Year:

  1.  12
    Leibniz and the Structure of Sciences: Modern Perspectives on the History of Logic, Mathematics, Epistemology, Ed. Vincenzo De Risi.Laurynas Adomaitis - 2020 - The Leibniz Review 30:163-171.
  2.  14
    Leibniz: Dissertation on Combinatorial Art. Translated with Introduction and Commentary by Massimo Mugnai, Han van Ruler, and Martin Wilson.Richard T. W. Arthur - 2020 - The Leibniz Review 30:141-145.
  3.  19
    Leibniz’s Naturalized Philosophy of Mind, by Larry M. Jorgensen.Julia Borcherding - 2020 - The Leibniz Review 30:109-117.
  4.  28
    Leibniz’s Early Theodicy and its Unwelcome Implications.Thomas Feeney - 2020 - The Leibniz Review 30:1-28.
    To explain why God is not the author of sin, despite grounding all features of the world, the early Leibniz marginalized the divine will and defined existence as harmony. These moves support each other. It is easier to nearly eliminate the divine will from creation if existence itself is something wholly intelligible, and easier to identify existence with an internal feature of the possibles if the divine will is not responsible for creation. Both moves, however, commit Leibniz to a necessitarianism (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5.  5
    News From the Leibniz-Gesellschaft.Nora Gädeke - 2020 - The Leibniz Review 30:173-174.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6.  8
    Review of "Leibniz’s Key Philosophical Writings: A Guide", Ed. Paul Lodge and Lloyd Strickland.Adam Harmer - 2020 - The Leibniz Review 30:147-161.
    Encountering Leibniz for the first time can be a dizzying experience. Unlike many early modern thinkers, Leibniz did not produce a treatise, which outlines his philosophical system step by step. Rather, each of Leibniz’s texts provides a kaleidoscopic view of the whole, a complex mixture of elements, some in the foreground, some receding into the background, present but not altogether in focus. Furthermore, Leibniz produced philosophical work over 6 decades, and the extent to which his views changed over that time (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7.  12
    How Sincere Was Leibniz’s Criticism of Hobbes’s Political Thought?Fiorenza Manzo - 2020 - The Leibniz Review 30:29-60.
    This paper focuses on Leibniz’s engagement with Thomas Hobbes’s political anthropology in the Mainz-period writings, and demonstrates that Leibniz tried to construct an alternative to the English philosopher by conceiving of a physically- and ontologically-grounded psychology of actions. I provide textual evidence of this attempt, and account for Leibniz’s rejection of Hobbes’s political theory and anthropological assumptions. In doing so, I refer to diverse aspects of Leibniz’s work, thereby highlighting his aspiration to congruity and consistency between different areas of investigation. (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8.  8
    Leibniz on Animal Generation.Osvaldo Ottoviani & Alessandro Becchi - 2020 - The Leibniz Review 30:63-106.
  9.  4
    News From SELLF.Paul Rateau - 2020 - The Leibniz Review 30:175-176.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10.  36
    Leibniz’s Legacy and Impact, Ed. Julia Weckend and Lloyd Strickland. [REVIEW]Markku Roinila - 2020 - The Leibniz Review 30:119-140.
    A postprint-version of the review is available in PhilPapers.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
 Previous issues
  
Next issues