- Author’s Reply: Negligence and Normative Import.Katrina L. Sifferd & Tyler K. Fagan - 2022 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 22 (August):1-19.details
- Minding Negligence.Craig K. Agule - 2022 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 16 (2):231-251.details
- What’s Really Wrong with Fining Crimes? On the Hard Treatment of Criminal Monetary Fines.Ivó Coca-Vila - 2022 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 16 (2):395-415.details
- We are More Than our Executive Functions: on the Emotional and Situational Aspects of Criminal Responsibility and Punishment.Federica Coppola - 2022 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 16 (2):253-266.details
- Neuroscience and Normativity: How Knowledge of the Brain Offers a Deeper Understanding of Moral and Legal Responsibility.William Hirstein - 2022 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 16 (2):327-351.details
- Neuroscience and Normativity: How Knowledge of the Brain Offers a Deeper Understanding of Moral and Legal Responsibility.William Hirstein - 2022 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 16 (2):327-351.details
- The Objective(s) of Responsible Brains.Douglas Husak - 2022 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 16 (2):267-281.details
- Relating Neuroscience to Responsibility: Comments on Hirstein, Sifferd, and Fagan’s Responsible Brains.Michael S. Moore - 2022 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 16 (2):283-298.details
- Is Executive Function the Universal Acid?Stephen J. Morse - 2022 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 16 (2):299-318.details
- Inert.Dennis Patterson - 2022 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 16 (2):319-324.details
- Correction to: Inert.Dennis Patterson - 2022 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 16 (2):325-325.details
- Review of Vincent Chiao, Criminal Law in the Age of the Administrative State: Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2019, 270 pp. [REVIEW]Peter Ramsay - 2022 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 16 (2):423-428.details
- Author’s Reply: Negligence and Normative Import.Katrina L. Sifferd & Tyler K. Fagan - 2022 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 16 (2):353-371.details
- Review of A du Bois-Pedain and A Bottoms, eds., Penal Censure: Engagements Within and Beyond Desert Theory: Studies in Penal Theory and Penal Ethics. Oxford: Hart (2019) 328 pp. [REVIEW]Gabrielle Watson - 2022 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 16 (2):417-422.details
- Review of Alexander Brown and Adriana Sinclair, The Politics of Hate Speech Laws. [REVIEW]Sebastien Bishop - 2022 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 16 (1):223-229.details
- A Review of Elinor Mason’s Ways to be Blameworthy. [REVIEW]Andreas Brekke Carlsson - 2022 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 16 (1):215-221.details
- What is Criminal Rehabilitation?Lisa Forsberg & Thomas Douglas - 2022 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 16 (1):103-126.details
- Intervening Agency and Civilian Liability.Helen Frowe - 2022 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 16 (1):181-191.details
- The Merits and Limits of Conscience-Based Legal Exemptions.Jocelyn Maclure - 2022 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 16 (1):127-134.details
- Dark Mores: Some Comments on Tommie Shelby’s Dark Ghettos: Injustice, Dissent, and Reform.Charles W. Mills - 2022 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 16 (1):29-43.details
- Dark Times, Black Light: A Reply to Yankah, Kelly, and Mills.Tommie Shelby - 2022 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 16 (1):45-55.details
- Conceptualizing Coercive Indoctrination in Moral and Legal Philosophy.Evan Tiffany - 2022 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 16 (1):153-179.details
|
Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?
Create an account to enable off-campus access through your institution's proxy server.
|