View year:

  1.  29
    Out of the Echo Chambers and into the Public Sphere: A Habermasian Social Epistemological Critique.Joshua Jose Ocon - 2025 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 14 (4):25-35.
    The tendency to be more excluding on account of views and beliefs held has intensified all the more. The proliferation of discussions and forums through social media reflects both the potential and challenges of the Internet as a public sphere. While these platforms foster widespread and immediate engagement, the rise of echo chambers, characterized by selective information sharing and trust disparities, undermines inclusivity and genuine public discourse. This paper examines the tension between echo chambers and the Internet's potential as a (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2.  13
    On Using Genealogies to Debunk Conspiracy Theories: A Reply to Stamatiadis-Bréhier.Nader Shoaibi - 2025 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 14 (4):1-6.
  3.  79
    Particularism and the Conventional Wisdom Revisited.Scott Hill - 2025 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 14 (3):12-17.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4. Generalist Denialism and the Particularist Critique.Kurtis Hagen - 2025 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 14 (2):35-45.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  5. Kuhnian History of Science and the "Great Man" of Science Model.Moti Mizrahi - 2025 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 14 (2):46-60.
    I argue that forays into history of science in Kuhn’s The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1962/1996) are by and large instances of “Great Man” history of science. “Great Man” history is the idea that history is the biography of great men. The “Great Man” of science model not only excludes women and people of color from science but also suggests that only special, exceptional people can succeed in science. If this is correct, then Kuhn (1962/1996) fails to usher in a (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6. Political Genealogies for Conspiracy Theories, Debunked.Alexios Stamatiadis-Bréhier - 2025 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 14 (1):27-40.
    In a recent paper, Nader Shoaibi (2024) makes a valuable contribution to the discussion on genealogies and conspiracy theories (CTs) by focusing on a particular kind of genealogy: what he calls 'political genealogies'. Roughly, political genealogies are not so much interested in the epistemic warrant (or rationality) of a given belief or theory. Rather, their function is to illuminate the social and political conditions that give rise to the spread of (unwarranted) CTs. Shoaibi also notes that such genealogies have an (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
 Previous issues
  
Next issues