Contents
1202 found
Order:
1 — 50 / 1202
Material to categorize
  1. Confusing Necessities in De Interpretatione 9.Clifford M. Roberts - 2024 - Revue de Philosophie Ancienne 42 (1):71-109.
    It is generally agreed that Aristotle’s aim in De Interpretatione 9 is to rebut arguments purporting to show that bivalence entails fatalism. But the nature of his rebuttal is controversial. Some have argued that Aris- totle accepts the arguments as valid and responds by limiting biva- lence; others have argued that he accepts unlimited bivalence and responds by showing the arguments to be invalid. This paper develops and defends a novel version of the latter view, one which diverges from extant (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2. Aristote. Rationalités.Annie Hourcade & René Lefebvre - 2011 - Mont Saint-Aignan: PURH.
    Les contributions réunies dans le présent recueil ont, pour la plupart, fait l’objet de communications à l’occasion de deux Journées d’étude organisées l’une à l’Université de Rouen Haute-Normandie par l’ « Équipe de recherche sur les aires culturelles » (ERIAC), l’autre à l’Université de Rennes I par « Philosophie des normes », respectivement les 23 et 25 janvier 2008. Leur ensemble ne donne pas une cartographie complète, même dans les grandes lignes, de la conception aristotélicienne de la rationalité sous ses (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3. Freeing Aristotle’s Epagoge from Induction.Pavel Hobza - 2024 - Ancient Philosophy 44 (2):407-428.
    Although our notion of induction stems from the Aristotelian epagoge, it was probably Cicero who first translated it into Latin as inductio. I argue that, despite occasional similarities, Aristotle’s epagoge is different from induction. In the first part, I point out the differences in epagoge’s function and nature. (1) Unlike induction, epagoge can proceed both from particulars to universals and the other way round, being an application of universals to particulars. (2) While induction is taken to be a means for (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4. Escepticismo, metafísica y argumentación. Estudios sobre filosofía griega antigua.Daniel Vazquez - 2023 - Mexico City: NUN.
    Este libro recopila siete estudios que discuten algunas de las aportaciones de Aristóteles, Platón y Sexto Empírico en temas de argumentación filosófica, tiempo, causalidad y escepticismo radical. Algunas de las preguntas que abordo incluyen: ¿Qué papel debe tener la metáfora y la analogía en el discurso filosófico? ¿Cuáles son los presupuestos éticos de una discusión filosófica abierta y productiva y por qué a veces fracasa? ¿Cuál es el alcance y qué se debe responder ante el escepticismo radical? ¿Es el tiempo (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5. Qui imperitus est vestrum, primus calculum omittat. Aristotelis sophistici elenchi 1 in the Boethian Tradition.Leone Gazziero - 2023 - Ad Argumenta 4:75-118.
    The prologue of the Sophistici elenchi is as close an Aristotelian text gets to dealing with language as a subject matter in its own right, only in reverse. Language and its features bear consideration to the extent that they account for some major predicaments discursive reasoning is prone to, both as a separate and as a common endeavour. That being said, the linguistic pitfalls that trick us into thinking that whatever is the case for words and word-compounds is also the (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6. Getting Your Sources Right: What Aristotle Didn’t Say.James Mahon - 1999 - In Researching and Applying Metaphor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 69-80.
    In this chapter I argue that writers on metaphor have misunderstood Aristotle on metaphor. Aristotle is not an elitist about metaphor and does not consider metaphors to be merely ornamental. Rather, Aristotle believes that metaphors are ubiquitous and believes that people can express themselves in a clearer and more attractive way through the use of metaphors and that people learn and understand things better through metaphor. He also distinguishes between the use of metaphor and the coinage of metaphor, and believes (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7. Kategorije 10, 13b27-35: logička forma singularnih subjektno-predikatnih rečenica [Categories 10, 13b27-35: Logical form for Singular Predications].Igor Martinjak - 2021 - Nova Prisutnost : Časopis Za Intelektualna I Duhovna Pitanja 19 (2):373-388.
    The possibility of formal representation of Aristotle’s discussion about singular predication in Categories 10, 13b27-35 is investigated through three symbolic idioms: the first-order language with identity, with and without definitive description, and through the languages of free logics. I show that such representations are not fully adequate. According to the first option, we are committing Aristotle with some (meta)logical implications he is not willing to accept. According to the second option, we are burdening Aristotle with Russell’s theory of names. Finally, (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8. Why Are Accidents Included under Being per se?Elliot Polsky - forthcoming - Nova et Vetera.
    In In V Metaphysics, lec. 9, Aquinas distinguishes between “being by accident” (ens per accidens) and “being by itself” (ens per se) and includes the nine accidental categories under the latter. But isn’t substance a being per se while accidents are, by definition, accidental beings? Several authors—including Ralph McInerny, Paul Symington, and Greg Doolan—have offered explanations of this strange classification. Drawing on an overlooked parallel text in the Posterior Analytics commentary and on Aquinas’s critique of Avicenna’s understanding of accidental denominatives, (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  9. Getting Your Sources Right: What Aristotle Didn’t Say.James Mahon - 1999 - In Researching and Applying Metaphor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 69-80.
    In this chapter I argue that writers on metaphor have misunderstood Aristotle on metaphor. Aristotle is not an elitist about metaphor and does not consider metaphors to be merely ornamental. Rather, Aristotle believes that metaphors are ubiquitous and believes that people can express themselves in a clearer and more attractive way through the use of metaphors and that people learn and understand things better through metaphor. He also distinguishes between the use of metaphor and the coinage of metaphor, and believes (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10. Experimenting with every American king.Poppy Mankowitz - 2023 - Natural Language Semantics 31 (4):349-387.
    The standard contemporary semantics for ‘every’ predict the truth of occurrences of sentences with restrictors that denote the empty set, such as ‘Every American king lives in New York’. The literature on empty restrictors has been concerned with explaining a particular violation of this prediction: many assessors consider empty-restrictor sentences to be odd rather than valued, and they are apparently more likely to do so when such sentences include determiners like ‘every’ as opposed to those like ‘no’. Empirical investigation of (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11. The First Square of Opposition.Ryan Christensen - 2023 - Phronesis 68 (4):371-383.
    It has become an article of faith among historians of logic that the square of opposition diagram is due not to Aristotle, but to Apuleius. I examine three Aristotelian texts and argue that Prior Analytics I.46 contains a square of opposition, making Aristotle the discoverer of the diagram.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  12. Contraintes disciplinaires – anciennes et modernes – de l’interprétation logique des Catégories d’Aristote.Gazziero Leone - 2019 - In Véronique Brière & Juliette Lemaire (eds.), Qu'est-ce qu'une catégorie?: interprétations d'Aristote. Louvain-la-Neuve: Peeters. pp. 9-59.
    L. Gazziero, « “Οἰκείως τῇ λογικῇ πραγματείᾳ” (Simplicii in Aristotelis categorias commentarium, 12.11). Contraintes disciplinaires – anciennes et modernes – de l’interprétation logique des Catégories d’Aristote », dans V. Brière et J. Lemaire (éd.), Qu’est-ce qu’une catégorie ? Interprétations d’Aristote, Leuven, Peeters, 2019, p. 9-59 [ISBN 9789042936621] -/- In addition to understanding the very notion of « category » according to its different Aristotelian contexts, the first order of business of an archaeology of Aristotle’s categories is to inquire into its (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13. Word, thought, and object in Aristotle's De int. 14 and Metaphysics Γ3.Colin Guthrie King - 2021 - Studia Philosophica 80:53–73.
    The discussion of the Principle of Non-Contradiction (PNC) in Aristotle’s Metaphysics Γ is usually taken to include three ‘versions’ of the principle: an ontological, psychological, and logical one. In this article I develop an interpretation of Metaphysics Γ3 and a parallel text, De interpretatione 14, in order to show that these texts are concerned with two related but different principles: a version of the Principle of Identity, and a corollary to this, which concerns the ability to accept two ‘opposite’ items (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  14. Aristotle’s Logic of Biological Diversity.Andrea Libero Carbone - 2023 - Apeiron 56 (3):621-642.
    Aristotle’s biology is based on his method of division of animal kinds by multiple differentiae. This results in complex clusters of non-subordinate terms, between which Aristotle seeks to establish universal correlations. The form of these, however, does not correspond to that prescribed by his theory of syllogism. Mereological relations between terms are not linear and quantification is far more complex than the distinction between universal and particular propositions. Thus the axiomatisation of Aristotle’s biology requires a tool designed for analysing such (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15. Essentialism in the Categories.Gabriel Shapiro - 2023 - Phronesis 68 (3):326-369.
    According to the Categories, predicates can be ‘said of’ their subjects or they can be ‘present in’ their subjects. The said-of relation has received relatively little scholarly attention, and scholars disagree on the answers to four foundational questions about the relation. (i) What is it? (ii) Is it an essential relation? (iii) How is it related to predication? (iv) Is it primitive? I argue that A is said-of B just in case A is a formal part of B. On this (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  16. The Semantics of Divine Esse in Boethius.Elliot Polsky - 2024 - Nova et Vetera 22 (4):1215-1264.
    Boethius identifies God both with esse ipsum and esse suum. This paper explains Boethius's general semantic use of "esse" and the application of this use to God. It questions the helpfulness of attributing to Boethius "existence" words and argues for a more robust role in Boethius’s thought for Hilary of Poitiers’s and Augustine’s exegeses of Exodus 3:14-15 than has been acknowledged in recent scholarship.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  17. Substance and Prediction in Aristotle. [REVIEW]Gareth B. Matthews - 1993 - Review of Metaphysics 46 (3):624-625.
  18. Aristotle on Comparison.Elena Comay del Junco - 2022 - Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 61:103-142.
    Many contemporary philosophers hold that comparison requires a common, monistic ‘covering value’, and Aristotle is often described as a forerunner of this view. This paper reconsiders that claim. First, its textual warrant is substantially weaker than has been thought. Philosophically, moreover, Aristotle’s theory of non-synonymous predication allows for comparisons to be made using the special kind of non-synonymous terms that he calls pros hen legomenon, literally those ‘said with reference to a single thing.’ His favourite example is ‘healthy’ as said (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  19. Jüngere Textzeugen in der griechischsprachigen Überlieferung von Aristoteles’ „περὶ ἑρμηνείας“ und ihre textkritische Bedeutung.Michael Krewet - 2021 - Hermes 149 (3):280.
  20. ΑΠΟΡΙΑ und ΑΠΑΤΗ in der aristotelischen Dialektik.Georgios E. Papatsimpas - 2016 - Hermes 144 (3):299-305.
    Both words ἀπορία (difficulty, puzzle) and ἀπάτη (trick, deceit) are regarded here as representatives of the meaning „path, way“. This article focuses mainly on their use as key concepts in the theory of Aristotle’s dialectic and secondly on their use in the practice of Aristotle’s investigations. I argue that the two notions have a special and important role in Aristotle’s conception of dialectic as expressed in the Topics and in the Sophistici Elenchi, according to his view that it is the (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  21. The Discovery of Principles in Prior Analytics 1.30.Marko Malink - 2022 - Phronesis 67 (2):161-215.
    In Prior Analytics 1.27–30, Aristotle develops a method for finding deductions. He claims that, given a complete collection of facts in a science, this method allows us to identify all demonstrations and indemonstrable principles in that science. This claim has been questioned by commentators. I argue that the claim is justified by the theory of natural predication presented in Posterior Analytics 1.19–22. According to this theory, natural predication is a non-extensional relation between universals that provides the metaphysical basis for demonstrative (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  22. Greek rhetoricians and the enthymeme - (j.) fredal the enthymeme. Syllogism, reasoning, and narrative in ancient greek rhetoric. Pp. VIII + 217. Pennsylvania: The pennsylvania state university press, 2020. Cased, us$89.95. Isbn: 978-0-271-08613-2. [REVIEW]Owen Goldin - 2022 - The Classical Review 72 (1):79-81.
  23. O MODELO EXPLANATÓRIO-CAUSAL DE ARISTÓTELES EM SEGUNDOS ANALÍTICOS II.8-10 E O CASO DAS SUBSTÂNCIAS HILEMÓRFICAS.Daniela Fernandes Cruz - 2021 - In Jeferson Forneck, Daniel Peres dos Santos, João Francisco Cortés Bustamante & Isis Hochmann de Freitas (eds.), XXI Semana Acadêmica Do PPG Em Filosofia da PUCRS Vol. 1. Porto Alegre: Editora Fundação Fênix. pp. 45-59.
    Nos Segundos Analíticos II.8-10, Aristóteles apresenta um modelo investigativo de descoberta da essência pela causa a partir de uma estrutura triádica: a demonstração silogística. Esse modelo explanatório-causal é colocado em prática em casos de processos naturais (e.g. eclipse, trovão) e, apesar de mencionadas, as substâncias sensíveis (e.g. homem) não são concretamente analisadas – algo que só se consolida nos livros centrais da Metafísica (mais especificamente, em Z.17) a partir da análise hilemórfica. Além disso, em Segundos Analíticos II.9, Aristóteles apresenta uma (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  24. Ὁ ἄπειρος πρῶτος τὴν ψῆφον βαλέτω. Leaving No Pebble Unturned in Sophistici elenchi, 1.Leone Gazziero - 2021 - In Gazziero Leone (ed.), Le langage. Lectures d’Aristote. Leuven: Peeters. pp. 241-343.
    Relying on evidence from fifteen epigraphic collections and sixty-odd ancient sources as well as discussing a literature of over five hundred titles, the essay’s highly unorthodox conclusions are a case in point of the micrological ideal of achieving novelty on any given subject by way of transcribing and studying first-hand all relevant materials – edited and unedited alike. The paper’s ambition was to shed new light on one of the most intriguing analogies of the whole Aristotelian corpus, namely the comparison (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  25. Aristote et le langage. Mode d’emploi.Leone Gazziero - 2021 - In Gazziero Leone (ed.), Le langage. Lectures d’Aristote. Leuven: Peeters. pp. 1-8.
    Quelque nombreuses et quelque influentes qu'elles soient par ailleurs, les vues d'Aristote sur le langage se caractérisent à la fois par leur hétérogénéité et par leur marginalité. Sans faire nulle part du langage et de la signification l'objet d'une investigation autonome et méthodique, Aristote multiplie les remarques et les digressions à leur sujet, que ce soit dans ses écrits d'éthique et de politique ou dans ses traités d'histoire et de philosophie naturelle, ou encore dans ses manuels de dialectique, de poétique (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  26. Commentary on the Posterior Analytics of Aristotle.Thomas Aquinas - 1949 - Albany, NY, USA: Magi Books. Edited by Fabian R. Larcher.
    Original publisher: London: Burns, Oates, and Washbourne, 1934.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  27. On the Sea Battle Tomorrow That May Not Happen: A Logical and Philosophical Analysis of the Master Argument.Tomasz Jarmużek - 2018 - Berlin and New York: Peter Lang.
    The book examines the Master Argument of Diodorus Cronus in the context of the Sea-Battle Tomorrow of Aristotle. The author investigates problems of sentences about the future, time and determinism. He shows that certain reconstructions of the MA do not assume a linear time structure. Thus, the MA is not an argument in favour of determinism.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  28. Megaric Metaphysics.Dominic Bailey - 2012 - Ancient Philosophy 32 (2):303-321.
    I examine two startling claims attributed to some philosophers associated with Megara on the Isthmus of Corinth, namely: Ml. Something possesses a capacity at t if and only if it is exercising that capacity at t. M2. One can speak of a thing only by using its own proper A6yor;. In what follows, I will call the conjunction of Ml and M2 'Megaricism' .1 The lit­ erature on ancient philosophy contains several valuable discussions of Ml and M2 taken individually .2 (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  29. Relativity, categories and principles in the diuisio aristotelea 67M/32DL.Roberto Granieri - 2022 - Journal of Hellenic Studies 142:204-218.
    The Diuisio Aristotelea 67M/32DL draws a distinction between two categories of beings, per se and relatives. I defend three main theses. First, that the relation of dependence characterizing the members of the latter category is modal and symmetrical in nature and, accordingly, the per se-relatives contrast cannot be equivalent to the substance-accidents contrast. Second, that the type of relativity relevant to this diuisio is both ontological and semantic in nature (but with different emphases depending on the version of the diuisio (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  30. Systems of Predication. Aristotle’s Categories in Topics, I, 9.Roberto Granieri - 2016 - Documenti E Studi Sulla Tradizione Filosofica Medievale 27:1-18.
    In this paper I investigate Aristotle’s account of predication in Topics I 9. I argue for the following interpretation. In this chapter Aristotle (i) presents two systems of predication cutting across each other, the system of the so-called four ‘predicables’ and of the ten ‘categories’, in order to distinguish them and explore their mutual relationship. I propose a semantic interpretation of the relationship between them. According to this reading, every proposition formed through a predicable constitutes at the same time a (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  31. Aristotle's De Interpretatione 8 is about ambiguity.Susanne Bobzien - 2007 - In Dominic Scott (ed.), Maieusis: Essays in Ancient Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 301.
    ABSTRACT: In this paper I show that, contrary to the prevalent view, in his De Interpretatione chapter 8, Aristotle is concerned with a kind of ambiguity, i.e. with homonymy; more precisely, with homonymy of linguistic expressions as it may occur in dialectical argument. The paper has two parts. In the first part, I argue that in the Sophistici Elenchi 175b39-176a5 Aristotle indubitably deals with homonymy in dialectical argument; that De Interpretatione 8 is a parallel to Sophistici Elenchi 175b39-176a5; that De (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  32. La distinción aristotélica entre enérgeia y kı́nesis comprendida de modo intensional.Matı́as Von Dem Bussche - 2019 - Mutatis Mutandis: Revista Internacional de Filosofía 14.
    El siguiente artı́culo intenta defender la tesis de que la distinción aristotélica entre enérgeia y kı́nesis debe ser comprendida de modo intensional (en contraposición a una lectura extensional), tomando como punto de partida su célebre aparición en Met IX 6. Sobre la base de la identificación del problema acerca del cual trata dicho pasaje, se toma en consideración otras apariciones de la distinción en Met IX 8, en la EE, en la EN y en otros textos, en orden a documentar, (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  33. Sullogismos and Sullogizesqai in Aristotle's Organon.James Duerlinger - 1969 - American Journal of Philology 90 (3):320.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  34. (1 other version)The Aristotelian Tradition in Ancient Rhetoric.Friedrich Solmsen - 1941 - American Journal of Philology 62 (1):35.
  35. Sullogismoi ec Upoqesews in Aristotle.Paul Shorey - 1889 - American Journal of Philology 10 (4):460.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  36. (1 other version)Greek Foundations of Traditional Logic.Phillip de Lacy & Ernst Kapp - 1944 - American Journal of Philology 65 (3):305.
  37. Filosofía vs. erística según platón Y aristóteles: Acerca de la distinción entre estar problematizado Y hablar Por el gusto de hablar.Graciela E. Marcos - 2020 - Argos 1 (38):7-29.
    En este artículo pretendo echar luz sobre la distinción entre filosofía y erística en Platón y Aristóteles, dirigiendo la atención a la noción de aporía. En la sección I, sobre la base de un examen de las ocurrencias de eristikós en Menón, intento mostrar que Sócrates aparece estrechamente conectado al erístico, quien suele ser presentado como su oponente más peligroso. En la sección II, analizo la taxonomía de Aristóteles de los opositores al principio de no-contradicción en Metafísica IV, con el (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  38. Understanding Mediated Predication in Aristotle’s Categories.Patrick Grafton-Cardwell - 2021 - Ancient Philosophy 41 (2):443-462.
    I argue there are two ways predication relations can hold according to the Categories: they can hold directly or they can hold mediately. The distinction between direct and mediated predication is a distinction between whether or not a given prediction fact holds in virtue of another predication fact’s holding. We can tell Aristotle endorses this distinction from multiple places in the text where he licenses an inference from one predication fact’s holding to another predication fact’s holding. The best explanation for (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  39. False ἔvδοξα and fallacious argumentation.Colin Guthrie King - 2012 - History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis 15 (1):185-199.
    Aristotle determines eristic argument as argument which either operates upon the basis of acceptable premisses and merely give the impression of being deductive, or argument which truly is deductive but operates upon the basis of premisses which seem to be acceptable, but are not. I attempt to understand what Aristotle has in mind when he says that someone is deceived into accepting premisses which seem to be acceptable but which are really not, and how this disqualifies such arguments from being (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  40. Aristotle and Logical Theory.F. W. Kroon - 1981 - Philosophical Studies (Dublin) 28:388-389.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  41. The Ontological Status of Human Speech in Aristotle‘s "Categories".Pavol Labuda - 2019 - Filosoficky Casopis 67 (6):877-894.
    The subject of this paper is the issue of human speech in Aristotle, especially in his work Categories. Its primary goal is to elaborate an interpretation of Aristotle’s statements about human speech as a quantity (Cat. 4b20–b39, 5a15–b2) that would allow them to fit reasonably into the whole of Aristotle’s theory of language. The structure of the paper is as follows. In the first part a certain approach to the question of the reconstruction of Aristotle’s theory of language is proposed. (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  42. K. J. J. Hintikka: On the Interpretation of ‘De Interpretatione’ XII–XIII; J. M. E. Moravcsik: Being and Meaning in the ‘Sophist’. (Acta Philosophica Fennica, xiv.) Pp. 78. Helsinki: Akateeminen Kirjakauppa, 1962. Paper. [REVIEW]D. W. Hamlyn - 1963 - The Classical Review 13 (3):343-343.
  43. L. Minio-Paluello: Aristoteles Latinus, i. 6–7: Categoriarum Supplementa. Pp. lxvii1+32. Bruges: Desclée de Brouwer, 1966. Paper, 300 B.fr. [REVIEW]A. H. Armstrong - 1967 - The Classical Review 17 (3):387-387.
  44. (1 other version)Dorothea Frede: Aristoteles und die ‘Seeschlacht’: das Problem der Contingentia Futura in De Interpretatione 9. (Hypomnemata, 27.) Pp. 129. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht, 1970. Paper DM. 24. [REVIEW]Pamela M. Huby - 1972 - The Classical Review 22 (2):272-272.
  45. Aristotle’s Two Accounts of Relatives in Categories 7.Matthew Duncombe - 2015 - Phronesis 60 (4):436-461.
    AtCategories7, 6a36-7 Aristotle defines relatives, but at 8a13-28 worries that the definition may include some substances. Aristotle introduces a second account of relatives to solve the problem. Recent commentators have held that Aristotle intends to solve the extensional adequacy worry by restricting the extension of relatives. That is, R2 counts fewer items as relative than R1. However, this cannot explain Aristotle’s attitude to relatives, since he immediately returns to using R1. I propose a non-extensional reading. R1 and R2 do not (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  46. Wayne N. Thompson: Aristotle's Deduction and Induction: Introductory Analysis and Synthesis. Pp. 114. Amsterdam: Rodopi N.V., 1975. Paper, fl. 20. [REVIEW]Pamela M. Huby - 1977 - The Classical Review 27 (1):125-125.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  47. Jaakko Hintikka: Time and necessity: Studies in Aristotle's Theory of Modality. Pp. ix + 225. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1973. Cloth, £5·50. [REVIEW]W. E. W. St G. Charlton - 1976 - The Classical Review 26 (2):280-280.
  48. The Posterior Analytics - Jonathan Barnes: Aristotle's Posterior Analytics. Pp. xix + 277. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975. Cloth, £7. [REVIEW]A. W. Price - 1978 - The Classical Review 28 (1):86-87.
  49. Klaus Schickert: Die Form der Widerlegung beim frühen Aristoteles. (Zetemata, 65.) Pp. xiv + 111. Munich: C. H. Beck, 1977. Paper, DM. 32. [REVIEW]Pamela M. Huby - 1979 - The Classical Review 29 (2):319-319.
  50. Review Article Scepticism About A Sceptical Aristotle.Cathal Woods - 2009 - Polis 26 (1):140-149.
1 — 50 / 1202