- All discussions (665)
- Paper discussions (132)
- In the profession (28)
- PhilJobs (6)
- About PhilPapers (182)
- Philosophy discussions (454)
- Epistemology (66)Metaphilosophy (32)Metaphysics (49)Philosophy of Action (22)Philosophy of Language (44)Philosophy of Mind (140)Philosophy of Religion (17)M&E, Misc (6)Value Theory (104)
- Aesthetics (12)Applied Ethics (21)Meta-Ethics (24)Normative Ethics (25)Philosophy of Gender, Race, and Sexuality (11)Philosophy of Law (4)Social and Political Philosophy (52)Value Theory, Miscellaneous (60)
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic (39)Philosophy of Biology (18)Philosophy of Cognitive Science (42)Philosophy of Computing and Information (8)Philosophy of Mathematics (39)Philosophy of Physical Science (14)Philosophy of Social Science (10)Philosophy of Probability (6)General Philosophy of Science (38)Philosophy of Science, Misc (7)
- Ancient Greek and Roman Philosophy (11)Medieval and Renaissance Philosophy (1)17th/18th Century Philosophy (10)19th Century Philosophy (6)20th Century Philosophy (20)History of Western Philosophy, Misc (4)
- African/Africana Philosophy (0)Asian Philosophy (9)Continental Philosophy (12)European Philosophy (24)Philosophy of the Americas (3)Philosophical Traditions, Miscellaneous (1)Philosophy, Misc (14)
- Philosophy, Introductions and Anthologies (2)Philosophy, General Works (4)Teaching Philosophy (1)Philosophy, Miscellaneous (8)Other Academic Areas (20)
- Natural Sciences (2)Social Sciences (1)Cognitive Sciences (9)Formal Sciences (1)
1 - 20 / 676 2020-10-15We are pleased to announce the public launch of the 2020 PhilPapers Survey. The survey is a follow-up on the 2009 PhilPapers Survey, which was conducted in November 2009. As with the previous survey, the primary aim of the survey is to discover information about the distribution of philosophical views among professional philosophers in the English-speaking world. Everyone is welcome to take the survey (whether they have taken the 2009 survey or not).
The survey includes 100 questions in total. You will be asked to answer 50 questions, each giving a choice between 2 or more views on a philosophical issue (for example, "Analytic-synthetic distinction: Yes or no?"; "Mind: physicalism or non-physicalism?"). At the end of the survey you will also be given the option to answer the other 50 questions. Respondents must indicate that they accept or lean toward one of the options or can give one of a variety of "other" answers. Following the model of the 2009 s ... (read more)Permanent link: https://philpapers.org/post/27014
Today (January 28, 2019) is PhilPapers' tenth birthday. PhilPapers has grown enormously since its modest beginnings at the ANU. In the first months, we had only a few thousand users. Now we have hundreds of thousands. We started by indexing a relatively small number of articles that were readily available online. Now we have by far the most complete index of the philosophical literature with 2.4 million entries.
In the first years, it was just one person doing all the technical work. Now we have a robust and growing team at the Centre for Digital Philosophy. We're very grateful for all the work that everyone has put into PhilPapers, from our 600 or so category editors and our tens of thousands of casual contributors to the developers that have contributed code and the organizations that have supported them. We're enthusiastically looking ahead to what we can achieve as a community over the next ten years.Permanent link: https://philpapers.org/post/27010
2018-05-30We have just launched a beta testing version of PhilPeople, a directory and social network for philosophers developed by the PhilPapers Foundation with support from the American Philosophical Association. Visit the site to find out more!Permanent link: https://philpapers.org/post/27006
2018-01-09In the coming months, we will launch PhilPeople, a new service from the PhilPapers Foundation developed with the support of the APA. PhilPeople will be a searchable database of philosophers. It will have an associated search engine that enables searches on a number of dimensions (e.g. by areas of specialization, location, and demographic features). PhilPeople will also provide a profile page to any philosopher who wants one, with links to their publications on PhilPapers. It will include social networking features. It will also include an associated database of academic departments of philosophy, with searchable information about each of these departments.
PhilPeople will have many benefits for the philosophical community. For individual philosophers, it will provide a way of showcasing your research, making information about you and your work available to the broad community, and helping you to network with other philosophers. For those planning conferences and events, it w ... (read more)Permanent link: https://philpapers.org/post/27002
We're pleased to announce the launch of a new site: PhilArchive
As its name indicates, PhilArchive is an open access e-print archive for philosophical works. PhilArchive is a relaunch and rebranding of the archive service that has been present within PhilPapers since 2009. The archive service has been widely used, but we have found that some philosophers are unaware of it because of its location within PhilPapers. We anticipate that the new PhilArchive website will significantly increase awareness and use of the service. It will also help to logically separate PhilPapers open access content (which is completely free to all) from its indexing service (for which we ask universities to pay a fee).
At launch, PhilArchive includes the 27,000 works already in the PhilPapers archive, making it by far the largest open access archive in philosophy. PhilPapers and PhilArchive will remain tightly integrated, with all archived papers on one service automatically appearing on the other service ... (read more)Permanent link: https://philpapers.org/post/26998
2017-02-14We are pleased to announce the launch of a new look for PhilPapers. We have a new logo and a new design to go with it. The new design is more functional and more mobile-friendly.
Our new logo is the winning submission to last year's PhilPapers logo design contest. The winners are Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll from Florida (a link to their web pages has been added to the footer of the site for those who might be interested in working with them). We received about 300 submissions to the contest, many of which were excellent and very professional. The PhilPapers board chose finalists and then polled hundreds of people to choose the winner. We had to select just one design, but we would like to thank all the participants for their excellent contributions. We're lucky to have such a supportive community for this service.
In the weeks and months to come we will be announcing a number of exciting new services. We look forward to sharing these with you.Permanent link: https://philpapers.org/post/26882
2017-02-11Or should I say Goliath Chalmers? Why did you choose such a last name for your alias? Did you may be feel like grabbing' m by the...?
[to the reader: if you get this post, you'd better immediately save it. It wouldn't surprise me if it got deleted.]
university of Tabriz- Iran
Call for papers
Journal of Philosophical Investigations of University of Tabriz-Iran
Call for Papers
Volume 21 (autumn and winter), 2017
Deadline: Jul / Aug, 15, 2017
Word Limit: Articles range from 5000–10000 words
Open journal of Philosophical Investigations of University of Tabriz-Iran is an open access and peer-reviewed journal published by Department of Philosophy at University of Tabriz. The main objective of PI is to provide an intellectual platform for the international scholars in field of philosophy. PI aims to promote philosophical studies and investigations in philosophy. The journal publishes research papers in the fields of philosophy and branches of philosophy. Main topics may include research papers about:
- Moral Philosophy
- Political philosophy
- Philosophy of language
- Philosophy of religion
- Philosophy of science
- Philosophy of history
- Philosophy of mathematics
- Philosophy of mind
- Islamic philosophy
- Other related topics about phil ... (read more)
Upside down, round and round
Through the Looking Glass: Is the distinction between "real" and "virtual" image real?
Where should this thread be placed? Cognitive Sciences, along with my other threads about vision and other brain processes? Or by Physical Sciences, along with the countless myths on which contemporary science is built?
Light is a subjective phenomenon, only known to living creatures as far as we can tell. But it is also a physical phenomenon that stands at the basis of modern science. The way physicists understand light is since du Broglie (1925) the way they understand matter. From gravitational waves to an expanding universe, all depends on how we interpret light phenomena. To change the perception of light in science is to change science itself.
However tempting that maybe, my objectives are much less ambitious.
Allow me to start with a simple mirror and invite you to step inside with me. Who knows? Maybe we will encounter Alice in our journey. Just as long as w ... (read more)Latest replies:
- Hachem El Ouggouti, 2017-02-07 : __For a New Theory of Vision: Some preliminary Remarks__ How come we see a ray of light that is not directed at our eyes... (read more)
- Hachem El Ouggouti, 2017-02-08 : __Ether and Dark Matter__ The concept of the ether created unsolvable problems because of contradictory exigencies. As&n... (read more)
- Hachem El Ouggouti, 2017-02-10 : __Can Particles Interfere?__ Why not? What would otherwise be the sense of spending billions of euros or dollars on gian... (read more)
- Hachem El Ouggouti, 2017-02-20 : __The concept of Wavelength and its Fallacies__ Imagine a water wave with a certain wavelength. Let us say, 10 cm. That... (read more)
La Trobe UniversityI've recently rewritten my critique of Alvin Plantinga's persuasive modal version of the argument for the existence of God. I would be pleased for readers to review this draft version and let me know if I've made any basic logical blunders.
In this essay, I uncover both the strengths and weaknesses of Plantinga's argument. I conclude that while the argument is probably formally valid, it is ultimately unsound. I argue that it's only non-analytic premise is not only false, but necessarily so. You can read the draft version of my essay at www.RationalRealm.com/philosophy/metaphysics/plantinga-ontological-argument.html
Australian National UniversityThe recently updated/started pages no longer seem to update.
- Hachem El Ouggouti, 2017-01-31 : I sympathize with you. I know how it feels when the system suddenly turns against you. In my case it is a powerful (at l... (read more)
- Hachem El Ouggouti, 2017-01-31 : [I'm afraid the system(!) ate half of my reply. So, here it is again.] I sympathize with you. I know how it feels wh... (read more)
2017-01-24A thread of mine is being spammed by Pieter, and after one response from him all I get are posts in my thread The Logic of Physics: Some Problematic Concepts which have nothing to do with said thread. The people responsible at Philpapers apparently do not care about this thread pollution. In fact I know of an illustrious person who he is probably very happy of such a system glitch. If glitch it is. I won't be the first time I have been the object of such bully practices. As you all know three of my threads have been deleted already, and I won't mention numerous other incidents that hinder me as a user of this forum. You would expect the people responsible for this forum to simply ban me if they consider me an undesirable member. Somehow they do not have the balls. So, what of it, Goliath? Do you want to fight it out in the open, of will you stick to your sneaky tricks?
[pagination is given as page number in pdf file/page number in original text]
The first lines sound very strange coming from the founder of wave theory since they consecrate the standing of the opposite view, Geometric Optics:
"As happens in all the sciences in which Geometry is applied to matter, the demonstrations concerning Optics are founded on truths drawn from experience." Huygens sees therefore no conflict between his new approach and Optics which are based on the behavior of particles of light. Einstein's wave-particle duality was certainly nothing new!
Huygens therefore does not doubt the validity of optical laws that say that light travels in straight lines, that the angles of incidence and reflection are equal or that refraction obeys the law of sines.
That is all and well, but what is the relation between those particles that make up light, and those waves that the same part ... (read more)Latest replies:
- Hachem El Ouggouti, 2017-01-24 : __Chapter One (2)__ Huygens' central idea is "_that one and the same particle of matter can serve for many wave... (read more)
- Hachem El Ouggouti, 2017-01-29 : [Fo http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k5659616j/f1.image# ] __Chapter Two: On Reflexion__ revolves around the drawing... (read more)
- Hachem El Ouggouti, 2017-01-30 : __Chapter Three: On Refraction__ revolves around the drawing p.49/35. The drawing, just like those in the first and the... (read more)
- Hachem El Ouggouti, 2017-01-30 : __Chapter Three: On Refraction (2)__ What is the empirical status of the line BN? Remember that it is formed by drawing... (read more)
- Hachem El Ouggouti, 2017-02-01 : __Fermat's Illusion: the Rule of Least Possible Time__ This rule has made a great impression not only on illustrious... (read more)
2017-01-18I worry that I may have missed something and my apologies if so, but I can find no global category for my writings. The topic is usually nonduality, either directly or as the general context, yet there is no category for this. I do not wish to use the 'Idealism' category since it is not a mind-only theory, nor 'Monism' since it is not a reduction to a numerical one.
Nondualism is an ancient and firmly-established position that should be distinguished from most forms of Idealism and Monism. Yet there is nowhere to place essays on this topic. At present I am forced to use 'Metaphysics. Misc.', which makes little sense given the respectability, importance and global popularity of my view.
The absence of such a category means that writing cannot be collected together and browsed under a common heading and cannot be searched for by those who wish to familiarise themselves with this view.
It also suggests that there is a blind-spot in the approach to philosophy being adopted here. I can und ... (read more)
2017-01-09Can someone explain to me how to make sense of direct realism, more precisely : how can one claim that to perceive is to have direct access to the object itself if we grant that perceiving is the end product of a certain pattern of neurons firing ?
I can understand direct realism on aristotelian grounds where an objective form leaves the object and penetrates the intellect, but if firing neurons are involved, aren't we obliged to say that the brain reconstructs the "thing in itself" ? (I understand also the problems involved with the theory of sense-data and the motivations that originate from physicalism : my question is purely regarding the constraints imposed by basic neurological ideas).Latest replies:
- Alan Charles McKay, 2017-01-18 : I'll try to give a McDowellian answer to your question,It is of course correct that neuronal mechanisms provide a sc... (read more)
- David DiDomenico, 2017-01-18 : Good question. I'm not sure how the underlying neural patterns would be relevant in this debate. For the direct real... (read more)
- James M. Huebner, 2017-01-18 : I think this issue turns on two senses of the way we use the term "objective". In most cases, the term is mean... (read more)
- Robert Sawyer, 2017-01-18 : One way to make sense of direct realism is to place its claims in the context of human life as we ordinarily understand... (read more)
- Peter G. Jones, 2017-02-16 : Direct realism seems to be incomprehensible. I would go with the view that what we call objects are conceptual imputatio... (read more)
- 3 more ..
2017-01-09Aristotle claimed that the supralunar realm was composed solely of ether. But did he believe the moon was also made only of ether or did he express doubt about this ? And if he did believe the moon was made solely of ether, how did he explain away the imperfections of the moon which can be seen by the naked eye ?
1 - 20 / 676loading ..Home | New books and articles | Bibliographies | Philosophy journals | Discussions | Article Index | About PhilPapers | API | Contact us | Code of conduct
terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications).
Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Page generated Tue Apr 20 02:39:35 2021 on pp1