This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories

11 found
Order:
  1. Berkeley's Puzzle About the Water That Seems Both Hot and Cold.D. M. Armstrong - 1954 - Analysis 15 (2):44 - 46.
  2. Berkeley's Analysis of Perception. [REVIEW]A. S. C. - 1971 - Review of Metaphysics 25 (2):371-371.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. A Oposição de Berkeley Ao Ceticismo.Jaimir Conte - 2008 - Cadernos de História de Filosofia da Ciência 18 (2):3225-355.
    One of Berkeley’s main goals in the Principles and in the Three Dialogues, as expressly stated in the full titles these two works, as well as in the Philosophical Commen-taries, is the refutation of skepticism. This article aims to elucidate what Berkeley means by skepticism and to indicate which principles or doctrines, according to him, are at the root of the skeptics’ doubts. An attempt is made to show how Berkeley elaborated his opposition to skepticism. Finally, it is suggested that (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. Perception and the Language of Nature.Rebecca Copenhaver - 2013 - In James A. Harris (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of British Philosophy in the Eighteenth Century. Oxford University Press. pp. 107.
    This chapter discusses eighteenth-century British theories of perception, beginning with George Berkeley’s Essay Towards a New Theory of Vision. The chapter traces Berkeley’s influence through Thomas Reid, David Hume, David Hartley, Adam Smith and Dugald Stewart. The chapter presents theories of perception in this time a place a primarily concerned with metaphysics, mind and methodology rather than epistemology.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. Berkeley's Manifest Qualities Thesis.Phillip D. Cummins - 1990 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 28 (3):385-401.
  6. The Cartesian Roots of Berkeley's Account of Sensation.Melissa Frankel - 2017 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 55 (2):214-231.
    On the old story about early modern philosophy, Descartes is a “rationalist” who devalues the senses, and Berkeley an “empiricist” who rejects this. Berkeley plays into this story in his Notebooks, where he writes: “in vindication of the senses effectually to confute wt Descartes saith in ye last par. of the last Med: viz. that the senses oftener inform him falsly than truely”. But when we turn to this “last par.,” we find Descartes maintaining that “my senses report the truth (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. Revisiting Berkeley's Perceptual Relativity Argument.Melissa Frankel - 2013 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 30 (2):161-176.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. A New Approach to Berkeley's Ideal Reality.Alan Hausman & David Hausman - 1995 - In Robert G. Muehlmann (ed.), Berkeley's Metaphysics: Structural, Interpretive, and Critical Essays. The Pennsylvania State University Press. pp. 65-78.
  9. Berkeley's Argument for Idealism.Samuel Rickless - 2013 - Oxford University Press.
    Samuel Rickless presents a new account of Berkeley's controversial argument, and suggests it is the philosopher's greatest legacy: not only is it valid, but it may well be sound.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  10. Berkeley's Perceptual Realism.Katia Saporiti - 2004 - In Ralph Schumacher (ed.), Perception and Reality: From Descartes to the present. Mentis. pp. 188-213.
  11. On the Hausmans' "A New Approach".Fred Wilson - 1995 - In Robert G. Muehlmann (ed.), Berkeley's Metaphysics: Structural, Interpretive, and Critical Essays. The Pennsylvania State University Press.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography