Year:

  1. "On Anger, Silence and Epistemic Injustice".Alison Bailey - 2018 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 84:93-115.
    Abstract: If anger is the emotion of injustice, and if most injustices have prominent epistemic dimensions, then where is the anger in epistemic injustice? Despite the question my task is not to account for the lack of attention to anger in epistemic injustice discussions. Instead, I argue that a particular texture of transformative anger – a knowing resistant anger – offers marginalized knowers a powerful resource for countering epistemic injustice. I begin by making visible the anger that saturates the silences (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  2.  5
    Empathy and Testimonial Trust.Olivia Bailey - 2018 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 84:139-160.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  3.  64
    Harms and Wrongs in Epistemic Practice.Simon Barker, Charlie Crerar & Trystan S. Goetze - 2018 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 84:1-21.
    This volume has its roots in two recent developments within mainstream analytic epistemology: a growing recognition over the past two or three decades of the active and social nature of our epistemic lives; and, more recently still, the increasing appreciation of the various ways in which the epistemic practices of individuals and societies can, and often do, go wrong. The theoretical analysis of these breakdowns in epistemic practice, along with the various harms and wrongs that follow as a consequence, constitutes (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4.  16
    Can Closed-Mindedness Be an Intellectual Virtue?Heather Battaly - 2018 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 84:23-45.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  5.  10
    The Epistemology of Terrorism and Radicalisation.Quassim Cassam - 2018 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 84:187-209.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  6.  21
    Ambivalence About Forgiveness.Miranda Fricker - 2018 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 84:161-185.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7.  5
    Understanding Epistemic Trust Injustices and Their Harms.Heidi Grasswick - 2018 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 84:69-91.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  8.  14
    What's Epistemically Wrong with Conspiracy Theorising?Keith Harris - 2018 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 84:235-257.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  9.  4
    Just Say ‘No’: Obligations to Voice Disagreement.Casey Rebecca Johnson - 2018 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 84:117-138.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10.  43
    Healthcare Practice, Epistemic Injustice, and Naturalism.Ian James Kidd & Havi Carel - 2018 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 84:1-23.
    Ill persons suffer from a variety of epistemically-inflected harms and wrongs. Many of these are interpretable as specific forms of what we dub pathocentric epistemic injustices, these being ones that target and track ill persons. We sketch the general forms of pathocentric testimonial and hermeneutical injustice, each of which are pervasive within the experiences of ill persons during their encounters in healthcare contexts and the social world. What’s epistemically unjust might not be only agents, communities and institutions, but the theoretical (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11.  4
    Caring for Esteem and Intellectual Reputation: Some Epistemic Benefits and Harms.Alessandra Tanesini - 2018 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 84:47-67.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  12. Should We Biochemically Enhance Sexual Fidelity?Robbie Arrell - 2018 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 83:389-414.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13.  1
    An Unfit Future: Moral Enhancement and Technological Harm.Lewis Coyne - 2018 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 83:351-370.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  14. Moral Enhancement and Moral Freedom: A Critique of the Little Alex Problem.John Danaher - 2018 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 83:233-250.
    A common objection to moral enhancement is that it would undermine our moral freedom and that this is a bad thing because moral freedom is a great good. Michael Hauskeller has defended this view on a couple of occasions using an arresting thought experiment called the 'Little Alex' problem. In this paper, I reconstruct the argument Hauskeller derives from this thought experiment and subject it to critical scrutiny. I claim that the argument ultimately fails because (a) it assumes that moral (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15.  33
    The Trouble With Moral Enhancement.Inmaculada de Melo-Martín - 2018 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 83:19-33.
    Proponents of moral enhancement believe that we should pursue and apply biotechnological means to morally enhance human beings, as failing to do so is likely to lead to humanity's demise. Unsurprisingly, these proposals have generated a substantial amount of debate about the moral permissibility of using such interventions. Here I put aside concerns about the permissibility of moral enhancement and focus on the conceptual and evidentiary grounds for the moral enhancement project. I argue that such grounds are quite precarious.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  16.  7
    Psychedelic Moral Enhancement.Brian D. Earp - 2018 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 83:415-439.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  17.  9
    Moral Enhancement as a Collective Action Problem.Walter Glannon - 2018 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 83:59-85.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  18.  3
    Lone Wolf Terrorists and the Impotence of Moral Enhancement.Valerie Gray Hardcastle - 2018 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 83:271-291.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  19.  1
    Introduction.Michael Hauskeller & Lewis Coyne - 2018 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 83:1-3.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  20.  4
    Biomedical Moral Enhancement in the Face of Moral Particularism.Pei-Hua Huang & Peter Shiu-Hwa Tsu - 2018 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 83:189-208.
    Biomedical moral enhancement, or BME for short, aims to improve people’s moral behaviors through augmenting, via biomedical means, their virtuous dispositions such as sympathy, honesty, courage, or generosity. Recently, it has been challenged, on particularist grounds, however, that the manifestations of the virtuous dispositions can be morally wrong. For instance, being generous in terrorist financing is one such case. If so, biomedical moral enhancement, by enhancing people’s virtues, might turn out to be counterproductive in terms of people’s moral behaviors. In (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  21.  93
    Drugs and Hugs: Stimulating Moral Dispositions as a Method of Moral Enhancement.Michał Klincewicz, Lily Eva Frank & Marta Sokólska - 2018 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 83:329-350.
    Advocates of moral enhancement through pharmacological, genetic, or other direct interventions sometimes explicitly argue, or assume without argument, that traditional moral education and development is insufficient to bring about moral enhancement. Traditional moral education grounded in a Kohlbergian theory of moral development is indeed unsuitable for that task; however, the psychology of moral development and education has come a long way since then. Recent studies support the view that moral cognition is a higher-order process, unified at a functional level, and (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  22.  5
    Moral Enhancement and Climate Change: Might It Work?Aleksandra Kulawska & Michael Hauskeller - 2018 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 83:371-388.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  23. Enhancing Care.Teodora Manea - 2018 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 83:145-163.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  24.  5
    Moral-Epistemic Enhancement.Norbert Paulo - 2018 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 83:165-188.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  25.  1
    Would Aristotle Have Seen the Wrongness of Slavery If He Had Undergone a Course of Moral Enhancement?Nigel Pleasants - 2018 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 83:87-107.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  26.  9
    What is Moral Enhancement?Mark Rowlands - 2018 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 83:5-18.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  27.  1
    Retributivism and the Moral Enhancement of Criminals Through Brain Interventions.Elizabeth Shaw - 2018 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 83:251-270.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  28.  1
    Is Moral Enhancement a Right, or a Threat to Rights?John R. Shook - 2018 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 83:209-231.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  29.  1
    Moral Enhancement and the Human Condition.Edward Skidelsky - 2018 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 83:109-120.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  30.  3
    The Experimental Psychology of Moral Enhancement: We Should If We Could, But We Can't.Sylvia Terbeck & Kathryn B. Francis - 2018 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 83:313-328.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  31.  1
    Moral Enhancement, Instrumentalism, and Integrative Ethical Education.Giuseppe Turchi - 2018 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 83:293-311.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  32.  4
    Kantian Challenges for the Bioenhancement of Moral Autonomy.Anna Frammartino Wilks - 2018 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 83:121-143.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  33. The Sins of Moral Enhancement Discourse.Harris Wiseman - 2018 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 83:35-58.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  34.  15
    Wittgenstein on Solipsism in the 1930s: Private Pains, Private Languages, and Two Uses of ‘I’.Tim Button - 2018 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 82:205-229.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  35. Against Conservatism in Metaphysics.Maegan Fairchild & John Hawthorne - 2018 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 82:45-75.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  36.  60
    Quantifier Variance Dissolved.Suki Finn & Otávio Bueno - 2018 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 82:289-307.
    Quantifier variance faces a number of difficulties. In this paper we first formulate the view as holding that the meanings of the quantifiers may vary, and that languages using different quantifiers may be charitably translated into each other. We then object to the view on the basis of four claims: (i) quantifiers cannot vary their meaning extensionally by changing the domain of quantification; (ii) quantifiers cannot vary their meaning intensionally without collapsing into logical pluralism; (iii) quantifier variance is not an (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  37.  17
    The Basis of Necessity and Possibility.Bob Hale - 2018 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 82:109-138.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  38.  35
    What is a Social Practice?Sally Haslanger - 2018 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 82:231-247.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  39.  51
    Lady Parts: The Metaphysics of Pregnancy.Elselijn Kingma - 2018 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 82:165-187.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  40.  36
    Essence and Mere Necessity.Jessica Leech - 2018 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 82:309-332.
  41.  20
    Compatibilism, Indeterminism, and Chance.Penelope Mackie - 2018 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 82:265-287.
    Many contemporary compatibilists about free will and determinism are agnostic about whether determinism is true, yet do not doubt that we have free will. They are thus committed to the thesis that free will is compatible with both determinism and indeterminism. This paper explores the prospects for this version of compatibilism, including its response to the argument that indeterminism would introduce an element of randomness or chance or luck that is inimical to free will and moral responsibility.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  42. Preface.Anthony O'Hear - 2018 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 82:v.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  43.  4
    Metaphysical Optimism.Penelope Rush - 2018 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 82:365-393.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  44.  49
    Laws for Metaphysical Explanation.Jonathan Schaffer - 2018 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 82:1-22.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  45.  16
    Cardinals, Ordinals, and the Prospects for a Fregean Foundation.Eric Snyder, Stewart Shapiro & Richard Samuels - 2018 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 82:77-107.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  46.  27
    Changing Metaphysics: What Difference Does It Make?Amie L. Thomasson - 2018 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 82:139-163.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  47.  21
    Irrealism About Grounding.Naomi Thompson - 2018 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 82:23-44.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  48.  79
    Spaces of Possibility.Timothy Williamson - 2018 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 82:189-204.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
 Previous issues
  
Next issues