This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories

79 found
Order:
1 — 50 / 79
Material to categorize
  1. Aristotle on Earlier Greek Psychology: The Science of Soul.Jason W. Carter - 2019 - Cambridge University Press.
    This volume is the first in English to provide a full, systematic investigation into Aristotle's criticisms of earlier Greek theories of the soul from the perspective of his theory of scientific explanation. Some interpreters of the De Anima have seen Aristotle's criticisms of Presocratic, Platonic, and other views about the soul as unfair or dialectical, but Jason W. Carter argues that Aristotle's criticisms are in fact a justified attempt to test the adequacy of earlier theories in terms of the theory (...)
    No categories
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2. Aristotle’s Resolution of the Aporia About Coming-To-Be in Physics I 8.Gabriela Rossi - 2017 - Eirene 53 (1):247-271.
    In Physica I,8 Aristotle endeavors to show that a long-term Eleatic puzzle about coming-to-be can be resolved by appealing to his own ontological principles of change (substratum, privation, and form). In this paper, I posit that the key to Aristotle’s resolution lies in the introduction of aspectual distinctions within numerical unities. These distinctions within the terminus a quo and the terminus as quem of coming-to-be made it possible for Aristotle to maintain, while answering the puzzle, that there is no coming-to-be (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3. Algunas notas sobre la discusión con los eléatas en Física I de Aristóteles.Gabriela Rossi - 2001 - Tópicos: Revista de Filosofía 20:137-159.
    The purpose of this paper is to illustrate the role of some peculiar elements of Aristotle's dialectical development —namely, those emerging in the Sophistical Refutations (SE)— in the analysis and discussion of the Eleatic thesis in Physics I, 2-3. The paper adresses some of Aristotle's preliminary thoughts (Phys. I, 2) (which are read as methodological considerations), and some remarks against Melissus' argument (Phys. I, 3), in order to find connections between such claims and passages of SE, as well as the (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4. Desanudando argumentos. Las aplicaciones filosóficas de la dialéctica según las Refutaciones Sofísticas.Gabriela Rossi - 2016 - Méthexis 19 (1):79-109.
  5. Aristotle on Methodological Approaches to the Study of the Human Soul.Hynek Bartoš - 2012 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 12 (2):199-220.
    This paper focuses on Aristotle’s methodology of science and its application to the study of the human soul. My aim is to contrast two significantly different methodological approaches and to formulate two pairs of premises that Aristotle employs in two clearly differentiated and independent fields of study, namely in his zoological works and in the works of practical philosophy. Acknowledging these principles, as I suggest, may shed a new light on the methodological difficulties that Aristotle indicates in the introductory chapters (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6. Dios en la ética de Aristóteles.David Torrijos-Castrillejo - 2011 - Pensamiento 68 (255):5-23.
    In the last few years, a new paradigm of the knowledge of the divinity in Aristotle has emerged, affording the possibility of understanding him as efficient cause. In that case, if God is efficient cause and gives rise to teleology, this must have some existential significance for man. We can ask ourselves therefore whether the knowledge of metaphysics can offer some orientation also for ethics. Yet if this were true, the need would arise to deepen the question of how much (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7. Cinquant'anni di Ricerca:Problemi E Metodi.Enrico Berti - 2011 - In Enrico Berti & Carlo Natali (eds.), Aristotle: Metaphysics and Practical Philosophy: Essays in Honour of Enrico Berti. Peeters.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8. Aristotle on Method and Metaphysics.Edward Feser (ed.) - 2013 - Palgrave-Macmillan.
  9. Sur un point de la méthode d’Aristote.Paul Tannery - 1893 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 6 (4):468-474.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10. Shields, Christopher. Order in Multiplicity: Homonymy in the Philosophy of Aristotle.Leo J. Elders - 2000 - Review of Metaphysics 54 (1):171-171.
  11. Aristotelian Symposium Aristote et les Problèmes de Méthode. Communications présentées au Symposium Aristotelicum tenu à Louvain du 24 août au I septembre 1960. Pp. vii+364. Louvain: Nauwelaerts, 1961. Paper, 350 B.fr. [REVIEW]A. Wasserstein - 1963 - The Classical Review 13 (01):50-55.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  12. Aristotelian Problems.James G. Lennox - 1994 - Ancient Philosophy 14 (Special Issue):53-77.
  13. On the Nature of Epagôgê.Russell Winslow - 2006 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 11 (1):81-107.
    This essay pursues an interpretation of epagôgê in Aristotle in order to challenge the current claims in the scholarship that Aristotle’s method of discovery is, on the one hand, empirical or, on the other hand, a priori. In contrast to these claims, this essay offers a reading of the Analytica in conjunction with the Physics in order to propose the following: if we are to think through Aristotle’s method of discovery, we must first unhinge ourselves from the oppositional paradigm of (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  14. Prinzipienfindung Bei Aristoteles.John J. Cleary - 1997 - Ancient Philosophy 17 (1):237-244.
  15. Aristotle on Nature: A Study in the Relativity of Concepts and Procedures of Analysis.H. S. Thayer - 1975 - Review of Metaphysics 28 (4):725 - 744.
  16. Motion, Mobility, and Method in Aristotle's "Physics": Comments on "Physics" 2.1.192b20-24.Anthony F. Beavers - 1988 - Review of Metaphysics 42 (2):357 - 374.
  17. Aristotle's Method.Owen McLeod - 1995 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 12 (1):1 - 18.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  18. Visual Aids to Teaching in Aristotle Franz Dirlmeier: Merkwürdige Zitate in der Eudemischen Ethik des Aristoteles. Pp. 43. Heidelberg: Winter, 1964. Paper, DM. 6.80. [REVIEW]D. J. Allan - 1964 - The Classical Review 14 (02):151-152.
  19. Aristotle and Platonic Dialectic in Metaphysics Gamma.Dirk Baltzly - 1999 - Apeiron 32 (4):171-202.
    I come not to clarify Aristotle’s defence of the principle of non-contradiction, but to put it in its proper context. I argue that remarks in Metaphysics IV.3 together with the argument of IV.4, 1006a11-31 show that Aristotle practises Plato’s method of dialectic in his defence of PNC. I mean this in the strong sense that he uses the very methodology described in the middle books of the Republic and, I claim, illustrated in such dialogues as Parmenides, Sophist and Theaetetus.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  20. Saying the Phenomena. [REVIEW]R. J. Hankinson - 1990 - Phronesis 35 (1):194-215.
  21. Does Language Matter to Philosophy?: Aristotle and Wittgenstein on the Nature of Philosophical Enquiry.Mark Addis - 1993 - Cogito 7 (3):211-216.
  22. Methodological Superiority of Aristotle Over Euclid.H. G. Apostle - 1958 - Philosophy of Science 25 (2):131-134.
  23. Phainomena in Aristotle's Methodology.John J. Cleary - 1994 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 2 (1):61 – 97.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
Aristotle: Dialectic
  1. Review of Aristotle, De Anima: Translation, Introduction, and Notes, C.D.C. Reeve. [REVIEW]Caleb Cohoe - 2018 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews:1.
    This is an excellent translation of Aristotle's De Anima or On the Soul, part of C.D.C. Reeve's impressive ongoing project of translating Aristotle's works for the New Hackett Aristotle. Reeve's translation is careful and accurate, committed to faithfully rendering Aristotle into English while making him as readable as possible. This edition features excellent notes that will greatly assist readers (especially in their inclusion of related passages that illuminate the sections they annotate) and an introduction that situates the work within Aristotle's (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2. Ethica Eudemia I 6: O Método das Endoxa no Contexto da Ética Aristotélica.Mariane Farias de Oliveira - 2014 - XIII Semana Acadêmica Do PPG Em Filosofia da PUCRS.
  3. Voltando à Dialética de Aristóteles (réplica a Marco Zingano).Oswaldo Porchat Pereira - 2004 - Analytica 8 (1):143-188.
  4. Dialética e definição: problemas de método na ética aristotélica.Eduardo Wolf Pereira - 2017 - Dissertation, University of São Paulo, Brazil
    A presente pesquisa visa caracterizar o método empregado por Aristóteles na Ethica Nicomachea a partir de uma análise que contrasta duas interpretações: de um lado, a tese já tradicional que busca ver na filosofia prática do Estagirita um método estritamente dialético; de outro, a tese alternativa, explorada apenas recentemente, que aponta o uso, na EN, de um procedimento filosófico próximo das prescrições sugeridas nos Segundos Analíticos para a busca definicional nas ciências. O núcleo da primeira tese deverá ser analisado sob (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5. Explanation and Method in Eudemian Ethics I.6.Lucas Angioni - 2017 - Archai: Revista de Estudos Sobre as Origens Do Pensamento Ocidental 20:191-229.
    I discuss the methodological passage in the begin- ning of Ethica Eudemia I.6 (1216b26-35), which has received attention in connection with Aristotle’s notion of dialectic and his methodology in Ethics. My central focus is not to discuss whether Aristotle is prescribing and using what has been called the method of endoxa. I will focus on how this passage coheres with the remaining parts of the same chapter, which also are advancing methodological remarks. My claim is that the meth- od of (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  6. NOTES ON NICOMACHEAN ETHICS 1173a2–5.Grönroos Gösta - 2016 - Classical Quarterly 66 (2):484–490.
    In Nicomachean Ethics (= Eth. Nic.) 10.2, Aristotle addresses Eudoxus’ argument that pleasure is the chief good in his characteristically dialectical manner. The argument is that pleasure is the chief good, since all creatures, rational (ἔλλογα) and non-rational (ἄλογα) alike, are perceived to aim at pleasure (1172b9–11).1 At 1172b35–1173a5, Aristotle turns to an objection against Eudoxus’ argument. For some object (οἱ δ᾽ἐνιστάμενοι) to the argument by questioning one of its premisses, namely that what all creatures aim at is the good (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7. Aristoteles’ Kategorie des Relativen zwischen Dialektik und Ontologie.Ludger Jansen - 2006 - Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy 9.
    Like the doctrine of the categories in general, Aristotle’s category of the relative fulfils disparate functions: On the one hand, the category of the pros ti fulfils a dialectic or logical function that aims at the avoidance of fallacies. On the other hand, the category respects the peculiar mode of being of the relative. Taking these two different functions into consideration helps with the interpretation of Aristotle’s two definitions of the relative and his treatment of the properties of the relative (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8. Does Aristotle Have a Dialectical Attitude in EE I 6? A Negative Answer.Fernando Martins Mendonça - 2017 - Archai: Revista de Estudos Sobre as Origens Do Pensamento Ocidental 20:161-190.
    In this paper, I analyse EE I 6, where Aristotle presented a famous methodological digression. Many interpreters have taken this chapter as advocating a dialectical procedure of enquiry. My claim is that Aristotle does not keep a dialectical attitude towards endoxa or phainomena in this chapter. In order to accomplish my goal, I shall show that EE I 6 does not provide enough evidence for the dialectical construal of it, and that this construal, in turn, hangs on some assumptions brought (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  9. Euporia: On the Limits Horizons and Possibilities of Critical Theory (Or: On Reconstruction).Raymond Aaron Younis - 2017 - In Harry F. Dahms & Eric Lybeck (eds.), Reconstructing social theory history and practice. Bingley: Emerald. pp. 89-108.
  10. Dialectical Strategic Planning in Aristotle.Iovan Drehe - 2015 - Symposion: Theoretical and Applied Inquiries in Philosophy and Social Sciences 2 (3):287–309.
    The purpose of this paper is to give an account and a rational reconstruction of the heuristic advice provided by Aristotle in the Topics and Prior Analytics in regard to the difficulty or ease of strategic planning in the context of a dialectical dialogue. The general idea is that a Questioner can foresee what his refutational syllogism would have to look like given the character of the thesis defended by the Answerer, and therefore plan accordingly. A rational reconstruction of this (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11. Sobre ‘dizer de modo verdadeiro, mas não de modo claro’ e a operação dialética em Aristóteles.Fernando Martins Mendonça - 2013 - Filosofia Antiga E Medieval (Encontro Nacional Anpof).
  12. The Philosopher and the Dialectician in Aristotle's Topics.David Merry - 2016 - History and Philosophy of Logic 37 (1):78-100.
    I claim that, in the Topics, Aristotle advises dialectical questioners to intentionally argue fallaciously in order to escape from some dialectically awkward positions, and I work through the consequences of that claim. It will turn out that, although there are important exceptions, the techniques for finding arguments described in Topics I–VII are, by and large, locations that Aristotle thought of as appropriate for use in philosophical inquiry. The text that grounds this claim, however, raises a further problem: it highlights the (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13. A dialética como método investigativo em Aristóteles?Fernando Martins Mendonça - 2013 - eBooks PUCRS 1:1-8.
  14. Al-Samarqandi. Un Précurseur de l'Analyse des Controverses Scientifiques.Dominique Raynaud - 2013 - Al-Mukhatabat. Epistemological Approaches to the History of Arabic Sciences 7:8-25.
    Despite the enthusiasm generated by social constructionism in the study of scientific debates, this contribution shows that – down to their praxeological dimension – the study of scientific controversies can benefit from sources ignored in today sociological literature. The contribution discloses these sources from the works of Shams al-Dīn al-Samarqandī (ca. 1250–ca. 1302), who is the first author to have offered etiquettes of investigation and debate (ādāb al-baḥth wa-al-munāẓara). Consequences are drawn towards constructivist epistemology.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15. Franz Ungler: Zur antiken und neuzeitlichen Dialektik.Michael Höfler & Michael Wladika (eds.) - 2005 - Peter Lang.
  16. As razões de Aristóteles. [REVIEW]Lucas Angioni - 2000 - Educacao E Filosofia 14.
  17. Aristóteles em nova perspectiva: introdução à teoria dos quatro discursos.Olavo de Carvalho - 1997 - Topbooks.
    Há embutida nas obras de Aristóteles uma ideia medular, que escapou à percepção de quase todos os seus leitores e comentaristas, da Antiguidade até hoje. Mesmo aqueles que a perceberam e foram apenas dois, que eu saiba, ao longo dos milênios limitaram-se a anotá-la de passagem, sem lhe atribuir explicitamente uma importância decisiva para a compreensão da filosofia de Aristóteles. No entanto, ela é a chave mesma dessa compreensão, se por compreensão se entende o ato de captar a unidade do (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  18. Aristoteles’ Kategorie des Relativen Zwischen Dialektik Und Ontologie.Ludger Jansen - 2006 - Philosophie­Geschichte Und Logische Analyse 9.
    Like the doctrine of the categories in general, Aristotle’s category of the relative fulfils disparate functions: On the one hand, the category of the pros ti fulfils a dialectic or logical function that aims at the avoidance of fallacies. On the other hand, the category respects the peculiar mode of being of the relative. Taking these two different functions into consideration helps with the interpretation of Aristotle’s two definitions of the relative and his treatment of the properties of the relative (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  19. Paradox of Religion...Miro Brada - manuscript
    Religion supposes another world after death: paradise / hell / nirvana / karma... We live in incomplete world, because there is other 'truer' world. This replicates Plato philosophy (428-347 BC): behind something, is something, is something - till the pure idea (final judgement, karma, etc). In contrast, 'I think, therefore I am' (Descartes, 1637), showed the reality independent of Plato's parallel worlds. When I am thinking, regardless of what, 'I am' - whether there is or not 'truer' world. I show (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  20. Was ist die Funktion geschichtlicher Bezüge bei Aristoteles?Erwin Sonderegger - 2002 - Studia Philosophica 61:139-152.
    Aristotle is often called the father of the history of philosophy. However, if his references to earlier theses are to be taken as historical in our sense, then they must also be subject to historical critique – which is much to their disadvantage. However, looking through the function of his doxographies and furthter references to earlier theses shows that such a historical view is an anachronism in a way similar to the expectation of finding science in Aristotle. Rather the references (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  21. «καὶ ὅτι ἔστι τις τρίτος ἄνθρωπος»(Aristotelis sophistici elenchi 22 178b36–179a10). Prolégomènes à une histoire ancienne de l'argument du 'troisième homme'.Leone Gazziero - 2010 - Rhizai. A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science:181-220.
    Few arguments from the past have stirred up as much interest as Aristotle’s “Third man” and not so many texts have received as much attention as its account in chapter 22 of the Sophistici elenchi. And yet, several issues about both remain highly controversial, starting from the very nature of the argument at stake and the exact signification of some of its features. The essay provides a close commentary of the text, dealing with its main difficulties and suggesting an overall (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  22. Aristotle's "De Interpretatione": Contradiction and Dialectic (Review).Eugene Garver - 1998 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 36 (3):459-460.
  23. The Development of Dialectic From Plato to Aristotle.Jakob Leth Fink (ed.) - 2012 - Cambridge University Press.
    The period from Plato's birth to Aristotle's death (427-322 BC) is one of the most influential and formative in the history of Western philosophy. The developments of logic, metaphysics, epistemology, ethics and science in this period have been investigated, controversies have arisen and many new theories have been produced. But this is the first book to give detailed scholarly attention to the development of dialectic during this decisive period. It includes chapters on topics such as: dialectic as interpersonal debate between (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  24. Aristotle's Concept of Dialectic.G. L. J. - 1978 - Review of Metaphysics 32 (2):353-354.
  25. The Dialectic of Aristotle.James Hogan - 1955 - Philosophical Studies 5:3-21.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  26. Aristotle's Concept of Dialectic.Martha Husain - 1979 - International Studies in Philosophy 11:210-212.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  27. «ΚΑI OΤΙ EΣΤΙ ΤΙΣ ΤΡΙΤΟΣ AΝΘΡΩΠΟΣ» (Aristotelis Sophistici Elenchi 22 178b36–179a10). Prolegomena to Ancient History of the Argument of 'Third Man'.Gazziero Leone - 2010 - Rhizai 7 (2):181-220.
    Few arguments from the past have stirred up as much interest as Aristotle’s “Third man” and not so many texts have received as much attention as its account in chapter 22 of the Sophistici elenchi. And yet, several issues about both remain highly controversial, starting from the very nature of the argument at stake and the exact signification of some of its features. We provide a close commentary of the text, dealing with its main difficulties and suggesting an overall interpretation (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
1 — 50 / 79