Year:

  1.  1
    Solving the Single IRB/Boilerplate Bind: Establishing Institutional Guidelines.Melissa E. Abraham, Elizabeth Hohmann & Megan Morash - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (4):87-88.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2. A Neuroethical Analysis of Physicians’ Dual Obligations in Clinical Research.Michael O. S. Afolabi - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (4):39-42.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3.  1
    Moving Beyond Moral Revulsion: A Deeper Analysis of Social Justice Within Clinical Ethics Training.Julie Aultman & Andrew J. Whipkey - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (4):67-69.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  4.  2
    Revising Our Standards on Dual-Role Physicians: Proceed, but Proceed With Caution.Stephen A. Berman & Luciana Garbayo - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (4):49-50.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5. The Bane of “Boilerplate” Language in Research Consent Forms: Ensuring Consent Forms Promote Autonomous Authorization.Jeffrey R. Botkin - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (4):83-84.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6. The Need for National Guidance Around Informed Consent About GBCA Safety.Stephen D. Brown - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (4):75-77.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7. Consent for Research Participation in Practice.Robert M. Califf - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (4):19-21.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8. Why Insurance Companies Should Pay for Medical Cannabis.David Casarett & Donald I. Abrams - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (4):8-10.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9. Place, Virtue Ethics and Physician-Researcher Dual-Role Consent in Clinical Research.Andrew Crowden & Matthew Gildersleeve - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (4):37-39.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10. Dual-Role Research and Consent by Unique Specialists.Michael Da Silva, Randi Zlotnik Shaul, Christy Simpson & Katherine Boydell - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (4):46-48.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11. Voluntary Informed Consent Is Not Risk Dependent.Sara A. S. Dekking, Rieke van der Graaf, C. Michel Zwaan & Johannes J. M. van Delden - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (4):33-35.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  12. The Importance of Listening to Patients and to Evidence Regarding Consent for Research.Neal W. Dickert - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (4):23-25.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13. The United States as an Isolationist in Global Biomedical Ethics and Human Rights.Gregory J. Dober - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (4):62-64.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  14. The New Colossus: Clinical Ethics, Empathy, and Grace.Bryn S. Esplin & Monica Sosa - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (4):64-66.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  15.  1
    A Hybrid Approach to Obtaining Research Consent.Christine Grady - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (4):28-30.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  16. Everything in Moderation: Dual Role Consent and State Law Mandates.Valerie Gutmann Koch & Nadia N. Sawicki - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (4):35-37.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  17. Returning Individual Research Results Regarding Gadolinium Deposition in the Brain Is the Preferable Choice.Caroline J. Huang, W. Patricia Bandettini & Marion Danis - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (4):77-78.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  18. Single IRBs Are Responsible to Ensure Consent Language Effectively Conveys the Local Context.Sara Chandros Hull & Adam I. Schiffenbauer - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (4):85-86.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  19. Research Participants Should Have the Option to Be Notified of Results of Unknown but Potential Significance.Nora Hutchinson, Alexander Capron & Adélaïde Doussau - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (4):78-80.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  20. Should Research Participants Be Notified About Results of Currently Unknown but Potential Significance?Liza-Marie Johnson, Jennifer Zabrowski & Benjamin S. Wilfond - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (4):73-74.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  21. Role Synergy Versus Role Conflict in Dual-Role Consent in Usual Care Trials.Elizabeth A. Kitsis - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (4):42-43.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  22.  6
    An Ethical Case for Dual-Role Consent: Increasing Research Diversity as a Matter of Respect and Justice.Stephanie A. Kraft & Nanibaa’ A. Garrison - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (4):44-46.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  23. Don’T We Need Something More in These Extraordinary Times? Response to the Commentaries.Mark Kuczewski - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (4):W10-W12.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  24. Clinical Ethicists Awakened: Addressing Two Generations of Clinical Ethics Issues Involving Undocumented Patients.Mark Kuczewski - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (4):51-57.
    Because the United States has failed to provide a pathway to citizenship for its long-term undocumented population, clinical ethicists have more than 20 years of addressing issues that arise in caring for this population. I illustrate that these challenges fall into two sets of issues. First-generation issues involve finding ethical ways to treat and discharge patients who are uninsured and ineligible for safety-net resources. More recently, ethicists have been invited to help address second-generation issues that involve facilitating the presentation for (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  25.  2
    Pediatricians Awakened: Addressing Family Immigration Status as a Critical and Intersectional Social Determinant of Health.Julie M. Linton, Nusheen Ameenuddin & Olanrewaju Falusi - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (4):69-72.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  26. Clinical Research Is a Team Sport.Ross E. McKinney - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (4):22-23.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  27. How Conducting “Usual Care” Research Might Affect Obtaining Consent.Jerry Menikoff - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (4):1-3.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  28.  6
    When Is It Ethical for Physician-Investigators to Seek Consent From Their Own Patients?Stephanie R. Morain, Steven Joffe & Emily A. Largent - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (4):11-18.
    Classic statements of research ethics advise against permitting physician-investigators to obtain consent for research participation from patients with whom they have preexisting treatment relationships. Reluctance about “dual-role” consent reflects the view that distinct normative commitments govern physician–patient and investigator–participant relationships, and that blurring the research–care boundary could lead to ethical transgressions. However, several features of contemporary research demand reconsideration of the ethics of dual-role consent. Here, we examine three arguments advanced against dual-role consent: that it creates role conflict for the (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  29.  1
    What Is a Clinical Ethicist?Jonathan D. Moreno - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (4):4-5.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  30. Undocumented Migration and Evolving Health Care Ethical Issues.Nestor Rodriguez - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (4):58-60.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  31. The DNA Test Results That Uncovered a Family Secret.Dani Shapiro - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (4):6-7.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  32. Mitigating Challenges in Dual-Role Consent: Honoring Patient Preferences to Discuss Research Participation With Someone They Know.Akshay Sharma & Liza-Marie Johnson - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (4):30-32.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  33.  1
    Caring for the Undocumented: A View From the Safety Net.Marc Tunzi - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (4):60-62.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  34. Justifying Investigator/Clinician Consent When The Physician-Patient Relationship Can Support Better Research Decision-Making.Benjamin S. Wilfond & Kathryn M. Porter - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (4):26-28.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  35. The Limitations of “Boilerplate” Language in Informed Consent: Single IRB Review of Multisite Genetic Research in Military Personnel.Benjamin S. Wilfond, Jennifer Zabrowski & Liza M. Johnson - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (4):81-82.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  36.  3
    The Equivalence Thesis: Why Timers Do Not Successfully Resuscitate the Acts/Omissions and Withdrawal/Withholding Debate.Dominic Wilkinson, Ella Butcherine & Julian Savulescu - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (4):W6-W9.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  37. Broadening the Conversation About Intersectionality in Clinical Medicine.Yolonda Wilson, Amina White, Akilah Jefferson & Marion Danis - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (4):W1-W5.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  38.  3
    Withdrawing and Withholding in the Clinical Arena.Jean Abbott & Kristin Furfari - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (3):45-47.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  39.  3
    A Global Dialogue on Withholding and Withdrawal of Medical Care: An East Asian Perspective.Akira Akabayashi, Reina Ozeki-Hayashi, Keiichiro Yamamoto & Eisuke Nakazawa - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (3):50-52.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  40.  3
    Sunk Cost Bias and Withdrawal Aversion.Michał Białek, Ori Friedman, Jonathan A. Fugelsang, Ethan A. Meyers & Martin H. Turpin - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (3):57-59.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  41. Nancy Cruzan and the Withhold Versus Withdraw Dilemma.William H. Colby - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (3):1-2.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  42.  2
    Parental Decision Making and the Limitations of the Equivalence Thesis.Dougals Diekema & Aaron Wightman - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (3):43-45.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  43.  2
    Navigating End-of-Life Decisions Using Informed Nondissent.Denise M. Dudzinski & Alexander A. Kon - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (3):42-43.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  44. No Escalation of Treatment: Moving Beyond the Withholding/Withdrawing Debate.Elizabeth W. Dzeng, Sarah E. Wieten, Jacob A. Blythe & Jason N. Batten - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (3):63-65.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  45. Categorical Mistakes and Moral Biases in the Withholding-Versus-Withdrawal Debate.Bjørn Hofmann - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (3):29-31.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  46.  4
    The Decision to Withdraw in Children With Ventricular Assist Devices.Seth A. Hollander & Danton Char - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (3):61-62.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  47. Dangers of Withholding Treatment in Emergency and Prehospital Settings.Kenneth V. Iserson - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (3):47-48.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  48.  7
    Empirical Over Theoretical Ethics: Choosing What Matters to Patients and Families.Annie Janvier & Marlyse F. Haward - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (3):54-56.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  49.  3
    We Reject the “‘‘Equivalence Thesis”.Alan Jotkowitz & Shimon Glick - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (3):53-54.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  50.  17
    Withdrawal Aversion as a Useful Heuristic for Critical Care Decisions.Piotr Grzegorz Nowak & Tomasz Żuradzki - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (3):36-38.
    While agreeing with the main conclusion of Dominic Wilkinson and colleagues (Wilkinson, Butcherine, and Savulescu 2019), namely, that there is no moral difference between treatment withholding and withdrawal as such, we wish to criticize their approach on the basis that it treats the widespread acceptance of withdrawal aversion (WA) as a cognitive bias. Wilkinson and colleagues understand WA as “a nonrational preference for withholding (WH) treatment over withdrawal (WD) of treatment” (22). They treat WA as a manifestation of loss aversion (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  51.  3
    Female Genital Cutting and the Cultural Boundaries of Medical Practice.Aasim I. Padela & Rosie Duivenbode - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (3):3-6.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  52. Psychological Hesitancy Is Not an Ethical Standard.John J. Paris - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (3):59-60.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  53. To Act or Not to Act, That Is the Question.Rosamond Rhodes - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (3):39-41.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  54.  3
    Review of Ilana Löwy, Imperfect Pregnancies: A History of Birth Defects & Prenatal Diagnosis. [REVIEW]Kirsten A. Riggan - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (3):W1-W3.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  55.  7
    Withdrawal Aversion and the Equivalence Test.Julian Savulescu, Ella Butcherine & Dominic Wilkinson - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (3):21-28.
    If a doctor is trying to decide whether or not to provide a medical treatment, does it matter ethically whether that treatment has already been started? Health professionals sometimes find it harder to stop a treatment than to refrain from starting the treatment. But does that feeling correspond to an ethical difference? In this article, we defend equivalence—the view that withholding and withdrawal of treatment are ethically equivalent when all other factors are equal. We argue that preference for withholding over (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  56. “Ceteris Paribus” and Morally Relevant Facts.Jan Schildmann, Florian Bruns & Alexander Kremling - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (3):66-67.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  57.  3
    Withdrawing and Withholding Treatment: What Do Medical Professionals Owe Their Patients?Andreas T. Schmidt - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (3):31-33.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  58.  3
    What to Expect When Expecting CRISPR Baby Number Four.Cynthia Selin & Christopher Thomas Scott - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (3):7-9.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  59.  5
    Withholding and Withdrawing: A Religious–Cultural Path Toward a Practical Resolution.Avraham Steinberg & Vardit Ravitsky - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (3):49-50.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  60.  4
    Withholding and Withdrawing Life-Sustaining Treatment and the Relevance of the Killing Versus Letting Die Distinction.Robert D. Truog & Andrew McGee - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (3):34-36.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  61.  4
    Withholding and Withdrawing Life-Sustaining Treatment: Ethically Equivalent?Lars Øystein Ursin - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (3):10-20.
    Withholding and withdrawing treatment are widely regarded as ethically equivalent in medical guidelines and ethics literature. Health care personnel, however, widely perceive moral differences between withholding and withdrawing. The proponents of equivalence argue that any perceived difference can be explained in terms of cognitive biases and flawed reasoning. Thus, policymakers should clear away any resistance to accept the equivalence stance by moral education. To embark on such a campaign of changing attitudes, we need to be convinced that the ethical analysis (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  62.  1
    Parental Decision Making and the Limitations of the Equivalence Thesis.Aaron Wightman & Douglas Diekema - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (3):43-45.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  63.  6
    Psychological Maltreatment and Medical Neglect of Transgender Adolescents: The Need for Recognition and Individualized Assessment.Armand H. Matheny Antommaria, Robert A. Shapiro & Lee Ann E. Conard - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (2):72-74.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  64.  5
    Puberty Blockers Are Necessary, but They Don’T Prevent Homelessness: Caring for Transgender Youth by Supporting Unsupportive Parents.Florence Ashley - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (2):87-89.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  65.  4
    True Autonomy/False Dichotomies? Genderqueer Kids and the Myth of the Quick Fix.Lauren L. Baker - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (2):63-65.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  66.  10
    Addressing the Practical Implications of Intersectionality in Clinical Medicine: Ethical, Embodied and Institutional Dimensions.Claudia Barned, Corinne Lajoie & Eric Racine - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (2):27-29.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  67.  4
    Identification Before Prescription: Necessary Changes for the Support of Transgender Youth.Elizabeth R. Boskey & Jonathan M. Marron - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (2):78-80.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  68.  5
    Intersectionality and Clinical Decision Making: The Role of Race.Yen Ji Julia Byeon, Sherrill L. Sellers & Vence L. Bonham - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (2):20-22.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  69.  11
    A Two-Pronged Approach to Minimizing Harms for Transgender Youth: Medical Interventions and Social Interventions.Lisa Campo-Engelstein - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (2):85-87.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  70.  9
    Multiple Marginalizations: What Bioethics Can Learn From Black Feminism.Amal W. Cheema, Karen M. Meagher & Richard R. Sharp - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (2):1-3.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  71.  13
    Can Intersectionality Help Lead to More Accurate Diagnosis?Hae Lin Cho - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (2):37-39.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  72.  4
    An Argument for the Intersectional Education of Those Working in International Humanitarian Medical Nongovernmental Organizations.Adriana Clavel-Vazquez & César Palacios-González - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (2):42-44.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  73.  5
    Transgender Children, Puberty Blockers, and the Law: Solutions to the Problem of Dissenting Parents.Doriane Lambelet Coleman - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (2):82-84.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  74.  71
    Moving Beyond Mismatch.Robin Dembroff - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (2):60-63.
    In this peer commentary on Maura Priest's "Transgender Children and the Right to Transition: Medical Ethics When Parents Mean Well but Cause Harm", I argue against the "mismatch" model of trans identity. On this model, which is prevalent in institutional and medical contexts, to be trans is to have one's gender identity "mismatch" with one's sexed body.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  75.  12
    Age Difference in the Clinical Encounter: Intersectionality and Phenomenology.Hans-Georg Eilenberger, Annemie Halsema & Jenny Slatman - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (2):32-34.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  76.  4
    Ethical Guidelines for DNA Testing in Migrant Family Reunification.Nita Farahany, Saheel Chodavadia & Sara H. Katsanis - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (2):4-7.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  77.  4
    The Social Context of Adolescents’ Right to Transition.Joshua Franklin - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (2):65-66.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  78.  11
    Puberty-Blocking Treatment and the Rights of Bad Candidates.B. R. George & Danielle M. Wenner - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (2):80-82.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  79.  3
    Clinical Encounters: The Social Justice Question in Intersectional Medicine.Patrick Ryan Grzanka & Jenny Dyck Brian - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (2):22-24.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  80.  3
    Decision Making and the Long-Term Impact of Puberty Blockade in Transgender Children.Rebecca M. Harris, Amy C. Tishelman, Gwendolyn P. Quinn & Leena Nahata - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (2):67-69.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  81.  7
    The Right to Best Care for Children Does Not Include the Right to Medical Transition.Michael Laidlaw, Michelle Cretella & Kevin Donovan - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (2):75-77.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  82.  2
    Narrative Ethics and Intersectionality.Elizabeth Lanphier & Uchenna Anani - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (2):29-31.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  83.  9
    Is There Cross-Cultural Evidence for an Association Between Intersectionality and Bioethical Decision Making? Not Yet, but Awaiting Advances in Mental Mapping.Darryl R. J. Macer - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (2):34-36.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  84.  8
    Intersectionality: A Scientific Realist Critique.Carles Muntaner & Jura Augustinavicius - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (2):39-41.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  85.  10
    Should Parental Refusal of Puberty-Blocking Treatment Be Overridden? The Role of the Harm Principle.Lauren Notini, Rosalind McDougall & Ken C. Pang - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (2):69-72.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  86. Transgender Children and the Right to Transition: Medical Ethics When Parents Mean Well but Cause Harm.Maura Priest - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (2):45-59.
    Published in the American Journal of Bioethics.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  87.  3
    Intersectionality and Power Imbalances Clinicians of Color Face When Patients Request White Clinicians.Keisha Shantel Ray - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (2):25-26.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  88.  10
    Intersectionality in Clinical Medicine: The Need for a Conceptual Framework.Yolonda Wilson, Amina White, Akilah Jefferson & Marion Danis - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (2):8-19.
    Intersectionality has become a significant intellectual approach for those thinking about the ways that race, gender, and other social identities converge in order to create unique forms of oppression. Although the initial work on intersectionality addressed the unique position of black women relative to both black men and white women, the concept has since been expanded to address a range of social identities. Here we consider how to apply some of the theoretical tools provided by intersectionality to the clinical context. (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  89.  2
    Thesis, Antithesis, and Fallacious Synthesis: The Troublesome Dialectic of Professional Behavior and Its Regulation.Mark Arnold - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (1):41-44.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  90.  3
    Genetic Contextualism and the Value of a Structured Process.Jeffrey R. Botkin - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (1):72-73.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  91.  8
    Genomic Contextualism, Genetic Determinism, and Causal Models.Angie Boyce - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (1):73-75.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  92.  3
    Physician Sexual Assault: The Moral Imperative for Gender Equity in Medicine.Alyssa M. Burgart - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (1):4-6.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  93.  1
    Genomes in Context.Wylie Burke - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (1):66-67.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  94.  4
    How Can We Integrate Interests and Reasoned Arguments in Bioethics?Celeste M. Condit - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (1):64-65.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  95.  3
    Toward More Effective Self-Regulation in Medicine.Elliott J. Crigger & Barbara L. McAneny - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (1):7-10.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  96.  5
    “You Say Unethical, I Say Criminal”: How Definitions Can Influence Approach.Mark S. Davis - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (1):35-36.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  97.  4
    Promoting Professionalism Through Virtue Ethics.David John Doukas - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (1):37-39.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  98.  3
    An Undocumented Immigrant With End-Stage Renal Disease.Leah Eisenberg - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (1):80-81.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  99.  4
    Unpacking the Concept of a Genomic Result.Angela Fenwick, Anneke Lucassen & Rachel Horton - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (1):70-71.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  100.  7
    It’s the Idiom, Stupid: A Plea for Formal Rhetorical Analysis in Bioethics.Jeremy R. Garrett - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (1):67-69.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  101.  6
    Disabusing Physicians of the Assumption of Competing Interests.Chelsea Haramia - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (1):46-47.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  102.  2
    Serious Ethical Violations in Medicine: The Irish Situation.Patrick Heavey - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (1):39-41.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  103.  5
    How Do We Solve Maria’s Problem? A Hospitalist Perspective.Liam Howley - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (1):86-87.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  104.  5
    Bold Societal Responses Are Needed in Tackling Serious Ethical Violations in Medicine.Adnan A. Hyder & Paul Ndebele - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (1):44-46.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  105.  1
    Clarifying the Relationship Between Serious Ethical Violations and Conflicts of Interest.Ian Kerridge, Narcyz Ghinea & Wendy Lipworth - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (1):48-50.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  106.  1
    We Can Do Something! Caring for the Ongoing Needs of an Undocumented Patient.Mark Kuczewski - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (1):82-83.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  107.  4
    Genomic Contextualism: Shifting the Rhetoric of Genetic Exceptionalism.John A. Lynch, Aaron J. Goldenberg, Kyle B. Brothers & Nanibaa' A. Garrison - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (1):51-63.
    As genomic science has evolved, so have policy and practice debates about how to describe and evaluate the ways in which genomic information is treated for individuals, institutions, and society. The term genetic exceptionalism, describing the concept that genetic information is special or unique, and specifically different from other kinds of medical information, has been utilized widely, but often counterproductively in these debates. We offer genomic contextualism as a new term to frame the characteristics of genomic science in the debates. (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  108.  4
    Serious Ethical Violations by Physicians: What’s the Solution?Ross E. McKinney - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (1):11-12.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  109.  4
    Justifying a Surrogate’s Request to Forego Oral Feeding.Paul T. Menzel - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (1):92-94.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  110.  4
    Review of David Alfandre, Ed., Against-Medical-Advice Discharges From the Hospital: Optimizing Prevention and Management to Promote High Quality, Patient-Centered Care. [REVIEW]Haavi Morreim - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (1):W1-W4.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  111.  4
    Is Genetic Exceptionalism Past Its Sell-By Date? On Genomic Diaries, Context, and Content.Thomas H. Murray - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (1):13-15.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  112.  3
    Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “A Radical Approach to Ebola: Saving Humans and Other Animals”.Carolyn P. Neuhaus, Brendan Clarke, Phyllis Illari, Charles H. Norell & Sarah J. L. Edwards - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (1):W8-W9.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  113.  2
    Abusive Doctors: How the Atlanta Newspaper Exposed a System That Tolerates Sexual Misconduct by Physicians.Lois Norder & Carrie Teegardin - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (1):1-3.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  114.  6
    “DNA Is Information, and Genetics Is Information Technology”: Reconsidering the Genetic Code.Stacey Pereira - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (1):75-76.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  115.  27
    Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Health Research Priority Setting: The Duties of Individual Funders”.Leah Pierson & Joseph Millum - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (1):W5-W7.
    We respond to open peer commentaries on our target article, "Health Research Priority Setting: The Duties of Individual Funders".
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  116.  1
    Whether, When, and How to Honor Advance VSED Requests for End-Stage Dementia Patients.Thaddeus Mason Pope - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (1):90-92.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  117.  5
    Toward Broader Genetic Contextualism: Genetic Testing Enters the Age of Evidence-Based Medicine.Vardit Ravitsky, Julie Richer & Anne-Marie Laberge - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (1):77-79.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  118.  4
    Lessons From New York’s Dementia Directive and Applications to Withholding Oral Feedings.Judith Schwarz - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (1):95-97.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  119.  4
    Philosophical Bioethics in the Policy Arena: A Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Just Policy? An Ethical Analysis of Early Intervention Policy Guidance”.Ilina Singh, Alex McKeown & Rose Mortimer - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (1):W14-W18.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  120.  6
    The Buck Stops Where: The Duty of a Hospital to Provide Medical Care to Undocumented Patients.Sarah Spieldenner - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (1):84-85.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  121.  15
    Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Patenting Foundational Technologies: Lessons From CRISPR and Other Core Biotechnologies”.Sigrid Sterckx, Kristof Van Assche, Lisa Diependaele, Michael Morrison, Julian Cockbain & Oliver Feeney - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (1):W10-W13.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  122.  8
    Foregoing Spoon Feeding in End-Stage Dementia.Anita Tarzian - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (1):88-89.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  123.  5
    Serious Ethical Violations in Medicine: A Statistical and Ethical Analysis of 280 Cases in the United States From 2008–2016. [REVIEW]Heidi A. Walsh, Jessica Mozersky, John T. Chibnall, Emily E. Anderson & James M. DuBois - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (1):16-34.
    Serious ethical violations in medicine, such as sexual abuse, criminal prescribing of opioids, and unnecessary surgeries, directly harm patients and undermine trust in the profession of medicine. We review the literature on violations in medicine and present an analysis of 280 cases. Nearly all cases involved repeated instances of intentional wrongdoing, by males in nonacademic medical settings, with oversight problems and a selfish motive such as financial gain or sex. More than half of cases involved a wrongdoer with a suspected (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
 Previous issues
  
Next issues