This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories

566 found
Order:
1 — 50 / 566
Material to categorize
  1. Peer Review: An Unflattering Picture.Kenneth M. Adams - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):135-136.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. Peer-to-Peer: Harnessing the Power of Disruptive Technologies.I. Alon - 2001 - Knowledge, Technology & Policy 13 (4):138-139.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. Law and Disagreement.Robert John Araujo - 2000 - International Philosophical Quarterly 40 (4):511-512.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. The Dimensions of Disagreement.Rudolf Arnheim - 1979 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 38 (1):15-20.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. Aha! Trick Questions, Independence, and the Epistemology of Disagreement.Michael Arsenault & Zachary C. Irving - 2012 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 1 (3):185-194.
    We present a family of counter-examples to David Christensen's Independence Criterion, which is central to the epistemology of disagreement. Roughly, independence requires that, when you assess whether to revise your credence in P upon discovering that someone disagrees with you, you shouldn't rely on the reasoning that lead you to your initial credence in P. To do so would beg the question against your interlocutor. Our counter-examples involve questions where, in the course of your reasoning, you almost fall for an (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6. Disagreement. [REVIEW]Nathan Ballantyne & Nathan L. King - 2012 - Mind 121 (483):808-812.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. Doctoral Dissertations.William Nathan Ballantyne, Why We Disagree & Why It Matters - 2013 - Review of Metaphysics 67 (1):247-272.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. Masking Disagreement Among Scientific Experts.John Beatty - manuscript
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  9. Disagreement About 'Universals' or Universal Disagreement?Christina Behme - 2010 - Gnosis 11 (2):1-10.
    It has been widely assumed that all languages share some structural features; language universals. Evans and Levinson challenge this assumption and provide a wealth of empirical evidence supporting their claim that linguistic diversity is the most remarkable characteristic of human languages. The response to their paper reveals fundamental disagreements, indicating that different authors rely on substantially different definitions of key terms such as ‘language’ and ‘language universal’. In this paper I will not take sides but discuss the implications of these (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10. Towards a Unified Notion of Disagreement.Delia Belleri & Michele Palmira - 2013 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 88 (1):139-159.
    The recent debate on Semantic Contextualism and Relativism has definitely brought the phenomenon of disagreement under the spotlight. Relativists have considered disagreement as a means to accomplish a defence of their own position regarding the semantics of knowledge attributions, epistemic modals, taste predicates, and so on. The aim of this paper is twofold: first, we argue that several specific notions of disagreement can be subsumed under a common “schema” which provides a unified and overarching notion of disagreement. Secondly, we avail (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  11. The Disagreement on the Definition of Religion.Andrzej Bronk - 1995 - Roczniki Filozoficzne 43 (2):114.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. Peer Gynt.V. C. C. - 1956 - Review of Metaphysics 9 (3):519-519.
  13. More Equal Than Others: A View From the Grassroots.John Cable - 2013 - Philosophy of Mathematics Education Journal 27.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. Commentary on “The Normative Significance of Deep Disagreement”.Campolo Chris - unknown
  15. Towards a Philosophy of Radical Disagreement.Paul A. Chambers - 2012 - Journal for Peace and Justice Studies 22 (1):74-101.
    Following Oliver Ramsbotham’s observation that conflict resolution and analysis have not taken radical disagreement seriously enough, and in light of his lament that he has not yet found an adequate philosophy of radical disagreement, this article claims that the philosophy of Alasdair MacIntyre provides some coreelements of any adequate philosophy of radical disagreement. MacIntyre’s theory suggests that the problem of radical disagreement is in fact more radical thanRamsbotham affirms. Ramsbotham’s account of the strategic engagement of discourses approach is critiqued in (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. Equal Weight View.Stewart Cohen - 2013 - In David Phiroze Christensen & Jennifer Lackey (eds.), The Epistemology of Disagreement: New Essays. Oxford University Press. pp. 98.
  17. Rethinking Disagreement: Philosophical Incommensurability and Meta-Philosophy.Richard J. Colledge - 2014 - Symposium: Canadian Journal of Continental Philosophy/Revue canadienne de philosophie continentale 18 (2):33-53.
    Set in the context of the current interest among Analytic philosophers in the “epistemology of disagreement,” this paper explores the meta-philosophical problem of philosophical incommensurability. Motivated by Nietzsche’s provocative remark about philosophy as prejudices and desires of the heart “sifted and made abstract,” the paper first outlines the contours of the problem and then traces it through a series of examples. Drawing largely on the tradition of phenomenology and philosophical hermeneutics, a broadly Continental response to this formidable problem is suggested. (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. On the Acrimoniousness of Intellectual Disputes.Randall Collins - 2002 - Common Knowledge 8 (1):47-70.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  19. Diagnosing Verbal Disputes: The Case of Ontology.Nathan Dahlberg - unknown
    According to Eli Hirsch many ontological disputes are verbal because, in these disputes, each side is most charitably interpreted as speaking the truth in its own language. In this thesis I argue that the ontological disputes Hirsch targets can’t be verbal. The problem with Hirsch’s proposal is that these ontological disputes are explicable in terms of ancillary disagreements about the explanatory value of intrinsic properties. If Hirsch believes that the ancillary disagreements are nonverbal, I argue, then he should interpret ontological (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. Disagreeing About Disagreement in Law: The Argument From Theoretical Disagreement.Tim Dare - 2010 - Philosophical Topics 38 (2):1-15.
    Ronald Dworkin argues that disagreement in hard cases is ‘theoretical’ rather than empirical and of central importance to our understanding of law, showing ‘plain fact’ theories such as H. L. A. Hart’s sophisticated legal positivism to be false. The argument from theoretical disagreement targets positivism’s commitment to idea that the criteria a norm must meet to be valid in a given jurisdiction are constituted by a practice of convergent behavior by legal officials. The ATD suggests that in hard cases there (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. The Many Relativisms and the Question of Disagreement.de Sa Dan López - 2007 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 15 (2):269 – 279.
    What different relativist claims about a given domain are to be distinguished? Which of them is best placed to account for intuitive facts about disagreement in that domain? In a recent paper in this journal, ‘Indexical Relativism versus Genuine Relativism’ (2004), Max Kölbel distinguishes two forms of relativism, andargues that one of them, indexical relativism, faces problems in accounting for disagreement. In the first part of this discussion I present my own taxonomy of relativist positions in a given domain, which (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   10 citations  
  22. Uniqueness Revisited.Igor Douven - 2009 - American Philosophical Quarterly 46 (4):347 - 361.
    Various authors have recently argued that you cannot rationally stick to your belief in the face of known disagreement with an epistemic peer, that is, a person you take to have the same evidence and judgmental skills as you do. For, they claim, because there is but one rational response to any body of evidence, a disagreement with an epistemic peer indicates that at least one of you is not responding rationally to the evidence. Given that you take your peer (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   12 citations  
  23. All Men Are Intellectuals: A Disagreement Between Friends.Adrian Edwards - 1973 - New Blackfriars 54 (635):164-170.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24. Persistent Disagreement.Catherine Z. Elgin - 2010 - In Richard Feldman & Ted A. Warfield (eds.), Disagreement. Oxford University Press.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  25. Beyond Anarchy: Self-Organized Topology for Peer-to-Peer Networks.S. Fabrice & R. Ghanea-Hercock - 2004 - Complexity 9 (2):49-53.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26. Discourse and Disagreement.Arturo Fallico - 1963 - World Futures 2 (1):89-91.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. Toward Understanding Reasoned Resolution of Disagreement.Don Fawkes - 2006 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 13 (1):56-62.
    People disagree. Along with doubt, modesty and curiosity, disagreement is one of the most valuable assets reasoning beings can have. Disagreements give us alternatives. Sometimes we need to decide among alternatives. This paper is for such times; it addresses the development of a rational model for the resolution of disagreement. The goal is to reach rational agreement, or to reach the stage at which disagreement can be clearly described and turned over to rational consensus theories. A rarely noticed problem with (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28. C. I. Lewis and the Benacerraf Problem.Bob Fischer - forthcoming - Episteme:1-12.
    Realists about modality offer an attractive semantics for modal discourse in terms of possible worlds, but standard accounts of the worlds—as properties, propositions, or causally-isolated concreta—invoke entities with which we can’t interact. If realism is true, how can we know anything about modal matters? Let's call this "the Benacerraf Problem." I suggest that C. I. Lewis has an intriguing answer to it. Given that we’re willing to disentangle some of Lewis’s insights from his phenomenalism, we can take the following line. (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29. Contextualismo y Semanticismo: Debate Abierto En la Filosofía Del Lenguaje Contemporánea.Camós Francesc & María J. Frápolli - 2008 - Episteme (Porto Alegre) 28 (1):1-20.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30. The Significance of Disagreement Among Philosophers.William Gerber - 1958 - Hibbert Journal 57:368.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. Moral Virtue and the Epistemology of Disagreement.Christopher W. Gowans - 2010 - Philosophical Topics 38 (2):39-57.
    The paper is a defense of the thesis that there are situations in which morally virtuous persons who are epistemic peers may disagree about what to do without either person being rationally required to change his or her judgment (a version of the Steadfast position in the epistemology of disagreement debate). The argument is based in part on similarities between decisions of virtuous agents and other practical decisions such as a baseball manager’s decision to change pitchers during a game. In (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32. On the Very Idea of a Verbal Dispute.Andrew Graham - 2014 - Dialogue 53 (2):299-314.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33. Democratic Disagreement.Amy Gutmann & Dennis Thompson - 1999 - In Stephen Macedo (ed.), Deliberative Politics: Essays on Democracy and Disagreement. Oxford University Press. pp. 243.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  34. Creative Disagreement.Stevan Harnad - unknown
    Do scientists agree? It is not only unrealistic to suppose that they do, but probably just as unrealistic to think that they ought to. Agreement is for what is already established scientific history. The current and vital ongoing aspect of science consists of an active and often heated interaction of data, ideas and minds, in a process one might call "creative disagreement." The "scientific method" is largely derived from a reconstruction based on selective hindsight. What actually goes on has much (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  35. Of 'Aspect'is Not the Same, but This Disagreement Apart, His Remarks Have Been Relevant and Have Been Taken Into Account.Robert Hetzron - 1982 - In Ferenc Kiefer (ed.), Hungarian General Linguistics. Benjamins. pp. 4--131.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36. Epistemic Modals and Credal Disagreement.Torfinn Thomesen Huvenes - 2015 - Philosophical Studies 172 (4):987-1011.
    Considerations involving disagreement, as well as related considerations involving correction and retraction, have played an important role in recent debates about epistemic modals. For instance, it has been argued that contextualist views about epistemic modals have problems when it comes to explaining cases of disagreement. In response to these challenges, I explore the idea that the relevant cases of disagreement may involve credal disagreement. In a case of credal disagreement, the parties have different degrees of belief or credences. There does (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  37. Disagreements in Iranian Dissertation Defenses. Izadi - 2013 - Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 9 (2):199-224.
    Despite having unwelcome effects on interpersonal relationships, disagreements constitute the mainstream of talk in dissertation defense sessions. This paper reports on variations in the design of disagreement turns in 20 Iranian defense sessions in L2 English. Drawing on and modifying Locher’s classification of disagreement strategies, turns were classified into two main categories of “mitigated” and “unmitigated”. Then, for each category, linguistic and paralinguistic devices, which were used in framing disagreements, were identified. The data features almost an equal number of mitigated (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38. Too Soon to Say.Edward James - 2012 - Philosophy 87 (03):421-442.
    (1) Rupert Read charges that Rawls culpably overlooks the politicized Euthyphro: Do we accept our political perspective because it is right or is it right because we accept it? (2) This charge brings up the question of the deficiency dilemma: Do others disagree with us because of our failures or theirs? —where the two dilemmas appear to be independent of each other and lead to the questions of the logic of deficiency, moral epistemic deficiency, epistemic peers, and the hardness of (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. Some Aspects of Philosophical Disagreement.Henry W. Johnstone - 1954 - Dialectica 8 (3):245-257.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  40. Disagreement as a Dramatic Event.Jr Dwight Van de Vate - 1965 - The Monist 49 (2):248 - 261.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41. Wittgenstein, Winch, Kripkenstein y la posibilidad de la crítica.Pedro Karczmarczyk - 2013 - Cuadernos de Filosofía 30:07-37.
    The present paper deals with the consequences Kripke’s interpretation of Wittgenstein’s private language argument has for political and social thought. We will show this is particularly important because it challenges the framework where ordinarily is located the discussion of the political and social relevance of Wittgenstein’s thought. Classical discussion has been concerned mainly with the role of communitary agreement, its relativistic or conservative consequences, the room for criticism and disagreement that it leaves, etc. We discern in classical reading a commitment (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. How to Resolve Disagreement in "Attitude".Joseph Katz - 1951 - Journal of Philosophy 48 (23):721-726.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43. Disagreement.Jean Kazez - 2010 - The Philosophers' Magazine 50:70-71.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. Disagreement and the Burdens of Judgment.Thomas Kelly - 2013 - In David Phiroze Christensen & Jennifer Lackey (eds.), The Epistemology of Disagreement: New Essays. Oxford University Press.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   20 citations  
  45. Sustaining a Rational Disagreement.Christoph Kelp & Igor Douven - 2012 - In H. DeRegt, S. Hartmann & S. Okasha (eds.), EPSA Philosophy of Science: Amsterdam 2009. Springer. pp. 101--110.
    Much recent discussion in social epistemology has focussed on the question of whether peers can rationally sustain a disagreement. A growing number of social epistemologists hold that the answer is negative. We point to considerations from the history of science that favor rather the opposite answer. However, we also explain how the other position can appear intuitively attractive.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  46. A Puzzle About Disputes and Disagreements.Anna Kollenberg & Alex Burri - 2015 - Erkenntnis 80 (1):167-189.
    The paper addresses the situation of a dispute in which one speaker says ϕ and a second speaker says not-ϕ. Proceeding on an idealising distinction between “basic” and “interesting” claims that may be formulated in a given idiolectal language, I investigate how it might be sorted out whether the dispute reflects a genuine disagreement, or whether the speakers are only having a merely verbal dispute, due to their using different interesting concepts. I show that four individually plausible principles for the (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. Epistemic Value and Epistemic Compromise, A Reply to Moss.Amir Konigsberg - 2013 - Episteme 10 (1):87-97.
    In this paper I present a criticism of Sarah Moss‘ recent proposal to use scoring rules as a means of reaching epistemic compromise in disagreements between epistemic peers that have encountered conflict. The problem I have with Moss‘ proposal is twofold. Firstly, it appears to involve a double counting of epistemic value. Secondly, it isn‘t clear whether the notion of epistemic value that Moss appeals to actually involves the type of value that would be acceptable and unproblematic to regard as (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48. The Disagreement-Argument and Aesthetic Subjectivism.Francis J. Kovach - 1979 - New Scholasticism 53 (1):22-41.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49. New Essays on Disagreement.Jennifer Lackey (ed.) - 2012 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  50. Les « autres » applications des technologies Peer-to-Peer.Julien Laflaquière - 2005 - Multitudes 2 (2):59-68.
    In the flow of information concerning Peer-to-Peer, it is difficult to get away from the apparently inexhaustible topic of music file sharing. This article invites us to refocus our attention towards the vast diversity of possible uses of the P2P technologies. After a survey of a few examples, the article denounces the ongoing confusion between an innovative and promising technology and the uses to which it can be subjected.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 566