19th Century Japanese Philosophy, Misc

This important volume introduces the reader to a variety of schools of thought. Ideal for classroom use, this is the ultimate resource for students and teachers of Japanese philosophy.

For the ninth volume of Frontiers of Japanese Philosophy, titled bilingually in French and English Philosopher la traduction/Philosophizing translation, most of the contributors wrote their articles in foreign languages. By claiming that philosophy has a fundamental “translation-ness”, the editor believes that we can open Japanese philosophy to pluralistic orientations from the perspective of the thematic of “translation,” and in doing so probe into the essential problems of Japanese philosophy. The pieces collected here focus on questions of translation derived from observations (...) of East Asian history and culture where we can place Japanese philosophy. They provide diverse discourses on philosophical translation. (shrink)

In Search of the Way deals with intellectual and religious developments in early-modern Japan. It touches on the fate of Christianity but mainly covers Buddhism, Shinto, and Neo-Confucianism, particularly the latter. Of central concern is the constant debate over how society should be organized and how the individual can achieve self-fulfilment as just one element of a larger whole. It touches on such matters as ritual, pilgrimage, and religion in practice, but the emphasis is on ideological debate, disagreement, and consensus.

Originally published as 「明治の哲学界：有機体の哲学とその系譜」in 井上克人編『豊饒なる明治』, Kansai Daigaku Shuppannbu, 2012, 3–22. Translated by Morisato Takeshi. German Idealism was introduced to Japanese intellectuals in the middle of Meiji era and was mainly received from a mystical or religious perspective, as we see in Inoue Tetsujirō’s “harmonious existence,” Inoue Enryō’s “unity of mind and body,” and Kiyozawa Manshi’s “existentialism.” Since these theories envisioned true reality as a unified and living whole, I group them under the label “philosophy of organism” and from there argue (...) that their conviction that “all is truth and truth is all” was shaped in large part by the Awakening of Faith in the Mahayana. The understanding of Buddhist concepts by Meiji philosophers was philosophical in its content, and those who devoted themselves to the study of Western philosophy were encouraged to describe Eastern thought in Western philosophical terms. As a result, the philosophical world of the Meiji era developed an original standpoint that unified Eastern and Western perspectives by means of a logic of “phenomena-in-reality.”. (shrink)

福澤諭吉‐丸山眞男らの近代日本理解を批判。通説を覆す気鋭の問題作!徳川期は旧弊なる儒教社会であり、明治はそこから脱皮し西洋化する―という通説は誤りである!明治以降、国民が、実は虚妄であるところの“主体 化”によって“序列化”し、天皇中心の思想的枠組みを構築する論理を明快に暴き出す野心作である。.

中世から近世に移るカオスの中で人びとはどのように生き、社会の中で思想を形成していったか。本書はそこにみられる、近代が切り捨ててきた、人と人とのつながりを真摯に追求する。.

Conceptions of Geist (mind/spirit) associated with German Romanticism shaped ideologies of national folk, not only in Europe but elsewhere in the world. In Meiji Japan (1868hidden essencespirit” in Meiji Japan and to a critique of present-day exclusionary ideologies of Japanese spirit and identity.

Introduction: Ethics and the universal in Meiji Japan -- Civilization and foolishness : contextualizing ethics in early Meiji Japan -- The epistemology of Rinrigaku -- Rinrigaku and religion : the formation and fluidity of moral subjectivity -- Resisting civilizational hierarchies : the ethics of spirit and the spirit of the people -- Approaching the moral ideal : national morality, the state, and dangerous thought -- Epilogue: The ethics of humanism and moral particularism in twentieth-century Japan.

This essay explores the sudden emergence of Neo-Confucianism as an independent intellectual and professional calling, and its adoption by both scholars and political leaders as the dominant intellectual and epistemological discourse in early modern Japan (1600-1868). I shall do this by examining two of the mostimportant early Neo-Confucian converts from Zen Buddhism, Fujiwara Seika and Hayashi Razan during the late 16th and the early 17th centuries. Their conversions were initially separate events, each prompted by personal circumstances and choices. But these (...) converts later sparked the appearance of other exclusive Neo-Confucianists, and eventually to the new intellectual mainstream of a Neo-Confucianism independent of Buddhism, during the Tokugawa period. Previous scholars have approached the issue of these converts from Zen to Neo-Confucianism through the lens of a philosophical shift. However, this is a hasty conclusion which ignores socio-intellectual factors surrounding these converts’ life and situation. My preliminary research reveals that Neo-Confucianconversion was not the result of philosophical change; rather, it was propelled by practical and utilitarian motivation. They abandoned Buddhism to locate themselves as ‘professional’ Neo-Confucianists, and this strategy successfully served their purpose. (shrink)

Around 1907, 1987, and 2007 Japan faced a crossroads in defining internationalism and Asianism, determining their relative priorities, and assessing their relevance for national identity. Similarities can be found in the far-reaching changes occurring in Japan's external environment in the three periods and in the importance of setting a new direction for strategic thinking. Misjudgments in the first two periods are reviewed in order to draw lessons for responding to today's challenges. A distorted outlook on internationalism led to rejection of (...) shifts in US thinking welcomed elsewhere in the global community. Now as attention focuses on debates over the Six-Party Talks as a test of internationalization and over the East Asian Community and regionalism as a test of Asianism, it is possible that the riveting impact of the issue, as with the issue 20 years earlier, will remain a symbol that trumps a strategic approach toward Asia at a moment of far-reaching regional reorganization. Shortcomings in dealing with the concepts internationalism and Asianism are connected; at the very time the Japanese struggle with one, they are also at an impasse over the other. The same set of factors may be at work: an absence of agreed principles on which to anchor foreign policy; fragmented strategic thinking that loses sight of interconnections and the big picture; and national identity that excessively separates Japan from global forces that transform politics and society and that narrowly compartmentalize the historical developments that shaped relations with Asian countries without capturing the fundamental regional dynamics. (shrink)

日本朱子学、日本陽明学、徂徠学、幕末思想など、代表的な思想家たちの歴史観/政治観を軸に近世を俯瞰する著者の代表研究。.

本書の第1部は近代日本の思想家がグリーンの理想主義をどのように受容し、それをどう批判し、日本の伝統的思想とどのように融合させ、独自の思想を展開してきたかを中心問題とする。とりあげられる思想家・学者は中 島力造・高山樗牛、綱島梁川、西田幾多郎、河合榮治郎の五人である。第2部はグリーンの形而上学、道徳哲学、政治哲学、宗教思想の中心問題を永遠意識の視点から体系的に再検討することを目的とした。.

In this essay I describe the development of Japanese criminal law theories with a focus on criminal attempt theories. ;As the certain instability exists in modern theories on criminal attempts, I will explain the cause of this instability. ;By this explanation I will told you about the reason why I have chosen this theme as that of my doctorate dissertation. ;In attempted crime there is no objective infringement on the interests, which are protected by criminal laws. It is the reason (...) why punishment on attempted crime is unclearly justified in general than in consummated crime. For this reason there are many unsolved problems in theories and practices concerning criminal attempts. This has led to instability in scholarly theories and judicial precedents, However, if a theory to clarify a reason for punishing criminal attempt can be established, it will contribute to setting up a coherent thinking process throughout the general theory on entire criminal law. Therefore, the subject of my essay is of importance. ;Secondly, I will explain the reason why I chose the theories at the Meiji era as theme of my research. The Meiji era was a crucial period in the history of Japanese criminal law. During this era, when the modernization of Japan began, West European models of criminal codes and theories were first introduced to the nation. Therefore, in order to understand the complicated nature of the criminal attempt theories in modern Japan correctly, it is important to trace the originals at Meiji era, when West European criminal law, particularly the highly modernized and civilized post-revolutionary French criminal law was introduced into Japan. In this essay I have made clear that theories about the criminal law took root in Japan after adjustment for a long time. ;In my research on the history of criminal attempt theory I illustrate how the western theories were transformed, and took root in Japan. This work refers to theories by several famous Japanese judicial practitioners and legislators such as Mr. Kozoh MIYAGUI, Dr. Shouichi INOUYE, Dr. Chu EGUI and Mr. Renzoh KOGA. Especially, it refers to theory by Dr. G. Boissonade, the French legal scholar, who contributed greatly to introducing French criminal law and theory into Japan. ;To conclude, the French l'Ecole neo-classique theory which sought to check the abuse of power by despotic government in order to protect civil rights against it, were first introduced in Japan, followed by German-influenced theory. (shrink)

The importation of Spencerism and Social Darwinism into Japan in the early Meiji era occurred against a background of rapid economic and industrial change which provoked widespread political unrest. This accelerated modernization was forced by Western demands for trade liberalization and the threat of Western imperialism. In this context, selected elements of Western scientific naturalism and liberalism could provide a prestigious ratification of élite agendas for the management of change, provided they could be made culturally recognizable. It is suggested that (...) traditional and Western knowledge claims were combined by key Meiji intellectuals in such a way that the product, Meiji Social Darwinism, supplied both the prestige of Western scientific positivism and the familiarity conferred by traditional resources. The clear differentiation between the constituents which made up Meiji Social Darwinism enables us to identify the distinct cultural functions performed by each of these sets of resources. In this study, these cultural functions emerge as elements in an élite class strategy. (shrink)