Year:

  1.  18
    Gnostic Disagreement Norms.Domingos Faria - 2022 - European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 18 (1):(A2)5-22.
    Our main question in this paper is as follow: (Q) What are the epistemic norms governing our responses in the face of disagreement? In order to answer it, we begin with some clarification. First, following McHugh (2012), if we employ a useful distinction in normativity theory between evaluative and prescriptive norms, there are two readings of (Q)––we explore such distinction in section 2. And secondly, we accept gnosticism, that is, the account that the fundamental epistemic good is knowledge. It is (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2.  5
    Kengo Miyazono and Lisa Bortolotti PHILOSOPHY OF PSYCHOLOGY: AN INTRODUCTION, Cambridge, Polity Press, 2021.David Grčki - 2022 - European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 18 (1).
    BOOK REVIEW Kengo Miyazono and Lisa Bortolotti, PHILOSOPHY OF PSYCHOLOGY: AN INTRODUCTION, Cambridge, Polity Press, 2021, ISBN-13: 978-1509515486, ISBN-13: 509515488, Hardcover, $ 40.89, Paperback, $20.00, e-book, $24.95.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3. Toril Moi, Rita Felski, and Amanda Anderson, Character: Three Inquiries in Literary Studies.David Grčki - 2022 - European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 18 (1).
    BOOK REVIEW Toril Moi, Rita Felski, and Amanda Anderson, CHARACTER: THREE INQUIRIES IN LITERARY STUDIES, University of Chicago Press, 2019, ISBN-13: 978-0-226-65866, ISBN-13: 978-0-226-65883-4, Hardcover, $60.00, Paperback, $20.00, e-book, $14.01.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4.  9
    A Reply to S Siddharth’s ‘Against Phenomenal Bonding’.Gregory Miller - 2022 - European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 18 (1):(D1)5-18.
    In this journal S Siddharth has recently argued that the phenomenal bonding response to the subject summing argument for panpsychism is question begging, therefore we should reject constitutive forms of panpsychism. The argument specifically focuses on the proposals of Goff and Miller. In this reply, I show that the argument is unsound.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5.  12
    Debunking Doxastic Transparency.Ema Sullivan-Bissett - 2022 - European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 18 (1):(A3)5-24.
    In this paper I consider the project of offering an evolutionary debunking explanation for transparency in doxastic deliberation. I examine Nicole Dular and Nikki Fortier’s (2021) attempt at such a project. I suggest that their account faces a dilemma. On the one horn, their explanation of transparency involves casting our mechanisms for belief formation as solely concerned with truth. I argue that this is explanatorily inadequate when we take a wider view of our belief formation practices. I show that Dular (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6.  70
    EXTREME PERMISSIVISM REVISITED.Tamaz Tokhadze - 2022 - European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 18 (1):(A1)5-26.
    Extreme Permissivism is the view that a body of evidence could rationally permit both the attitude of belief and disbelief towards a proposition. This paper puts forward a new argument against Extreme Permissivism, which improves on a similar style of argument due to Roger White (2005, 2014). White’s argument is built around the principle that the support relation between evidence and a hypothesis is objective: so that if evidence E makes it rational for an agent to believe a hypothesis H, (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
 Previous issues
  
Next issues