This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories

6315 found
Order:
1 — 50 / 6315
Material to categorize
  1. The Problem of Knowledge. [REVIEW]C. P. A. - 1957 - Review of Metaphysics 10 (4):715-715.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. The Art of Conjecture. [REVIEW]M. A. - 1967 - Review of Metaphysics 21 (1):155-156.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. LAIRD, J. - Knowledge, Belief, and Opinion. [REVIEW]R. I. Aaron - 1932 - Mind 41:113.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. Has Dretske Really Refuted Skepticism?Charles J. Abate - unknown
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. The Asymmetry Between the Practical and the Epistemic: Arguing Against the Control-View.André J. Abath & Leonardo De Mello Ribeiro - 2014 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 17 (3):383.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6. What Knowledge Is Not.W. R. Abbott - 1971 - Analysis 31 (4):143 - 144.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. Knowledge and Belief.Raziel Abelson - 1968 - Journal of Philosophy 65 (22):733-737.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. The Function of Epistemic Justification.Frederick Adams - 1986 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 16 (3):465 - 492.
    Assume that epistemic justification has a cognitive function and that a belief's being justified is not just its being caused by the appropriate information (for this property of the belief may be cognitively impenetrable). What is the function of epistemic justification? it cannot be to actualize knowledge-The belief's being caused by appropriate information alone does that! so what is its function? I suggest it is to cause us to believe and/or take action.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  9. Reply to Kvanvig.Robert Merrihew Adams - 1989 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 50 (2):299-301.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10. Epistemic Justification.Jonathan E. Adler - 2005 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70 (3):739-742.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. In Search of Rationality—A Personal Report.Joseph Agassi - 1982 - In Karl R. Popper & Paul Levinson (eds.), In Pursuit of Truth: Essays on the Philosophy of Karl Popper on the Occasion of His 80th Birthday. Harvester Press. pp. 237--48.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  12. Why We Cannot Rely on Ourselves for Epistemic Improvement.Kristoffer Ahlstrom‐Vij - 2013 - Philosophical Issues 23 (1):276-296.
    There is something very appealing about the idea that we are epistemic agents. One reason—if not the main reason—is that, while we are undoubtedly fallible creatures, us being epistemic agents that do things means that it might just be within our power to improve and thereby do better. One important way in which we would want to improve is in relation to our well-established tendency for cognitive bias. Still, the proper role of epistemic agency in us avoiding or correcting for (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  13. Epistemic Angst: Radical Skepticism and the Groundlessness of Our Believing, by Pritchard, Duncan. [REVIEW]Scott Aikin - forthcoming - Australasian Journal of Philosophy:1-3.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. The Ad Hominem Argument against'Knowledge is True Belief': A Reply to Martens.Scott F. Aikin - 2011 - European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 7 (1):5-10.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. ’KNOWLEDGE IS TRUE BELIEF’ REBUTTED.Scott F. Aikin - 2010 - European Journal of Analytic Philosohy 6 (2):5 - 13.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. Bar Room Knowledge and Epistemic Pragmatism.Scott F. Aikin - 2007 - Southwest Philosophy Review 23 (2):55-57.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. Contextualism, a New Theory Ofepistemic Justification?Timo Airksinen - 1982 - Philosophia 12 (1-2):37-50.
  18. Insight Knowledge of No Self in Buddhism: An Epistemic Analysis.Miri Albahari - 2014 - Philosophers' Imprint 14 (21).
    Imagine a character, Mary Analogue, who has a complete theoretical knowledge of her subject matter: the illusory nature of self. Suppose that when presenting her paper on no self at a conference she suffers stage-fright – a reaction that implies she is under an illusion of the very self whose existence she denies. Might there be something defective about her knowledge of no self? The Buddhist tradition would claim that Mary Analogue, despite her theoretical omniscience, lacks deep ‘insight knowledge’ into (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. Saying and Believing.S. Alexandrescu - 1983 - In Herman [Ed] Parret (ed.), On Believing. De la Croyance. Epistemological and Semiotic Approaches. De Gruyter. pp. 16-30.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. IX.—Some Byways of the Theory of Knowledge.R. F. Alfred Hoernlé - 1921 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 22 (1):157-172.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. What is Knowledge?B. Allen - 2004 - Common Knowledge 10 (2):365-365.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22. What Is Complexity Science? Knowledge of the Limits to Knowledge.Peter Allen - 2001 - Emergence: Complexity and Organization 3 (1):24-42.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  23. On Being Justified in Believing False Propositions.Robert Almeder - 1985 - Philosophia 15 (3):271-285.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24. On Seeing the Truth: A Reply.Robert Almeder - 1976 - Philosophical Quarterly 26 (103):163-165.
    This paper is a reply to hoffman's piece "almeder on truth and evidence" ("philosophical quarterly", Volume 25, January 1975). In "truth and evidence" ("philosophical quarterly", Volume 24, October 1974) I had argued that gettier-Type counterexamples to the classical definition of knowledge as completely justified true belief are defective because they assume the false proposition that a person can be completely justified in believing a false proposition. Hoffman objected to my reasons for saying as much and in this paper I reply (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25. The Value of Knowledge.Brenda Almond - 2010 - In Richard Bailey (ed.), The Sage Handbook of Philosophy of Education. Sage Publication. pp. 297.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26. Review: Epistemic Warrant as Proper Function. [REVIEW]William Alston - 1995 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55 (2):397 - 402.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. What Is Distinctive About the Epistemology of Religious Belief?William P. Alston - 1999 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 1999:91-102.
    In what follows, I discuss the extent to which the epistemology of religious belief differs from the epistemology of other areas of our belief, as well as the extent to which it is similar. There will be important similarities: for example, the standards for the application of terms of epistemic assessment like ‘justified’, ‘warranted’,and ‘rational’. But in this essay, I concentrate on delineating some important differences between religious and non-religious epistemology.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28. Review: Foley's Theory of Epistemic Rationality. [REVIEW]William P. Alston - 1989 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 50 (1):135 - 147.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  29. Go Ldm An. What is Justified Belief?I. Alvin - 1979 - In George Pappas (ed.), Justification and Knowledge. Boston: D. Reidel. pp. 10--9.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30. The Problem of Misleading Evidence: An Assessment of the Justified-True Belief Approach.Catherine L. Bellanca Anderson - 1979 - Dissertation, Syracuse University
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. Knowledge and Conviction.David James Anderson - 2012 - Synthese 187 (2):377-392.
    Much philosophical effort has been exerted over problems having to do with the correct analysis and application of the concept of epistemic justification. While I do not wish to dispute the central place of this problem in contemporary epistemology, it seems to me that there is a general neglect of the belief condition for knowledge. In this paper I offer an analysis of 'degrees of belief' in terms of a quality I label 'conviction', go on to argue that one requires (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32. Problem: The Metaphysics of Knowledge.James F. Anderson - 1946 - Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 21:106.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33. Margins for Error in Context.Denis Bonnay andPaul Egre - 2008 - In G. Carpintero & M. Koelbel (eds.), Relative Truth. Oxford University Press.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34. A Contextualist Theory of Epistemic Justification.David B. Annis - 1978 - American Philosophical Quarterly 15 (3):213 - 219.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   38 citations  
  35. Knowledge.David B. Annis - 1976 - Philosophia 6 (1):209-213.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36. Knowledge and Belief: The Relation of the Two Concepts.David Boyden Annis - 1969 - Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37. Thinking Through Error: The Moving Target of Knowledge.Brunella Antomarini - 2012 - Lexington Books.
    Thinking through Error: The Moving Target of Knowledge argues that there is a positive view of error. Making errors does not only mean that we’ve done something wrong, but also that we —more or less unaware— are given a chance to find something new and true. Trying to avoid errors is a social request, but it is uncertainty that has a liberating function on the philosophical level, as well as on the individual, psychological level.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38. In Refutation of Complementary Conceptual Schemes: The Objective Metaphysics of Complementarity.Constantin Antonopoulos - 1997 - Idealistic Studies 27 (1-2):23-45.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. Why Ascribe Knowledge to God?Thomas Aquinas - 2000 - In Brian Davies (ed.), Philosophy of Religion: A Guide and Anthology. Oxford University Press.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40. Reasons and Rationalizations: The Limits to Organizational Knowledge.Chris Argyris (ed.) - 2004 - Oxford University Press.
    This is a book about how social sciences can be improved in ways that its relevance is expanded, the applicability of its knowledge is enlarged and increased, and the commitment to questioning the status quo is strengthened.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  41. Being and Knowledge.Leslie Armour - 2003 - Maritain Studies/Etudes Maritainiennes 19:71-84.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. Timothy J. McGrew, The Foundations of Knowledge. [REVIEW]Benjamin Armstrong - 1996 - Philosophy in Review 16:421-423.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43. Timothy J. McGrew, The Foundations of Knowledge Reviewed By.Benjamin F. Armstrong - 1996 - Philosophy in Review 16 (6):421-423.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. Skepticism and Theories of Justification.Benjamin Franklin Armstrong - 1980 - Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania
    An equally important part of the discussion concerns the role that doubt must play in inquiries about theories of justification. I argue that Chisholm's efforts to remove such considerations from these inquiries are mistaken. The importance of doubt is a point about which Wittgenstein has much to say in On Certainty. I try to bring to bear some of his insights. ;An important part of my discussion concerns where one is not to start when one is dealing with skeptical arguments. (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45. II—Does Knowledge Entail Belief?D. M. Armstrong - 1970 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 70 (1):21-36.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. The 'Thermometer' View of Knowledge.David M. Armstrong - 2000 - In Sven Bernecker & Fred I. Dretske (eds.), Knowledge: Readings in Contemporary Epistemology. Oxford University Press.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. Knowledge and Belief.J. H. Scobell Armstrong - 1952 - Analysis 13 (5):111 - 117.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48. 7. Rationality and Self-Confidence.Frank Arntzenius - 2007 - Oxford Studies in Epistemology: Volume 2 2:165.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49. A Preliminary Report on "Work with Knowledge Versus Work Without Knowledge of Results".George F. Arps - 1917 - Psychological Review 24 (6):449-455.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50. Negated Defaults in Commonsense Entailment.Nicholas Asher & Yi Mao - 2001 - Bulletin of the Section of Logic 30 (1):41-60.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
1 — 50 / 6315