About this topic
Summary This is a category for debates about chance that do not easily fit into other categories. 
Key works N/a
Introductions N/a
  Show all references
Related categories
Siblings:
172 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Order:
1 — 50 / 172
  1. Marshall Abrams (2012). Mechanistic Probability. Synthese 187 (2):343-375.
    I describe a realist, ontologically objective interpretation of probability, "far-flung frequency (FFF) mechanistic probability". FFF mechanistic probability is defined in terms of facts about the causal structure of devices and certain sets of frequencies in the actual world. Though defined partly in terms of frequencies, FFF mechanistic probability avoids many drawbacks of well-known frequency theories and helps causally explain stable frequencies, which will usually be close to the values of mechanistic probabilities. I also argue that it's a virtue rather than (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
  2. C. J. Adcock (1928). Law and Chance. Australasian Journal of Psychology and Philosophy 6 (3):210-212.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. David Albert (2010). Probability in the Everett Picture. In Simon Saunders, Jonathan Barrett, Adrian Kent & David Wallace (eds.), Many Worlds?: Everett, Quantum Theory, & Reality. Oxford University Press.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  4. David Albert (2010). Review of Gerhard Ernst, Andreas Hüttemann (Eds.), Time, Chance, and Reduction: Philosophical Aspects of Statistical Mechanics. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2010 (9).
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. Marra Alessandra (2016). Objective Oughts and a Puzzle About Futurity. In Olivier Roy, Allard Tamminga & Malte Willer (eds.), Deontic Logic and Normative Systems. College Publications. pp. 171-186.
    The paper argues that the standard definition of objective oughts (as oughts in light of the relevant facts) leaves room for a puzzle about futurity: Can objective oughts depend on what will happen in the future? If yes, how to account for those objective oughts that are future-dependent? Two main options are investigated: (i) treating the future as a fact and, hence, committing to the inevitability of the future, or (ii) adopting a branching-time account of the future, and weighting future (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6. Victoria N. Alexander (2014). Introduction: Toward a Definition of Biosemiosic Chance. Biosemiotics 7 (3):329-334.
    In this special issue, our objective is to clarify what biosemioticians may mean insofar as they claim that living systems are capable of making choices or that biosemiotic interpretations are partially indeterminate. A number of different senses of the term “chance” are discussed as we move toward a consensus. We find that biosemiosic chance may arise out of conditions involving quantum indeterminacy, randomness, deterministic chaos, or unpredictability, but biosemiosic chance is mainly due to the fact that living entities invest their (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. Michael J. Almeida (2010). Discussion Note: Chance, Epistemic Probability and Saving Lives: Reply to Bradley. Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 2010:1-1.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. Fred Attneave (1953). Psychological Probability as a Function of Experienced Frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology 46 (2):81.
  9. Vilhelm Aubert (1959). Chance in Social Affairs. Inquiry 2 (1-4):1 – 24.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   31 citations  
  10. Larry Azar (1969). Life, Atoms, Chance. New Scholasticism 43 (1):185-187.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. Tudor M. Baetu (2014). Chance, Experimental Reproducibility, and Mechanistic Regularity. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 27 (3):253-271.
    Examples from the sciences showing that mechanisms do not always succeed in producing the phenomena for which they are responsible have led some authors to conclude that the regularity requirement can be eliminated from characterizations of mechanisms. In this article, I challenge this conclusion and argue that a minimal form of regularity is inextricably embedded in examples of elucidated mechanisms that have been shown to be causally responsible for phenomena. Examples of mechanistic explanations from the sciences involve mechanisms that have (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  12. Davis Baird (1991). The Empire of Chance: How Probability Changed Science and Everyday LifeGerd Gigerenzer Zeno Swijtink Theodore Porter Lorraine Daston John Beatty Lorenz Krüger. Isis 82 (1):103-105.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. Jeffrey A. Barrett (1995). Review of I. Ekeland, The Broken Dice, and Other Mathematical Tales of Chance. [REVIEW] Philosophia Mathematica 3 (3):310-313.
  14. D. J. Bartholomew (1995). Choice or Chance? In E. Barker (ed.), Lse on Freedom. Lse Books. pp. 3.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. David J. Bartholomew (2008). God, Chance, and Purpose: Can God Have It Both Ways? Cambridge University Press.
    The thesis of this book is that chance is neither unreal nor non-existent but an integral part of God's creation.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  16. David J. Bartholomew (2008). God, Chance and Purpose: Can God Have It Both Ways? Cambridge University Press.
    Scientific accounts of existence give chance a central role. At the smallest level, quantum theory involves uncertainty and evolution is driven by chance and necessity. These ideas do not fit easily with theology in which chance has been seen as the enemy of purpose. One option is to argue, as proponents of Intelligent Design do, that chance is not real and can be replaced by the work of a Designer. Others adhere to a deterministic theology in which God is in (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. Robert Batterman (1995). Physics and Chance. Philosophical Review 104 (4):624-627.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. John Beatty (2006). Chance Variation: Darwin on Orchids. Philosophy of Science 73 (5):629-641.
    How, according to Darwin, does chance variation affect evolutionary outcomes? In his 1866 book, On the Various Contrivances by which British and Foreign Orchids are Fertilised by Insects, Darwin developed an argument that played an important role in his overall case for evolution by natural selection, as articulated in later editions of the Origin. This argument also figured significantly in Darwin's reflections on the theological dimensions of evolution by natural selection.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   12 citations  
  19. Gordon Belot (2016). Undermined. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 94 (4):781-791.
    ABSTRACTA popular strategy for understanding the probabilities that arise in physics is to interpret them via reductionist accounts of chance—indeed, it is sometimes claimed that such accounts are uniquely well-suited to make sense of the probabilities in classical statistical mechanics. Here it is argued that reductionist accounts of chance carry a steep but unappreciated cost: when applied to physical theories of the relevant type, they inevitably distort the relations of probability that they take as input.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. C. David Benson (2002). The Assembly of GodsJane Chance. Speculum 77 (2):490-491.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. J. Berkovitz (2001). On Chance in Causal Loops. Mind 110 (437):1-23.
    A common line of argument for the impossibility of closed causal loops is that they would involve causal paradoxes. The usual reply is that such loops impose heavy consistency constraints on the nature of causal connections in them; constraints that are overlooked by the impossibility arguments. Hugh Mellor has maintained that arguments for the possibility of causal loops also overlook some constraints, which are related to the chances (single-case, objective probabilities) that causes give to their effects. And he argues that (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  22. Rudolph Berlinger (1991). Signal und Chance. Die Krisis des Autoritätsbewußtseins. Eine Rede. Perspektiven der Philosophie 17:455-461.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23. Charles Birch (1974). Chance, Necessity and Purpose. In F. Ayala & T. Dobzhansky (eds.), Studies in the Philosophy of Biology. University of California Press. pp. 225--239.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24. Richard J. Blackwell (1984). Philosophical Foundations of Probability Theory. By Roy Weatherford. Modern Schoolman 62 (1):70-71.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25. David Bohm (1957). Causality and Chance in Modern Physics. University of Pennsylvania Press.
    CHAPTER ONE Causality and Chance in Natural Law. INTRODUCTION IN nature nothing remains constant. Everything is in a perpetual state of transformation, ...
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   35 citations  
  26. Darren Bradley (2015). Everettian Confirmation and Sleeping Beauty: Reply to Wilson. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 66 (3):683-693.
    In Bradley, I offered an analysis of Sleeping Beauty and the Everettian interpretation of quantum mechanics. I argued that one can avoid a kind of easy confirmation of EQM by paying attention to observation selection effects, that halfers are right about Sleeping Beauty, and that thirders cannot avoid easy confirmation for the truth of EQM. Wilson agrees with my analysis of observation selection effects in EQM, but goes on to, first, defend Elga’s thirder argument on Sleeping Beauty and, second, argue (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  27. Grzegorz Bugajak (2008). On The Notion of Chance and Its Application in Natural Sciences. In Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy. pp. 7-15.
    The notion of chance plays an important role in some philosophical analyses and interpretations of scientific theories. The most obvious examples of that are the theories of evolution and quantum mechanics. This notion, however seems to be notoriously vague. Its application in such analyses, more often than not refers to its common-sense understanding, which, by definition, cannot be sufficient when it comes to sound philosophical interpretations of scientific achievements. The paper attempts at formulating a ‘typology of chance’. It distinguishes eight (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28. Steven M. Cahn (1967). Chance. In Paul Edwards (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Philosophy. New York: Macmillan. pp. 73--75.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29. C. A. Campbell & K. W. Rankin (1963). Choice and Chance. Philosophical Quarterly 13 (50):85.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30. Javier Sánchez Cañizares (2009). Bartholomew. DJ, God, Chance and Purpose. Can God Have It Both Ways? Anuario Filosófico 41 (3):693-695.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. James A. Coffman (2014). On the Meaning of Chance in Biology. Biosemiotics 7 (3):377-388.
    Chance has somewhat different meanings in different contexts, and can be taken to be either ontological or epistemological . Here I argue that, whether or not it stems from physical indeterminacy, chance is a fundamental biological reality that is meaningless outside the context of knowledge. To say that something happened by chance means that it did not happen by design. This of course is a cornerstone of Darwin’s theory of evolution: random undirected variation is the creative wellspring upon which natural (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32. Horacio Arlo Costa & Jeffrey Helzner (2009). Iterated Random Selection as Intermediate Between Risk and Uncertainty. ISIPTA'09 ELECTRONIC PROCEEDINGS.
  33. Pascal Couillard (2003). From Chance to Choice. Dialogue 42 (2):408-411.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34. Kurt Danziger (1992). The Taming of Chance. [REVIEW] British Journal for the History of Science 25 (3):371-372.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35. Jimmy H. Davis & Harry L. Poe (2008). Chance or Dance: An Evaluation of Design. Templeton Press.
    Chance or Dance is ideal for students and general readers interested in understanding how modern science gives evidence for the creation of nature by the God of the Bible.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36. J. P. Day (1974). MELLOR, D. H. "The Matter of Chance". [REVIEW] Mind 83:622.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37. David Deutsch (1999). Quantum Theory of Probability and Decisions. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London:3129--37.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   38 citations  
  38. Thomas Drucker (1990). Enigmas of Chance: An AutobiographyMark Kac. Isis 81 (2):375-376.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. John Dudley (2013). Aristotle's Concept of Chance: Accidents, Cause, Necessity, and Determinism. State University of New York Press.
    _The first exhaustive study of Aristotle's concept of chance._.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40. John Dudley (2012). Aristotle's Concept of Chance: Accidents, Cause, Necessity, and Determinism. State University of New York Press.
    The first exhaustive study of Aristotle's concept of chance.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  41. John Dudley, U388, & , Aristotle's Concept of Chance and its Importance for Human Responsibility.
    In this chapter I aim to show the nature and importance of the concept of chance in Aristotle. Aristotle's understanding of chance as an accidental cause makes it possible for us to obtain a better understanding of life. The aim of life, says Aristotle, fundamentally the search for the goodness and eternity of God. We search for the goodness of God by seeking our full development in life, and we search for God's eternity by attempting to survive and to stay (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. Michael Dummett (1988). What Chance for Ecumenism? New Blackfriars 69 (822):530-545.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43. Antony Eagle (2016). Probability and Randomness. In Alan Hájek & Christopher Hitchcock (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Probability and Philosophy. Oxford University Press. pp. 440-459.
  44. Antony Eagle (2014). Is the Past a Matter of Chance? In Alastair Wilson (ed.), Chance and Temporal Asymmetry. Oxford University Press. pp. 126-158.
  45. Antony Eagle (2011). Deterministic Chance. Noûs 45 (2):269 - 299.
    I sketch a new constraint on chance, which connects chance ascriptions closely with ascriptions of ability, and more specifically with 'CAN'-claims. This connection between chance and ability has some claim to be a platitude; moreover, it exposes the debate over deterministic chance to the extensive literature on (in)compatibilism about free will. The upshot is that a prima facie case for the tenability of deterministic chance can be made. But the main thrust of the paper is to draw attention to the (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  46. F. Y. Edgeworth (1922). The Philosophy of Chance. Mind 31 (123):257-283.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  47. F. Y. Edgeworth (1884). Iv. —-The Philosophy of Chance. Mind 34:223-235.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48. F. Y. Edgeworth (1884). The Philosophy of Chance. Mind 9 (34):223-235.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  49. Dorothy Edgington (1997). Mellor on Chance and Causation. [REVIEW] British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (3):411-433.
    Mellor's subject is singular causation between facts, expressed ‘E because C’. His central requirement for causation is that the chance that E if C be greater than the chance that E if C: chc(E)>chc(E). The book is as much about chance as it is about causation. I show that his way of distinguishing chc (E) from the traditional notion of conditional chance leaves than him with a problem about the existence of chQ(P) when Q is false (Section 3); and also (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  50. M. Eigen & Ruthild Winkler (1981). Laws of the Game How the Principles of Nature Govern Chance /by Manfred Eigen and Ruthild Winkler ; Translated by Robert and Rita Kimber. --. --. Knopf Distributed by Random House, 1981.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 172