This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories

334 found
Order:
1 — 50 / 334
  1. Meinong's Much Maligned Modal Moment.K. A. - 2002 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 64 (1):95-118.
    Russell's objections to object-theory have been refuted by the proofs of the consistency of Meinong's system given by various writers. These proofs exploit technical distinctions that Meinong apparently uses very little if at all. Instead, Meinong introduces a theoretical postulate called the modal moment. I describe this postulate and its place in Meinong's system, and I argue that it has been much under-rated by Meinong's logician expositors.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2. A. Meinong, Ueber Die Bedeutung des Weberschen Gesetzes.R. Adamson - 1883 - Mind 8:251.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3. Evelyn Dölling, 'Wahrheit Suchen Und Wahrheit Bekennen ,' Alexius Meinong: Skizze Seines Lebens Rodopi, Amsterdam 1999, Pp. 266. [REVIEW]Liliana Albertazzi - 2000 - Axiomathes 11 (1-3):137-141.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4. The Philosophy of Alexius Meinong.Liliana Albertazzi - 1996 - Axiomathes 7 (1-2).
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5. Forms of Completion.Liliana Albertazzi - 1995 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 50:321-340.
    The essay underlines the complementarity between theory and experimentation as a characteristic feature of the Meinong-school. In particular, it deals with the nucleus of a theory of presentation implicit in the theory of production. In fact, on the basis of Benussi's experimental results, I distinguish between presentation and representation, relatively to the various phases of the moment-now as the qualitative primitive of cognition. This result has various consequences which shed light on the act-side: it shows that the production relation relates (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  6. Brentano, Meinong and Husserl on Internal Time.Liliana Albertazzi - 1993 - Brentano Studien 3:89-110.
    Brentano's Descriptive Psychology marks a breakthrough into clarification of internal time, made possible by using his doctrine of intentionality (and modality) of consciousness. Husserl's version of descriptive psychology, a pure phenomenological psychology, according to its author tries to overcome Brentano's (naturalistic) description of internal experience by explicitly considering the intentional content of mental events, and the different categories of objects as objects of a possible consciousness. Husserl's investigations on internal time are an example of a quite specific sort of genetic (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  7. The School of Alexius Meinong.Liliana Albertazzi, Dale Jacquette & Roberto Poli - 2001
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  8. Meinong prima di meinong. Alcune note per Una storia degli oggetti impossibili.Antonio Allegra - 2010 - Giornale di Metafisica 32 (3):595-609.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9. Existence, Fiction, Assumption. Meinongian Themes and the History of Austrian Philosophy. Meinong Studies, Vol. VI.Mauro Antonelli & Marian David (eds.) - 2016 - de Gruyter.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10. Logical, Ontological, and Historical Contributions on the Philosophy of Alexius Meinong.Mauro Antonelli & Marian David (eds.) - 2014 - De Gruyter.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11. Talking About Nothing. Numbers, Hallucinations, and Fictions.István Aranyosi - 2012 - Philosophy 87 (1):145-150.
    If everything exists, then it looks, prima facie, as if talking about nothing is equivalent to not talking about anything. However, we appear as talking or thinking about particular nothings, that is, about particular items that are not among the existents. How to explain this phenomenon? One way is to deny that everything exists, and consequently to be ontologically committed to nonexistent “objects”. Another way is to deny that the process of thinking about such nonexistents is a genuine singular thought. (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  12. Reacting to Meinong.David M. Armstrong - 1995 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 50:615-627.
    1. Some reasons are given for rejecting the view that there are entities that do not exist. 2. It is suggested, nevertheless, that this view has some plausibility when we consider unrealized empirical possibilities. 3. Even if non-existent entities are rejected, there remains Meinong's distinction between object and objectives, roughly: things and facts. The author would analyze objects in terms of objectives, yielding a world of facts.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13. Alexius Meinong. Teoria dell'oggetto. [REVIEW]G. Auletta - 2004 - Epistemologia 27 (1):167-169.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  14. Marty and Meinong on What Judgements Are About.Giuliano Bacigalupo - 2017 - In Hamid Taieb & Guillaume Fréchette (eds.), Mind and Language – on the Philosophy of Anton Marty. De Gruyter. pp. 195-218.
    In this paper, I analyse and compare Anton Marty’s and Alexius Meinong’s theories of judgement. There are at least two reasons speaking in favour of such a comparison. First, both philosophers were influenced by Franz Brentano’s approach to consciousness, in general, and by his theory of judgement, in particular: in differing degrees, Marty and Meinong may be considered pupils of Brentano. Second, the two philosophers introduced similar amendments to Brentano’s approach. According to Brentanian orthodoxy, we do not have access to (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15. Une balistique de l'intentionnalité. Compte rendu de Arkadiusz Chrudzimski, Gegenstandstheorie und Theorie der Intentionalität bei Alexius Meinong, Dordrecht, Springer, 2007, 386 pages. [REVIEW]Giuliano Bacigalupo - 2010 - Methodos 10.
    Comme le titre l’indique (« Théorie de l’objet et intentionnalité chez Alexius Meining »), ce volume d’Arkadiusz Chrudzimski récemment publié chez Springer a pour but d´étudier les multiples connexions entre la théorie de l’intentionnalité et la théorie de l’objet au sein du développement de la pensée d’Alexius Meinong (1853-1920). Plus précisément, selon l’auteur, la théorie de l’objet formulée par Meinong en 1904 – dans ses traits fondamentaux mais pas définitifs – serait l’aboutissement in..
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  16. Robin, D. Rollinger, Austrian Phenomenology: Brentano, Husserl, Meinong, and Others on Mind and Object. [REVIEW]Kimberly Baltzer-Jaray - 2011 - Symposium 15 (2):209-212.
  17. Meinong's Hume Studies: Part II. Meinong's Analysis of Relations.Kenneth Barber - 1971 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 31 (4):564-584.
  18. Meinong's Hume Studies: Part I: Meinong's Nominalism.Kenneth Barber - 1970 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 30 (4):550-567.
  19. Meinong's 'Hume Studies': Translation and Commentary.Kenneth Frank Barber - 1966 - Dissertation, The University of Iowa
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  20. Introduzione. I pregiudizi hanno le gambe corte.Carola Barbero & Venanzio Raspa - 2005 - Rivista di Estetica 45 (3):3-26.
    According to Alexius Meinong, in order to give a philosophical explanation of the world we need to consider both existent and nonexistent objects, lest we fall into the "prejudice in favour of the real". The paper starts by examining some basic concepts of object theory seen as an existence-free science (modes of being, principle of independence of so-being from being, "Aussersein" and Meinong's paradox). There follows an exposition of Bertrand Russell's position, characterized by a "robust sense of reality", and afterwards (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  21. Meinong Values.Wilhelm Baumgartner & Wojciech Zełaniec - 1996 - Axiomathes 7 (1-2):233-239.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  22. Review: Terence Parsons, Nonexistent Objects. [REVIEW]George Bealer - 1984 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 49 (2):652-655.
  23. Review of G. Priest, Towards Non-Being: The Logic and Metaphysics of Intentionality[REVIEW]Jc Beall - 2006 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2006 (9).
  24. Meinong's Theory of Objects and Values.David R. Bell - 1964 - Philosophical Books 5 (1):8-9.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  25. The Neo-Meinongian Conception of Existence.R. Belohrad - 2003 - Filosoficky Casopis 51 (1):57-69.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  26. Meinong: A Critique From the Left.Ermanno Bencivenga - 1985 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 25:461-483.
    Meinong justifies the need of his Gegenstandstheorie by presenting it as a generalization of (existing) metaphysics, in that the former deals with both existent and non-existent objects, whereas the latter used to deal with existent objects only. But this justification is disingenuous, since the notion of a non-existent object is virtually a contradiction in terms for the traditional paradigm. What Meinong is really proposing is a conceptual revolution of a Kantian variety, and we need to get clearer about the full (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  27. Realism: A Critique of Brentano and Meinong.Gustav Bergmann - 1967 - University of Wisconsin Press.
  28. Modal Meinongianism and Fiction: The Best of Three Worlds.Francesco Berto - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 152 (3):313-35.
    We outline a neo-Meinongian framework labeled as Modal Meinongian Metaphysics (MMM) to account for the ontology and semantics of fictional discourse. Several competing accounts of fictional objects are originated by the fact that our talking of them mirrors incoherent intuitions: mainstream theories of fiction privilege some such intuitions, but are forced to account for others via complicated paraphrases of the relevant sentences. An ideal theory should resort to as few paraphrases as possible. In Sect. 1, we make this explicit via (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  29. Realism. A Critique of Brentano and Meinong by Gustav Bergmann. [REVIEW]Guido Bonino - 2018 - Humana Mente 6 (25).
  30. Beyond Russell and Meinong.V. Warren Bourgeois - 1981 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 11 (4):653 - 666.
    This paper adjudicates the debate between russell and meinong on the tenability of meinong's theory of objects. The conclusion is that while russell did not adequately reply to meinong's defence of the theory, The defence is nonetheless, Unsuccessful. The contemporary interest in meinong's theory, The controversial features of the theory, Russell's objections, And meinong's replies are discussed.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  31. Pure Objects and the Ontological Argument.R. Brecher - 1975 - Sophia 14 (3):10-18.
  32. Sechs Briefe an A. Meinong.Franz Brentano - 1965 - In R. Kindinger (ed.), Philosophenbriefe: Aus der wissenschaftlichen Korrespondenz von A. Meinong. Akademische Druck u. Verlagsanstalt.
  33. The Phenomenology of Adolf Reinach: Chapters in the Theory of Knowledge and Legal Philosophy.Lucinda Ann Vandervort Brettler - 1973 - Dissertation, McGill University (Canada)
  34. Critical Notice of A. Meinong, Über Annahmen (Leipzig, 1910).C. D. Broad - unknown
    Everyone is or ought to be acquainted with the thesis of Meinong's extraordinarily able and important work. It is that beside acts of judgment and ideas there is an intermediate kind of psychical state -- the act of supposing -- which resembles judgment in that its content can be affirmative or negative, but differs from it and resembles ideas in that it is unaccompanied by conviction. Meinong tries to show that it is necessary to assume such acts for a variety (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  35. MEINONG, A. - Über Annahmen. [REVIEW]C. D. Broad - 1913 - Mind 22:90.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  36. Review of Nicholas Griffin, Dale Jacquette (Eds.), Russell Vs. Meinong: The Legacy of "on Denoting"[REVIEW]Berit Brogaard - 2009 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2009 (4).
  37. Handbook of Metaphysics and Ontology.Hans Burkhardt & Barry Smith (eds.) - 1991 - Philosophia Verlag.
    The Handbook of Metaphysics and Ontology reflects the conviction that the history of metaphysics and current work in metaphysics and ontology can each throw valuable light on the other. Thus it is designed to serve both äs a means of making more widely accessible the results of recent scholarship in the history of philosophy, and also äs a unique work of reference in reladon to the metaphysical themes at the centre of much current debate in analyüc philosophy. The work contains (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  38. Our Robust Sense of ReaUty.Panayot Butchvarov - 1985 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 25:403-421.
    Anti-Meinongian philosophers, such as Russell, do not explain what they mean by existence when they deny that there are nonexistent objects — they just sense robustly. I argue that any plausible explanation of what they mean tends to undermine their view and to support the Meinongian view. But why are they so strongly convinced that they are right? I argue that the reason is to be found in the special character of the concept of existence, which has been insufficiently examined (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  39. Did Meinong Plant a Jungle?Richard Campbell - 1972 - Philosophical Papers 1 (2):89-102.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  40. Suarez and Meinong on Beings of Reason and Non-Existent Objects.Bernardo J. Cantens - 1999 - Dissertation, University of Miami
    The central purpose of this dissertation is to compare Suarez's treatment of beings of reason with Meinong's treatment of non-existent objects. The dissertation is divided into three parts. In the first part I analyze Suarez's view of beings of reason. I do this first by giving a general overview of Suarez's philosophy ; second, by explaining Suarez's notion of real being ; and finally, by analyzing Suarez's notion of beings of reason . In the second part I analyze Meinong's view (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  41. Meinong and Reference.James John Cappio - 1981 - Dissertation, Princeton University
    Alexius Meinong's Theory of Objects is known to the Anglo-American philosophical community almost exclusively through Bertrand Russell's criticism of the theory in "On Denoting" and later works, and even though certain recent writers have urged that the interpretive tradition intitated by Russell is importantly in error, no interpretation designed to present Meinongianism as a coherent genuine alternative to the Russellian tradition in semantics has yet been offered. This study contributes to such an alternative interpretation, employing a combination of historical and (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  42. On Assumptions. By Alexius Meinong.Lawrence R. Carleton - 1987 - Modern Schoolman 64 (2):136-138.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  43. Meinong and Bühler.Serena Cattaruzza - 1996 - Axiomathes 7 (1-2):103-110.
  44. Relations, Quasi-Assumptions and Material Aprioris: Reality and Values in Brentano, Meinong, Husserl.Beatrice Centi - 2009 - In Beatrice Centi & Huemer Wolfgang (eds.), Value and Ontology. Ontos. pp. 12-45.
  45. Relations, Quasi-Assumptions, and Material Aprioris: Reality and Values in Brentano, Meinong, Husserl.Beatrice Centi - 2009 - In B. Centi & W. Huemer (eds.), Value and Ontology. Ontos.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  46. Brentano and Meinong Studies.Roderick M. Chisholm - 1982 - Rodopi.
  47. Homeless Objects.Roderick M. Chisholm - 1973 - Revue Internationale de Philosophie 22 (2/3=104/105):207.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  48. Meinong's Theory of Intentionality.A. Chrudzimski - 2001 - Dialectica 55 (2):119-143.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  49. Sachverhalte, Objekte und Supervenienz. Brentano, Marty und Meinong.Arkadiusz Chrudzimski - 2009 - Brentano Studien 12:99-119.
    Die offizielle Urteilstheorie Brentanos war eine nicht-propositionale Theorie. Die These, dass man, um die in einem Urteilsakt involvierten intentionalen Beziehungen zu erklären, keine propositionalen Entitäten einführen muss, war in der Tat eine seiner interessantesten Ideen. Brentano hat aber im Laufe seiner Lehrtätigkeit sehr viele neue Wege ausprobiert und so finden wir in seinen Vorlesungen aus den späten achtziger Jahren auch eine Urteilstheorie, die jedem Urteilsakt eine propositionale Entität zuordnet. Gerade diese Lehre war für Brentanos Studenten besonders inspirierend. Vor allem Anton (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  50. Brentano, Marty, and Meinong on Emotions and Values.Arkadiusz Chrudzimski - 2009 - In Beatrice Centi & Huemer Wolfgang (eds.), Value and Ontology. Ontos. pp. 12--171.
    At least since Hume we have a serious problem with explaining our moral valuations. Most of us – with notable exception of certain (in)famous esoteric thinkers like Nietzsche or De Sade – share a common intuition that our moral claims are in an important sense objective. We believe that they can be right or wrong; and we believe that if they happen to be right, then they are binding for each human being conducting a similar action in similar circumstances. Now (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
1 — 50 / 334