This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories
Siblings:
621 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Order:
1 — 50 / 621
  1. Conceptual Surroundings Of Absolute (1991). Anselm W. Muller. In H. G. Lewis (ed.), Peter Geach: Philosophical Encounters. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 185.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. M. M. Adams (2004). Anselm on Faith and Reason. In Brian Leftow (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Anselm. Cambridge University Press. pp. 32--60.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  3. Marilyn Adams (1996). Confessions of a Rational Mystic: Anselm's Early Writings. [REVIEW] Speculum 71 (2):489-492.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. Marilyn Adams (1987). St. Anselm on the Goodness of God. Medioevo 13:75-102.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. Marilyn McCord Adams (2012). Evil as Nothing. Modern Schoolman 89 (3-4):131-145.
    Anselm inherited a Platonizing approach to philosophy from Augustine and Boethius. But he characteristically reworked what he found in their texts by questioning and disputing it into something more rigorous. In this paper, I compare and contrast Anselm’s treatment of the trope ‘evil is nothing, not a being’ withBoethius’s use of it in The Consolation of Philosophy. In the first section, I expose a fallacious argument form common to them both: paradigm Fness is identical with paradigm Gness; X participates in (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6. Marilyn McCord Adams (1996). Confessions of a Rational Mystic: Anselm's Early Writings.Gregory Schufreider. Speculum 71 (2):489-492.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. Marilyn Mccord Adams (1995). Satisfying Mercy: St. Anselm's "Cur Deus Homo", Reconsidered. Modern Schoolman 72 (2/3):91-108.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. Robert Merrihew Adams (1971). The Logical Structure of Anselm's Arguments. Philosophical Review 80 (1):28-54.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  9. Ja Aertsen (1987). Turns in Truth, Anselm-of-Canterbury, Aquinas, Thomas and Vico, Giovanni. Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 49 (2):187-239.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10. Mary Agnes Edsall (2010). Learning From the Exemplar: Anselm's Prayers and Meditations and the Charismatic Text. Mediaeval Studies 72.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. Scott Aikin & Michael Hodges (2014). St. Anselm's Ontological Argument as Expressive: A Wittgensteinian Reconstruction. Philosophical Investigations 37 (2):130-151.
    We offer a reading of Anselm's Ontological Argument inspired by Wittgenstein which focuses on the fact that the “argument” occurs in a prayer addressed to God, making it a strange argument since as a prayer it seems to presuppose its conclusion. We reconstruct the argument as expressive. Within the religious perspective, the issues are to be focused on the right object not to present an argument for the existence of God. While this sort of reading lets us understand much about (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. Harold E. Aikins (1959). Theobald, Archbishop of Canterbury. Avrom Saltman. Speculum 34 (4):674-677.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. Ignacio Escribano Alberca (1965). ""El Alcance Teológico Del" Proslogion" de San Anselmo. Verdad y Vida 23 (90):237-253.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. Claude Albert (2007). Mental Language and Tradition Encounters in Medieval Philosophy : Anselm, Albert and Ockham. In John Marenbon (ed.), The Many Roots of Medieval Logic: The Aristotelian and the Non-Aristotelian Traditions: Special Offprint of Vivarium 45, 2-3 (2007). Brill.
  15. M. Alberto (2001). Research on the Sources for the Theory of Paronyms in Anselm of Canterbury. Rivista di Filosofia Neo-Scolastica 93 (1):3-38.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. Robert E. Allinson (1993). Anselm's One Argument. Philosophical Inquiry 15 (1-2):16-19.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. Ciro E. Schmidt Andrade (forthcoming). En Anselmo de Canterbury. Sapientia.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. Ciro Schmidt Andrade (2009). La sabiduría desde el "Quarens intellectum" en Anselmo de Canterbury. Revista de filosofía (Chile) 41 (126):45-61.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. Alexander Andrée (2011). Anselm of Laon Unveiled: The Glosae Svper Iohannem and the Origins of the Glossa Ordinaria on the Bible. Mediaeval Studies 73:217-260.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. B. Angelet (1987). ''Idem Dicere in Corde, Et Cogitare''. Or: What We Still Can Learn From an Existential Anselm. Aquinas 30 (1):93-108.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. G. E. M. Anscombe (1993). Russelm or Anselm? Philosophical Quarterly 44 (173):500-504.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22. G. E. M. Anscombe (1985). Why Anselm's Proof in the Proslogion is Not an Ontological Argument. Thoreau Quarterly 17 (1-2):32-40.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23. G. E. M. Anscombe (1982). Por qué la prueba de Anselmo en el "Proslogion" no es un argumento ontológico. Anuario Filosófico 15 (2):9-18.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24. Anselm, Complete Philosophical and Theological Treatises of Anselm of Canterbury.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  25. Anselm, Proslogium; Monologium; Gaunilon's on Behalf of the Fool.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26. Anselm, Anselm on the Existence of God (Proslogion and Anselm's Reply to Gaunilo).
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. Anselm (1998). The Major Works. Oxford University Press.
    Although utterly convinced of the truth of Christianity, Anselm of Canterbury struggled to make sense of his religion. He considered the doctrines of faith an invitation to question, to think, and to learn; and he devoted his life to confronting and understanding the most elusive aspects of Christianity. His writings on matters such as free will, the nature of truth, and the existence of God make Anselm one of the greatest theologians and philosphers in history, and this translation provides readers (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  28. Anselm (1979). St. Anselm's Proslogion with a Reply on Behalf of the Fool. University of Notre Dame Press.
  29. Anselm (1977). St. Anselm's Treatise on Free Will: The Booke of Seynt Anselme Which Treatith of Free Wylle Translated in to Englysche: A Facsimile of the Complete Text of a Recently Discovered 15th C. Manuscript. Toucan Press.
  30. Anselm (1965). St. Anselm's Proslogion. Oxford, Clarendon Press.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  31. Anselm (1965). Truth, Freedom, and Evil. New York: Harper & Row.
    Editors' foreword.--Editors' introduction.--Bibliography (p. 79-85).--Preface, by Anselm.--Concerning truth (De veritate)--On freedom of choice (De libertate arbitrii)--The fall of Satan (De casu Diaboli).
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32. Anselm (1964). The De Grammatico of St. Anselm: The Theory of Paronymy. University of Notre Dame Press.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33. Anselm (1962). Basic Writings: Proslogium; Monologium; Gaunilon's on Behalf of the Fool; Cur Deus Homo. La Salle, Ill., Open Court Pub. Co..
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34. Anselm (1900). Anselm of Canterbury. Edwin Mellen Press.
    v. 1. Monologion. Proslogion. Debate with Gaunilo. Meditation on human redemption.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  35. Anselm Jasper, Hopkins Herbert Warren & Richardson (1974). Anselm of Canterbury.
    Anselm (b. 1033; d. 1109) flourished during the period of the Norman Conquest of England (1066), the call by Pope Urban II to the First Crusade (1095), and the strident Investiture Controversy. This latter dispute pitted Popes Gregory VII, Urban II, and Paschal II against the monarchs of Europe in regard to just who had the right—whether kings or bishops—to invest bishops and archbishops with their ecclesiastical offices. It is not surprising that R. W. Southern, Anselm’s present-day biographer, speaks of (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36. Franciscus Salesius Anselm & Schmitt (1936). Ein Neues Unvollendetes Werk des Hl. Anselm von Canterbury. Aschendorff.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  37. Saint Anselm (2009). Proslogion. In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Exploring Philosophy: An Introductory Anthology. Oxford University Press.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  38. Saint Anselm (1992). St. Anselm's Proslogion: With a Reply on Behalf of the Fool by Gaunilo and the Author's Reply to Gaunilo. University of Notre Dame Press.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. St Anselm (2008). Anselm of Canterbury: The Major Works. Oxford University Press UK.
    After Aquinas, Anselm is the most significant medieval thinker. Utterly convinced of the truth of the Christian religion, he was none the less determined to try to make sense of his Christian faith, and the result is a rigorous engagement with problems of logic which remain relevant for philosophers and theologians even today. This translation provides the first opportunity to read all of Anselm's most important works in one volume.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40. Anselm & Gaunilo (2009). The Ontological Argument. In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Exploring Philosophy of Religion: An Introductory Anthology. Oxford University Press.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  41. Anna Arezzo & Veneranda Castellano (2006). Anselmo di Canterbury E la Dialettica. Quaestio 6 (1):514-515.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. Leslie Armour (1986). Newman, Anselm and Proof of the Existence of God. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 19 (1/2):87 - 93.
  43. E. J. Ashworth (1978). The Tradition of Medieval Logic and Speculative Grammar From Anselm to the End of the Seventeenth Century: A Bibliography From 1836 Onwards. Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. F. Asiedu (2012). From Augustine to Anselm: The Influence of de Trinitate on the Monologion. Brepols Publishers.
    Anselm described the Monologion, his first major theological work, as a model meditation on the divine essence; and he enjoined his potential critics to read Augustine’s De trinitate diligently and then judge the Monologion by it. In following Anselm’s admonition, I have paid particular attention to Anselm’s claims about the persuasiveness of his arguments, and probed the cogency of some of the many arguments that make up the Monologion. The result is something like a critical companion to the Monologion. It (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45. Steven S. Aspenson (1990). In Defense of Anselm. History of Philosophy Quarterly 7 (1):33 - 45.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. Allan Bäck (1983). Anselm on Perfect Islands. Franciscan Studies 43 (1):188-204.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. Allan Bäck (1981). Existential Import in Anselm's Ontological Argument. Franciscan Studies 41 (1):97-109.
  48. Forrest E. Baird (1995). A Simple Version of Anselm's Argument. Teaching Philosophy 18 (3):245-249.
    Anselm’s Proslogion argument is fascinating, important, and notoriously difficult. Many introductions to the argument are either as difficult as the original or are unfaithful to it. This paper presents an accessible introduction, faithful to the original, which breaks the argument down into four basic components: “That-Than-Which-a-Greater Cannot-be-Conceived,” “From Conceptual Existence to Real Existence,” “From Real Existence to Necessary Existence,” and “‘That-Than-Which-a-Greater Cannot-be-Conceived’ as God.”.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49. Forrest Edward Baird (1980). The Proslogion Argument of Anselm as a Non-Reductionist Example of Philosophical Theology. Dissertation, The Claremont Graduate University
    It is the goal of this study not to examine the logic of the Argument, but rather to determine the motive of the Argument's author. It is hoped that such a determination of Anselm's intentions will prove useful as a prolegomena to the larger task of assessing the logic of the Proslogion Argument. ;After an exegesis of the text of the Proslogion, showing this mixture of philosophy and theology, interpretations of the Argument are presented. In particular, the philosophical interpretations of (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50. J. Barnes (1978). CAMPBELL, R. "From Belief to Understanding - A Study of Anselm's Proslogion Argument on the Existence of God". [REVIEW] Mind 87:604.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 621