Works by Diller, Kevin (exact spelling)

5 found
Order:
  1. Are Sin and Evil Necessary for a Really Good World?: Questions for Alvin Plantinga’s Felix Culpa Theodicy.Kevin Diller - 2008 - Faith and Philosophy 25 (1):87-101.
    Arguably, the most philosophically nuanced defense of a Felix Culpa theodicy, born out of serious theological reflection, is to be found in Alvin Plantinga’srecent article entitled “Superlapsarianism, or ‘O Felix Culpa.’” In this paper I look at Plantinga’s argument for the necessity of evil as a means to God’s fargreater ends and raise four objections to it. The arguments I give are aimed at the theological adequacy of explaining the emergence of evil as a functionalgood. I conclude that Plantinga’s Felix (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  2.  3
    We Have Liftoff..Oliver Crisp, Kevin Diller, Trent Dougherty & Michael Rea - 2013 - Journal of Analytic Theology 1.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3. Introduction to Vol. 2.Kevin Diller - 2014 - Journal of Analytic Theology 2.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4.  1
    Introduction to Vol. 3.Trent Dougherty & Kevin Diller - 2015 - Journal of Analytic Theology 3.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5.  43
    Karl Barth and the Relationship Between Philosophy and Theology.Kevin Diller - 2010 - Heythrop Journal 51 (6):1035-1052.
    It is commonly held that Karl Barth emphatically rejected the usefulness of philosophy for theology. In this essay I explore the implications of Barth's theological epistemology for the relationship and proper boundaries between philosophy and theology, given its origin in Barth's theology of revelation. I seek to clarify Barth's position with respect to philosophy by distinguishing the contingency of its offence from any necessary incompatibility. Barth does not reject philosophy per se, but the way in which philosophy is typically conducted. (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark