Results for 'Frans Birrer'

(not author) ( search as author name )
657 found
Order:
  1.  98
    Data Mining to Combat Terrorism and the Roots of Privacy Concerns.Frans A. J. Birrer - 2005 - Ethics and Information Technology 7 (4):211-220.
    Recently, there has been a heavy debate in the US about the government’s use of data mining in its fight against terrorism. Privacy concerns in fact led the Congress to terminate the funding of TIA, a program for advanced information technology to be used in the combat of terrorism. The arguments put forward in this debate, more specifically those found in the main report and minority report by the TAPAC established by the Secretary of Defense to examine the TIA issue, (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  2.  52
    Including Public Perspectives in Industrial Biotechnology and the Biobased Economy.Lino Paula & Frans Birrer - 2006 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 19 (3):253-267.
    Industrial (“white”) biotechnology promises to contribute to a more sustainable future. Compared to current production processes, cases have been identified where industrial biotechnology can decrease the amount of energy and raw materials used to make products and also reduce the amount of emissions and waste produced during production. However, switching from products based on chemical production processes and fossil fuels towards “biobased” products is at present not necessarily economically viable. This is especially true for bulk products, for example ethanol production (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  3.  16
    Expert Advice and Argumentation: Some Remarks on the Work of Douglas Walton.Frans A. J. Birrer - 2001 - Argumentation 15 (3):267-276.
    Appeal to expert judgement has become a wide-spread and unavoidable element in public debates in modern society. The many and fundamental argumentative complications that they raise have not received proportional attention in argumentation studies so far. A prominent exception is a recent book by Douglas Walton, devoted entirely to arguments involving expert opinion . Confronting some examples from the field of Science and Society with Walton's earlier work, the need can be traced for a more elaborate and sophisticated treatment of (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  4.  25
    Understanding Values and Biases in I.T.Frans A. J. Birrer - 1999 - Acm Sigcas Computers and Society 29 (1):16-21.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5. Mathematical Explanation: A Contextual Approach.Sven Delarivière, Joachim Frans & Bart Van Kerkhove - 2017 - Journal of Indian Council of Philosophical Research 34 (2):309-329.
    PurposeIn this article, we aim to present and defend a contextual approach to mathematical explanation.MethodTo do this, we introduce an epistemic reading of mathematical explanation.ResultsThe epistemic reading not only clarifies the link between mathematical explanation and mathematical understanding, but also allows us to explicate some contextual factors governing explanation. We then show how several accounts of mathematical explanation can be read in this approach.ConclusionThe contextual approach defended here clears up the notion of explanation and pushes us towards a pluralist vision (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  6.  37
    Is Mathematics a Domain for Philosophers of Explanation?Erik Weber & Joachim Frans - 2017 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 48 (1):125-142.
    In this paper we discuss three interrelated questions. First: is explanation in mathematics a topic that philosophers of mathematics can legitimately investigate? Second: are the specific aims that philosophers of mathematical explanation set themselves legitimate? Finally: are the models of explanation developed by philosophers of science useful tools for philosophers of mathematical explanation? We argue that the answer to all these questions is positive. Our views are completely opposite to the views that Mark Zelcer has put forward recently. Throughout this (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  7.  45
    Mechanistic Explanation and Explanatory Proofs in Mathematics.Joachim Frans & Erik Weber - 2014 - Philosophia Mathematica 22 (2):231-248.
    Although there is a consensus among philosophers of mathematics and mathematicians that mathematical explanations exist, only a few authors have proposed accounts of explanation in mathematics. These accounts fit into the unificationist or top-down approach to explanation. We argue that these models can be complemented by a bottom-up approach to explanation in mathematics. We introduce the mechanistic model of explanation in science and discuss the possibility of using this model in mathematics, arguing that using it does not presuppose a Platonist (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  8.  32
    Computational Explanation in Cognitive Sciences: The Mechanist Turn.S. Delarivière & J. Frans - 2015 - Constructivist Foundations 10 (3):426-429.
    Upshot: The computational theory of mind has been elaborated in many different ways throughout the last decades. In Explaining the Computational Mind, Milkowski defends his view that the mind can be explained as computational through his defense of mechanistic explanation. At no point in this book is there explicit mention of constructivist approaches to this topic. We will, nevertheless, argue that it is interesting for constructivist readers.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9.  18
    Kapitel 8: Architektonische Bedeutung des Schematismuskapitels.Mathias Birrer - 2017 - In Kant Und Die Heterogenität der Erkenntnisquellen. De Gruyter. pp. 235-268.
    No categories
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10.  44
    The Game of Fictional Mathematics: Review of M. Leng, Mathematics and Reality[REVIEW]J. Frans - 2012 - Constructivist Foundations 8 (1):126-128.
    Upshot: Leng attacks the indispensability argument for the existence of mathematical objects. She offers an account that treats the role of mathematics in science as an indispensable and useful part of theories, but retains nonetheless a fictionalist position towards mathematics. The result is an account of mathematics that is interesting for constructivists. Her view towards the nominalistic part of science is, however, more in conflict with radical constructivism.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11.  17
    Identifying the Motivations of Chimpanzees: Culture and Collaboration.Horner Victoria, E. Bonnie Kristin & B. M. Frans - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (5).
  12.  16
    The Game of Fictional Mathematics. Review of “Mathematics and Reality” by Mary Leng.Joachim Frans - 2012 - Constructivist Foundations 8 (1):126-128.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13.  7
    Kapitel 1: Einleitung: Das Schematismuskapitel und das Heterogenitätsproblem.Mathias Birrer - 2017 - In Kant Und Die Heterogenität der Erkenntnisquellen. De Gruyter. pp. 1-32.
    No categories
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  14.  6
    Kapitel 5: Der zweite Schritt der B Deduktion als locus der Selbstaffektion.Mathias Birrer - 2017 - In Kant Und Die Heterogenität der Erkenntnisquellen. De Gruyter. pp. 161-201.
    No categories
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15.  6
    Kapitel 9: Das Schema als transzendentale Zeitbestimmung.Mathias Birrer - 2017 - In Kant Und Die Heterogenität der Erkenntnisquellen. De Gruyter. pp. 269-307.
    No categories
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  16.  4
    Gegenläufige Interpretationen.Mathias Birrer - 2017 - In Kant Und Die Heterogenität der Erkenntnisquellen. De Gruyter. pp. 108-114.
    No categories
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  17.  3
    Einleitende Bemerkungen.Mathias Birrer - 2017 - In Kant Und Die Heterogenität der Erkenntnisquellen. De Gruyter. pp. 97-107.
    No categories
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  18.  3
    Inhalt.Mathias Birrer - 2017 - In Kant Und Die Heterogenität der Erkenntnisquellen. De Gruyter.
    No categories
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  19.  3
    Kapitel 4: Die Anschauungshaftigkeit der Zeit und der innere Sinn.Mathias Birrer - 2017 - In Kant Und Die Heterogenität der Erkenntnisquellen. De Gruyter. pp. 115-160.
    No categories
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  20.  3
    Kapitel 6: Die Lehre des doppelten Ich.Mathias Birrer - 2017 - In Kant Und Die Heterogenität der Erkenntnisquellen. De Gruyter. pp. 202-214.
    No categories
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  21.  3
    Kapitel 2: Kants Lehre des kognitiven Dualismus.Mathias Birrer - 2017 - In Kant Und Die Heterogenität der Erkenntnisquellen. De Gruyter. pp. 33-43.
    No categories
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  22.  3
    Kapitel 7: Selbstaffektion und die formale Anschauung der Zeit.Mathias Birrer - 2017 - In Kant Und Die Heterogenität der Erkenntnisquellen. De Gruyter. pp. 215-234.
    No categories
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  23.  3
    Schlussbetrachtung.Mathias Birrer - 2017 - In Kant Und Die Heterogenität der Erkenntnisquellen. De Gruyter. pp. 308-318.
    No categories
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  24.  3
    Siglenverzeichnis.Mathias Birrer - 2017 - In Kant Und Die Heterogenität der Erkenntnisquellen. De Gruyter. pp. 319-319.
    No categories
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  25.  2
    Namenregister.Mathias Birrer - 2017 - In Kant Und Die Heterogenität der Erkenntnisquellen. De Gruyter. pp. 326-327.
    No categories
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  26.  1
    Kapitel 3: Konzeptualismus und Non-Konzeptualismus.Mathias Birrer - 2017 - In Kant Und Die Heterogenität der Erkenntnisquellen. De Gruyter. pp. 44-96.
    No categories
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  27.  1
    Widmung.Mathias Birrer - 2017 - In Kant Und Die Heterogenität der Erkenntnisquellen. De Gruyter.
    No categories
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  28. Frontmatter.Mathias Birrer - 2017 - In Kant Und Die Heterogenität der Erkenntnisquellen. De Gruyter.
    No categories
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  29.  45
    Critical Notice of 'Controversy and Confrontation. Relating Controversy Analysis with Argumentation Theory' by Frans H. Van Eemeren and Bart Garssen. [REVIEW]María G. Navarro - 2011 - Informal Logic 31 (1):69-74.
    Since the first volume appeared in 2005, the collection Controversies has brought together pieces of work related to the field of argumentation, giving particular attention to those that are concerned with theoretical and practical problems connected with discursive controversy and confrontation. Authors such as P. Barrotta, M. Dascal, S. Frogel, H. Chang and D. Walton had already either edited or written previous editions to the present volume (volume six) of the collection. F. H. van Eemeren and B. Garssen (the former (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  30.  35
    Ape Imagination? A Sentimentalist Critique of Frans de Waal’s Gradualist Theory of Human Morality.Paul Carron - 2018 - Biology and Philosophy 33 (3-4):22.
    This essay draws on Adam Smith’s moral sentimentalism to critique primatologist Frans de Waal’s gradualist theory of human morality. De Waal has spent his career arguing for continuity between primate behavior and human morality, proposing that empathy is a primary moral building block evident in primate behavior. Smith’s moral sentimentalism—with its emphasis on the role of sympathy in moral virtue—provides the philosophical framework for de Waal’s understanding of morality. Smith’s notion of sympathy and the imagination involved in sympathy is (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  31. Primates, Philosophers and the Biological Basis of Morality: A Review of Primates and Philosophers by Frans de Waal, Princeton University Press, 2006, 200 Pp. [REVIEW]Massimo Pigliucci - 2007 - Biology and Philosophy 22 (4):611-618.
    Philosophical inquiries into morality are as old as philosophy, but it may turn out that morality itself is much, much older than that. At least, that is the main thesis of prima- tologist Frans De Waal, who in this short book based on his Tanner Lectures at Princeton, elaborates on what biologists have been hinting at since Darwin’s (1871) book The Descent of Man and Hamilton’s (1963) studies on the evolution of altruism: morality is yet another allegedly human characteristic (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  32.  69
    Review Of: Frans H. Van Eemeren, Peter Houtlosser, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans: Argumentative Indicators in Discourse. A Pragma-Dialectical Study: Springer: Dordrecht, 2007, Ix, 234 Pp. [REVIEW]Manfred Kienpointner - 2010 - Argumentation 24 (4):519-524.
    Review of: Frans H. van Eemeren, Peter Houtlosser, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans: Argumentative Indicators in Discourse. A Pragma-Dialectical Study Content Type Journal Article Pages 519-524 DOI 10.1007/s10503-010-9182-7 Authors Manfred Kienpointner, Institut für Sprachen und Literaturen, Universität Innsbruck, Innrain 52, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria Journal Argumentation Online ISSN 1572-8374 Print ISSN 0920-427X Journal Volume Volume 24 Journal Issue Volume 24, Number 4.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  33.  49
    Frans van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, & Bert Meuffels: Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness: Empirical Research Concerning the Pragma-Dialectical Discussion Rules: Springer, Dordrecht, 2009, Volume 16 of the Springer Argumentation Library. ISBN: 978-90-481-2613-2. DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-2614-9. HB: $139.00.Dale Hample - 2010 - Argumentation 24 (3):375-381.
    Frans van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, & Bert Meuffels: Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness: Empirical Research Concerning the Pragma-Dialectical Discussion Rules Content Type Journal Article Pages 375-381 DOI 10.1007/s10503-010-9183-6 Authors Dale Hample, University of Maryland College Park MD 20742 USA Journal Argumentation Online ISSN 1572-8374 Print ISSN 0920-427X Journal Volume Volume 24 Journal Issue Volume 24, Number 3.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  34.  26
    Reflections on Theoretical Issues in Argumentation Theory. Editors Frans H. Van Eemeren and Bart Garssen . Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2015; Pp. 289. $139.00 eBook, $179.00 Hardcover. [REVIEW]Kaitlyn Haynal - 2016 - Informal Logic 36 (1):92-96.
    Reflections on Theoretical Issues in Argumentation Theory Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2015. Pp. xiv, 1-293. ISBN 978-3-319-21102-2. eBook US$139.00, €118,99; Hardcover US$179.00, €147,69.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  35.  31
    Frans H. Van Eemeren and Bart Garssen : Topical Themes in Argumentation Theory: Twenty Exploratory Studies.Mark Aakhus - 2014 - Argumentation 28 (4):489-492.
    Every 4 years, for the past three decades, the world of argumentation research has gathered in Amsterdam at the International Society for the Study of Argumentation conferences to explore advances in understanding argumentation and how argumentation advances our understanding of the human condition. While comprehensive proceedings of selected papers are produced to document what has transpired in the world of argumentation over the preceding 4 years, there remains the important matter of taking the intellectual pulse of the world’s argumentation scholars, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  36.  25
    Frans H. Van Eemeren (2012): Maniobras Estratégicas En El Discurso Argumentativo. Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas & Editorial Plaza y Valdés (Series “Theoria Cum Praxi”, No. 9). Spanish Translation, by Cristián Santibáñez and María Elena Molina, Of: Frans H. Van Eemeren (2010): Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse: Extending the Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation, John Benjamins, Amsterdam (Series “Argumentation in Context”, No. 2). [REVIEW]Fernando Leal - 2014 - Argumentation 28 (1):129-132.
    Each one of the five books authored or co-authored by Frans van Eemeren which have so far been translated into Spanish clearly fulfills a different role. Following the chronological order, we first have Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions (van Eemeren and Grootendorst 1984; Spanish translation 2013), a book that contains the theoretical spadework in the field of pragmatics on which the whole edifice of pragma-dialectics is erected. Then follows Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies (van Eemeren and Grootendorst 1992; Spanish translation (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  37.  9
    Frans de waal. The age of empathy: Nature's lessons for a Kinder society.da Trindade Gabriel Garmendia & Marin Ana Paula Foletto - 2017 - Synesis 9 (1):180-195.
    Resenha de Frans de Waal. The Age of Empathy: Nature's Lessons for a Kinder Society. London: Souvenir Press, Paperback Edition, 2011.
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  38.  16
    Beauty and Desire: Frans Hemsterhuis' Aesthetic Experiments.Peter C. Sonderen - 1996 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 4 (2):317 – 345.
    (1996). Beauty and desire: Frans hemsterhuis’ Aesthetic experiments. British Journal for the History of Philosophy: Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 317-345. doi: 10.1080/09608789608570944.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  39.  9
    The Hand of the Artist: Reflections on the Notion of Technê in Some Antwerp Gallery Paintings by Frans II Francken and His Circle.Annette de Vries - 2010 - Intellectual History Review 20 (1):79-101.
    This paper explores and highlights the value given to craftsmanship or technê in the community of liefhebbers and artists associated with the pictures of collections genre. Taking as its case study a group of gallery interiors by the probable inventor and leading light of the genre, Frans II Francken, it places pictures of collections within the reform of attitudes towards manual dexterity and the mechanical arts that took place in the Early Modern period. Antwerp gallery interiors exemplify the intellectual (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  40.  4
    Building Blocks in Search of a Theory: Primates and Philosophers: How Morality Evolved Frans de Waal Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2006. [REVIEW]Tomislav Bracanović - 2007 - Biological Theory 2 (4):422-424.
    A critical review of Frans de Waal's book on evolution of morality (Frans de Waal, Primates and Philosophers: How Morality Evolved, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2006).
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  41.  40
    Considering Pragma-Dialectics: A Festschrift for Frans H. Van Eemeren on the Occasion of His 60th Birthday.F. H. van Eemeren, Peter Houtlosser, Haft-van Rees & A. M. (eds.) - 2006 - L. Erlbaum Associates.
    Considering Pragma-Dialectics honors the monumental contributions of one of the foremost international figures in current argumentation scholarship: Frans van Eemeren. The volume presents the research efforts of his colleagues and addresses how their work relates to the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation with which van Eemeren’s name is so intimately connected. This tribute serves to highlight the varied approaches to the study of argumentation and is destined to inspire researchers to advance scholarship in the field far into the future. Replete (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  42. Considering Pragma-Dialectics: A Festschrift for Frans H.F. H. van Eemeren, Peter Houtlosser, Haft-van Rees & A. M. (eds.) - 2006 - L. Erlbaum Associates.
    Considering Pragma-Dialectics honors the monumental contributions of one of the foremost international figures in current argumentation scholarship: Frans van Eemeren. The volume presents the research efforts of his colleagues and addresses how their work relates to the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation with which van Eemeren’s name is so intimately connected. This tribute serves to highlight the varied approaches to the study of argumentation and is destined to inspire researchers to advance scholarship in the field far into the future. Replete (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  43.  48
    Look, Ma! No Frans!Michael J. Wreen - 1994 - Pragmatics and Cognition 2 (2):285-306.
    This paper criticizes the pragma-dialectical conception of a fallacy, according to which a fallacy is an argumentative speech act which violates one or more of the rules of 'rational discussion'. That conception is found to be neither a necessary nor a sufficient condition for committing a fallacy. It is also found wanting in several other respects.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  44. A Particular Consequentialism: Why Moral Particularism and Consequentialism Need Not Conflict: Jonas Olson and Frans Svensson.Jonas Olson - 2003 - Utilitas 15 (2):194-205.
    Moral particularism is commonly presented as an alternative to ‘principle- or rule-based’ approaches to ethics, such as consequentialism or Kantianism. This paper argues that particularists' aversions to consequentialism stem not from a structural feature of consequentialism per se, but from substantial and structural axiological views traditionally associated with consequentialism. Given a particular approach to value, there need be no conflict between moral particularism and consequentialism. We consider and reject a number of challenges holding that there is after all such a (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  45.  79
    Physics and Astronomy: Aristotle's Physics II.2.193b22–194a12this Paper Was Prepared as the Basis of a Presentation at a Conference Entitled “Writing and Rewriting the History of Science, 1900–2000,” Les treilLes, France, September, 2003, Organized by Karine Chemla and Roshdi Rashed. I Have Compared Aristotle's and Ptolemy's Views of the Relationship Between Astronomy and Physics in a Paper Called “Astrologogeômetria and Astrophysikê in Aristotle and Ptolemy,” Presented at a Conference Entitled “Physics and Mathematics in Antiquity,” Leiden, the Netherlands, June, 2004, Organized by Keimpe Algra and Frans de Haas. For a Discussion of Hellenistic Views of This Relationship See Ian Mueller, “Remarks on Physics and Mathematical Astronomy and Optics in Epicurus, Sextus Empiricus, and Some Stoics,” in Philippa Lang , Re-Inventions: Essays on Hellenistic and Early Roman Science, Apeiron 37, 4 : 57–87. I Would Like to Thank Two Anonymous Readers of This Essay for Meticulous Corrections and Th. [REVIEW]Ian Mueller - 2006 - Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 16 (2):175-206.
    In the first part of chapter 2 of book II of the Physics Aristotle addresses the issue of the difference between mathematics and physics. In the course of his discussion he says some things about astronomy and the ‘ ‘ more physical branches of mathematics”. In this paper I discuss historical issues concerning the text, translation, and interpretation of the passage, focusing on two cruxes, the first reference to astronomy at 193b25–26 and the reference to the more physical branches at 194a7–8. In (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  46.  98
    Frans H. Van Eemeren: Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse. Extending the Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation: John Benjamins Publishing Company, Argumentation in Context , Vol. 2, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, 2010, XII + 308 Pp. [REVIEW]Eddo Rigotti - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (2):261-270.
  47.  36
    E. Feteris, B. Garssen and F. Snoeck Henkemans (Eds): Keeping in Touch with Pragma-Dialectics. In Honor of Frans H. Van Eemeren. [REVIEW]Paul van den Hoven - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (3):409-412.
  48.  2
    Review of van Eemeren, Frans H., Ed. Prototypical Argumentative Patterns: Exploring the Relationship Between Argumentative Discourse and Institutional Context. [REVIEW]Sara Rubinelli - 2018 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 7 (3):347-351.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  49.  17
    E. Feteris, B. Garssen and F. Snoeck Henkemans (Eds): Keeping in Touch with Pragma-Dialectics. In Honor of Frans H. Van Eemeren. [REVIEW]Paul den Hoven - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (3):409-412.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  50.  44
    Aristotle’s On Generation and Corruption I, Edited by Frans de Haas and Jaap Mansfeld. [REVIEW]Andrea Falcon - 2007 - Ancient Philosophy 27 (1):200-205.
1 — 50 / 657