This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories

253 found
Order:
1 — 50 / 253
  1. Locke and Berkeley's Commonplace Book.R. I. Aaron - 1931 - Mind 40 (160):439-459.
  2. Hutcheson, Perception, and the Sceptic's Challenge.Fred Ablondi - 2012 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (2):269-281.
    Francis Hutcheson's theory of perception, as put forth in his Synopsis of Metaphysics, bears a striking similarity to that of John Locke. In particular, Hutcheson and Locke both have at the centre of their theories the notion of ideas as representational entities acting as the direct objects of all of our perceptions. On first consideration, one might find this similarity wholly unremarkable, given the popularity of Locke's Essay. But the Essay was published in 1689 and the Synopsis in 1742, and (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  3. I Think Something That You Do Not Think, and That is Red. John Locke and George Berkeley Over Abstract Ideas and Kant's Logical Abstractionism.Alexander Aichele - 2012 - Kant-Studien 103 (1).
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. Berkeley's Lasting Legacy: 300 Years Later.Timo Airaksinen & Bertil Belfrage (eds.) - 2011 - Cambridge Scholars Press.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. Kant's Critique of Berkeley.Henry E. Allison - 1973 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 11 (1):43.
  6. Lady Mary Shepherd's Case Against George Berkeley.Margaret Atherton - 1996 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 4 (2):347 – 366.
  7. Corpuscles, Mechanism, and Essentialism in Berkeley and Locke.Margaret Atherton - 1991 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 29 (1):47-67.
  8. Berkeley's Immaterialism and Kant's Transcendental Idealism: M. R. Ayers.M. R. Ayers - 1982 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 13:51-69.
    Ever since its first publication critics of Kant's Critique of Pure Reason have been struck by certain strong formal resemblances between transcendental idealism and Berkeley's immaterialism. Both philosophers hold that the sensible world is mind-dependent, and that from this very mind-dependence we can draw a refutation of scepticism of the senses.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. Berkeley's Immaterialism and Kant's Transcendental Idealism.M. R. Ayers - 1982 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures 13:51-69.
    Ever since its first publication critics of Kant's Critique of Pure Reason have been struck by certain strong formal resemblances between transcendental idealism and Berkeley's immaterialism. Both philosophers hold that the sensible world is mind-dependent, and that from this very mind-dependence we can draw a refutation of scepticism of the senses.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10. Is Berkeley's Theory of Ideas A Variant of Locke's?Teppei Baba - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 16:9-15.
    I try to show that Berkeley's theory of ideas is not a variant of Locke's. We can find such an interpretation of Berkeley in Thomas Reid. So, we could call this interpretation a 'traditional interpretation'. This traditional interpretation has an influence still now, for example, Tomida interprets Berkeley in this line (Tomida2002). We will see that this traditional interpretation gives a serious problem to Berkeley (section 1). And I am going to present an argument against this traditional interpretation (section 2).
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. Husserl's Berkeley.A. Z. Bar-on - 1983 - Analecta Husserliana 16:353.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. Berkeley Et Les Métaphysiques de Son Temps.Jean-Christophe Bardout - 2008 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (1):119-139.
    : La contribution de Berkeley à l'histoire de la métaphysique n'a que rarement été étudiée par ses commentateurs français ou anglo-saxons. La présente étude se propose de revenir sur la définition berkeleyenne de la métaphysique, sur la place qu'elle occupe dans l'économie de sa pensée, et tente ainsi d'éclairer la contribution de Berkeley à l'histoire de la notion de métaphysique à l'époque moderne. Nous montrons que la critique berkeleyenne de la métaphysique n'empêche pas Berkeley de maintenir sa pertinence théorique, si (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. Did Berkeley Misunderstand Locke?Winston H. F. Barnes - 1940 - Mind 49 (193):52-57.
  14. Joseph, H. W. B., A Comparison of Kants Idealism with that of Berkeley. [REVIEW]D. Baumgardt - 1933 - Société Française de Philosophie, Bulletin 38:441.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. Learning From Six Philosophers: Descartes, Spinoza, Leibniz, Locke, Berkeley, Hume, Volume 2.Jonathan Bennett - 2003 - Clarendon Press (Paperback).
    Jonathan Bennett engages with the thought of six great thinkers of the early modern period: Descartes, Spinoza, Leibniz, Locke, Berkeley, Hume. While not neglecting the historical setting of each, his chief focus is on the words they wrote. What problem is being tackled? How exactly is the solution meant to work? Does it succeed? If not, why not? What can we learn from its success or its failure? These questions reflect Bennett's dedication to engaging with philosophy as philosophy, not as (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  16. Berkeley, Lee and Abstract Ideas.Hans Peter Benschop - 1997 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 5 (1):55 – 66.
  17. George Berkeley : Eighteenth-Century Responses: Volume Ii.David Berman (ed.) - 2015 - Routledge.
    The material reprinted in this two-volume set, first published in 1989, covers the first eighty-five years in responses to George Berkeley’s writings. David Berman identifies several key waves of eighteenth-century criticism surrounding Berkeley’s philosophies, ranging from hostile and discounted, to valued and defended. The first volume includes an account of the life of Berkeley by J. Murray and key responses from 1711 to 1748, whilst the second volume covers the years between 1745 and 1796. This fascinating reissue illustrates the breadth (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. George Berkeley : Eighteenth-Century Responses: Volume I.David Berman (ed.) - 2014 - Routledge.
    The material reprinted in this two-volume set, first published in 1989, covers the first eighty-five years in responses to George Berkeley’s writings. David Berman identifies several key waves of eighteenth-century criticism surrounding Berkeley’s philosophies, ranging from hostile and discounted, to valued and defended. The first volume includes an account of the life of Berkeley by J. Murray and key responses from 1711 to 1748, whilst the second volume covers the years between 1745 and 1796. This fascinating reissue illustrates the breadth (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. George Berkeley (Routledge Revivals): Eighteenth-Century Responses: Volume I.David Berman (ed.) - 2014 - Routledge.
    The material reprinted in this two-volume set, first published in 1989, covers the first eighty-five years in responses to George Berkeley’s writings. David Berman identifies several key waves of eighteenth-century criticism surrounding Berkeley’s philosophies, ranging from hostile and discounted, to valued and defended. The first volume includes an account of the life of Berkeley by J. Murray and key responses from 1711 to 1748, whilst the second volume covers the years between 1745 and 1796. This fascinating reissue illustrates the breadth (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. Berkeley and Irish Philosophy.David Berman - 2005 - Thoemmes Continuum.
    George Berkeley -- On missing the wrong target -- Enlightenment and counter-Enlightenment in Irish philosophy -- The culmination and causation of Irish philosophy -- Francis Hutcheson on Berkeley and the Molyneux problem -- The impact of Irish philosophy on the American Enlightenment -- Irish ideology and philosophy -- An early essay concerning Berkeley's immaterialism -- Mrs. Berkeley's annotations in An account of the life of Berkeley (1776) -- Some new Bermuda Berkeleiana -- The good bishop : new letters -- Beckett (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. George Berkeley: Eighteenth-Century Responses.David Berman (ed.) - 1989 - Garland.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22. Berkeley and Gentile.Daniele Bertini - 2007 - Idealistic Studies 37 (1):43-50.
    My purpose is to compare Berkeley’s and Gentile’s idealism, interpreting Berkeley’s Treatise, §§22–23, and Gentile’s reading of this passage. The Italian philosopher finds in Berkeley’s master argument the original source of the true idealistic way of thinking, but he believes that Berkeley has not been sufficiently consistent in deducing all the consequences from his new principle. This criticism is the ground of Gentile’s actual idealism. Comparing the two positions is very instructive both to elucidate the general issue of idealism and (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23. The Spirit and the Heap: Berkeley and Hume on the Self and Self-Consciousness.Talia Mae Bettcher - 1999 - Dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles
    This dissertation concerns an important dispute between George Berkeley and David Hume. The dispute involves Berkeley's defense of his conception of the self as a spirit, a purely active being which perceives ideas; and Hume's elimination of that conception via his own, according to which the self is merely a heap, a causally connected system of perceptions. At bottom, this difference in the way that the self is conceptualized is informed by a fundamental difference in philosophical starting-point. Berkeley seeks to (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24. Berkeley and Mental Representation : Why Not a Lockean Theory of Ideas?Martha Brandt Bolton - 2008 - In Stephen H. Daniel (ed.), New Interpretations of Berkeley's Thought. Humanity Books.
  25. The Early Reception of Berkeley's Immaterialism, 1710-1733.H. M. Bracken - 1961 - Philosophical Quarterly 11 (44):278-280.
  26. On Some Points in Bayle, Berkeley, and Hume.Harry M. Bracken - 1987 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 4 (4):435 - 446.
  27. Bayle, Berkeley and Hume.Harry M. Bracken - 1977 - Eighteenth-Century Studies 11:227--45.
  28. Berkeley: Irish Cartesian.Harry M. Bracken - 1975 - Philosophical Studies 24 (101):39-51.
  29. The Early Reception of Berkeley's Immaterialism, 1710-1733.Harry M. Bracken - 1967 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 23 (1):101-101.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30. Berkeley and Malebranche on Ideas.Harry M. Bracken - 1963 - Modern Schoolman 41 (1):1-15.
  31. The Early Reception of Berkeley's Immaterialism, 1710-1733.Harry M. Bracken & Andre-Louis Leroy - 1960 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 21 (2):271-272.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32. The Early Reception of Berkeley's Immaterialism, 1710-1733.Harry Mcfarland Bracken - 1959 - M. Nijhoff.
  33. Review: Stephen Gersh and Dermot Moran, Eds. Eriugena, Berkeley, and the Idealist Tradition. [REVIEW]Costica Bradatan - 2008 - Berkeley Studies:40-43.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34. George Berkeley e a tradição platônica.Costica Bradatan & Jaimir Conte - 2009 - Princípios 16 (26):257-284.
    Existe já uma grande quantidade de literatura dedicada à presença na filosofia inicial de Berkeley de alguns assuntos tipicamente platônicos (arquétipos, o problema da mente de Deus, a relaçáo entre ideias e coisas, etc.). Baseados em alguns desses escritos, nas próprias palavras de Berkeley, assim como no exame de alguns elementos da tradiçáo platônica num amplo sentido, sugiro que, longe de serem apenas tópicos isolados, livremente espalhados nos primeiros escritos de Berkeley, eles formam uma perfeita rede de aspectos, atitudes e (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35. From Inference to Affordance : The Problem of Visual Depth-Perception in the Optical Writings of Descartes, Berkeley and Gibson.Michael Braund - 2006 - Dissertation,
  36. The Reception of Berkeley in Germany in the 18th-Century.W. Breidert - 1985 - Revue Internationale de Philosophie 39 (154):223-241.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37. On the Early Reception of Berkeley in Germany.Wolfgang Breidert - 1987 - In Ernest Sosa (ed.), Essays on the Philosophy of George Berkeley. D. Reidel.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38. Berkeley on the Unity of the Self.S. C. Brown - 1971 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures 5:64-87.
    That the legacy of Berkeley's philosophy has been a largely sceptical one is perhaps rather surprising. For he himself took it as one of his objectives to undermine scepticism. He roundly denied that there were ‘any principles more opposite to Scepticism than those we have laid down’ . Yet Hume was to write of Berkeley that ‘most of the writings of that very ingenious author form the best lessons of scepticism, Bayle not excepted’. And it has become something of a (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. Berkeley and Scholasticism.Joseph William Browne - 1972 - Modern Schoolman 49 (2):113-123.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40. Berkeley, Spinoza, and the Radical Enlightenment.Genevieve Brykman - 2010 - In Silvia Parigi (ed.), George Berkeley: Religion and Science in the Age of Enlightenment. Springer.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41. Idealism and Greek Philosophy: What Descartes Saw and Berkeley Missed.M. F. Burnyeat - 1982 - Philosophical Review 91 (1):3-40.
  42. Idealism and Greek Philosophy: What Descartes Saw and Berkeley Missed.M. F. Burnyeat - 1982 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures 13:19-50.
  43. Locke, Berkeley, and Hume as Philosophers of Money.George C. Caffentzis - 2010 - In Silvia Parigi (ed.), George Berkeley: Religion and Science in the Age of Enlightenment. Springer.
    For the last 30 years I have been writing a trilogy on Locke’s, Berkeley’s, and Hume’s philosophies of money. With the publication of Clipped Coins. Abused Words and Civil Government; John Locke’s Philosophy of Money and Exciting the Industry of Mankind; George Berkeley’s Philosophy of Money and with the last volume on Hume in preparation, the trilogy is now almost completed.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. Berkeley, Reid, and the Mathematization of Mid-Eighteenth-Century Optics.G. N. Cantor - 1977 - Journal of the History of Ideas 38 (3):429.
    Berkeley's "new theory of vision" and, In particular, His sensationalist solution to the problem of judging distance and magnitude were discussed by many eighteenth-Century authors who faced a variety of problem situations. More specifically, Berkeley's theory fed into the debate over whether the phenomena of vision were susceptible to mathematical analysis or were experientially determined. In this paper a variety of responses to berkeley are examined, Concluding with thomas reid's attempt to distinguish physical optics (which can be analyzed geometrically) from (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  45. G. E. Moore's Refutation of Berkeley's Idealism.James D. Carney - 1959 - Dissertation, The University of Nebraska - Lincoln
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. Berkeley no país das Luzes: ceticismo e solipsismo no século XVIII.Sébastian Charles - 2004 - Doispontos 1 (2).
    A influência do ceticismo nos século XVI e XVII é por demais evidente para ser posta em questão. De Montaigne a Bayle, parece que o cético foi o promotor tanto de uma refutação radical dos princípios metafísicos escolásticos e depois cartesianos quanto de uma crítica feroz às autoridades religiosas e políticas. Ora, esse papel parece ter se amenizado no Século das Luzes, ou melhor, se deslocado - somente as dimensões críticas do social continuaram pertinentes. Pretende-se mostrar aqui o pressuposto de (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. De Pascal a Locke: la reprise berkeleyenne des enjeux philosophiques concernant la tolerance religieuse et civile.Sebastien Charles - 2015 - In Berkeley Revisited: Moral, Social and Political Philosophy. Voltaire Foundation. pp. 177-190.
  48. Berkeley and Campailla: Unsuccessful Meeting or Probable Influence?Sebastien Charles - 2009 - Giornale Critico Della Filosofia Italiana 5 (1):25-40.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49. Berkeley's Principles and Dialogues. Background Source Materials Charles J. McCracken Et Ian C. Tipton Collection «Cambridge Philosophical Texts in Context» Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2000, X, 300 P. [REVIEW]Sébastien Charles - 2002 - Dialogue 41 (04):807-.
  50. As posições de Newton, Locke e Berkeley sobre a natureza da gravitação.Silvio Seno Chibeni - 2013 - Scientiae Studia 11 (4):811-839.
    Ao defender, nos Princípios matemáticos de filosofia natural, a existência de uma força de gravitação universal, Newton desencadeou uma onda de dúvidas e objeções filosóficas. Suas próprias declarações sobre a natureza da gravitação não são facilmente interpretáveis como formando um conjunto consistente de opiniões. Por um lado, logo após fornecer as três definições de "quantidades de forças centrípetas" (Defs. 6-8), Newton observa que está tratando tais forças "matematicamente", sem se pronunciar sobre sua realidade física. Mas, por outro lado, no Escólio (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 253