This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories
Siblings:
281 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Order:
1 — 50 / 281
  1. John F. Ahearne (1984). Nuclear Deterrence. Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 59 (1):78-90.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. L. H. Ahrens (1961). Regularities Involving69he And49he and Their Possible Implications for Nuclear Structure. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa 36 (3):163-178.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. Rodney Allen (1986). The Case for Unilateral Nuclear Disarmament. Critical Philosophy 3 (1/2):7.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. Susan B. Anthony (1984). Spiritual Deterrence in the Nuclear Age. Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 59 (1):64-77.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. David Ardagh (1990). The Immorality of Nuclear Deterrence. International Philosophical Quarterly 30 (3):343-358.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  6. Robert J. Art (1985). Between Assured Destruction and Nuclear Victory: The Case for the "Mad-Plus" Posture. Ethics 95 (3):497-516.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. D. Attwood (1991). Threats and Nuclear Deterrence: Paul Ramsey's Account of the Morality of Nuclear Threats. Studies in Christian Ethics 4 (1):40-57.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. Lawrence Badash (2004). Per F. Dahl.From Nuclear Transmutation to Nuclear Fission, 1932–1939. Xii + 304 Pp., Illus., Bibl., Indexes. Bristol, U.K., 2002. $75. [REVIEW] Isis 95 (4):714-715.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. Brenda M. Baker (1985). Duress, Responsibility, and Deterrence. Dialogue 24 (04):605-.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  10. Jorg Baldauf (1985). Nuclear Weapons Free Zones in Europe: Problems and Prospects. Scientia 79:215.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. Robert Barry (1988). Review Discussion: Can Deterrence Be Moral? The Thomist 52 (4):719.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. S. I. Benn (1984). Deterrence or Appeasement? Or, On Trying to Be Rational About Nuclear War[1]. Journal of Applied Philosophy 1 (1):5-20.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  13. Dieter Birnbacher (1987). Das Moralische Dilemma der Nuklearen Abschreckung. Analyse & Kritik 9 (1-2):175-192.
    The moral dilemma of nuclear deterrence arises from two conflicting facts: the fact that in a world of conflicting superpowers with nuclear arsenals preserving peace must have an overriding moral priority; and that a policy of mutual nuclear deterrence, which seems well suited to achieve this aim, faces grave moral difficulties on its own, the main difficulty being the moral indefensibility of the act of retaliation threatened in case of attack. It is argued that a consequentialist approach to the moral (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. G. R. Bishop, M. A. Grace, C. E. Johnson, H. R. Lemmer & J. Perez Y. Jorba (1957). Nuclear Alignment of147Nd. Philosophical Magazine 2 (16):534-540.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  15. Glacomo Bonanno, Deterrence, Observability and Awareness.
    ,d simple example is used to analyze the issue ofimperfcsct obseruabilitt of commitmerit and to highlight the follotving phenor»enon: u'hen a player h«s tlie option of taking — at a cost — a (potentiality' deterring action, she is less lil.ely to do so cigainst an opponent rgho is aware of' tlie aoailabilitt' of tliis opticrn thaii against an opponent it her is not..
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. Steven J. Brams & D. Marc Kilgour (1987). Is Nuclear Deterrence Rational, and Will Star Wars Help? Analyse & Kritik 9 (1-2):62-74.
    Deterrence means threatening to retaliate against an attack in order to deter it in the first place. The central problem with a policy of deterrence is that the threat of retaliation may not be credible if retaliation leads to a worse outcome - perhaps a nuclear holocaust - than a side would suffer from absorbing a limited first strike and not retaliating. - The optimality of deterrence is analyzed by means of a Deterrence Game based on Chicken, in which each (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. Steven J. Brams & D. Marc Kilgour (1985). Optimal Deterrence. Social Philosophy and Policy 3 (1):118.
    1. Introduction The policy of deterrence, at least to avert nuclear war between the superpowers, has been a controversial one. The main controversy arises from the threat of each side to visit destruction on the other in response to an initial attack. This threat would seem irrational if carrying it out would lead to a nuclear holocaust – the worst outcome for both sides. Instead, it would seem better for the side attacked to suffer some destruction rather than to retaliate (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. F. A. Brisbout, C. Dahanayake, A. Engler, Y. Fujimoto & D. H. Perkins (1956). LXII. On the Nature of Particles Produced in Extremely Energetic Nuclear Collisions. Philosophical Magazine 1 (7):605-621.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  19. Joan Lisa Bromberg (1992). Inventing Accuracy: A Historical Sociology of Nuclear Missile GuidanceDonald MacKenzie. Isis 83 (3):523-524.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. G. Brown & I. S. Hughes (1957). The Absorption of Slow Negative Π-Mesons by the Elements in Nuclear Emulsions. Philosophical Magazine 2 (18):777-779.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. Laurie M. Brown (1985). Otto Hahn and the Rise of Nuclear PhysicsWilliam R. Shea. Isis 76 (4):612-613.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22. Paul S. Brown (1985). Why Research on Defensive Weapons is Important. Scientia 79:349.
  23. Conrad G. Brunk (1988). John Finnis, Joseph Boyle, Jr., and Germain Grisez, Nuclear Deterrence, Morality and Realism Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 8 (10):393-395.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24. Sue Rabbitt Bulmer (2001). Nuclear Revisionism. Minerva 39 (2):259-264.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25. Arthur Lee Burns (1970). Ethics and Deterrence a Nuclear Balance Without Hostage Cities?
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26. John Robert Burroughs (1991). Nuclear Obligations: Nuremberg Law, Nuclear Weapons, and Protest. Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley
    Nuclear weapons use and deployment and nonviolent anti-nuclear protest are evaluated in light of Nuremberg and other international law. ;Use of nuclear weapons would constitute war crimes and crimes against humanity as defined in both the Nuremberg Charter and Allied Control Council Law No. 10 and applied by the International Military Tribunal and other Nuremberg courts. Strategic and atomic bombing during World War II did not set a precedent for use of nuclear weapons. The consequentialist argument for World War II (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. B. Sharon Byrd (1989). Kant's Theory of Punishment: Deterrence in its Threat, Retribution in its Execution. [REVIEW] Law and Philosophy 8 (2):151 - 200.
    Kant's theory of punishment is commonly regarded as purely retributive in nature, and indeed much of his discourse seems to support that interpretation. Still, it leaves one with certain misgivings regarding the internal consistency of his position. Perhaps the problem lies not in Kant's inconsistency nor in the senility sometimes claimed to be apparent in the Metaphysic of Morals, but rather in a superimposed, modern yet monistic view of punishment. Historical considerations tend to show that Kant was discussing not one, (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   11 citations  
  28. Duane L. Cady & Richard Werner (eds.) (1991). Just War, Nonviolence, and Nuclear Deterrence: Philosophers on War and Peace. Longwood Academic.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29. Theodore Caplow (2010). Armageddon Postponed: A Different View of Nuclear Weapons. Hamilton Books.
    Since the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, tens of thousands of nuclear weapons manufactured by governments around the world. None have been used so far, and the absence of nuclear war among armed nations is a mystery. Caplow considers this and other questions in his study of nuclear weaponry.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30. Lisa Carlson & Raymond Dacey (2010). Social Norms and the Traditional Deterrence Game. Synthese 176 (1):105-123.
    Bicchieri (The grammar of society: The nature and dynamics of norms, 2006, xi) presents a formal analysis of norms that answers the questions of "when, how, and to what degree" norms affect human behavior in the play of games. The purpose of this paper is to apply a variation of the Bicchieri norms analysis to generate a model of norms-based play of the traditional deterrence game (Zagare and Kilgour, Int Stud Q 37: 1-27, 1993; Morrow, Game theory for political scientists, (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. Michael Carver (1985). The Problem of Extended Deterrence. Scientia 79:63.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32. G. B. Chadwick, S. A. Durrani, P. B. Jones, J. W. G. Wignall & D. H. Wilkinson (1958). Observations of K−-Meson Interactions in Nuclear Emulsion. Philosophical Magazine 3 (35):1193-1212.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  33. G. B. Chadwick & P. B. Jones (1958). Interactions of Antiprotons in Nuclear Emulsion. Philosophical Magazine 3 (34):1189-1191.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34. R. Paul Churchill (1989). Nuclear Deterrence and Nuclear Paternalism. Social Philosophy Today 2:191-204.
  35. Stephen J. Cimbala (1987). "Launch Under Attack": The War Nobody Wanted. Journal of Social Philosophy 18 (2):26-32.
  36. C. A. J. Coady (1986). Analysing Deterrence. Critical Philosophy 3 (1/2):126.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37. Avner Cohen (1987). Lackey on Nuclear Deterrence: A Public Policy Critique or Applied Ethics Analysis?:Moral Principles and Nuclear Weapons. Douglas P. Lackey. Ethics 97 (2):457-.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38. Avner Cohen & Steven Lee (eds.) (1986). Nuclear Weapons and the Future of Humanity: The Fundamental Questions. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    The excellent quality and depth of the various essays make [the book] an invaluable resource....It is likely to become essential reading in its field.—CHOICE.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. David A. Conway (1974). Capital Punishment and Deterrence: Some Considerations in Dialogue Form. Philosophy and Public Affairs 3 (4):431-443.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40. David Copp (1986). Introduction: Deterrence and Disarmament. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Supplementary Volume 12:1.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  41. Thomas Corbishley (1965). Can War Be Just in a Nuclear Age? New Blackfriars 46 (543):682-686.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. Raymond Paul Cuzzort (1989). Using Social Thought the Nuclear Issue and Other Concerns.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43. Oksana Alexandria Dackiw (1988). Defense Policy and Public Opinion: The British Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament, 1945-1985. Dissertation, Columbia University
    This study is concerned with the rise and fall of anti-nuclear activism in Great Britain. Although anti-nuclear activists do not represent the majority of British public views on defense, their very vocal and highly visible activity can have major disruptive effects of U.S. foreign policy and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. Moreover, insights into the anti-nuclear movement in Britain offer a standing point for a comparative assessment of analogous campaigns throughout Europe. ;In exploring this topic, the dissertation examines three key (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. P. Dagley, M. A. Grace, J. S. Hill & C. V. Sowter (1958). Nuclear Alignment and the Beta Transition in Cobalt-58. Philosophical Magazine 3 (30):489-496.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45. P. Dagley, M. A. Grace, J. S. Hill & O. V. Sowter (1958). Nuclear Alignment and the Beta Transition in Cobalt-58. Philosophical Magazine 3 (29):489-496.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. David Weinberger (1987). Nuclear Dialogues.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. Leslie Dewart (1963). Christianity's Vocation in the Nuclear Age. New Blackfriars 44 (512):57-62.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48. Paul W. Diener (1988). Nuclear Deterrence. Journal for Peace and Justice Studies 1 (1):47-70.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49. Daniel A. Dombrowski (1983). Gandhi, Sainthood, and Nuclear Weapons. Philosophy East and West 33 (4):401-406.
  50. Thomas Donaldson (1987). Nonstrategic Nuclear Thinking:The Logic of Deterrence. Anthony Kenny; Nuclear Weapons and the Future of Humanity: The Fundamental Questions. Avner Cohen, Steven Lee. Ethics 97 (3):638-.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 281