Results for 'Mor Segev'

124 found
Order:
  1. Aristotle on Religion.Mor Segev - 2017 - Cambridge University Press.
    Aristotle is a severe critic of traditional religion, believing it to be false, yet he also holds that traditional religion and its institutions are necessary if any city, including the ideal city he describes in the Politics, is to exist and flourish. This book provides, for the first time, a coherent account of the socio-political role which Aristotle attributes to traditional religion despite his rejection of its content. Mor Segev argues that Aristotle thinks traditional religion is politically necessary because (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  2.  3
    Aristotle's Ideal City-Planning: Politics 7.12.Mor Segev - 2019 - Classical Quarterly 69 (2):585-596.
    At Pol. 7.12, 1331a19–20, Aristotle states it as a matter of fact that the citizenry of the best city should be divided into ‘public messes’. His primary concern in the rest of the chapter is to uncover the optimal way in which syssitia should be organized, and the way in which they should be situated in relation to other facilities, public buildings, agorai and temples in the city. The proposed plan is roughly as follows. Syssitia would be divided into three (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3.  6
    Aristotle on the Proper Attitude Toward True Divinity.Mor Segev - 2020 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 94 (2):187-209.
    Aristotle does not explicitly state how it is that one should ideally relate to the true gods of his metaphysics, like the prime mover. He does, however, speak of an unreciprocated relationship of friendship between humans and such gods. I argue that Aristotle’s conception of the magnanimous person sheds light on that relationship. The magnanimous person, who is a philosopher, devalues humanity and devotes her life and efforts to the divine. Thus, contrary to some scholars, Aristotle’s conception of magnanimity resembles (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4. ‘Obviously All This Agrees with My Will and My Intellect’: Schopenhauer on Active and PassiveNousin Aristotle'sDe Animaiii.5.Mor Segev - 2014 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22 (3):535-556.
    In one of the unpublished parts of his manuscript titled the Spicilegia, Arthur Schopenhauer presents an uncharacteristically sympathetic reading of an Aristotelian text. The text in question, De anima III. 5, happens to include the only occurrence of arguably the most controversial idea in Aristotle, namely the distinction between active and passive nous. Schopenhauer interprets these two notions as corresponding to his own notions of the ?will? and the ?intellect? or ?subject of knowledge?, respectively. The result is a unique interpretation, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5.  21
    Aristotle on Nature, Human Nature and Human Understanding.Mor Segev - 2017 - Rhizomata 5 (2):177-209.
    Name der Zeitschrift: Rhizomata Jahrgang: 5 Heft: 2 Seiten: 177-209.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6.  46
    The Teleological Significance of Dreaming in Aristotle.Mor Segev - 2012 - Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 43:107-141.
    In his discussions of dreaming in the Parva Naturalia, Aristotle neither claims nor denies that dreams serve a natural purpose. Modern scholarship generally interprets dreaming as useless and teleologically irrelevant for him. I argue that Aristotle's teleology permits certain types of dream to have a natural role in end-directed processes. Dreams are left-overs from waking experience, but they may, like certain bodily residues, be used by nature, which does ‘nothing in vain’ and makes use of available resources, for the benefit (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7.  5
    Aristotle on Plato’s Republic VIII-IX: Politics V. 12, 1316a1-B27.Mor Segev - 2018 - Polis 35 (2):374-400.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8.  5
    Traditional Religion and Its Natural Function in Aristotle.Mor Segev - 2018 - Classical World: A Quarterly Journal on Antiquity 111 (3):295-320.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9.  13
    Aristotle on Religion by Mor Segev.Robert Mayhew - 2018 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 56 (3):553-554.
    Here is the problem: Aristotle seems clearly to reject the traditional Olympian gods. His own conception of god seems to have no religious significance; for whatever else this god knows, it certainly does not know particulars, including humans and their characters, actions, and futures. Yet in the Politics, Aristotle includes priests as public officials and lands devoted to the traditional gods as necessary parts of his ideal polis, and he even seems to regard the Oracle of Delphi as an important (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10.  3
    Aristotle on Religion, Written by Mor Segev.M. Ross Romero - 2019 - Polis 36 (2):387-390.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11.  19
    Is the Criminal Law (So) Special? Comments on Douglas Husak’s Theory of Criminalization.Re'em Segev - 2010 - Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies 1 (1):3-20.
    This is Re'em Segev's contribution to the symposium on Douglas Husak's book "Overcriminalization.".
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  12. Should Law Track Morality?Re'em Segev - 2017 - Criminal Justice Ethics 36 (2):205-223.
    Does the moral status of an action provide in itself a non-instrumental, pro-tanto reason for a corresponding legal status – a reason that applies regardless of whether the law promotes a value that is independent of the law, such as preventing wrongdoing or promoting distributive or retributive justice? While the relation between morality and law is a familiar topic, this specific question is typically not considered explicitly. Yet it seems to be controversial and each of the contrasting answers to this (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  13.  96
    Defining Knowledge in Terms of Belief: The Modal Logic Perspective.Joseph Y. Halpern, Dov Samet & Ella Segev - 2009 - Review of Symbolic Logic 2 (3):469-487.
    The question of whether knowledge is definable in terms of belief, which has played an important role in epistemology for the last 50 years, is studied here in the framework of epistemic and doxastic logics. Three notions of definability are considered: explicit definability, implicit definability, and reducibility, where explicit definability is equivalent to the combination of implicit definability and reducibility. It is shown that if knowledge satisfies any set of axioms contained in S5, then it cannot be explicitly defined in (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  14. The Absolute and the Failure to Think of the Ontological Difference Heidegger's Critique of Hegel.Alon Segev - 2008 - Studia Phaenomenologica 8:453-472.
    The aim of this paper is to examine Heidegger’s critique of Hegel and to determine whether it is justified. Heidegger claims that Hegel tries to reduce everything to a single absolute entity, to the absolute knowing subject. The result is the identification of being and nothing, as Hegel formulates it at the beginning of his Logic. Hegel identifies being with nothing because being has no references, no predicates, no properties. Heidegger agrees with Hegel that being and nothing are the same, (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15. Well-Being and Fairness.Re’em Segev - 2006 - Philosophical Studies 131 (2):369-391.
    The article explores the interaction of two, potentially clashing, considerations, each reflecting a different conception of fairness concerning the resolution of interpersonal conflicts. According to the Equal Chance Principle, the harm for each person should be minimized in a significant and (roughly) equal degree; when this is impossible, each person should be accorded the highest possible equal chance to avoid the harm. According to the Importance Principle, the danger to the person who would otherwise suffer the more serious harm should (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  16. Should We Prevent Deontological Wrongdoing?Re’em Segev - 2016 - Philosophical Studies 173 (8):2049-2068.
    Is there a reason to prevent deontological wrongdoing—an action that is wrong due to the violation of a decisive deontological constraint? This question is perplexing. On the one hand, the intuitive response seems to be positive, both when the question is considered in the abstract and when it is considered with regard to paradigmatic cases of deontological wrongdoing such as Bridge and Transplant. On the other hand, common theoretical accounts of deontological wrongdoing do not entail this answer, since not preventing (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  17.  48
    Justification Under Uncertainty.Re’em Segev - 2012 - Law and Philosophy 31 (5):523-563.
    There is a controversy as to the moral status of an action in the face of uncertainty concerning a non-moral fact that is morally significant (according to an applicable moral standard): According to the objective conception, the right action is determined in light of the truth, namely the actual state of affairs (regarding the pertinent fact), whereas according to the subjective conception, the right action depends on the epistemic state of the agent, namely her (justified) belief (concerning the pertinent fact). (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  18. Making Sense of Discrimination.Re'em Segev - 2014 - Ratio Juris 27 (1):47-78.
    Discrimination is a central moral and legal concept. However, it is also a contested one. Particularly, accounts of the wrongness of discrimination often rely on controversial and particular assumptions. In this paper, I argue that a theory of discrimination that relies on premises that are very general and widely accepted provides a plausible account of the concept of wrongful discrimination. According to the combined theory, wrongful discrimination consists of allocating a benefit that is not supported by a morally significant fact, (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  19.  12
    Cognitive Bias Modification for Inferential Style.Noa Avirbach, Baruch Perlman & Nilly Mor - 2018 - Cognition and Emotion 33 (4):816-824.
    ABSTRACTIn this study, we developed a cognitive bias modification procedure that targets inferential style, and tested its effect on hope, mood, and self-esteem. Participants were randomly assigned to training conditions intended to encourage either a negative or a positive inferential style. Participants’ inferences for their failure on a cognitive challenge were congruent with their training condition. Moreover, compared to participants in the positive training condition, those in the negative condition reported less hope and exhibited lower mood and self-esteem following the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  20.  94
    Second-Order Equality and Levelling Down.Re'em Segev - 2009 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87 (3):425 – 443.
    Many think that equality is an intrinsic value. However, this view, especially when based on a consequential foundation, faces familiar objections related to the claim that equality is sometimes good for none and bad for some: most notably the levelling down objection. This article explores a unique (consequential) conception of equality, as part of a more general conception of fairness concerning the resolution of interpersonal conflicts, which is not exposed to these objections.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  21. Hierarchical Consequentialism.Re'em Segev - 2010 - Utilitas 22 (3):309-330.
    The paper considers a hierarchical theory that combines concern for two values: individual well-being – as a fundamental, first-order value – and (distributive) fairness – as a high-order value that its exclusive function is to complete the value of individual well-being by resolving internal clashes within it that occur in interpersonal conflicts. The argument for this unique conception of high-order fairness is that fairness is morally significant in itself only regarding what matters – individual well-being – and when it matters (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  22.  25
    Brooding and Attentional Control in Processing Self-Encoded Information: Evidence From a Modified Garner Task.Shimrit Daches, Nilly Mor, Jennifer Winquist & Eva Gilboa-Schechtman - 2010 - Cognition and Emotion 24 (5):876-885.
  23.  7
    Cognition and Emotion, Volume 24, 2010, List of Contents.Dirk Hermans, Jan De Houwer, Jenny Yiend, Nilly Mor, Leah D. Doane, Emma K. Adam, Susan Mineka, Richard E. Zinbarg, James W. Griffith & Michelle G. Craske - 2010 - Cognition and Emotion 24 (8).
  24. Justification, Rationality and Mistake: Mistake of Law is No Excuse? It Might Be a Justificaton!Re’em Segev - 2006 - Law and Philosophy 25 (1):31-79.
    According to a famous maxim, ignorance or mistake of law is no excuse. This maxim is supposed to represent both the standard and the proper rule of law. In fact, this maxim should be qualified in both respects: ignorance and mistake of law sometimes are, and (perhaps even more often) should be, excused. But this dual qualification only reinforces the fundamental and ubiquitous assumption which underlies the discussions of the subject, namely, that the only ground of exculpation relevant to ignorance (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  25.  12
    Responsibility and Justificatory Defenses.Re’em Segev - 2017 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 11 (1):97-110.
    Criminal prohibitions typically forbid harming people. Justificatory defenses, such as lesser evil, justifying necessity and justifying self-defense, provide exceptions to such prohibitions if certain conditions are met. One common condition is that the agent is not responsible for the conflict. The questions whether justificatory defenses should include such a condition, and if so what should be its content, are controversial. I argue that responsibility for a conflict counts against protecting the responsible person at the expense of a non-responsible or a (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  26. Well-Being and Fairness in the Distribution of Scarce Health Resources.Re'em Segev - 2005 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (3):231 – 260.
    Based on a general thesis regarding the proper resolution of interpersonal conflicts, this paper suggests a normative framework for the distribution of scarce health resources. The proposed thesis includes two basic ideas. First, individual well-being is the fundamental value. Second, interpersonal conflicts affecting well-being should be resolved in light of several conceptions of fairness, reflecting the independent value of persons and the moral significance of responsibility of individuals for the existence of interpersonal conflicts. These ideas are elaborated in several principles (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  27.  26
    Affirmative Action: Well‐Being, Justice, and Qualifications.Re’em Segev - 2019 - Ratio Juris 32 (2):138-156.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  28.  8
    Species‐Specific microRNA Regulation Influences Phenotypic Variability.Eyal Mor & Noam Shomron - 2013 - Bioessays 35 (10):881-888.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  29.  14
    Ethical Issues Related To BRCA Gene Testing in Orthodox Jewish Women.Pnina Mor & Kathleen Oberle - 2008 - Nursing Ethics 15 (4):512-522.
    Persons exhibiting mutations in two tumor suppressor genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2, have a greatly increased risk of developing breast and/or ovarian cancer. The incidence of BRCA gene mutation is very high in Ashkenazi Jewish women of European descent, and many issues can arise, particularly for observant Orthodox women, because of their genetic status. Their obligations under the Jewish code of ethics, referred to as Jewish law, with respect to the acceptability of various risk-reducing strategies, may be poorly understood. In this (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  30.  61
    Responsibility and Moral Luck: Comments on Benjamin Zipursky, Two Dimensions of Responsibility in Crime, Tort, and Moral Luck.Re'em Segev - 2008 - Theoretical Inquiries in Law 9 (1):17-24.
    The essence of the moral luck question is whether the responsibility of persons is determined only in light of actions that are within their control or also in light of factors, such as the consequences of their actions, which are beyond their control. Most people seem to have contrasting intuitions regarding this question. On the one hand, there is a common intuition that the responsibility of persons should be judged only in light of what is within their control. On the (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  31.  18
    Corporate Social Responsibility as Shaped by Managers’ Role Dissonance: Cleaning Services Procurement in Israel.Galit Segev, Sarit Nisim & Orly Benjamin - 2015 - Journal of Business Ethics 130 (1):209-221.
    Public procurement provides an excellent window into the shaping of corporate social responsibility of companies contracted by the government. To this emerging scholarly realization, we want to add that public procurement provides also the opportunity to examine corporate social responsibility as practiced by public sector organizations. This opportunity enables the investigation of the conditions under which public sector organizations endorse CSR guidelines, adherence to which demonstrates accountability for their service providers’ legal, employment-related practices. Our study examined the possibility that public (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  32.  31
    Justice and Chances.Re'em Segev - 2018 - Journal of Social Philosophy 49 (2):315-333.
    According to a common view, in a case involving an indivisible good and several potential beneficiaries, who are equal in every relevant respect, there is a non-instrumental reason to allocate the benefit in a way that gives each an equal chance to receive the benefit. In this paper, I argue that this view is incompatible with several plausible and widely held assumptions. I emphasize especially the assumption that the distributive role of chances is secondary to that of benefits in an (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  33.  14
    How Medicare Is Altering the Hospice Movement.David S. Greer & Vincent Mor - 1985 - Hastings Center Report 15 (5):5-9.
  34.  35
    Within-Person Variations in Self-Focused Attention and Negative Affect in Depression and Anxiety: A Diary Study.Nilly Mor, Leah D. Doane, Emma K. Adam, Susan Mineka, Richard E. Zinbarg, James W. Griffith, Michelle G. Craske, Allison Waters & Maria Nazarian - 2010 - Cognition and Emotion 24 (1):48-62.
  35.  70
    On Definability in Multimodal Logic.Joseph Y. Halpern, Dov Samet & Ella Segev - 2009 - Review of Symbolic Logic 2 (3):451-468.
    Three notions of definability in multimodal logic are considered. Two are analogous to the notions of explicit definability and implicit definability introduced by Beth in the context of first-order logic. However, while by Beth’s theorem the two types of definability are equivalent for first-order logic, such an equivalence does not hold for multimodal logics. A third notion of definability, reducibility, is introduced; it is shown that in multimodal logics, explicit definability is equivalent to the combination of implicit definability and reducibility. (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  36. The Distributive Justice Theory of Self-Defense: A Response to Whitley Kaufman.Re'em Segev - 2008 - Ethics and International Affairs 22 (1).
    In several papers, I have argued for a theory of distributive justice and considered its implications. This theory includes a principle of responsibility that was endorsed by others within an account of defensive force (self-defense and defense of others). Whitley Kaufman criticizes this account which he refers to as the "distributive justice theory of self-defense" (DJ theory). In this paper, I respond to this criticism. I argue that Kaufman presents the theory inaccurately, that his standard of evaluation of the theory (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  37.  37
    Sub-Optimal Justification and Justificatory Defenses.Re’em Segev - 2010 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 4 (1):57-76.
    Justificatory defenses apply to actions that are generally wrong and illegal—mainly since they harm people—when they are justified—usually since they prevent harm to others. A strict conception of justification limits justificatory defenses to actions that reflect all pertinent principles in the optimal manner. A more relaxed conception of justification applies to actions that do not reflect all pertinent principles optimally due to mistake but are not too far from this optimum. In the paper, I consider whether justificatory defenses should reflect (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  38.  62
    The Legality of Interrogational Torture: A Question of Proper Authorization or a Substantive Moral Issue.Mordechai Kremnitzer & Re'em Segev - 2000 - Israel Law Review 34 (2):509-559.
    The article explores the Israeli Supreme Court main judgment regarding the legality of the use of special interrogation methods in order extract information concerning future acts of terror. The Judgment's main conclusion was that while there might be a justification for using exceptional interrogation measures in order to save lives, based on the concept of lesser evil as embedded in the criminal defense of necessity, the government is nevertheless not authorized to use such means in the absence of explicit legislation (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  39.  24
    Design for Collective Intelligence: Pop-Up Communities in MOOCs.Muriel Garreta-Domingo, Peter B. Sloep, Davinia Hérnandez-Leo & Yishay Mor - 2018 - AI and Society 33 (1):91-100.
  40.  65
    Moral Rightness and the Significance of Law: Why, How and When Mistake of Law Matters.Re'em Segev - 2014 - University of Toronto Law Journal, Forthcoming 64:36-63.
    The question of whether a mistake of law should negate or mitigate criminal liability is commonly considered to be pertinent to the culpability of the agent, often examined in light of the (epistemic) reasonableness of the mistake. I argue that this view disregards an important aspect of this question, namely whether a mistake of law affects the rightness of the action, particularly in light of the moral significance of the mistake. I argue that several plausible premises, regarding moral rightness under (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  41.  5
    Patient’s Perspectives of Experimental HCV-Positive to HCV-Negative Renal Transplantation: Report From a Single Site.Sarah E. Van Pilsum Rasmussen, Shanti Seaman, Diane Brown, Niraj Desai, Mark Sulkowski, Dorry L. Segev, Christine M. Durand & Jeremy Sugarman - forthcoming - Ajob Empirical Bioethics:1-13.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  42.  46
    A Light-Fronts Approach to a Two-Center Time-Dependent Dirac Equation.Bilha Segev & J. C. Wells - 2001 - Foundations of Physics 31 (6):993-1015.
    The two center time dependent Dirac equation, for an electron in the external field of two colliding ultrarelativistic heavy ions is considered. In the ultrarelativistic limit, the ions are practically moving at the speed of light and the electromagnetic fields of the ions are confined to the light fronts by the extreme Lorentz contraction and by the choice of gauge, designed to remove the long-range Coulomb effects. An exact solution to the ultrarelativistic limit of the two-center Dirac equation is found (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  43.  75
    Lesser Evil and Responsibility: Comments on Jeff McMahan's Analysis of the Morality of War.Re'em Segev - 2007 - Israel Law Review 40 (3):709-729.
    The main aim of Jeff McMahan's manuscript on the morality of war is to answer the question: why and accordingly when is it justified or permissible to kill people in war? However, McMahan argues that the same principles apply to individual actions and to war. McMahan rejects all doctrines of collective responsibility and liability. His claim is that every individual is liable for what he has done and not for the actions of others - even if both are part of (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  44. Number 1 Regular Articles.Josep Call, Olga Kochukhova, Gustaf Gredebäck, Sorel Cahan, Yaniv Mor, Nina Kazanina, Colin Phillips, Ori Friedman, Alan M. Leslie & Susan A. Gelman - 2007 - Cognition 105:726-729.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  45.  48
    Review of Michael Ignatieff, The Lesser Evil: Political Ethics in an Age of Terror. [REVIEW]Re’em Segev - 2005 - Ethics 115 (4):821-824.
    How should a democratic state fight terrorism? This is the question discussed by Michael Ignatieff in his latest book. Ignatieff explores several possible positions as a response to this question. The review considers the analysis of these positions.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  46.  15
    A Study On Proverbs Rebted To Horse In Kyrgyz, Uigur, Macedonia-Kosova Turkish Languages And In Turkish Legadery Stories.Gökmen Mor - 2008 - Journal of Turkish Studies 3:515-544.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  47.  31
    Governmental Power: Quality or Identity? Comment on Alon Harel's Argument Against Outsourcing Violence.Re'em Segev - 2011 - Law and Ethics of Human Rights 5 (2):416-423.
    What is the appropriate division of power between public officials and private individuals? The straightforward answer to this question, it seems, is that an official should have a power if she employs it (morally) better compared to a private individual. However, Alon Harel argues that this answer is misguided, or at least partially, since there are some decisions—mainly concerning the employment of violence—that should be made and implemented only by public officials regardless of the (relative) moral quality of the decision (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  48.  7
    Preferred Provider Relationships Between Medicare Advantage Plans and Skilled Nursing Facilities Reduce Switching Out of Plans: An Observational Analysis.Elizabeth M. Goldberg, Laura M. Keohane, Vincent Mor, Amal N. Trivedi, Hye-Young Jung & Momotazur Rahman - 2018 - Inquiry: The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing 55:004695801879741.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  49.  18
    Dysfunctional Implications of Narrow Window Theory: Variability in the Intuitive Assessment of Correlation.Sorel Cahan & Yaniv Mor - 2007 - Cognition 105 (1):47-64.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  50.  25
    The Argument for (Living) Originalism: Comments on Jack Balkin's Theory of Constitutional Interpretation.Re'em Segev - 2013 - Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies.
    In this comment I consider Jack Balkin’s general argument for his method of constitutional interpretation – the question of why interpret (the United States Constitution) in this way (as presented in his book Living Originalism). I contrast this question with the way in which the conclusion of this argument should be implemented with regard to specific clauses – the question of how to interpret (the United States Constitution). While the former question is concerned with the general form of the argument, (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
1 — 50 / 124