This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories
Siblings:
576 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Order:
1 — 50 / 576
  1. E. ?Kesson (1956). The Analysis of Deontic Experience in H?Gerstr?M's Philosophy. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 57:161 - 176.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. Elof Åkesson (1957). The Analysis of Deontic Experien E in Hägerström's Philosophy. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 57:161.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. Elof Åkesson (1957). VI.—The Analysis of Deontic Experience in Hägerström's Philosophy. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 57 (1):161-176.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. Azizah Al-Hibri (1980). Conditionality and Ross's Deontic Distinction. Southwestern Journal of Philosophy 11 (1):79-87.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  5. Carlos Alarcon-Cabrera (1998). Von Wright's Deontic Logics and "Contrary-to-Duty Imperatives". Ratio Juris 11 (1):67-79.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6. C. E. Alchourrón & D. Makinson (1981). New Studies in Deontic Logic. In Risto Hilpinen (ed.), New Studies in Deontic Logic. pp. 125--148.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   36 citations  
  7. Carlos E. Alchourrón (1996). Detachment and Defeasibility in Deontic Logic. Studia Logica 57 (1):5 - 18.
    The purpose of the paper is to present a logical framework that allow to formalize a kind of prima facie duties, defeasible conditional duties, indefeasible conditional duties and actual (indefeasible) duties, as well as to show their logical interconnections.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  8. Carlos E. Alchourrón (1972). The Intuitive Background of Normative Legal Discourse and its Formalization. Journal of Philosophical Logic 1 (3/4):447 - 463.
  9. Carlos E. Alchourron & Antonio A. Martino (1990). Logic Without Truth. Ratio Juris 3 (1):46-67.
  10. Marra Alessandra (2016). Objective Oughts and a Puzzle About Futurity. In Olivier Roy, Allard Tamminga & Malte Willer (eds.), Deontic Logic and Normative Systems. College Publications. pp. 171-186.
    The paper argues that the standard definition of objective oughts (as oughts in light of the relevant facts) leaves room for a puzzle about futurity: Can objective oughts depend on what will happen in the future? If yes, how to account for those objective oughts that are future-dependent? Two main options are investigated: (i) treating the future as a fact and, hence, committing to the inevitability of the future, or (ii) adopting a branching-time account of the future, and weighting future (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. José Júlio Alferes, Ricardo Gonçalves & João Leite (2013). Equivalence of Defeasible Normative Systems. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 23 (1-2):25-48.
    Normative systems have been advocated as an effective tool to regulate interaction in multi-agent systems. The use of deontic operators and the ability to represent defeasible information are known to be two fundamental ingredients to represent and reason about normative systems. In this paper, after introducing a framework that combines standard deontic logic and non-monotonic logic programming, deontic logic programs (DLP), we tackle the fundamental problem of equivalence between normative systems using a deontic extension of David Pearce?s Equilibrium Logic and (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. Tamminga Allard & Willer Malte (eds.) (forthcoming). Proceedings of the 13th International Conference in Deontic Logic and Normative Systems. Spring.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. Layman E. Allen (1969). Castaneda H. N.. Obligation and Modal Logic. Logique Et Analyse, N.S. Vol. 3 , Pp. 40–48. Journal of Symbolic Logic 33 (4):612.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. Layman E. Allen (1968). Review: H. N. Castaneda, Obligation and Modal Logic. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 33 (4):612-612.
  15. Michael J. Almeida (1990). Deontic Logic and the Possibility of Moral Conflict. Erkenntnis 33 (1):57 - 71.
    Standard dyadic deontic logic (as well as standard deontic logic) has recently come under attack by moral philosophers who maintain that the axioms of standard dyadic deontic logic are biased against moral theories which generate moral conflicts. Since moral theories which generate conflicts are at least logically tenable, it is argued, standard dyadic deontic logic should be modified so that the set of logically possible moral theories includes those which generate such conflicts. I argue that (1) there are only certain (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. Michael J. Almeida (1989). Deontic Problems with Prohibition Dilemmas. Logique Et Analyse 32 (128):163-175.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. Amit Almor & Steven A. Sloman (1996). Is Deontic Reasoning Special? Psychological Review 103 (2):374-380.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  18. Alan Ross Anderson (1958). The Logic of Norms. Logique Et Analyse 1 (2):84.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  19. Alan Ross Anderson (1958). A Reduction of Deontic Logic to Alethic Modal Logic. Mind 67 (265):100-103.
  20. Alan Ross Anderson (1956). Review: A. N. Prior, A Note on the Logic of Obligation. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 21 (4):379-379.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. Albert J. J. Anglberger (2008). Dynamic Deontic Logic and its Paradoxes. Studia Logica 89 (3):427-435.
    In Meyer’s promising account [7] deontic logic is reduced to a dynamic logic. Meyer claims that with his account “we get rid of most (if not all) of the nasty paradoxes that have plagued traditional deontic logic.” But as was shown by van der Meyden in [4], Meyer’s logic also contains a paradoxical formula. In this paper we will show that another paradox can be proven, one which also effects Meyer’s “solution” to contrary to duty obligations and his logic in (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22. Albert J. J. Anglberger, Nobert Gratzl & Olivier Roy (2015). Obligation, Free Choice, and the Logic of Weakest Permissions. Review of Symbolic Logic 8 (4):807-827.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23. Albert Jj Anglberger (2009). Alternative Reductions for Dynamic Deontic Logics. In Hieke Alexander & Leitgeb Hannes (eds.), Reduction, Abstraction, Analysis. Ontos Verlag. pp. 179.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24. Leo Apostel (1960). Game Theory and the Interpretation of Deontic Logic. Logique Et Analyse 3 (2):70-90.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  25. L. Åqvist (1966). Next and Ought. Alternative Foundations for von Wright's Tense Logic, with an Application to Deontic Logic. Logique Et Analyse 9:231-251.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  26. L. Aqvist (1964). On Dawson-Models for Deontic Logic. Logique Et Analyse 7:14-21.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  27. L. Åqvist (1962). A Binary Primitive in Deontic Logic. Logique Et Analyse 19 (3):90-97.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  28. Lennart Åqvist (2000). Three Characterizability Problems in Deontic Logic. Nordic Journal of Philosophical Logic 5 (2):65-82.
    We consider an infinite hierarchy of systems of Alethic Modal Logic with so-called Levels of Perfection, and add to them suitable definitions of such interesting deontic categories as those of supererogation, offence, conditional obligation and conditional permission. We then state three problems concerning the proper characterization of the resulting logic(s) for our defined notions, and discuss two of these problems in some detail.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  29. Lennart Aqvist (1998). Prima Facie Obligations in Deontic Logic: A Chisholmian Analysis Based on Normative. In Christoph Fehige & Ulla Wessels (eds.), Preferences. De Gruyter. pp. 135.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30. Lennart Åqvist (1991). Introduction to Deontic Logic and the Theory of Normative Systems. Noûs 25 (1):109-116.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   12 citations  
  31. Lennart Åqvist (1986). Some Results on Dyadic Deontic Logic and the Logic of Preference. Synthese 66 (1):95 - 110.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  32. Lennart Åqvist (1969). Improved Formulations of Act-Utilitarianism. Noûs 3 (3):299-323.
    The article deals with two problems that arise within moorean style act-utilitarianism (a.u.): (i) how is the notion of 'the alternatives to' a particular action to be explicated? (ii) how should a.u. be formulated in order for it to validate the laws of standard deontic logic? it is argued that these intertwined problems can be solved only if the traditional formulations a a.u. are rejected in favor of some new and more viable ones. in the literature the two problems seem (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  33. Lennart Åqvist (1964). Interpretations of Deontic Logic. Mind 73 (290):246-253.
    The author is concerned with a minimal system dl of deontic logic, His main purpose being to draw attention to the existence of interpretations of dl that give rise to various systems of what may be called "atheoretical logic." by this we understand logical systems dealing with expressions that are--Very probably at least--Neither true nor false, Such as sentences expressing promises, Intentions, Wishes, Commands, And similar things. As it is well known, The status of atheoretical logic in this sense is (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  34. Lennart åQvist (1963). Postulate Sets and Decision Procedures for Some Systems of Deontic Logic. Theoria 29 (2):154-175.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35. Lennart Åqvist & Jaap Hoepelman (1981). Some Theorems About a “Tree” System of Deontic Tense Logic. In Risto Hilpinen (ed.), New Studies in Deontic Logic. pp. 187--221.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  36. Nicholas Asher & Daniel Bonevac (1996). Prima Facie Obligation. Studia Logica 57 (1):19-45.
    This paper presents a nonmonotonic deontic logic based on commonsense entailment. It establishes criteria a successful account of obligation should satisfy, and develops a theory that satisfies them. The theory includes two conditional notions of prima facie obligation. One is constitutive; the other is epistemic, and follows nonmonotonically from the constitutive notion. The paper defines unconditional notions of prima facie obligation in terms of the conditional notions.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  37. Guillaume Aucher, Guido Boella & Leendert Torre (2011). A Dynamic Logic for Privacy Compliance. Artificial Intelligence and Law 19 (2-3):187-231.
    Knowledge based privacy policies are more declarative than traditional action based ones, because they specify only what is permitted or forbidden to know, and leave the derivation of the permitted actions to a security monitor. This inference problem is already non trivial with a static privacy policy, and becomes challenging when privacy policies can change over time. We therefore introduce a dynamic modal logic that permits not only to reason about permitted and forbidden knowledge to derive the permitted actions, but (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38. John Bacon (1973). Kripke's Deontic Semantics Again. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 14 (4):581-582.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  39. P. Bailhache (1984). Quelques foncteurs faussement primitifs en logique déontique. Logique Et Analyse 27 (8):393.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40. P. Bailhache (1981). Analytical deontic logic authorities and addressees. Logique Et Analyse 24 (93):67.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41. Patrice Bailhache (2002). Review: Sven Ove Hansson, The Structure of Values and Norms. [REVIEW] Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 8 (4):531-533.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. Patrice Bailhache (1999). Review: Lamber M. M. Royakkers, Extending Deontic Logic for the Formalisation of Legal Rules. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (4):1841-1842.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43. Patrice Bailhache (1999). Royakkers Lambèr M. M.. Extending Deontic Logic for the Formalisation of Legal Rules. Law and Philosophy Library, Vol. 36. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Boston, and London, 1998, Ix + 191 Pp. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (4):1841-1842.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. Patrice Bailhache (1998). How to Mix Alethic, Deontic, Temporal, Individual Modalities. Logica Trianguli 2:3-16.
    Deontic logic handles not only deontic modalities, but also alethic and temporal ones. In addition, individuals like authorities and addressees play an important role. R5-D5 is a system handling alethic, deontic and temporal modalities, whose adequacy has been proved in an earlier paper. Similarly for KD*UXY with sets of individuals . The present article is an attempt to construct a general system mixing R5-D5 and KD*UXY.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45. Patrice Bailhache (1995). Temporalized Deontic Worlds with Individuals. Logique Et Analyse 38 (149):23-42.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. Patrice Bailhache (1995). Canonical Models for Temporal Deontic Logic. Logique Et Analyse 149:3-21.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  47. Patrice Bailhache (1980). Several Possible Systems of Deontic Weak and Strong Norms. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 21 (1):89-100.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48. P. Balbiani & P. Seban (2011). Reasoning About Permitted Announcements. Journal of Philosophical Logic 40 (4):445-472.
    We formalize what it means to have permission to say something. We adapt the dynamic logic of permission by van der Meyden (J Log Comput 6(3):465–479, 1996 ) to the case where atomic actions are public truthful announcements. We also add a notion of obligation. Our logic is an extension of the logic of public announcements introduced by Plaza ( 1989 ) with dynamic modal operators for permission and for obligation. We axiomatize the logic and show that it is decidable.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  49. Paul Bartha (2002). Review of John F. Horty, Agency and Deontic Logic. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2002 (2).
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50. Charles A. Baylis (1939). Jörgensen Jörgen. Imperatives and Logic. Erkenntnis, Vol. 7 No. 4 , Pp. 288–296. Journal of Symbolic Logic 4 (1):36.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 576