This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories

67 found
Order:
1 — 50 / 67
Material to categorize
  1. Alexander of Aphrodisias on Pleasure and Pain in Aristotle.Wei Cheng - 2018 - In William Harris (ed.), Pleasure and Pain in Classical Times. Leiden: pp. 174-200..
  2. Aristotle on Pythagoras - J. A. Philip: Pythagoras and Early Pythagoreanism. Pp. X+222. Toronto: University of Toronto Press , 1966. Cloth, 52s. Net. [REVIEW]G. B. Kerferd - 1969 - The Classical Review 19 (2):202-203.
  3. Aristotle on Earlier Greek Psychology: The Science of Soul.Jason W. Carter - 2019 - Cambridge University Press.
    This volume is the first in English to provide a full, systematic investigation into Aristotle's criticisms of earlier Greek theories of the soul from the perspective of his theory of scientific explanation. Some interpreters of the De Anima have seen Aristotle's criticisms of Presocratic, Platonic, and other views about the soul as unfair or dialectical, but Jason W. Carter argues that Aristotle's criticisms are in fact a justified attempt to test the adequacy of earlier theories in terms of the theory (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4. Aristotle’s Resolution of the Aporia About Coming-To-Be in Physics I 8.Gabriela Rossi - 2017 - Eirene 53 (1):247-271.
    In Physica I,8 Aristotle endeavors to show that a long-term Eleatic puzzle about coming-to-be can be resolved by appealing to his own ontological principles of change (substratum, privation, and form). In this paper, I posit that the key to Aristotle’s resolution lies in the introduction of aspectual distinctions within numerical unities. These distinctions within the terminus a quo and the terminus as quem of coming-to-be made it possible for Aristotle to maintain, while answering the puzzle, that there is no coming-to-be (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5. XV—Aristotle's Criticism of Platonic Doctrine Concerning Goodness and The Good.D. J. Allan - 1963 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 64 (1):273-286.
  6. Aristote Et l'Idéalisme Platonicien. [REVIEW]Marie V. Williams - 1911 - The Classical Review 25 (3):78-80.
  7. Aristotle on Pythagoras. [REVIEW]G. B. Kerferd - 1969 - The Classical Review 19 (2):202-203.
  8. Aristotle on Socrates. [REVIEW]R. Hackforth - 1946 - The Classical Review 60 (2):69-70.
  9. Aristotle’s Dialogue with Socrates: On the Nicomachean Ethics. [REVIEW]James H. Nichols Jr - 2011 - Ancient Philosophy 31 (1):218-221.
  10. Aristotle and Euclid's Postulates.Fabio Acerbi - 2013 - Classical Quarterly 63 (2):680-685.
    Book 1 of Euclid's Elements opens with a set of unproved assumptions: definitions , postulates, and ‘common notions’ . The common notions are general rules validating deductions that involve the relations of equality and congruence. The attested postulates are five in number, even if a part of the manuscript tradition adds a sixth, almost surely spurious , that in some manuscripts features as the ninth, and last, common notion. The postulates are called αἰτήματα both in the manuscripts of the Elements (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  11. Aristotle and Kant.Jonathan Barnes - 1998 - The Classical Review 48 (2):353-354.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  12. Aristotle on the Impossibility of Anaximander’s Apeiron: On Generation and Corruption, 332a20-25.Michael Wedin - 2013 - Phronesis 58 (1):17-31.
    In On Generation and Corruption, Aristotle rejects the very possibility of such a thing as Anaximander’s apeiron. Characterized as a kind of intermediate stuff, the apeiron turns out to consist of contraries and as such is impossible. Commentators have rightly noted this point and some have also indicated that Aristotle offers an argument of sorts for his negative estimate. However, the argument has received scant attention, and it is fair to say that it remains unclear exactly why Aristotle rejects Anaximander’s (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13. Friend or Foe?—Some Encounters with Plato in Aristotle Metaphysics Zeta.Frank Lewis - 2003 - Modern Schoolman 80 (4):365-390.
  14. Zeno's Dichotomy in Aristotle.Richard McKirahan - 2001 - Philosophical Inquiry 23 (1-2):1-24.
  15. On Ideas: Aristotle's Criticism of Plato's Theory of Forms.Michael T. Ferejohn - 1996 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 34 (1):137-138.
    BOOK REVI~WS 137 Gail Fine. On Ideas: Aristotle's Criticism of Plato's Theory of Forms. New York: Oxford University Press, 1994. Pp. xiv + 4oo. Cloth, $55.oo. To many readers it will no doubt seem odd at first that an author could spend over four hundred printed pages discussing a portion of a treatise comprising just a scant five pages of Greek text, even supposing that the work faithfully reports Aristotelian doctrine. However, in working through Fine's book , one comes to (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  16. A Case For The Utility Of The Mathematical Intermediates.H. S. Arsen - 2012 - Philosophia Mathematica 20 (2):200-223.
    Many have argued against the claim that Plato posited the mathematical objects that are the subjects of Metaphysics M and N. This paper shifts the burden of proof onto these objectors to show that Plato did not posit these entities. It does so by making two claims: first, that Plato should posit the mathematical Intermediates because Forms and physical objects are ill suited in comparison to Intermediates to serve as the objects of mathematics; second, that their utility, combined with Aristotle’s (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  17. Aristotle’s Criticism of Plato’s Republic. [REVIEW]Pascal Massie - 1999 - Review of Metaphysics 52 (3):709-710.
    Aristotle dedicates the first chapters of Politics B to a critical examination of Plato’s Kallipolis from the standpoint of the end of the city and the means to achieve it. Many modern commentaries have depicted Aristotle’s critique as unfair to Plato. Through a detailed philosophical commentary, Mayhew attempts to demonstrate on the contrary that “Aristotle is right, and his modern critics wrong”.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  18. Aristotle and the Later Tradition: Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, Supplementary Volume 1991.Henry Blumenthal & Julia Annas (eds.) - 1991 - Clarendon Press.
    This volume contains papers by a group of leading experts on Aristotle and the later Aristotelian tradition of Neoplatonism. The discussion ranges from Aristotle's treatment of Parmenides, the most important pre-Socratic Greek philosopher, to Neoplatonic and medieval use of Aristotle, for which Aristotle himself set guidelines in his discussions of his predecessors. Traces of these guidelines can be seen in the work of Plotinus, and that of the later Greek commentators on Aristotle. The study of these commentators, and the recognition (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  19. Aristotle and the Stoics Reading Plato, Bulletin of the Classical Institute.V. Harte & M. M. McCabe (eds.) - 2010
  20. O Exame de Aristóteles da Proposição Ontológica de Parménides.Miguel Spinelli - 1997 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 53 (2):323 - 349.
    Embora Aristóteles considere a fórmula ontológica de Parménides ὠς (ȍπως) ἒστƖνcomo primitiva e incomplete faz dela, todavia, o fundamento de todo o discurso verdadeiro e sensato. Interessado, sobretudo, em rever a teoria das Ideias de Platão, é bem provável, inclusive, que ele tenha encontrado na fórmula de Parménides, além de motivacao para o seu próprio empenho, o fundamento sintático-semântico do discurso ontológico, mais precisamente, dos modos ou categorias pelos quais podemos expressar-nos gramatical e fllosoflcamente. /// Aristotles' Treatment of Parmenides 1 (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  21. Translating Gorgias in [Aristotle] 980a10.Janet B. Davis - 1997 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 30 (1):31 - 37.
  22. Aristotle's Criticism of Parmenides in "Physics" I.G. A. Spangler - 1979 - Apeiron 13 (2):92 - 103.
  23. Aristotle's Criticism of Plato's Communism of Women and Children.Robert Mayhew - 1996 - Apeiron 29 (3):231 - 248.
  24. Aristotle's Diagnosis of Atomism.Pieter Sjoerd Hasper - 2006 - Apeiron 39 (2):121 - 155.
  25. In The Shadow Of Aristotle And Hegel: Communicative Ethics And Current Controversies In Practical Philosophy.Seyla Benhabib - 1989 - Philosophical Forum 21 (1):1-31.
  26. A Note on Eκεσi.Nicholas P. White - 1971 - Phronesis 16 (1):164-168.
  27. A Ristotle on Zeno and the Now.F. R. Pickering - 1978 - Phronesis 23 (3):253-257.
  28. Aristotle's Criticism of Plato and the Academy.Harold F. Cherniss - 1944 - Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  29. Aristotle's Criticism of Presocratic Philosophy.Harold F. Cherniss - 1935 - New York: Octagon Books.
  30. Philoponus on the Fallacy of Accident.Allan Bäck - 1987 - Ancient Philosophy 7:131-146.
  31. Aristotle's Review of the Presocratics: Is Aristotle Finally a Historian of Philosophy?Catherine Collobert - 2002 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 40 (3):281-295.
    281ARISTOTLE? S REVIEW OF THE PRESOCRATICS * Catherine Collobert is Associate Professor of Philosophy at the University of Ottawa. Journal of the History of Philosophy, vol. 40, no. 3 281?95 [281] Aristotle?s Review of the Presocratics: Is Aristotle Finally a Historian of Philosophy?1 CATHERINE COLLOBERT* ?JUST AS INEXPERIENCED SOLDIERS IN FIGHTS, rushing forward from all sides, often strike fine blows, but without knowledge, so they do not seem to understand what they say? . This negative judgment of Aristotle about his (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  32. Augustine and Neo-Platonism.Scott MacDonald - 2004 - In Jorge J. E. Gracia & Jiyuan Yu (eds.), Uses and Abuses of the Classics: Western Interpretations of Greek Philosophy. Ashgate.
    From very early on, Western philosophers have been obsessed with the understanding of a relatively few works of philosophy which have played a disproportionately large and fundamental role in developing the Western philosophical canon, dominating the curriculum in the past and in the present; there is no indication that they will not do so in the future.Uses and Abuses of the Classics examines the various ways in which the different periods of the history of philosophy have approached these texts. The (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
Aristotle: Criticism of Plato
  1. What Has Aquinas Got Against Platonic Forms?Turner C. Nevitt - 2018 - In Gyula Klima & Alex Hall (eds.), Hylomorphism and Mereology: Proceedings of the Society for Medieval Logic and Metaphysics Volume 15. Newcastle Upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. pp. 67–79.
    Aquinas consistently criticizes Plato and his followers for their commitment to the existence of separate forms or ideas. There is no whiteness existing by itself apart from any particular white things or any particular person's thoughts about them. The same goes for every natural form, from humanity to heat. And yet Aquinas is happy to appeal to such separate forms as examples to illustrate his own metaphysical views. This seems like a strange and dangerous procedure. If Aquinas considers Platonic forms (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2. Aristotle's Case for Perceptual Knowledge.Robert Howton - 2017 - Dissertation, University of Toronto
    Sense experience, naïvely conceived, is a way of knowing perceptible properties: the colors, sounds, smells, flavors, and textures in our perceptual environment. So conceived, ordinary experience presents the perceiver with the essential nature of a property like Sky Blue or Middle C, such that how the property appears in experience is identical to how it essentially is. In antiquity, as today, it was controversial whether sense experience could meet the conditions for knowledge implicit in this naïve conception. Aristotle was a (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3. "Aucun attribut universel n’est une substance" (Aristotelis Metaphysica, Z, 13, 1038b 35). Aristote critique des Idées de Plato.Leone Gazziero - 2016 - Annuaire de l'École Pratique des Hautes Études 123:121-142.
    Y a-t-il des Idées et peut-on démontrer qu’elles existent ? Parmi les protagonistes anciens de la controverse qui a opposé partisans et adversaires des Idées, Aristote mérite une attention toute particulière. De fait, si – au moment où Aristote intervient dans le débat autour de l’hypothèse des Idées – ce débat a déjà une histoire, c’est avec lui que cette histoire atteint une maturité qui est à la fois d’ordre doctrinal et doxographique. De fait, non seulement Aristote est le premier (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4. Il "de Ideis" di Aristotele e la Teoria Platonica delle Idee.Norman Gulley, W. Leszl & D. Harlfinger - 1975 - Olschki.
    The book is a reconstruction and detailed presentation (close to a commentary) of Aristotle's lost work On Ideas, based, in the main, on the testimony of Alexander of Aphrodisias in his commentary to the Metaphysics; Alexander's text is included in the critical edition by D. Harlfinger.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  5. An Absurd Accumulation: Metaphysics M.2, 1076b11-36.Emily Katz - 2014 - Phronesis 59 (4):343-368.
    The opening argument in the Metaphysics M.2 series targeting separate mathematical objects has been dismissed as flawed and half-hearted. Yet it makes a strong case for a point that is central to Aristotle’s broader critique of Platonist views: if we posit distinct substances to explain the properties of sensible objects, we become committed to an embarrassingly prodigious ontology. There is also something to be learned from the argument about Aristotle’s own criteria for a theory of mathematical objects. I hope to (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  6. Rationes ex machina. La micrologie à l’âge de l’industrie de l’argument.Leone Gazziero - 2008 - Paris: Vrin.
    Do Ideas exist and can we prove it ? Do proofs of their existence have all the same value or not ? Aristotle addresses these issues in two famous documents of the controversy that pitted supporters of the theory of Forms against its opponents within Plato’s Academy : his lost work, quoted by Alexander of Aphrodisias by the title of Peri Ideon, and the lengthy thrust against Ideas that can be read, with some minor variations, in books A, chapter 9, (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  7. "Aristotle's Metaphysics. Books M and N," Translated with Introduction and Notes by Julia Annas.H. T. Walsh - 1978 - Modern Schoolman 55 (3):312-313.
  8. Lo strabismo dello storico (fra gli antichi e noi). Intervista teorico-biografica. A cura di Marco Solinas.Mario Vegetti & Marco Solinas - 2008 - Iride: Filosofia e Discussione Pubblica 21 (3):529-568.
  9. Reply to Fred Seddon, "Plato, Aristotle, Rand, and Sexuality" (Fall 2008): Interpreting Plato's Dialogues: Aristotle Versus Seddon.Roderick T. Long - 2008 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 10 (1):219 - 229.
    In reply to Seddon's charge that Long's analysis in Reason and Value rests on a mistaken reading of Plato, Long both defends his interpretation of Plato and argues that nothing in Reason and Value depends on Plato interpretation in any case.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10. Plato, Aristotle, and the Third Man Argument.Jurgis Brakas - 2011 - In Michael Bruce & Steven Barbone (eds.), Just the Arguments: 100 of the Most Important Arguments in Western Philosophy. Wiley-Blackwell.
  11. On Ideas—Aristotle’s Criticism of Plato’s Theory of Forms.Jonathan Barnes - 1996 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 56 (2):489-491.
    In Chapter 9 of the first book of the Metaphysics Aristotle criticizes “those who posit the Ideas as causes”. His second group of criticisms urges that “the ways in which we try to prove that the forms exist” are unsatisfactory, and he enumerates five such ‘ways’. Alexander of Aphrodisias, in his commentary on the passage, offers to explain in more detail what the five ways were and why each is a cul-de-sac. Gail Fine’s On Ideas is a commentary on this (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  12. Aristotle on Plato Harold Cherniss, Aristotle's Criticism of Plato and the Academy, Vol. I. Pp. Xxvi+610. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1944. Cloth, $5.00 (33S. 6d.). [REVIEW]J. Tate - 1946 - The Classical Review 60 (01):32-33.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13. Assumptions Involved in the Third Man Argument.N. B. Booth - 1958 - Phronesis 3 (2):146-149.
  14. A Proof From the Peri Ideon Revisited.Robert Barford - 1976 - Phronesis 21 (3):198-218.
  15. Aristotle's Criticism of Plato's Form of the Good: Ethics Without Metaphysics?Gerasimos Santas - 1989 - Philosophical Papers 18 (2):137-160.
  16. Aristotle's Metaphysics: Books [Mu] and [Nu]. Aristotle - 1976 - Clarendon Press.
  17. Platonic Number in the Parmenides and Metaphysics XIII.Dougal Blyth - 2000 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 8 (1):23 – 45.
    I argue here that a properly Platonic theory of the nature of number is still viable today. By properly Platonic, I mean one consistent with Plato's own theory, with appropriate extensions to take into account subsequent developments in mathematics. At Parmenides 143a-4a the existence of numbers is proven from our capacity to count, whereby I establish as Plato's the theory that numbers are originally ordinal, a sequence of forms differentiated by position. I defend and interpret Aristotle's report of a Platonic (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
Aristotle and Other Philosophers, Misc
  1. Out of Thin Air? Diogenes on Causal Explanation.Bryan C. Reece - 2020 - In Hynek Bartoš & Colin King (eds.), Heat, Pneuma, and Soul in Ancient Philosophy and Medicine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 106-120.
    Diogenes subscribes to a principle that, roughly, causal interaction and change require a certain sort of uniformity among the relata. Attending to this principle can help us understand Diogenes's relationship to the superficially similar Anaximenes without insisting, as some do, that Diogenes must be consciously responding to Parmenides. Diogenes is distinctive and philosophically interesting because his principle combines two senses of ‘archê’ (principle, starting-point), namely, the idea of source or origin and that of underlying (material) principle, and gives the rudiments (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
1 — 50 / 67