This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories

152 found
Order:
1 — 50 / 152
  1. added 2020-02-11
    The Positivist and the Ontologist: Bergmann, Carnap and Logical Realism.Eugenio S. G. Lombardo - 2003 - Mind 112 (448):724-728.
  2. added 2020-02-11
    Einführung in Die Symbolische Logik MIT Besonderer Berücksichtigung Ihrer Anwendungen. Rudolf Carnap.Norman M. Martin - 1955 - Philosophy of Science 22 (2):167-168.
  3. added 2020-02-11
    International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, Vol. I, No. 3: Foundations of Logic and Mathematics. [REVIEW]Paul Weiss - 1939 - Ethics 50 (1):119-120.
  4. added 2019-12-07
    A Note on Carnap’s Result and the Connectives.Tristan Haze - 2019 - Axiomathes 29 (3):285-288.
    Carnap’s result about classical proof-theories not ruling out non-normal valuations of propositional logic formulae has seen renewed philosophical interest in recent years. In this note I contribute some considerations which may be helpful in its philosophical assessment. I suggest a vantage point from which to see the way in which classical proof-theories do, at least to a considerable extent, encode the meanings of the connectives (not by determining a range of admissible valuations, but in their own way), and I demonstrate (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  5. added 2019-12-07
    How May the Propositional Calculus Represent?Tristan Haze - 2017 - South American Journal of Logic 3 (1):173-184.
    This paper is a conceptual study in the philosophy of logic. The question considered is 'How may formulae of the propositional calculus be brought into a representational relation to the world?'. Four approaches are distinguished: (1) the denotational approach, (2) the abbreviational approach, (3) the truth-conditional approach, and (4) the modelling approach. (2) and (3) are very familiar, so I do not discuss them. (1), which is now largely obsolete, led to some interesting twists and turns in early analytic philosophy (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6. added 2019-09-09
    Husserl and Carnap on Regions and Formal Categories.Ansten Klev - 2017 - In Stefania Centrone (ed.), Essays on Husserl’s Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics. Dordrecht: Springer Verlag. pp. 409-429.
    Husserl, in his doctrine of categories, distinguishes what he calls regions from what he calls formal categories. The former are most general domains, while the latter are topic-neutral concepts that apply across all domains. Husserl’s understanding of these notions of category is here discussed in detail. It is, moreover, argued that similar notions of category may be recognized in Carnap’s Der logische Aufbau der Welt.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  7. added 2019-06-21
    Carnap* Replies.Geoffrey Hellman - 2018 - The Monist 101 (4):388-393.
    In an imagined dialogue between two figures called “Carnap*” and “Quine*” that appeared in the Library of Living Philosophers volume in 1986, certain proposals and clarifications of the linguistic doctrine were offered by Carnap* answering Quinean objections, but these were brushed aside rather breezily in a reply to this dialogue in the same volume by Quine himself. After a brief summary of the questions at issue in that earlier dialogue, Carnap* is here allowed a final reply, introducing yet another variant (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8. added 2019-06-07
    Wahrheit und Bewahrung.Carl G. Hempel & Rudolf Carnap - 1952 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 17 (2):139.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  9. added 2019-06-06
    An Observation on Carnapʼs Continuum and Stochastic Independencies.J. B. Paris - 2013 - Journal of Applied Logic 11 (4):421-429.
    We characterize those identities and independencies which hold for all probability functions on a unary language satisfying the Principle of Atom Exchangeability. We then show that if this is strengthen to the requirement that Johnson's Sufficientness Principle holds, thus giving Carnap's Continuum of inductive methods for languages with at least two predicates, then new and somewhat inexplicable identities and independencies emerge, the latter even in the case of Carnap's Continuum for the language with just a single predicate.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10. added 2019-06-06
    The Development of Carnap’s Semantics.Igor Hanzel - 2009 - American Journal of Semiotics 25 (1/2):123-151.
    The paper reconstructs the three main stages in the development of Carnap’s semantics in the years 1935–1947. It starts with Carnap’s approach to metalogic in his Zirkelprotokolle and his Logische Syntax der Sprache from the point of view of one-level approach to the relation between metalanguage and its object-language. It then analyzes Tarski’s turn to semantics in his paper presented at the Paris conference in September 1935, as well as the implications of his view for Carnap’s approach to semantics from (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  11. added 2019-06-06
    Ideal Languages and Carnap’s Principle of Tolerance.Paolo Dau - 1985 - International Studies in Philosophy 17 (3):15-31.
  12. added 2019-06-06
    Carnap Rudolf. The Methodological Character of Theoretical Concepts. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Volume I, The Foundations of Science and the Concepts of Psychology and Psychoanalysis, Edited by Feigl Herbert and Scriven Michael, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis 1956, Pp. 38–76.Carnap Rudolf. Beobachtungssprache Und Theoretische Sprache. German, with German and English Summaries. Logica, Studia Paul Bernays Dedicata, Bibliothèque Scientifique No. 34, Éditions du Griffon, Neuch'tel 1959, Pp. 32–44; Also Dialectica, Vol. 12 , Pp. 236–248. [REVIEW]Yehoshua Bar-Hillel - 1960 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 25 (1):71-74.
  13. added 2019-06-06
    Carnap Rudolf. Remarks to Kemeny's Paper. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Vol. 13 No. 3 , Pp. 375–376.Abner Shimony - 1958 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 23 (1):77-77.
  14. added 2019-06-06
    Meaning and Synonymy in Natural Languages.Rulon Wells & Rudolf Carnap - 1955 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 20 (3):296.
  15. added 2019-06-06
    Linsky Leonard. Some Notes on Carnap's Concept of Inlensional Isomorphism and the Paradox of Analysis. Philosophy of Science, Vol. 16 , Pp. 343–347.Carnap Rudolf. A Reply to Leonard Linsky. Philosophy of Science, Vol. 16 , Pp. 347–350. [REVIEW]W. V. Quine - 1950 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 15 (2):149-150.
  16. added 2019-06-06
    Bergmann Gustav. Concerning Carnap's Definition of ‘Extensional’ and ‘Intensional.’ Mind, N.S. Vol. 57 , Pp. 494–495. [REVIEW]Max Black - 1950 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 14 (4):249-249.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  17. added 2019-06-06
    Concerning Carnap's Definition of `Extensional' and `Intensional.'.Max Black & Gustav Bergmann - 1950 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 14 (4):249.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  18. added 2019-06-06
    Wedberg Anders. The Logical Construction of the World. A Critical Analysis of Rudolf Carnap's Der Logische Aufbau der Welt. Theoria, Vol. 10 , Pp. 216–246. [REVIEW]Carl G. Hempel - 1948 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 13 (4):222-222.
  19. added 2019-06-06
    Carnap Rudolf. Remarks on Induction and Truth. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Vol. 6 No. 4 , Pp. 590–602.Kaufmann Felix. On the Nature of Inductive Inference. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Vol. 6 No. 4 , Pp. 602–609.Carnap Rudolf. Rejoinder to Mr. Kaufmann's Reply. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Vol. 6 No. 4 , Pp. 609–611. [REVIEW]Carl G. Hempel - 1946 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 11 (4):124-125.
  20. added 2019-06-06
    Introduction to Semantics.Rudolf Carnap - 1942 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  21. added 2019-06-06
    Oakeley H. D.. Epistemology and the Logical Syntax of Language. Mind, N.S. Vol. 49 , Pp. 427–444.Everett J. Nelson - 1940 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 5 (4):161-161.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  22. added 2019-06-06
    Testability and Meaning.Henry S. Leonard & Rudolf Carnap - 1937 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 2 (1):49.
  23. added 2019-06-05
    Analyticity, Carnap, Quine, and Truth.Marian David - 1996 - Philosophical Perspectives 10:281-296.
    Quine’s paper “Two Dogmas of Empiricism” is famous for its attack on analyticity and the analytic/synthetic distinction. But there is an element of Quine’s attack that should strike one as extremely puzzling, namely his objection to Carnap’s account of analyticity. For it appears that, if this objection works, it will not only do away with analyticity, it will also do away with other semantic notions, notions that (or so one would have thought) Quine does not want to do away with, (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  24. added 2019-06-05
    Nachruf auf Rudolf Carnap.Wolfgang Stegmüller - 1971 - Zeitschrift Für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 2 (1):1-13.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  25. added 2019-06-05
    Disease, Life, and Man. Rudolf Virchow, Lelland J. Rather.Edward C. Moore - 1959 - Philosophy of Science 26 (4):386-386.
  26. added 2019-06-05
    Goethe as a Scientist. Rudolf Magnus, Heinz Norden.Stephen C. Cappannari - 1952 - Philosophy of Science 19 (3):243-243.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  27. added 2019-01-09
    Pluralizm logiczny a relatywizm w logice.Bożena Czernecka-Rej - 2018 - Diametros 56:51-68.
    The aim of the article is to analyze the situation of contemporary logic with reference to the issue concerning connections between the pluralism of logical systems and relativism in logic. Accordingly, I seek answers to the following questions: Can the plurality of logic, more specifically, a large number and variety of systems constructed by logicians, be justified in a rational way? Does pluralism in logic imply the thesis of relativism? Is logical relativism in the contemporary philosophy of logic just a (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  28. added 2017-10-12
    The Context of the Development of Carnap’s Views on Logic Up to the Aufbau.Clinton Tolley - 2016 - Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 18:187-212.
  29. added 2017-09-08
    Frege and Carnap on the Normativity of Logic.Florian Steinberger - 2017 - Synthese 194 (1):143-162.
    In this paper I examine the question of logic’s normative status in the light of Carnap’s Principle of Tolerance. I begin by contrasting Carnap’s conception of the normativity of logic with that of his teacher, Frege. I identify two core features of Frege’s position: first, the normative force of the logical laws is grounded in their descriptive adequacy; second, norms implied by logic are constitutive for thinking as such. While Carnap breaks with Frege’s absolutism about logic and hence with the (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  30. added 2017-08-02
    Rudolf Carnap.Logan Paul Gage - 2017 - In Paul Copan, I. I. I. Tremper Longman, Christopher L. Reese & Michael G. Strauss (eds.), Dictionary of Christianity and Science: The Definitive Reference for the Intersection of Christian Faith and Contemporary Science. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan Academic. pp. 79-80.
    A brief introduction to the life and key work of Rudolf Carnap with special attention to his work on inductive logic.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  31. added 2017-02-11
    ""Quine's" Two Dogmas" as a Criticism of Logical Empiricism.Artur Koterski - 2012 - Filozofia Nauki 20 (1):45 - +.
    Dans les « Deux dogmes», Quine voulait démontrer que le positivisme logique n’était possible qu’en raison d’hypothèses injustifiées. L’intention de Quine était de montrer qu’il n’est possible de sauver l’empirisme que si l’on accepte une autre approche, holistique. Toutefois, l’article de Quine était anachronique dès le moment de sa publication. Le but de cet article est double. Tout d’abord, on esquissera l’argument de Quine et on le confrontera aux positions de Carnap et Dubislav. On montrera que la critique de Quine (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  32. added 2017-02-11
    Axiomatic Inscriptional Syntax. Part II. The Syntax of Protothetic.V. Frederick Rickey - 1973 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 14 (1):1-52.
  33. added 2017-02-11
    Review: Gustav Bergmann, Professor Quine on Analyticity. [REVIEW]Alan Ross Anderson - 1958 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 23 (1):68-68.
  34. added 2017-02-11
    Review: Luitgard Wundheiler, Alex Wundheiler, William N. Locke, A. Donald Booth, Some Logical Concepts for Syntax. [REVIEW]Alonzo Church - 1956 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 21 (3):312-313.
  35. added 2017-02-11
    Review: Rudolf Carnap, Meaning Postulates. [REVIEW]Abner Shimony - 1955 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 20 (2):188-189.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  36. added 2017-02-11
    Review: Rudolf Carnap, On Belief Sentences. [REVIEW]Rulon Wells - 1955 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 20 (3):296-296.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  37. added 2017-02-11
    Review: Rudolf Carnap, Truth and Confirmation. [REVIEW]Carl G. Hempel - 1952 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 17 (2):139-139.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  38. added 2017-02-11
    Review: Rudolf Carnap, Testability and Meaning. [REVIEW]Victor Kraft - 1951 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 16 (2):137-137.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  39. added 2017-02-11
    Review: Rudolf Carnap, Logical Foundations of Probability. [REVIEW]John G. Kemeny - 1951 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 16 (3):205-207.
  40. added 2017-02-11
    Review: Rudolf Carnap, Modalities and Quantification. [REVIEW]Paul Bernays - 1948 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 13 (4):218-219.
  41. added 2017-02-11
    Review: Rudolf Carnap, The Two Concepts of Probability. [REVIEW]Ernest Nagel - 1946 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 11 (1):19-23.
  42. added 2017-02-11
    Review: Rudolf Carnap, Introduction to Semantics. [REVIEW]C. H. Langford - 1943 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 8 (1):36-37.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  43. added 2017-02-11
    Review: Rudolf Carnap, Formalization of Logic. [REVIEW]Carl G. Hempel - 1943 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 8 (3):81-83.
  44. added 2017-02-11
    Martin Strauss. Mathematics as Logical Syntax—a Method to Formalize the Language of a Physical Theory. Erkenntnis, Vol. 7 No. 3 , Pp. 147–153. [REVIEW]Evert Beth - 1939 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 4 (1):25-26.
  45. added 2017-02-11
    Review: Rudolf Carnap, Notes for Symbolic Logic. [REVIEW]Alonzo Church - 1939 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 4 (1):29-30.
  46. added 2017-02-11
    Review: Bertrand Russell, On the Importance of Logical Form; Rudolf Carnap, Logical Foundations of the Unity of Science. [REVIEW]C. H. Langford - 1938 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 3 (4):157-158.
  47. added 2017-02-08
    Quine on Analyticity and Logical Truth.James F. Harris - 1969 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 7 (3):249-255.
    Quine claims that the analytic-synthetic distinction lacks a proper characterization of a notion to be used to reduce analytic statements "depending upon essential predication" to logically true statements. the author shows that the same arguments used by quine against analyticity can also be used against logical truth; if one notion is "given up", the other must be also. notions such as "filling blanks alike" and "identical propositions" presupposed by logical truth have the same deficiencies as does analyticity. logical truth is (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  48. added 2017-02-07
    Axiomatic Inscriptional Syntax. Part II: The Syntax of Protothetic.Frederick Rickey - 1973 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 14 (1):1-52.
  49. added 2017-02-07
    Book Review:Visual Thinking Rudolf Arnheim. [REVIEW]Marc Bornstein - 1973 - Philosophy of Science 40 (1):141-.
  50. added 2017-02-01
    Carnap's Ontology and Challenges.John Sweigart - 1963 - Philosophy of Science 30 (1):71-80.
1 — 50 / 152