This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories

43 found
Order:
  1. Other People's Experiences.Peter Alexander - 1950 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 51:25-46.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. Plantinga and Other Minds.Karl Ameriks - 1973 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 16 (4):285-91.
    Alvin plantinga has presented various counterexamples to the argument from analogy for other minds. I argue that the implausibility of the counterexample inferences plantinga offers depends not on a weakness essential to the analogical argument but rather on features peculiar to the inferences he provides. My procedure is to establish a number of necessary conditions for any acceptable analogical argument and then to show plantinga's counterexamples fail to meet these conditions. I then construct an analogical argument for other minds which (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. The Problem of Other Minds.Bruce Aune - 1961 - Philosophical Review 70 (July):320-339.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  4. Other Minds.Anita Avramides - 2001 - Routledge.
    How do I know whether there are any minds beside my own? This problem of other minds in philosophy raises questions which are at the heart of all philosophical investigations--how it is that we know, what is in the mind, and whether we can be certain about any of our beliefs. In this book, Anita Avramides begins with a historical overview of the problem from the Ancient Skeptics to Descartes, Malebranche, Locke, Berkeley, Reid, and Wittgenstein. The second part of the (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   22 citations  
  5. Structure-Mapping: Directions From Simulation to Theory.Theodore Bach - 2011 - Philosophical Psychology 24 (1):23-51.
    The theory of mind debate has reached a “hybrid consensus” concerning the status of theory-theory and simulation-theory. Extant hybrid models either specify co-dependency and implementation relations, or distribute mentalizing tasks according to folk-psychological categories. By relying on a non-developmental framework these models fail to capture the central connection between simulation and theory. I propose a “dynamic” hybrid that is informed by recent work on the nature of similarity cognition. I claim that Gentner’s model of structure-mapping allows us to understand simulation (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  6. A Note on Hampshire's Analogy.Jules Belford - 1972 - Mind 81 (October):600.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. Analogy and the Concept of Behaviour.Thomas W. Bestor - 1978 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 16 (2):3-20.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. Analogy, Induction and Other Minds.Theodore W. Budlong - 1975 - Analysis 35 (January):111-112.
    Alvin plantinga and michael slote, Following ayer, Have attempted to formulate the argument from analogy for the existence of other minds as an enumerative induction. Their way of avoiding the 'generalizing from a single case' objection is shown to be fallacious.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. Criteria, Analogy, and Knowledge of Other Minds.Hector-Neri Castañeda - 1962 - Journal of Philosophy 59 (20):533 - 546.
  10. Analogy.Todd Davies - manuscript
    This essay (my undergraduate honors thesis at Stanford, issued by the Center for the Study of Language and Information in November 1985) constructs a theory of analogy as it applies to argumentation and reasoning, especially as used in fields such as philosophy and law. The word analogy has been used in different senses, which the essay defines. The theory developed herein applies to analogia rationis, or analogical reasoning. Building on the framework of situation theory, a type of logical relation called (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. Perceiving Other Animate Minds in Augustine.Chad Engelland - 2016 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 90 (1):25-48.
    This paper dispels the Cartesian reading of Augustine’s treatment of mind and other minds by examining key passages from De Trinitate and De Civitate Dei. While Augustine does vigorously argue that mind is indubitable and immaterial, he disavows the fundamental thesis of the dualistic tradition: the separation of invisible spirit and visible body. The immediate self-awareness of mind includes awareness of life, that is, of animating a body. Each of us animates our own body; seeing other animated bodies enables us (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. Other Minds and the Egocentric Predicament.Herbert Feigl - 1959 - Journal of Philosophy 56:980-87.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. Two Analogy Strategies: The Cases of Mind Metaphors and Introspection.Eugen Fischer - forthcoming - Connection Science.
    Analogical reasoning is often employed in problem-solving and metaphor interpretation. This paper submits that, as a default, analogical reasoning addressing these different tasks employs different mapping strategies: In problem-solving, it employs analogy-maximising strategies (like structure mapping, Gentner & Markman 1997); in metaphor interpretation, analogy-minimising strategies (like ATT-Meta, Barnden 2015). The two strategies interact in analogical reasoning with conceptual metaphors. This interaction leads to predictable fallacies. The paper supports these hypotheses through case-studies on ‘mind’-metaphors from ordinary discourse, and abstract problem-solving in (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. Something-We-Know-Not-What, Something-We-Know-Not-Why: Berkeley, Meaning and Minds.Melissa Frankel - 2009 - Philosophia 37 (3):381-402.
    It is sometimes suggested that Berkeley adheres to an empirical criterion of meaning, on which a term is meaningful just in case it signifies an idea (i.e., an immediate object of perceptual experience). This criterion is thought to underlie his rejection of the term ‘matter’ as meaningless. As is well known, Berkeley thinks that it is impossible to perceive matter. If one cannot perceive matter, then, per Berkeley, one can have no idea of it; if one can have no idea (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  15. Mr Hampshire on the Analogy of Feeling.Erik Gotlind - 1954 - Mind 63 (October):519-524.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. The Force of Sympathy in the Ethics of David Hume.Lorenzo Greco - 2012 - In Lorenzo Greco & Alessio Vaccari (eds.), Hume Readings. Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura. pp. 193-210.
  17. The Analogy of Feeling.Stuart N. Hampshire - 1952 - Mind 61 (January):1-12.
    In this article the author is concerned with the justification of the knowledge of other minds by virtue of statements of other people's feelings based upon inductive arguments of any ordinary pattern as being inferences from the observed to the unobserved of a familiar and accepted form. The author argues that they are not logically peculiar or invalid, When considered as inductive arguments. The author also proposes that solipsism is a linguistically absurd thesis, While at the same time stopping to (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  18. Our Knowledge of Other Minds.C. D. Hardie - 1939 - Philosophy of Science 6 (3):309-317.
    I give some reason for accepting a form of the view that there is some logical, And not just contingent, Connection between publicly observable behavior and a person's psychological states. If my contentions are sound, They open the way to the enterprise of delineating a stratification of psychological state concepts. This involves determining which mental concepts are logically connected to observable behavior and how the other categories of mental states are specified on the basis of these.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. Other Minds, Rationality and Analogy.Jane Heal - 2000 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 74 (74):1-19.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. A Reply to Don Locke.Alec Hyslop - 1975 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 53 (1):68-69.
  21. The Analogical Inference to Other Minds.Alec Hyslop & Frank Jackson - 1972 - American Philosophical Quarterly 9 (June):168-76.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  22. Just What is Wrong with the Argument From Analogy?Don Locke - 1973 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 51 (August):153-56.
    A reply to hyslop and jackson, American philosophical quarterly, April 1972: I argue that the argument form analogy begs the question, Much as does the inductive justification of induction, Of which it is a version.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  23. Other Minds.Douglas C. Long - 1975 - Teaching Philosophy 1 (2):179-181.
    D. C. Long’s review of a monograph Godfrey Vesey prepared on the problem of our knowledge of other minds for the Open University series on problems of philosophy. Vesey discusses philosophers’ disenchantment with the traditional argument from analogy as a solution to the problem. This has been fostered by Wittgensteinian objections to the idea that psychological words get their meaning by reference to our own “private” experiences. Vesey similarly argues for the thesis that a person cannot be said to understand (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24. Analogy, Verification, and Other Minds.J. W. Meiland - 1966 - Mind 75 (October):564-568.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25. Three Problems About Other Minds.W. W. Mellor - 1956 - Mind 65 (April):200-217.
  26. Review of Alex Hyslop's "Other Minds". [REVIEW]Andrew Melnyk - 1996 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 74 (2):383-384.
  27. Evidential Necessity and Other Minds.Anne H. Narveson - 1966 - Mind 75 (January):114-121.
  28. Analogía, prudencia y abducción en la racionalidad interpretativa.María G. Navarro - 2006 - In Mauricio Beuchot (ed.), Contextos de la hermenéutica analógica. Editorial Torres Asociados.
  29. The Analogical Argument for Knowledge of Other Minds Reconsidered.Thomas M. Olshewsky - 1974 - American Philosophical Quarterly 11 (January):63-69.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30. Comment on Paul Ziff's The Simplicity of Other Minds.Alvin Plantinga - 1965 - Journal of Philosophy 62 (October):585-586.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. Our Evidence for the Existence of Other Minds.H. H. Price - 1938 - Philosophy 13 (52):425-56.
    In ordinary life everyone assumes that he has a great deal of knowledge about other minds or persons. This assumption has naturally aroused the curiosity of philosophers; though perhaps they have not been as curious about it as they ought to have been, for they have devoted many volumes to our consciousness of the material world, but very few to our consciousness of one another. It was thought at one time that each of us derives his knowledge of other minds (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  32. Other Minds and the Arment From Analogy.Stephen Prior & Henrik Rosenmeier - 1979 - Philosophical Investigations 2 (4):12-33.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  33. Other Minds and the Argument From.Stephen Prior & Henrik Rosenmeier - 1979 - Philosophical Investigations 2:12-33.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34. Professor Ayer's Query on 'Other Minds'.C. D. Rollins - 1947 - Analysis 8 (June):87-92.
  35. Human Knowledge: Its Scope and Limits.Bertrand Russell - 2009 - Routledge.
    How do we know what we "know"? How did we –as individuals and as a society – come to accept certain knowledge as fact? In _Human Knowledge,_ Bertrand Russell questions the reliability of our assumptions on knowledge. This brilliant and controversial work investigates the relationship between ‘individual’ and ‘scientific’ knowledge. First published in 1948, this provocative work contributed significantly to an explosive intellectual discourse that continues to this day.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   19 citations  
  36. Analogy.Bertrand Russell - 1948 - In David J. Chalmers (ed.), Human Knowledge: Its Scope and Limits. Simon & Schuster.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  37. The Range Principle and the Problem of Other Minds.Paul T. Sagal & Gunnar Borg - 1993 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 44 (3):477-91.
  38. A Defense of Mill on Other Minds.Charles Sayward - 2003 - Dialectica 57 (3):315–322.
    This paper seeks to explain why the argument from analogy seems strong to an analogist such as Mill and weak to the skeptic. The inference from observed behavior to the existence of feelings, sensations, etc., in other subjects is justified, but its justification depends on taking observed behavior and feelings, sensations, and so on, to be not merely correlated, but connected. It is claimed that this is what Mill had in mind.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. The Argument From Analogy is Not an Argument for Other Mnds.Richard I. Sikora - 1977 - American Philosophical Quarterly 14 (April):137-41.
    If the argument from analogy is an argument for other minds it must rely on a single case, The correlation of your mind with your body. If instead it only attempts to show that certain sorts of experiences are associated with other bodies, It can rely on innumerable correlations of your experiences with your behavior. Having determined in this way that ostensive memories are associated with another body and that they are the kind one would expect if one mind had (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  40. Rediscovering Empathy: Agency, Folk Psycholgy, and the Human Sciences.Karsten Stueber - 2006 - MIT Press.
    I do not consider these objections to be able to dislodge my arguments for the epistemic centrality of empathy for understanding agency, since the empathy view is not in fact committed to an implausible Cartesian view of the mind. But I do ...
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   36 citations  
  41. The Argument From Analogy and the Problem of Other Minds.James F. Thomson - 1951 - Mind 60:336-50.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. David Hume and the Problem of Other Minds.Anik Waldow - 2009 - Continuum.
    Other minds and their place in the Hume-literature -- A modern approach -- Scepticism versus naturalism -- The vulgar and the philosopher -- Relative ideas -- Concepts of the real -- Intuition and common sense -- Epistemic responsibility -- Degeneration of reason -- Just philosophy -- Conceiving minds -- Abstraction -- Argument from analogy -- Sympathy -- Limitations -- Generality -- Hume's concept of mind -- The world and the other -- Habit and intersubjective responsiveness -- Belief and education -- (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  43. Hampshire's Analogy.Richard Wollheim - 1952 - Mind 61 (October):567-573.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation