This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories

265 found
Order:
1 — 50 / 265
  1. added 2020-05-19
    On Sattopalambhavāda or an Indian Version of Esse Est Percipi Zolzaya Munkhtseren.Shinya Moriyama - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 4:61-68.
    Esse est percipi---this famous phrase of 18th century British philosopher, George Berkeley, is known to be an Idealist challenge against our common sense that there are mind-independent things. In contrast with the familiarity Berkeley’s theory, the existence of similar theory in Indian Buddhism in the 8th century is widely unknown. The Indian version of this theory can be expressed in Sanskrit, sattopalambhavāda, i.e., the theory claiming that “to be is to perceive/to be perceived.” The first and probably last philosopher who (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2. added 2020-05-01
    Three Objections Against Phenomenalist Interpretations of Kant Defeated.Michael Oberst - 2018 - Studi Kantiani 31:119-136.
    Many passages in Kant’s texts suggest that he is a phenomenalist about appearances, i.e., that appearances are only part of our mental content and do not exist outside our mind. In recent years, however, phenomenalist readings of Kant’s idealism have been of ill repute. Without wanting to make a positive case for phenomenalism, this paper attempts to rebut three particularly popular objections to any phenomenalist reading. In slogan form, they are 1) «There is only prima facie evidence», 2) «Kant is (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3. added 2020-05-01
    Learning From Six Philosophers: Descartes, Spinoza, Leibniz, Locke, Berkeley, Hume.David Scott - 2004 - Review of Metaphysics 57 (3):603-605.
    Mostly what Bennett learns from these six philosophers is not their positive doctrines. Rather, his learning takes the form of reconstruction and analysis of what he deems to be otherwise incorrect views. A good example is found in his treatment of Berkeley’s attack on the conceptual defects of materialism. On Bennett’s analysis Berkeley’s case rests on a flawed theory of representation, but Bennett sticks with Berkeley nonetheless. We see the same kind of learning in his excellent chapter 29 on the (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4. added 2020-05-01
    Philosophical Writing: Locke, Berkeley, Hume.James T. King - 1985 - Review of Metaphysics 38 (4):902-903.
    Richetti finds Locke, Berkeley, and Hume to be appropriate for a literary study on his claim that for these three philosophers writing was itself a special problem. Since their works were still addressed to a general, not a professional audience, each gave much consideration to the manner of the presentation of his thought, attempting to close the emerging gap between literary creation and technical writing. Further, because these authors dealt in the abstruse, sometimes in the paradoxical, finding a literary voice (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5. added 2020-02-11
    Learning From Six Philosophers: Descartes, Spinoza, Leibniz, Locke, Berkeley, Hume.Tad M. Schmaltz - 2002 - Mind 111 (442):367-373.
  6. added 2019-06-06
    Berkeley no país das Luzes: ceticismo e solipsismo no século XVIII.Sébastian Charles - 2004 - Dois Pontos 1 (2).
    resumo A influência do ceticismo nos século XVI e XVII é por demais evidente para ser posta em questão. De Montaigne a Bayle, parece que o cético foi o promotor tanto de uma refutação radical dos princípios metafísicos escolásticos e depois cartesianos quanto de uma crítica feroz às autoridades religiosas e políticas. Ora, esse papel parece ter se amenizado no Século das Luzes, ou melhor, se deslocado - somente as dimensões críticas do social continuaram pertinentes. Pretende-se mostrar aqui o pressuposto (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7. added 2019-06-06
    C.J. Mccracken And I.C. Tipton, Eds., Berkeley's Principles And Dialogues: Background Source Materials. [REVIEW]Stephen H. Daniel - 2001 - Philosophy in Review 21 (5):362-364.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8. added 2019-06-06
    Dialogue Between Berkeley and Hume.Louis Frédéric Ancillon & Charlotte Stanley - 2001 - Hume Studies 27 (1):99-127.
    First surprise! You make the brain itself into an idea, and consequently, also the five senses and the whole body. Thus you can no longer talk about sensations; that would be saying that a great idea, an idea of specific dimensions or an infinite number of small ideas, however you feel like explaining it to us, becomes the vehicle that seizes all other ideas, except of course yours, which finds no place there and doesn’t come up [to the mind].
    Remove from this list   Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9. added 2019-06-06
    Hume and Berkeley in the Prussian Academy: Louis Frédéric Ancillon’s “Dialogue Between Berkeley and Hume” of 1796.S. Charles, J. C. Laursen, R. H. Popkin & A. Zakatistovs - 2001 - Hume Studies 27 (1):85-97.
  10. added 2019-06-06
    Peirce on Berkeley’s Nominalistic Platonism.Douglas R. Anderson & Peter S. Groff - 1998 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 72 (2):165-177.
  11. added 2019-06-06
    Reid’s Critique of Berkeley and Hume: What’s the Big Idea?John Greco - 1995 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55 (2):279-296.
    Reid thought that the linchpin of his response to\nskepticism was his rejection of the theory of ideas. I\nargue that Reid's assessment of his own work is incorrect;\nthe theory of ideas plays no important role in at least one\nof Berkeley's and Hume's arguments for skepticism, and\nrejecting the theory is therefore neither necessary nor\nsufficient as a reply to that argument. Reid does in fact\nanswer the argument, but with his theory of evidence rather\nthan his rejection of the theory of ideas.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  12. added 2019-06-06
    The Critique of Berkeley’s Empiricism In Orwell’s 1984.Peter S. Wenz - 1986 - Idealistic Studies 16 (2):133-152.
    George Orwell wrote to Roger Senhouse upon completion of 1984 that the work was designed in part “to indicate by parodying them the intellectual implications of totalitarianism.” The implications for social and political philosophy have furnished a generation of readers with frightening realizations. I will attempt in what follows to show that the implications for epistemology and metaphysics are equally central to the book’s message, and equally discomfitting to philosophers in the Anglo-American tradition. The book connects totalitarianism with the entire (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13. added 2019-06-06
    Russell, Berkeley, y la materia objetiva.Ernesto Sosa - 1975 - Critica 7 (21):35-41.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  14. added 2019-06-06
    A Note on Berkeley’s New Theory of Vision and Thomas Reid’s Distinction Between Primary and Secondary Qualities.Bruce Silver - 1974 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 12 (2):253-263.
  15. added 2019-06-06
    Locke, Berkeley, Hume: Central Themes. [REVIEW]Vincent M. Cooke - 1972 - International Philosophical Quarterly 12 (4):621-623.
  16. added 2019-06-06
    From Berkeley to Hegel: A Chapter of the History of Philosophy Embodying A Critique of the Panlogist Phase of Idealism.Edward Douglas Fawcett - 1896 - The Monist 7 (1):41-81.
  17. added 2018-08-27
    Phenomenology and the Geometrization of Vision.Aurora Plomer - 1988 - Dissertation, Lancaster University (United Kingdom)
    Available from UMI in association with The British Library. ;The aim of this thesis is to evaluate Descartes and Berkeley's theories of perception in the light of Merleau Ponty's objections to classical theories in La Phenomenologie de la Perception. According to Merleau Ponty--whose thesis is elucidated by reference to the Gestaltists and Husserl--classical theories of perception either rely on causal explanations or on logical analyses. But, Merleau Ponty argues, neither form of explanation can suitably account for the intentional character of (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  18. added 2018-06-19
    La crítica de George Berkeley al representacionalismo de John Locke.Alberto Oya - 2018 - Anales Del Seminario de Historia de la Filosofía 35 (1):109-126.
    En su Tratado sobre los principios del conocimiento humano, George Berkeley ofrece una serie de argumentos cuyo objetivo es criticar la tesis materialista. Mi propósito en este artículo es reconstruir y analizar en detalle estos argumentos. Dado que la crítica de Berkeley al materialismo es, fundamentalmente, una crítica al materialismo representacionalista de John Locke, empezaré este artículo explicando cuáles son las ideas básicas de la propuesta de Locke.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  19. added 2018-06-19
    Reviewed Works: The Early Reception of Berkeley's Immaterialism, 1710-1733 by Harry M. Bracken; George Berkeley by Andre-Louis Leroy. [REVIEW]Walter B. Carter - 1960 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 21 (2):271.
  20. added 2018-03-24
    The Semiotic of Bishop Berkeley — A Prelude to Peirce?James A. Moore - 1984 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 20 (3):325 - 342.
    Peirce described himself as a disciple of Berkeley, and described the truth of Berkeleyanism as consisting, in part, of “hinging” all philosophy (or "all coenoscopy") on the concept of sign. This article collects Berkeley’s chief semiotic contributions, and discusses how it may have influenced Peirce’s semiotic.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  21. added 2018-03-14
    Hey, What's the Big Idea? Berkeley and Hume on Extension, Local Conjunction, and the Immateriality of the Soul.Don Garrett - 2018 - In Stefan Storrie (ed.), Berkeley's Three Dialogues: New Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 191-204.
  22. added 2018-03-14
    A Puzzle in the Three Dialogues and Its Platonic Resolution.John Russell Roberts - 2018 - In Stefan Storrie (ed.), Berkeley's Three Dialogues: New Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 146-159.
  23. added 2018-03-14
    Berkeley on Continuous Creation: Occasionalism Contained.Sukjae Lee - 2018 - In Stefan Storrie (ed.), Berkeley's Three Dialogues: New Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 106-122.
    No categories
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  24. added 2018-01-17
    George Berkeley and Jonathan Edwards on Idealism: Considering an Old Question in Light of New Evidence.Scott Fennema - 2019 - Intellectual History Review 29 (2):265-290.
  25. added 2018-01-17
    Is Shepherd's Pen Mightier Than Berkeley's Word?Samuel C. Rickless - 2018 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 26 (2):317-330.
    In 1827, Lady Mary Shepherd published Essays on the Perception of an External Universe, which offers both an argument for the existence of a world of external bodies existing outside our minds and a criticism of Berkeley's argument for idealism in A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge. In this paper, I evaluate Margaret Atherton's criticisms of Shepherd's case against Berkeley, and provide reasons for thinking that, although Shepherd's particular criticisms of Berkeley do not succeed, she correctly identifies an (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  26. added 2018-01-17
    Action, Knowledge and Embodiment in Berkeley and Locke.Tom Stoneham - 2018 - Philosophical Explorations 21 (1):41-59.
    Embodiment is a fact of human existence which philosophers should not ignore. They may differ to a great extent in what they have to say about our bodies, but they have to take into account that for each of us our body has a special status, it is not merely one amongst the physical objects, but a physical object to which we have a unique relation. While Descartes approached the issue of embodiment through consideration of sensation and imagination, it is (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  27. added 2018-01-17
    Kantian Phenomenalism Without Berkeleyan Idealism.Tim Jankowiak - 2017 - Kantian Review 22 (2):205-231.
    Phenomenalist interpretations of Kant are out of fashion. The most common complaint from anti-phenomenalist critics is that a phenomenalist reading of Kant would collapse Kantian idealism into Berkeleyan idealism. This would be unacceptable because Berkeleyan idealism is incompatible with core elements of Kant’s empirical realism. In this paper, I argue that not all phenomenalist readings threaten empirical realism. First, I distinguish several variants of phenomenalism, and then show that Berkeley’s idealism is characterized by his commitment to most of them. I (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  28. added 2017-06-16
    Berkeley Et Les Métaphysiques de Son Temps.Jean-Christophe Bardout - 2008 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (1):119-139.
    : La contribution de Berkeley à l'histoire de la métaphysique n'a que rarement été étudiée par ses commentateurs français ou anglo-saxons. La présente étude se propose de revenir sur la définition berkeleyenne de la métaphysique, sur la place qu'elle occupe dans l'économie de sa pensée, et tente ainsi d'éclairer la contribution de Berkeley à l'histoire de la notion de métaphysique à l'époque moderne. Nous montrons que la critique berkeleyenne de la métaphysique n'empêche pas Berkeley de maintenir sa pertinence théorique, si (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  29. added 2017-06-12
    The Early Reception of Berkeley's Immaterialism, 1710-1733.Walter B. Carter - 1960 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 21 (2):271-272.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  30. added 2017-06-05
    From Logical Positivism Back to Bishop Berkeley.Robin Stenwall - unknown
  31. added 2017-06-05
    "Clos'd by Your Senses Five": William Blake's Early Illuminated Prophecies and Berkeleian Epistemology.Vincent Miller Whitman - 2002 - Dissertation, The University of Connecticut
    This study uses the key terms of Berkeleian epistemology as a framework for understanding Blake's early prophetic works. As a foil, Berkeley highlights the importance of epistemology to Blake and makes clear that the fundamental characteristic of the Fall for Blake is the mistaken assumption that sensory perceptions are effects of an external spiritual cause. ;Most importantly: "Independence" denotes Berkeley's tenet that the existence of a "real thing" or physical object is constantly maintained by God regardless of whether any human (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  32. added 2017-06-05
    Berkeley and Cartesianism.Daisie Radner - 1978 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 8 (sup1):165-176.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  33. added 2017-06-05
    Berkeley and Malebranche: A Study in the Origins of Berkeley's Thought. [REVIEW]P. L. S. - 1935 - Journal of Philosophy 32 (2):47-48.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  34. added 2017-04-12
    Berkeley, Descartes and the Science of Nature.Jonathan Dancy - 2014 - The Harvard Review of Philosophy 20:4-16.
  35. added 2017-04-12
    Berkeley and Wittgenstein.Helen Paxton Gibbens - unknown
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  36. added 2017-04-12
    Dwa Typy Racjonalności — Berkeley I Newton.Jacek Gurczyński - 2013 - Rocznik Filozoficzny Ignatianum 19 (1).
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  37. added 2017-04-12
    The Reception of Berkeley in Germany in the 18th-Century.W. Breidert - 1985 - Revue Internationale de Philosophie 39 (154):223-241.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  38. added 2017-04-12
    Abstract Ideas and Meaning in Berkeley and Hume.Donald Gotterbarn - 1975 - Proceedings of the XVth World Congress of Philosophy 5:701-705.
  39. added 2017-04-12
    IX—Leibniz and Berkeley.J. J. MacIntosh - 1971 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 71 (1):147-164.
  40. added 2017-04-12
    IV. Berkeley, Newton, and Space1.W. Davis John - 1970 - In John W. Davis & Robert E. Butts (eds.), The Methodological Heritage of Newton. University of Toronto Press. pp. 57-73.
  41. added 2017-04-12
    Berkeley and Malebranche.Ralph W. Church & A. A. Luce - 1936 - Philosophical Review 45 (1):79.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  42. added 2017-02-22
    Epistemology and Ontology In Kant’s Critique of Berkeley.Ted Kinnaman - 2002 - Idealistic Studies 32 (3):203-220.
    Despite apparent similarities between them, in the Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics and in the second edition of the Critique of Pure Reason Kant makes several attempts to distinguish his idealism from Berkeley’s. I argue that Kant’s arguments in three of the four places where he explicitly distances himself from Berkeley are insufficient to their task because they attack only Berkeley’s empiricism rather than his immaterialism. Although a close reading of the Refutation of Idealism lies beyond the scope of this (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  43. added 2017-02-22
    Kant and Dogmatic Idealism: A Defense of Kant’s Refutation of Berkeley.Vance G. Morgan - 1993 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 31 (2):217-237.
  44. added 2017-02-22
    Bayle, Berkeley and Hume’s Metaphysics.John W. Davis - 1988 - Philosophie Et Culture: Actes du XVIIe Congrès Mondial de Philosophie 4:358-364.
  45. added 2017-02-22
    Berkeley's Immaterialism and Kant's Transcendental Idealism: M. R. Ayers.M. R. Ayers - 1982 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 13:51-69.
    Ever since its first publication critics of Kant's Critique of Pure Reason have been struck by certain strong formal resemblances between transcendental idealism and Berkeley's immaterialism. Both philosophers hold that the sensible world is mind-dependent, and that from this very mind-dependence we can draw a refutation of scepticism of the senses.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  46. added 2017-02-22
    Berkeley and Malebranche on Ideas.Harry M. Bracken - 1963 - Modern Schoolman 41 (1):1-15.
  47. added 2017-02-22
    The Early Reception of Berkeley's Immaterialism, 1710-1733.A. A. Luce - 1961 - Philosophical Quarterly 11 (44):278-280.
  48. added 2017-02-22
    The Early Reception of Berkeley's Immaterialism, 1710-1733.Harry M. Bracken - 1959 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 23 (1):101-101.
  49. added 2017-02-22
    A Comparison of Kant's Idealism with That of Berkeley.H. W. B. Joseph - 1930 - Journal of Philosophical Studies 5 (18):283-285.
  50. added 2016-12-08
    Siris and the Renaissance: Some Overlooked Berkeleian Sources.Silvia Parigi - 2010 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 135 (1):151.
    This essay deals with a quite unexplored topic : Berkeley's sources from Renaissance. In fact, while the relationships between Berkeley and the most well-known modern philosophers (as Descartes, Malebranche, Locke and Hume) have been widely analysed, the importance of Berkeley's classical learning and erudition for the development of his own philosophical thought has usually been overlooked. After some general considerations, I focus on two topics : ether and tar-water in Siris. Cet essai traite un sujet très peu exploré : les (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
1 — 50 / 265