Year:

  1.  7
    Précis Zu Knowledge, Stakes and Error.Alexander Dinges - 2020 - Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 74 (1):105-108.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2.  5
    Repliken zu den Kommentaren.Alexander Dinges - 2020 - Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 74 (1):120-123.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3.  6
    Aristotle's Rational Powers and the Explanation of Action.Filip Grgić - 2020 - Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 74 (1):53-79.
    In this paper, I discuss Aristotle's notion of rational powers as presented in his Metaphysics Θ.2 and Θ.5. I argue, first, that his account cannot serve as the model for explaining human rational actions in general. The role of rational powers is restricted to the explanation of arts and their exercises, including the exercises of knowledge through teaching. The exercises of character virtues do not follow the same pattern that is discernible in the exercises of rational powers. Second, I try (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4.  2
    Buchnotizen.Wolfgang Hellmich - 2020 - Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 74 (1):178-179.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5.  3
    Objektivität Und Wissen.Anton Friedrich Koch - 2020 - Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 74 (1):5-24.
    Andrea Kern has criticized the view that the fallibility of judgements is due to their objectivity and has tried to show that objective knowledge is comprehensible only if its infallibility is not logically excluded. She argues that the notion of knowledge is more fundamental than that of error and that we must bring into play an epistemic capacity as a form of perfection to understand what knowledge is. In the present article, this position is charitably criticized and modified. It is (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6.  4
    Der Faktor Psyche: Epistemologisch Oder Pragmatisch? Kommentar Zu Knowledge, Stakes and Error von Alexander Dinges.Steffen Lesle - 2020 - Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 74 (1):114-119.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7.  5
    Wissenszuschreibungen und asymmetrische Verluste: (k)ein Irrtum? Kommentar zu Knowledge, Stakes and Error von Alexander Dinges.Andy Mueller - 2020 - Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 74 (1):109-113.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8.  4
    Das Tue Ich Nicht, Weil Es Nicht Pflicht Ist. Das Argument der Supererogation Und Sein Unanständigkeitsproblem.Marie-Luise Raters - 2020 - Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 74 (1):80-104.
    Most arguments of Applied Ethics are well analyzed. An exception is the argument 'I do not do this because it is not my duty'. It makes sense to call the argument the 'argument of supererogation' : Since J. Urmson's essay Saints and Heroes of 1958, those actions are called 'supererogations' which are not supposed to be duties. The argument is widely used not only in Applied Ethics, but also in ordinary moral everyday life. Nevertheless, there is a need of investigation (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9.  3
    Theodizee Und Atheismus: Norbert Hoersters Argumentation Gegen Die Existenz Gottes.Ansgar Seide - 2020 - Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 74 (1):141-154.
    Starting from the problem of evil, Norbert Hoerster argues for an atheistic position. He discusses several historical and current attempts to reconcile the existing evils with the existence of God and comes to the negative conclusion that all of these attempts fail. From this, he concludes that the existing evils speak against the existence of God. In this article I argue that Hoerster's arguments are not sufficient for an atheistic conclusion. Rather, they only strengthen the case for agnosticism, the position (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10.  7
    The Philosophical Biography of the Utilitarian Tradition: Is Sidgwick a Point of Culmination?Christian Seidel - 2020 - Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 74 (1):124-140.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11.  3
    Gründe, Motivation Und Für-Etwas-Sprechen.Peter Stemmer - 2020 - Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 74 (1):25-52.
    The aim of this article is to explicate and to defend a desire-based conception of practical reasons. Often such a conception is suspected of reducing reasons to a mere motivational function and to spirit the central normative role away. It is, I think, totally correct that the primary function of reasons is to speak in favour of an action and to make an action right. But an analysis of this normative side shows that the speaking-in-favour-of itself presupposes a desire-relationship.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
 Previous issues
  
Next issues