This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories

0 found
Order:
Material to categorize
  1. (S.) Ebbesen Commentators and Commentaries on Aristotle's Sophistici Elenchi: A Study of Post-Aristotelian Ancient and Medieval Writings on Fallacies. 1. The Greek Tradition. Pp. Ix + 355. 2. Greek Texts and Fragments of the Latin Translation of “Alexander's” Commentary. Pp. Xxxvii + 556. 3. Appendices, Danish Summary, Indices. Pp. Iv + 415. (Corpus Latinum Commentariorum in Aristotelem Graecorum 7, 1—3.) Leiden: Brill. 1981. Fl. 192 (3 Vols). [REVIEW]A. C. Lloyd - 1986 - Journal of Hellenic Studies 106:231-233.
  2. La distinción aristotélica entre enérgeia y kı́nesis comprendida de modo intensional.Matı́as Von Dem Bussche - 2019 - Mutatis Mutandis: Revista Internacional de Filosofía 14.
    El siguiente artı́culo intenta defender la tesis de que la distinción aristotélica entre enérgeia y kı́nesis debe ser comprendida de modo intensional (en contraposición a una lectura extensional), tomando como punto de partida su célebre aparición en Met IX 6. Sobre la base de la identificación del problema acerca del cual trata dicho pasaje, se toma en consideración otras apariciones de la distinción en Met IX 8, en la EE, en la EN y en otros textos, en orden a documentar, (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3. Sullogismos and Sullogizesqai in Aristotle's Organon.James Duerlinger - 1969 - American Journal of Philology 90 (3):320.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4. The Aristotelian Tradition in Ancient Rhetoric.Friedrich Solmsen - 1941 - American Journal of Philology 62 (1):35.
  5. Sullogismoi ec Upoqesews in Aristotle.Paul Shorey - 1889 - American Journal of Philology 10 (4):460.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  6. Greek Foundations of Traditional Logic.Phillip de Lacy & Ernst Kapp - 1944 - American Journal of Philology 65 (3):305.
  7. Filosofía vs. erística según platón Y aristóteles: Acerca de la distinción entre estar problematizado Y hablar Por el gusto de hablar.Graciela E. Marcos - 2020 - Argos 1 (38):7-29.
    En este artículo pretendo echar luz sobre la distinción entre filosofía y erística en Platón y Aristóteles, dirigiendo la atención a la noción de aporía. En la sección I, sobre la base de un examen de las ocurrencias de eristikós en Menón, intento mostrar que Sócrates aparece estrechamente conectado al erístico, quien suele ser presentado como su oponente más peligroso. En la sección II, analizo la taxonomía de Aristóteles de los opositores al principio de no-contradicción en Metafísica IV, con el (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8. Mediated Predication in Aristotle's Categories.Patrick Grafton-Cardwell - forthcoming - Ancient Philosophy.
    I argue there are two ways predication relations can hold according to the Categories: they can hold directly or they can hold mediately. The distinction between direct and mediated predication is a distinction between whether or not a given prediction fact holds in virtue of another predication fact’s holding. We can tell Aristotle endorses this distinction from multiple places in the text where he licenses an inference from one predication fact’s holding to another predication fact’s holding. The best explanation for (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9. The Ontological Status of Human Speech in Aristotle‘s "Categories".Pavol Labuda - 2019 - Filosoficky Casopis 67 (6):877-894.
    The subject of this paper is the issue of human speech in Aristotle, especially in his work Categories. Its primary goal is to elaborate an interpretation of Aristotle’s statements about human speech as a quantity (Cat. 4b20–b39, 5a15–b2) that would allow them to fit reasonably into the whole of Aristotle’s theory of language. The structure of the paper is as follows. In the first part a certain approach to the question of the reconstruction of Aristotle’s theory of language is proposed. (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10. Waterlow Passage and Possibility: A Study of Aristotle's Modal Concepts. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 1982. Pp. [Vi] + 165. £10.50. [REVIEW]Michael J. White - 1984 - Journal of Hellenic Studies 104:212-214.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11. Aristotle's Syllogistic From the Standpoint of Modern Formal Logic. By J. Łukasiewicz. Pp. Xi + 141. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1951. 15s. [REVIEW]D. J. Allan - 1953 - Journal of Hellenic Studies 73:158-159.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  12. Rose Aristotle's Syllogistic. Springfield, Ill.: C. C. Thomas. 1968. Pp. Vii + 149. $8.50.D. W. Hamlyn - 1969 - Journal of Hellenic Studies 89:165-166.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13. Lear Aristotle and Logical Theory. Cambridge Etc.: University Press. 1980. Pp. Xi + 123. £8.95.A. R. Lacey - 1981 - Journal of Hellenic Studies 101:157-158.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  14. Ntroduzione E Commento.J. D. G. Evans - 1980 - Journal of Hellenic Studies 100:225.
  15. K. J. J. Hintikka: On the Interpretation of ‘De Interpretatione’ XII–XIII; J. M. E. Moravcsik: Being and Meaning in the ‘Sophist’. Pp. 78. Helsinki: Akateeminen Kirjakauppa, 1962. Paper. [REVIEW]D. W. Hamlyn - 1963 - The Classical Review 13 (3):343-343.
  16. Dorothea Frede: Aristoteles und die ‘Seeschlacht’: das Problem der Contingentia Futura in De Interpretatione 9. Pp. 129. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht, 1970. Paper DM. 24. [REVIEW]Pamela M. Huby - 1972 - The Classical Review 22 (2):272-272.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  17. Aristotle’s Two Accounts of Relatives in Categories 7.Matthew Duncombe - 2015 - Phronesis 60 (4):436-461.
    AtCategories7, 6a36-7 Aristotle defines relatives, but at 8a13-28 worries that the definition may include some substances. Aristotle introduces a second account of relatives to solve the problem. Recent commentators have held that Aristotle intends to solve the extensional adequacy worry by restricting the extension of relatives. That is, R2 counts fewer items as relative than R1. However, this cannot explain Aristotle’s attitude to relatives, since he immediately returns to using R1. I propose a non-extensional reading. R1 and R2 do not (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  18. Wayne N. Thompson: Aristotle's Deduction and Induction: Introductory Analysis and Synthesis. Pp. 114. Amsterdam: Rodopi N.V., 1975. Paper, Fl. 20. [REVIEW]Pamela Huby - 1977 - The Classical Review 27 (1):125-125.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  19. Jaakko Hintikka: Time and Necessity: Studies in Aristotle's Theory of Modality. Pp. Ix + 225. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1973. Cloth, £5·50. [REVIEW]W. E. W. St G. Charlton - 1976 - The Classical Review 26 (2):280-280.
  20. Klaus Schickert: Die Form der Widerlegung Beim Frühen Aristoteles. Pp. Xiv + 111. Munich: C. H. Beck, 1977. Paper, DM. 32. [REVIEW]Pamela Huby - 1979 - The Classical Review 29 (2):319-319.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  21. Aristotle on Scientific Knowledge - R. D. McKirihan: Principles and Proofs: Aristotle's Theory of Demonstrative Science. Pp. Xiv + 340. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1992. Cased, £35. [REVIEW]J. D. G. Evans - 1994 - The Classical Review 44 (1):84-85.
  22. J. Allen: Inference From Signs: Ancient Debates About the Nature of Evidence. Pp. Xi + 279. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2001. Cased, £30. ISBN: 0-19-825094-0. [REVIEW]Jonathan Barnes - 2002 - The Classical Review 52 (2):375-376.
  23. Crivelli Aristotle on Truth. Pp. Xii + 340. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. Cased, £50, US$85. ISBN: 0-521-82328-5. [REVIEW]Jean-Baptiste Gourinat - 2006 - The Classical Review 56 (1):65-66.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  24. Dire et penser dans le principe psychologique de non-contradiction d'Aristote.Fabien Schang - 2005 - Public@Tions Electroniques de Philosophi@ Scienti@E.
    Un paralogisme semble commis dans la démonstration par Aristote du principe psychologique de non-contradiction : à partir d’un principe performatif d’assertion (dire quelque chose, c’est le croire), une approche moderne nous incline à prétendre qu’Aristote présuppose une transparence référentielle des contextes opaques de croyance afin de corréler les versions psychologique et logique. Nous tenterons de restituer la preuve du principe (I). Au moyen de la formalisation moderne, nous appliquerons cette explication à quelques paradoxes (II). Nous en conclurons la nature de (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  25. Aristotle on Use of Homonymy in the Rhetoric.Mikołaj Domaradzki - 2018 - Ancient Philosophy 38 (2):333-346.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  26. There is Beauty Here, Too: Aristotle's Rhetoric for Science.John Poulakos & Nathan Crick - 2012 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 45 (3):295.
  27. Platonic and Aristotelian Influences in the Philosophy of Language: A Case for the Priority of the Cratylus.Hayden Kee - 2016 - Maritain Studies/Etudes Maritainiennes 32:72-82.
    Aristotle’s De Interpretatione has been referred to as the most influential text to be written in the history of semantics. I argue, however, that it is Plato who lays the foundation for subsequent reflection on signification. In the Cratylus, Plato confronts the two prevalent views of his time on the nature of the relationship between a name and a thing named: conventionalism, which holds that there is an arbitrary, imposed relationship between names and what they name; and naturalism, which holds (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  28. Metaphor and the Logicians From Aristotle to Cajetan.E. Jennifer Ashworth - 2007 - Vivarium 45 (2):311-327.
    I examine the treatment of metaphor by medieval logicians and how it stemmed from their reception of classical texts in logic, grammar, and rhetoric. I consider the relation of the word 'metaphor' to the notions of translatio and transumptio, and show that it is not always synonymous with these. I also show that in the context of commentaries on the Sophistical Refutations metaphor was subsumed under equivocation. In turn, it was linked with the notion of analogy not so much in (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  29. Sobre a natureza Das proposições silogísticas em aristóteles.António Pedro Mesquita - 2006 - Philosophica 28:15-32.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  30. Medieval Commentators on Future Contingents in De Interpretatione 9.Simo Knuuttila - 2010 - Vivarium 48 (1):75-95.
    This article considers three medieval approaches to the problem of future contingent propositions in chapter 9 of Aristotle's _De interpretatione_. While Boethius assumed that God's atemporal knowledge infallibly pertains to historical events, he was inclined to believe that Aristotle correctly taught that future contingent propositions are not antecedently true or false, even though they may be characterized as true-or-false. Aquinas also tried to combine the allegedly Aristotelian view of the disjunctive truth-value of future contingent propositions with the conception of all (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  31. Zur Einheit der Modalen Syllogistik des Aristoteles.Klaus J. Schmidt - 2008 - Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter 13 (1):54-86.
    On the unity of modal syllogistics in Aristotle. The goal of this paper is an interpretation of Aristotle's modal syllogistics closely oriented on the text using the resources of modern modal predicate logic. Modern predicate logic was successfully able to interpret Aristotle's assertoric syllogistics uniformly, that is, with one formula for universal premises. A corresponding uniform interpretation of modal syllogistics by means of modal predicate logic is not possible. This thesis does not imply that a uniform view is abandoned. However, (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  32. Passage and Possibility: A Study of Aristotle's Modal Concepts.Lynne Spellman - 1986 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 46 (4):688-692.
  33. Richard Bosley, "Aspects of Aristotle's Logic". [REVIEW]Robin Smith - 1976 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 14 (3):361.
  34. "Aristotle on Dialectic: "The" Topics. "Proceedings of the Third Symposium Aristotelicum", Ed. G. E. L. Owen. [REVIEW]William Kneale - 1970 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 8 (2):201.
  35. F. W. Zimmermann, "Al-Farabi's Commentary and Short Treatise on Aristotle's De Interpretatione". [REVIEW]Allan Bäck - 1983 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 21 (3):396.
  36. Frank A. Lewis, "Substance and Predication in Aristotle". [REVIEW]Norman O. Dahl - 1994 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 32 (3):484.
  37. Notes on the Second Half of "Metaphysics" Theta.4.Tad Brennan - 1994 - Phronesis 39:160.
  38. Aristotle on Inferences From Signs ("Rhetoric" I 2, 1357 B 1-25.Hermann Weidemann - 1989 - Phronesis 34:343.
  39. Definitions and Hypotheses in Posterior Analytics 72 a 19-25 and 76 B 35-77 a 4.Blake Landor - 1981 - Phronesis 26:308.
    In An. Post. I, 2, 72 a 8ff., Aristotle gives a description of the kinds of premisses that can occur in a demonstration. It is the purpose of this paper to explore some difficulties that arise in the interpretation of this passage and of the related passage at An. Post. I, 10, 76b 33 ff.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  40. Does Aristotle Beg the Question in His Defense of the Principle of Non-Contradiction?Michael Degnan - 1989 - Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 63:146.
  41. Naming and Non-Being in Aristotle.Thomas V. Upton - 1985 - Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 59:275.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  42. Infinity and Perfect Induction in Aristotle.Thomas V. Upton - 1981 - Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 55:149.
  43. Aristotle on Unqualified Knowledge: Do Referential Universals Solve the Meno Paradox?Michael J. Degnan - 1994 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 68:145.
  44. The Relationship of Aristotle's Two Analytics.Robin Smith - 1982 - Classical Quarterly 32 (2):327-335.
    In 1928, Friedrich Solmsen argued that Aristotle's Posterior Analytics was largely composed before the Prior Analytics. Ross rejected Solmsen's position in 1939, and a rather lengthy series of rebuttals and counter-attacks between the two scholars followed. Quite recently, Jonathan Barnes has revived this issue with arguments in favour of something very close to Solmsen's thesis: that Aristotle first developed a theory of demonstration before he had worked out the syllogistic, and that the Posterior Analytics was originally conceived against this background. (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  45. Quine on Aristotle on Identity.George Englebretsen - 1985 - Critica 17 (49):65-68.
    Quine has often expressed his impatience with the fact that "Identity evidently invites confusion between sign and object" He finds the confusion in the works of a great many philosophers. What is most interesting, however, is that he excludes Aristotle from his disapprobation. "On the other hand Aristotle had the matter straight: things are identical when 'whatever is predicated of the one should be predicated of the other'. I believe a closer inspection of Aristotle's views would lead Quine to abandon (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  46. Aristotle's Theory of the Syllogism: A Logico-Philosophical Study of Book A of the Prior Analytics.Henry Veatch - 1972 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 2 (4):369-378.
  47. Das Einzelne Bei Platon Und Aristoteles. [REVIEW]D. Tarrant - 1942 - The Classical Review 56 (2):92-92.
  48. The Influence of Aristotle's Rhetoric. [REVIEW]M. D. Reeve - 1977 - The Classical Review 27 (1):17-18.
  49. Aristotle and Logical Theory. [REVIEW]David Charles - 1981 - The Classical Review 31 (2):301-302.
  50. Some Aristotelian Concepts. [REVIEW]D. J. Allan - 1961 - The Classical Review 11 (3):221-222.
Nothing in this category. Everyone can categorize entries. Please help if you have the expertise.