View year:

  1.  33
    Beckett and Interdisciplinarity: A Reply to Hill.Francesco Censon - 2024 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 13 (5):33-37.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2.  1
    Corresponding Conspiracy Theorists.M. R. X. Dentith & Patrick Stokes - 2024 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 13 (5):15-32.
  3.  77
    An Interdisciplinary Drama: Conspiracist Philosophers versus Conspiring Social Scientists?Francesco Censon - 2024 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 13 (4):12-22.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4.  95
    The Dominant Ordinary Use of ‘Conspiracy Theory‘ is Narrow: A Reply to Censon.Scott Hill - 2024 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 13 (4):38-40.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5. Hazards of Conceptual Engineering: Revisiting the Case of ‘Conspiracy Theory’.Matthew Shields - 2024 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 13 (2):74-90.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6. Science Based on Artificial Intelligence Need not Pose a Social Epistemological Problem.Uwe Peters - 2024 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 13 (1).
    It has been argued that our currently most satisfactory social epistemology of science can’t account for science that is based on artificial intelligence (AI) because this social epistemology requires trust between scientists that can take full responsibility for the research tools they use, and scientists can’t take full responsibility for the AI tools they use since these systems are epistemically opaque. I think this argument overlooks that much AI-based science can be done without opaque models, and that agents can take (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
 Previous issues
  
Next issues