This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories

154 found
Order:
1 — 50 / 154
  1. added 2019-01-09
    Pluralizm logiczny a relatywizm w logice.Bożena Czernecka-Rej - 2018 - Diametros 56:51-68.
    The aim of the article is to analyze the situation of contemporary logic with reference to the issue concerning connections between the pluralism of logical systems and relativism in logic. Accordingly, I seek answers to the following questions: Can the plurality of logic, more specifically, a large number and variety of systems constructed by logicians, be justified in a rational way? Does pluralism in logic imply the thesis of relativism? Is logical relativism in the contemporary philosophy of logic just a (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2. added 2017-10-12
    The Context of the Development of Carnap’s Views on Logic Up to the Aufbau.Clinton Tolley - 2016 - Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 18:187-212.
  3. added 2017-09-08
    Frege and Carnap on the Normativity of Logic.Florian Steinberger - 2017 - Synthese 194 (1):143-162.
    In this paper I examine the question of logic’s normative status in the light of Carnap’s Principle of Tolerance. I begin by contrasting Carnap’s conception of the normativity of logic with that of his teacher, Frege. I identify two core features of Frege’s position: first, the normative force of the logical laws is grounded in their descriptive adequacy; second, norms implied by logic are constitutive for thinking as such. While Carnap breaks with Frege’s absolutism about logic and hence with the (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  4. added 2017-08-02
    Rudolf Carnap.Logan Paul Gage - 2017 - In Paul Copan, I. I. I. Tremper Longman, Christopher L. Reese & Michael G. Strauss (eds.), Dictionary of Christianity and Science: The Definitive Reference for the Intersection of Christian Faith and Contemporary Science. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan Academic. pp. 79-80.
  5. added 2017-02-11
    Axiomatic Inscriptional Syntax. Part II. The Syntax of Protothetic.V. Frederick Rickey - 1973 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 14 (1):1-52.
  6. added 2017-02-11
    Review: Rudolf Carnap, Rolf A. George, The Logical Structure of the World. Pseudoproblems in Philosophy. [REVIEW]Anders Wedberg - 1971 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 36 (3):551-552.
  7. added 2017-02-11
    Review: Rudolf Carnap, The Methodological Character of Theoretical Concepts; Rudolf Carnap, Beobachtungssprache Und Theoretische Sprache. [REVIEW]Yehoshua Bar-Hillel - 1960 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 25 (1):71-74.
  8. added 2017-02-11
    Review: Gustav Bergmann, Professor Quine on Analyticity. [REVIEW]Alan Ross Anderson - 1958 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 23 (1):68-68.
  9. added 2017-02-11
    Review: Rudolf Carnap, Remarks to Kemeny's Paper. [REVIEW]Abner Shimony - 1958 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 23 (1):77-77.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10. added 2017-02-11
    Review: Luitgard Wundheiler, Alex Wundheiler, William N. Locke, A. Donald Booth, Some Logical Concepts for Syntax. [REVIEW]Alonzo Church - 1956 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 21 (3):312-313.
  11. added 2017-02-11
    Review: Rudolf Carnap, Meaning and Synonymy in Natural Languages. [REVIEW]Rulon Wells - 1955 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 20 (3):296-297.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  12. added 2017-02-11
    Review: Rudolf Carnap, On Belief Sentences. [REVIEW]Rulon Wells - 1955 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 20 (3):296-296.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13. added 2017-02-11
    Review: Rudolf Carnap, Meaning Postulates. [REVIEW]Abner Shimony - 1955 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 20 (2):188-189.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  14. added 2017-02-11
    Review: Rudolf Carnap, Truth and Confirmation. [REVIEW]Carl G. Hempel - 1952 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 17 (2):139-139.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15. added 2017-02-11
    Review: Rudolf Carnap, Wahrheit Und Bewahrung. [REVIEW]Carl G. Hempel - 1952 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 17 (2):139-139.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  16. added 2017-02-11
    Review: Rudolf Carnap, Testability and Meaning. [REVIEW]Victor Kraft - 1951 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 16 (2):137-137.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  17. added 2017-02-11
    Review: Rudolf Carnap, Logical Foundations of Probability. [REVIEW]John G. Kemeny - 1951 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 16 (3):205-207.
  18. added 2017-02-11
    Review: Gustav Bergmann, Concerning Carnap's Definition of `Extensional' and `Intensional.'. [REVIEW]Max Black - 1950 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 14 (4):249-249.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  19. added 2017-02-11
    Review: Leonard Linsky, Some Notes on Carnap's Concept of Intensional Isomorphism and the Paradox of Analysis; Rudolf Carnap, A Reply to Leonard Linsky. [REVIEW]W. V. Quine - 1950 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 15 (2):149-150.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  20. added 2017-02-11
    Review: Anders Wedberg, The Logical Construction of the World. A Critical Analysis of Rudolf Carnap's Der Logische Aufbau der Welt. [REVIEW]Carl G. Hempel - 1948 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 13 (4):222-222.
  21. added 2017-02-11
    Review: Rudolf Carnap, Modalities and Quantification. [REVIEW]Paul Bernays - 1948 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 13 (4):218-219.
  22. added 2017-02-11
    Review: Rudolf Carnap, Remarks on Induction and Truth; Felix Kaufmann, On the Nature of Inductive Inference; Rudolf Carnap, Rejoinder to Mr. Kaufmann's Reply. [REVIEW]Carl G. Hempel - 1946 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 11 (4):124-125.
  23. added 2017-02-11
    Review: Rudolf Carnap, The Two Concepts of Probability. [REVIEW]Ernest Nagel - 1946 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 11 (1):19-23.
  24. added 2017-02-11
    Review: Rudolf Carnap, Introduction to Semantics. [REVIEW]C. H. Langford - 1943 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 8 (1):36-37.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  25. added 2017-02-11
    Review: Rudolf Carnap, Formalization of Logic. [REVIEW]Carl G. Hempel - 1943 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 8 (3):81-83.
  26. added 2017-02-11
    Review: H. D. Oakeley, Epistemology and the Logical Syntax of Language. [REVIEW]Everett J. Nelson - 1940 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 5 (4):161-161.
  27. added 2017-02-11
    Review: Martin Strauss, Mathematics as Logical Syntax--A Method to Formalize the Language of a Physical Theory. [REVIEW]Evert Beth - 1939 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 4 (1):25-26.
  28. added 2017-02-11
    Review: Rudolf Carnap, Notes for Symbolic Logic. [REVIEW]Alonzo Church - 1939 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 4 (1):29-30.
  29. added 2017-02-11
    Review: Bertrand Russell, On the Importance of Logical Form; Rudolf Carnap, Logical Foundations of the Unity of Science. [REVIEW]C. H. Langford - 1938 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 3 (4):157-158.
  30. added 2017-02-11
    Review: Rudolf Carnap, Testability and Meaning. [REVIEW]Henry S. Leonard - 1937 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 2 (1):49-50.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  31. added 2017-02-10
    ""Quine's" Two Dogmas" as a Criticism of Logical Empiricism.Artur Koterski - 2012 - Filozofia Nauki 20 (1):45 - +.
    Dans les « Deux dogmes», Quine voulait démontrer que le positivisme logique n’était possible qu’en raison d’hypothèses injustifiées. L’intention de Quine était de montrer qu’il n’est possible de sauver l’empirisme que si l’on accepte une autre approche, holistique. Toutefois, l’article de Quine était anachronique dès le moment de sa publication. Le but de cet article est double. Tout d’abord, on esquissera l’argument de Quine et on le confrontera aux positions de Carnap et Dubislav. On montrera que la critique de Quine (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  32. added 2017-02-07
    Quine on Analyticity and Logical Truth.James F. Harris - 1969 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 7 (3):249-255.
    Quine claims that the analytic-synthetic distinction lacks a proper characterization of a notion to be used to reduce analytic statements "depending upon essential predication" to logically true statements. the author shows that the same arguments used by quine against analyticity can also be used against logical truth; if one notion is "given up", the other must be also. notions such as "filling blanks alike" and "identical propositions" presupposed by logical truth have the same deficiencies as does analyticity. logical truth is (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  33. added 2017-02-06
    Axiomatic Inscriptional Syntax. Part II: The Syntax of Protothetic.Frederick Rickey - 1973 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 14 (1):1-52.
  34. added 2017-02-06
    Book Review:Visual Thinking Rudolf Arnheim. [REVIEW]Marc Bornstein - 1973 - Philosophy of Science 40 (1):141-.
  35. added 2017-02-06
    Book Review:Disease, Life, and Man Rudolf Virchow, Lelland J. Rather. [REVIEW]Edward C. Moore - 1959 - Philosophy of Science 26 (4):386-.
  36. added 2017-02-06
    Book Review:Goethe as a Scientist Rudolf Magnus, Heinz Norden. [REVIEW]Stephen C. Cappannari - 1952 - Philosophy of Science 19 (3):243-.
  37. added 2017-02-01
    Nachruf Auf Rudolf Carnap.Wolfgang Stegmüller - 1971 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 2 (1):1-13.
  38. added 2017-02-01
    Carnap's Ontology and Challenges.John Sweigart - 1963 - Philosophy of Science 30 (1):71-80.
  39. added 2017-02-01
    On Carnap's Views on Ontology.W. V. Quine - 1951 - Philosophical Studies 2 (5):65--72.
  40. added 2017-01-28
    The Cambridge Companion to Carnap.Michael Friedman & Richard Creath - 2009 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 15 (4):428-431.
    Rudolf Carnap is increasingly regarded as one of the most important philosophers of the twentieth century. He was one of the leading figures of the logical empiricist movement associated with the Vienna Circle and a central figure in the analytic tradition more generally. He made major contributions to philosophy of science and philosophy of logic, and, perhaps most importantly, to our understanding of the nature of philosophy as a discipline. In this volume a team of contributors explores the major themes (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  41. added 2017-01-28
    Carnap, le Langage Et la Philosophie.Jacques Bouveresse - 1975 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 40 (4):580-581.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  42. added 2017-01-28
    Review: Carnap, “On the Use of Hilbert’s Ε-Operator in Scientific Theories”.Herbert G. Bohnert - 1971 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 36 (2):320-321.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  43. added 2017-01-28
    Analisi Critica Del Recente Indirizzo di Logica Formale Del Carnap.Ludovico Geymonat - 1968 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 33 (2):317-317.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  44. added 2017-01-27
    The Cambridge Companion to Carnap. [REVIEW]James Justus - 2009 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 15 (4):428-430.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  45. added 2017-01-27
    Carnap Brought Home: The View From Jena. [REVIEW]Christopher Pincock - 2006 - Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 12:213-218.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  46. added 2017-01-27
    The Philosopher Without Qualities.A. W. Carus - 2002 - Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 9:369-377.
    The revival of interest in Carnap’s philosophy over the past two decades has shed much light on particular aspects of his intellectual development and its context. We now have a better appreciation of the background and motivation of the Aufbau. 1 The radical nature of the Syntax program has fmally, more than half a century after its first publication, begun to be acknowledged.2 And the later Carnap has also been re-assessed; the previously widespread impression that Quine was “right” and Carnap (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  47. added 2017-01-27
    The Synthesis of Logicism and Formalism in Carnap’s Logical Syntax of Language.Thomas Oberdan - 1993 - Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 1:157-168.
    One important achievement Rudolf Carnap claimed for his book, The Logical Syntax of Language, was that it effected a synthesis of two seemingly antithetical philosophies of mathematics, logicism and formalism. Reconciling these widely divergent conceptions had been a goal of Carnap’s for several years. But in the years in which Carnap’s synthesis evolved, important intellectual developments influenced the direction of his efforts and, ultimately, the final outcome. These developments were, first of all, the epoch-making theorems proved by Kurt Gödel, which (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  48. added 2017-01-27
    Dear Carnap, Dear Van. W. V. Quine and Rudolf Carnap. [REVIEW]Thomas Uebel - 1993 - Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 1:251-254.
    Few disputes have dominated the discourse of analytic philosophy like the one between Rudolf Carnap and Willard Van Orman Quine. Centered originally on the issue of intensionality in the philosophy of logic and language — ultimately the import of the distinction between analytic and synthetic statements — their conflict came to concern the nature of post-foundational epistemology and its relation to ontology. Are we to follow Carnap and explicate the conditions of intersubjectively meaningful speech in a purely formal inquiry that, (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  49. added 2017-01-26
    Carnap, Tarski, and Quine at Harvard: Conversations on Logic, Mathematics, and Science.Gary Ebbs - 2015 - History and Philosophy of Logic 36 (2):181-188.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  50. added 2017-01-26
    Review of Carnap, Tarski, and Quine at Harvard. [REVIEW]Sam Hillier - 2014 - Philosophy of Science 81 (3):476-480,.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
1 — 50 / 154