.  4
    The Abductive Argument for Libertarian Self-Ownership: Attractive but Inconclusive.Kasper Ossenblok - 2017 - Ethical Perspectives 24 (3):441-466.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4.  2
    The Fragility of Our Moral Standing to Blame.Eduardo Rivera López - 2017 - Ethical Perspectives 24 (3):333-361.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5.  20
    Killing, a Conceptual Analysis.Cheng-Chih Tsai - 2017 - Ethical Perspectives 24 (3):467-499.
    It is commonly held that killing is morally wrong and that the killers need to be punished, and in marginal cases where killing seems justifiable, we are advised to resort to the ethics of killing for general guidance. It is also commonly held that the notion of killing per se is accountable in terms of ‘causing death’, which is a metaphysical (or even physical) issue, having nothing to do with ethics. However, this dichotomy – between the ethics of killing and (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6.  7
    Defending Sufficientarianism.Jeanette Albæk Henriksen - 2017 - Ethical Perspectives 24 (2):181-198.
    In the present article, I aim to defend and slightly revise the ideal of Freedom from Duress as presented by Axelsen and Nielsen. I will argue that by perceiving the two categories of capabilities as they are presented in the ideal, that is capabilities related to basic needs and capabilities related to the fundamental interests of a human being in a social setting, as two distinct threshold-bundles, some priority between the two is possible and this hence eliminates the problem of (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7.  10
    The Link Between Firm Size and Corporate Social Responsibility: Are There Differences Between Family and Non-Family Business?Cristina López-Cózar-Navarro, Titziana Priedebergamini & Sonia Benito-Hernández - 2017 - Ethical Perspectives 24 (2):259-296.
    This paper examines the relationship between firm size and corporate social responsibility, and compares this relationship in family and non-family businesses. Three dimensions of CSR that we consider particularly important for family businesses were assessed: relationship with the community, relationship with employees and process and product quality management. The approach used is based on an empirical study conducted on 1,848 Spanish manufacturing firms, of which 824 are family owned. Our findings indicate that family and non-family enterprises vary in their relationships (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8.  9
    The Nature and Uniqueness of Material Value-Ethics Clarified.Vlastimil Vohánka - 2017 - Ethical Perspectives 24 (2):225-258.
    Although material value-ethics was introduced into philosophy at least a century ago, confusion still persists as to what it implies. This article offers some clarification. It states how material value-ethics stands opposed to formalistic ethics, commonly – though perhaps wrongly – attributed to Kant. The resulting analysis allows us to establish a combination of features that give material value-ethics an advantage over deontological, consequentialist and other perspectives, regardless of the hermeneutics issue.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9.  7
    Prioritarianism and Other-Regarding Decision-Making Under Risk.Alexandru Volacu - 2017 - Ethical Perspectives 24 (2):199-224.
    In the present contribution I attempt to refute a recent challenge raised by Michael Otsuka against prioritarianism, according to which the priority view is objectionable since it rejects the moral permissibility of choosing in accordance with rational self-interest – understood as maximization of expected utility – in one-person cases involving other-regarding decision-making under risk. I claim that Otsuka’s argument is bound to make an illegitimate move, which is either to assume implausibly that individuals are generally risk-neutral or to assume implausibly (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10.  51
    Review of Richard Joyce's Essays in Moral Skepticism. [REVIEW]Michael Klenk - 2017 - Ethical Perspectives 24 (1):158-162.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11. Putting the War Back in Just War Theory: A Critique of Examples.Rigstad Mark - 2017 - Ethical Perspectives 24 (1):123-144.
    Analytic just war theorists often attempt to construct ideal theories of military justice on the basis of intuitions about imaginary and sometimes outlandish examples, often taken from non-military contexts. This article argues for a sharp curtailment of this method and defends, instead, an empirically and historically informed approach to the ethical scrutiny of armed conflicts. After critically reviewing general philosophical reasons for being sceptical of the moral-theoretic value of imaginary hypotheticals, the article turns to some of the special problems that (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
 Previous issues
  
Next issues